TMI Show Ep 193: “Gen X-ed Out of a Job”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

In 1996, “TMI Show” co-host Ted Rall wrote the bestselling Gen X manifesto Revenge of the Latchkey Kids. In that generational classic and countless gritty cartoons, Ted predicted that, no matter what age they were, Gen X would arrive at the worst time to be that age due to the phenomenon of “Generational Leapfrog”: the Baby Boomers would run the show and pass the torch over Gen X to the Boomers’ children, the Millennials.

On “The TMI Show” with hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan, we tell you just how true that has turned out to be. Gen Xers—born between 1961 and 1978—are now in their 40s, 50s, and even low 60s, and they’re supposed to be at the peak of their careers, Not quite. Ageism is rampant, job opportunities are drying up, and they’re caught in a brutal tug-of-war with Millennials, Gen Z, and Boomers who won’t retire. Layoffs in tech and media are hitting hard, leaving seasoned pros out in the cold.

Yet Gen X isn’t backing down. These former latchkey kids, who bridged the analog-to-digital revolution, are famous for their resilience and adaptability. Despite career plateaus and economic uncertainty throughout their lives, many are reinventing themselves, refusing to coast into retirement. From dodging coded rejections for being “overqualified” to battling the “sandwich” phase of supporting kids and aging parents, Gen Xers are going out kicking and screaming. Tune in for a real talk session with Ted—Gen X 1.0—and Manila—Gen X 2.0—exposing Millennials’ ageism and the multigenerational job competition. The TMI Show drops demographic truth bombs you won’t hear elsewhere.

Plus:

  • El Señor Presidenté Para Siempre: El Salvador’s Congress, controlled by ruthless authoritarian despot Nayib Bukele, approves constitutional reforms allowing indefinite re-election and extending presidential terms to six years. Bukele, popular for reducing gang violence, now holds near-total institutional control, running a virtual dictatorship. Critics point to arrests of human rights defenders and his CECOT gulag as evidence of incipient fascism. 
  • Surrogacy Pedophile: Two gay men, including convicted child sex offender Brandon Keith Riley-Mitchell, raise a baby via surrogacy, bypassing adoption rules. Their viral crowdfunding campaign sparked outrage after Riley-Mitchell’s criminal history came out. The case exposes loopholes in surrogacy laws, with similar concerns raised in a Los Angeles child neglect case. 
  • More Bumpy Rides: Severe turbulence on a Delta flight from Salt Lake City to Amsterdam injures 25 passengers, forcing an emergency landing in Minnesota. Passengers describe chaotic scenes with items and people thrown about the cabin. Research links increasing turbulence to climate change; this is going to happen more often. 
  • Sacred Gems Come Home: India reclaims the sacred Piprahwa Gems, linked to the Buddha, after 127 years. Unearthed in 1898, the collection was nearly auctioned before a legal dispute led to its purchase by Godrej Industries. The gems will now be displayed permanently in India.

Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou – Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Ted Rall: Hey there. I’m Ted Rall, and I’m here for DeProgram along with
John Kiriakou. He’s the CIA whistleblower. I’m the editorial cartoonist.

Thank you so much for joining us. Thanks for joining us on the Rumble feed, on the YouTube feed, and everywhere else. You’re listening also to people just listening to the audio. We appreciate you too. Please like, follow, and share the show.

Lots to talk about today, as always. We talked about that this might happen,
John. I didn’t think it would happen this fast.

No way. The UK is almost certainly going to recognize Palestine at the UN General Assembly this September. Well, that’s our lead. We’re going to be talking about interesting news out of Iran, where Iran’s leading the way in abandoning US tech, namely GPS. And, you know, we could see a lot more of this kind of thing coming in the very near future from all over the world.

Super interesting, look into the future. Is Israel losing the American right? The evangelicals who’ve been their loyal supporters, Marjorie Taylor Greene is criticizing the Gaza war as genocide.

John Kiriakou: She’s right, of course, but it’s amazing to hear her and people like her saying anything like that.

Ted Rall: Two CIA-related stories that there’s no way I’m going to let you off the hook,
John, from talking about. Tom Sylvester is out at the CIA, and Sandy Grimes, the lady who caught Aldrich Ames, died at the age of 80. We’ll talk about her legacy, and we’ll talk about breaking news and anything else that comes up. And, of course, if you have questions, please put them into the feeds, and we always pick up on them and post them and talk about them.

But we’ve got lots of stuff to talk about. So Keir Starmer, he kind of gave it, some people are interpreting this as a wussy move, but he basically said he’ll recognize Palestine in September unless Israel comes to its senses and agrees to a ceasefire. They’ve been the ones who’ve been breaking all the ceasefires up until now. And, so, you know, obviously, Israel’s not going to do that. So by definition, the UK will join France. And there’s a whole passel of other countries who are interested in doing it too. So let’s get to it.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. Let’s start, if you don’t mind, with Tom Sylvester. Oh, thank you very much, Marble. Let’s do Tom Sylvester. I just want to get this out of the way because we have so much to talk about related to Gaza. Tom Sylvester is the CIA’s deputy director for operations. And in that position, you can argue, he’s the number three or number four official in the CIA. He’s in charge of all CIA operations around the world. This is a job that every CIA case officer aspires to. And by all accounts, he’s been very popular among the rank and file.

Well, if you’ve been the deputy director for operations, your final preretirement job is normally that you’re named station chief in London. That is the one job that everybody in the CIA aspires to. Everybody wants to be the station chief in London. So he was named station chief in London several months ago. But over the course of those several months, he gave an interview to Tim Weiner, who is the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of several books on the CIA. There’s one coming out soon called The Mission that several outlets are excerpting. And, apparently, CIA director
John Radcliffe didn’t like the fact that he spoke with Tim Weiner. Now, normally, the director of the CIA will instruct his officers to work with authors, especially with Tim Weiner. But whatever it is that Tom Sylvester said, it apparently pissed people off. And so the job was unceremoniously yanked from under him.

John Kiriakou: He will not be the CIA station chief in London. Director Radcliffe informed MI6, apparently, yesterday that Sylvester will not be the CIA station chief in London. And so today, Sylvester announced his retirement effective immediately. He’s just going to take his pension and go home. Now most of the time, senior officers, even if they’re disgruntled, will keep their mouth shut. The fact that he’s already spoken to Tim Weiner makes me think the story’s not over. We’re going to hear more.

Ted Rall: So my father worked in government, specifically in the US Air Force, for years at the upper echelons. And he told me, and
John, tell me if this is correct, that usually when you know you’re about to retire, that’s your one chance to vent and blow up. You know, you’re going to retire anyway, and you’ve had stuff that you wanted to say. You’ve got one big thing you want to do. Someone you want to blow up, some boss who was an asshole. And then this is when you do it. And then you retire, and they can’t get you. Is that basically what happened here?

John Kiriakou: 100%. And I’ll tell you my own experience. My last tour, when I resigned from the agency, was at the United Nations in New York. And my station chief, Mary Margaret Graham, and I did not like each other, not even a little bit. And so a couple of days before I left, she threatened me with putting out what’s called a burn notice against me. Oh, yeah, I saw that TV show. She threatened me with a burn notice. And I laughed at her. I was in her office, and, of course, she had her little witness there, the chief of operations, who was just a little dwarf. So I said, I’m not afraid of your threats. Burn notice? I said, come on. You forget that when I made this recent recruitment, you congratulated me by telling me to take petty cash and go get myself a blow job. I said, what do you think the Washington Post would say about that or the New York Times? Because as God is my witness, I’m going to call them and tell them. And she immediately backed off.

Ted Rall: Wow. So, by the way, I do want to answer, maybe you can answer this question. Marble is asking, why is London a desirable post? It’s like the top post, right?

John Kiriakou: It’s the post because you get a gigantic mansion to live in. You get a chauffeur-driven Jaguar limo that they drive you around in. You have the largest entertainment budget of any station chief in the world. Nobody’s trying to kill you there. And MI6 is the closest alliance, intelligence friendship in the world.

Ted Rall: Yeah. So it’s analogous to, in the State Department, right, ambassador to the Court of St. James. It’s the same kind of thing. It’s the job.

John Kiriakou: Exactly right. It is the job.

Ted Rall: I mean, even editorial cartoonist, like New York Times, you know? It’s like that, right?

John Kiriakou: And so, Hans, I absolutely positively did not. I’ve never paid for it in my life, and I’m proud to say that. So although we all pay for it in different ways.

Ted Rall: That’s what my working girlfriends used to tell me. Nothing’s free.

John Kiriakou: But even at lower levels in London, like, I’ve spoken about this operation I did with Christopher Steele back in February. And my counterparts in the station, who were, you know, just whatever, GS-12, GS-13, GS-14, they were living high on the hog too. You’re living in Knightsbridge or you’re living in Paddington in this beautiful mews house, and that life is good. And like I say, people aren’t trying to kill you on the way to work. Gotta love that. Refreshing.

Ted Rall: How, by the way, what do you think of Tom Sylvester, and what do you think of Tim Weiner?

John Kiriakou: You know, honestly, I like them both. Tom Sylvester was an inspired choice to be the deputy director for operations. The guy’s been a station chief, I don’t know, six times, seven times all around the world. He was a specialist in Soviet and then Russian operations and really quite the good ops guy, career-long ops guy, spent almost his entire adult life overseas. Tim Weiner, I actually have a great deal of respect for. I gave him an interview for his previous book about the CIA, and he treated me with great respect.

Ted Rall: So I read that book. It was a solid read for sure. It’s a solid read. And it won the National Book Award, which is a very big deal.

John Kiriakou: Very big deal.

Ted Rall: I mean, it’s definitely not a fun read, unfortunately. And that’s my kind of idea of a fun read. But it doesn’t, you know? I mean, I love that kind of thing. But the prose doesn’t sing, but I would say it’s worth it.

John Kiriakou: It’s a little bit on the dense side, but he footnotes the daylights out of his books. I appreciate that. He backs up everything he writes. It’s quite impressive. And then his books are, like, 800 pages long.

Ted Rall: I’m a sucker for those long books. I’ve been hearing that word counts are dropping at books. Like, 100,000, 120,000 words used to be a standard fiction book. Now 60 or 80,000 is closer to a novella because people’s attention span is so short, but the biographies and political nonfiction are still the outlier. They’re getting longer and longer all the time.

John Kiriakou: Can I answer Eric, who’s asking real quickly? Eric, the rule on the Peace Corps was written in granite. There could be no contact whatsoever between the CIA and the Peace Corps for several reasons. First of all, everybody already accuses the Peace Corps of being CIA. So it’s dangerous enough. Secondly, the Peace Corps has no protection. They’re out there in the sticks. You’re out there in the sticks doing God’s work, and there’s nobody to protect you. So we were not permitted to even, like, say hello if we ran into somebody from the Peace Corps.

Ted Rall: I mean, honestly, that is a good rule that you guys had because, you know, it’s to me, the analogy is the journalism, the journalist embedding programs. I’m violently opposed to them. And as soon as that started in Iraq, anytime you went anywhere, the locals would say, well, you’re just with the US soldiers. You’re a propagandist. I can’t trust you. Why shouldn’t I kill you? And it’s like, I mean, it’s so dangerous. And then, you know, as a journalist, the only weapon you have is your camera or your laptop. That’s it. You’re on your own. You’re really like your dick is waving out in the wind. I mean, it’s bad.

Ted Rall: So do you want to talk about Sandy Grimes, or should we save that for later?

John Kiriakou: Let’s do Sandy Grimes.

You know, Sandy Grimes is another kind of legendary figure, and she never really set out to be. Sandy started off as a secretary, in the days when I think she started back in ’67, is what I read. But those were the days when women were not permitted to have leadership roles. Not just leadership roles, they were not permitted to really do anything of import. They were only secretaries and clerks, file clerks. So she started off as a secretary and then rose up to be one of the greatest mole hunters in CIA’s history. And she’s the one who caught Aldrich Ames, one of the most despicable traitors in modern American history. So, and she was totally unsung. She didn’t even inside the building, if you would say to somebody, hey, so which one of these people over here is Sandy Grimes? Nobody would know because she wasn’t about the fanfare. Her job was to find the mole, and by God, she found him, and he got life without parole. I remember George Tenet saying one time in a meeting that Sandy had gone to him. George, of course, was the director at the time. And Sandy said, I’ve identified him. It’s Aldrich Ames. And it just so happened that George had to attend a White House briefing at which Ames was a participant. And George said that he just couldn’t look Ames in the eye. He knew he was a traitor, and he knew that he was going to be arrested in just a couple of days. And so he was determined only to look at Ames’ shoes so as not to give himself away. And he said he couldn’t help but to see that the shoes were, oh, the shoes that OJ Simpson wore, those, like, $500 shoes.

Ted Rall: Do you remember what those were? Oh, God. I don’t remember what those were.

John Kiriakou: I had never heard of them at the time. Well, neither had I, but they’re like Prada shoes.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Yeah.

John Kiriakou: And then a couple of days later, that’s always the thing, right?

Ted Rall: I mean, these guys, these moles, they have too much money. They’re living too high. That’s what attracts the wrong kind of attention.

John Kiriakou: Absolutely.

Ted Rall: I’m going to Google it real quickly. OJ Simpson’s shoes. And while you’re doing that, let me just bring in Robbie to talk about Bruno Magli.

John Kiriakou: Bruno Magli. That’s it.

Ted Rall: Robby’s shoes. Let me bring in producer Roobby. Guys, we just have to ask you a quick little favor, and we’re going to explain this to you. Okay. Robby’s our producer, Robby West, who I’m going to see next week in Montana. So we basically are trying to get some money here. And with the existing audience that we have, if we can get people to go over to Rumble and watch us on Rumble, same exact experience. There’s a live feed. It’s exactly the same thing. Instead of YouTube, which pays not nearly as well,
John and I will have a little easier time paying our bills every month. Serious. You want to explain it?

Robby West: Yeah. No. For sure. Thank you all for popping me on. Alright. So just real quick, I’m going to try to make this as precise and not boring as possible. So YouTube pays you based off of ads. And, basically, whenever you click on a video, whenever an ad pops up, they will literally throw a few pennies to Ted and
John here onto the channel. What I’m working on doing is getting DeProgram into the Rumble content creator program, and I want to do that for a couple of different reasons. One, Rumble is a free speech platform. So what does that mean? It means that Rumble will not one day decide that
John and Ted are being too controversial and pull the plug. So if you like
John and Ted, go to Rumble and listen to them, and they’ll be uncensored. Second, Rumble pays you based off of your watch hours. On YouTube, watch hours mean nothing. So it’s kind of like TV or radio. So the more people that watch, what happens is that they get paid literally hundreds of dollars per hour watched as opposed to maybe 6 or $7 over on YouTube. And like Ted was saying, the experience is exactly the same with one big exception. When you’re on Rumble, if you want in the creator program, they have to do five hours of Rumble-only premium content. So what does that mean? If there’s a topic that’s particularly controversial that you’re all interested in hearing, then you can see it live on Rumble and be able to continue supporting them and be able to help them pay some bills. I mean, y’all know what’s going on with them. Y’all know that they lost their income. So while we ask, y’all go over to Rumble, drop some follows. We have thousands of people here watching on YouTube. If only, I do not kid y’all, if 20% of y’all do what we’re asking, it would make a radical change financially for Ted and for
John. That’s all I got for you. Now drop the link in the chat.

Ted Rall: The chat, it’s in here. It’s rumble.com/c/deprogramshow. But you can just go to Rumble and just search for DeProgram and Ted Rall or
John Kiriakou, and you will find it. Robby, thank you so much for that. Okay. Sorry for the ad, guys. I mean, it’s like we’re getting to be like NPR.

Ted Rall:
John, anyway, you were saying about Sandy Grimes.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. So here she catches one of the most prolific moles in modern American history. And then the next day, she came into work and just went about her normal job looking for the next mole. So I felt bad when I saw she died. I didn’t realize that she was 80 years old, but God bless her. She was really one of those unknown heroes, those unsung heroes at the CIA. You know, every once in a while, the CIA will give out something called a Trailblazer Award. I never understood these things. And most of them will be, you know, white men who were station chief, like, in Havana when Batista was overthrown, or station chief when the last guy was pulled out of South Vietnam on the helicopter. And then they’ll toss one to somebody like Bonnie Hirschberg. I worked for Bonnie in the office of leadership analysis. Bonnie was a terrific analyst. She was an okay manager. What trail she blazed, I will never ever understand because she was just kind of a typical run-of-the-mill manager. But then you have people like this who are unsung. But, anyway, that’s the CIA today. Lot of news coming in with the CIA today.

Ted Rall: What is, before we move on from her, I mean, what are the personality traits that are required to catch a mole? Like, what skill set is required? I mean, it’s not, we have to navigate. Also, you’re, in the case of an Aldrich Ames, you’re bringing down someone who’s got title, position above your own. You can see a lot of institutional resistance. No one wants to hear it, right?

John Kiriakou: No one wants to hear it. And I’ll tell you what, there are no bigger secrets than the counterintelligence center at the CIA. That’s a very important question you’ve asked, Ted. The mole hunter at the CIA has to be somebody who is obsessed with secrecy to the point where you don’t even talk to yourself, like, in your own head. Like, for me, I’d be, I’d go to the credit union and say, I’m taking you down, Ames, you bastard. You know, I would never fit in in a position like that. And you have to not really care about people telling you, shut up, Kiriakou. Like, you just don’t like games because you don’t like his politics. You don’t like the cut of his jib. This is personal. You’re going after a good patriot, someone who’s doing God’s work for America, and you’re being an asshole. That’s right. And listen, somebody in counterintelligence is akin to somebody in internal affairs in a police department. No one likes you.

I’ll give you an example. On my first, at the end of my first full week at the agency, my boss walked me around both the new headquarters building and the old headquarters building just to point out where everything was. Here’s the cafeteria. Here’s the credit union. There’s medical services. This, in the lobby of the new building, is all glass, like, a glass atrium, and they have windows. And one window says health insurance, and one window says life insurance, and one window says sports tickets. And then there were a couple of other windows. He said, this is where you go if you want to buy baseball tickets, basketball, hockey, football tickets. And then there was another one that said, well, I shouldn’t say what it said, but it was the window that you go to if maybe you have a little bit of a drinking problem or you’ve got a problem with your credit or maybe you’re taking care of your elderly parents and it’s too much of a burden. He told me, don’t ever go to that window. I said, why? It’s nice that they do things like that. And he said, because the people at that window work for counterintelligence, and they don’t give a shit about your elderly parents. They want to know if you’re in a bad enough spot that you’re going to turn mole.

Ted Rall: So this is a little bit like, in the Cultural Revolution, let a thousand flowers bloom, where the Chinese Communist Party said, oh, we’re opening up ourselves to criticism. You know, all you academics, all you people who might be accused of being counter-revolutionaries, step forward. The party’s a big tent. We want to hear from all of you guys, then you step forward. Good. Off to a May 4 farm. Nobody ever sees you again.

John Kiriakou: That’s right.

Ted Rall: Wow. That is some dark cynical shit.

John Kiriakou: That was my first week. I’m like, holy shit. I never even went in there to buy a ticket to the ball game. I was just afraid of somebody just seeing me go in there.

Ted Rall: You can, that’s what Ticketron is for. Or Ticketmaster, whatever the fuck it’s called now.

John Kiriakou: That’s exactly right.

Ted Rall: Oh, man. That is so dark. Alright. Should we talk about Palestine?

John Kiriakou: You were right, Ted. You were right about Keir Starmer, and, frankly, I didn’t think he had the guts to do it. But then he kind of made a half step, if you don’t mind my taking over the conversation.

Ted Rall: Please.

John Kiriakou: He said, we’re going to recognize Palestine in September unless the Israelis let food in and are nicer people about it. It’s a decision designed by committee. You can tell that.

Ted Rall: Absolutely. And, you know, but I think it’s probably very easy to agree to. It’s kind of like, well, okay. Fine. I mean, the Israelis are not going to do this. I mean, it does have kind of, I mean, I don’t like it either because I feel one of the commenters, deep down in the thread, pointed out that really, this recognition should just be based on, not as a reward, a punishment for Israel, but it should just be a statement of self-determination for the Palestinian people.

John Kiriakou: Couldn’t agree more. In the original documents that led to the creation of Israel, and there’s even a YouTube video of Harry Truman talking about this, it says that Israel is going to be created today, whatever, 1948. And Palestine will be created as an independent state pending further discussion. Okay. That was 1948, and we’re still talking about it.

Ted Rall: Now that said, there are 153 nations. I guess it’s going to be 155 soon. Australia is apparently getting ready to pull the trigger. Luxembourg is getting ready to pull the trigger.

John Kiriakou: I didn’t see that one.

Ted Rall: And there’s a whole parcel of other European countries that are Croatia, Spain.

Yeah. Spain’s already in.

Yeah. So, I mean, I think, basically, it’s like you said, it’s going to be just the Axis powers of Germany and Japan, and Italy who are going to be out with the US. What a motley crew.

Ted Rall: And, you know, but so yeah. No. It’s a big deal. I mean, I think the pressure built so fast on Starmer. That’s what I mean, I knew it was going to happen. I just didn’t think it would happen this quickly.

John Kiriakou: And you know what started it was these pictures that ran in the BBC of starving children. That just opened the floodgates. I really believe that.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Well, let’s talk about that. Someone brought it up, and I apologize because this was further down. But I’m glad that someone asked about this question. So, there was this very one particular photo of this one kid who was really, really, really sick and with these haunting eyes. And you could see why this particular photo went viral. And the New York Times and other corporate media organizations have walked that back, obviously, in response to Zionists who’ve complained that the kid, aside from suffering from starvation, also had other diseases at the same time. So therefore, but those other diseases are not wasting diseases. But the kid was really, really sick, and he’s starving. So, and that’s why he was at the hospital.

Ted Rall: But, you know, look. To me, it’s kind of like, well, what do you make of that? My answer to that is I think it’s the last gasp of a dying regime. I mean, I think Israel is in real trouble now.

John Kiriakou: I agree. And I don’t think that they really realize just how deep they are. I saw an interview. Well, maybe you saw it too. It’s Tucker Carlson’s latest interview. It just dropped, and it’s with
John Mearsheimer, who is absolutely freaking brilliant. And Mearsheimer essentially said that. He said that the Israelis just don’t realize how deep they’re in. And on the contrary, they’re talking about this concept of a greater Israel, which includes the bottom third of Lebanon, the southern third of Lebanon. It includes another 50 miles inside of Syria. It includes the entire West Bank, and it includes the Gaza, I’m sorry, the Sinai Peninsula. It’s like, wait a minute. You guys should be thinking about your survival here and about your country falling apart because you’re carrying out a genocide, and you’ve got people who are in government talking about greater Israel. Mearsheimer made another important point. And this is how unhinged the American evangelical Christian community is, where you’ve got the likes of Ambassador Huckabee or Speaker of the House Mike
Johnson saying that Jesus wants us to support Israel and Israel’s policy. Well, last week, Israel’s policy was to utterly and completely destroy one of the last surviving Christian villages in the West Bank, drive out all the Christians, and steal their land. So you’re saying Jesus wants the Jews to drive out the Christians? And that’s what we’re going with? It makes absolutely no sense at all.

Ted Rall: So many Americans don’t know how many Christians there are in Palestine. A lot of them. By the way, though, I do want to say, you know, one of the things you wanted to talk about was the split now, the growing split on the American right over Israel. And I do want to be fair to Ambassador Huckabee. He’s the US ambassador to Israel. He went to the West Bank and visited that town that’s been repeatedly attacked by violent fascist settlers, probably most of whom are from, like, my neighbors from Brooklyn.

John Kiriakou: They’re from New Jersey and New York. And those scumbags who’ve been murdering, raping, and pillaging over there.

Ted Rall: But at least he went there, and he expressed concern, and he was, I think, turned off by what the settlers were doing. They showed up. Joe Rogan, who I think is unfairly characterized as a right-winger, but he’s boycotting, apparently, he’s not allowing Bibi Netanyahu to come on his show. Bibi wants to come on. I mean, I think they’re losing the thread, the Israelis. I mean, we’re talking about a country that is uniquely right. It’s the only country that’s currently on the face of the planet that owes its existence to the United Nations. It’s the only complete welfare state that owes its entire economy to the United States of America. It’s ignoring the UN and its resolutions. It’s ignoring public opinion in the US, the taxpayers who are paying that bill to the Israelis. I mean, these people are biting, chomping, stabbing, and hacking at the hand that feeds them. And, you know, I mean, they’re a rabid dog. And I wrote a column this week that’s called “Israel No Longer Has the Right to Exist.” And the argument that I’m trying to make here is in the community of nations, there are some things people can’t tolerate. Like, when Napoleon disrupted Europe, all these disparate powers who had competing interests got together to defeat him even though they hated each other. World War II, the US and the USSR were not buds, but they had to come together to fight Nazi Germany, not to stop the Holocaust because the US certainly didn’t care about it. Certainly, the Russians cared more about it because it happened in their territory. But they came in and got together because Nazi Germany was so militarily aggressive and violent and out of control and disruptive. They just had to be put down like a rabid dog. Imperial Japan the same way. That’s exactly the scenario that we have now with Israel. They’re such a destabilizing force in the Middle East. I mean, literally, even if you count Iran and the Axis of Resistance and all the shenanigans they had going on with the Houthis and all that. It’s nothing compared to Israel. Just in the last few months, they bombed Iran. They overthrew the government of Syria, and now they’re bombing the new government that they installed. I mean, these people are nuts.

John Kiriakou: They are nuts. And, you know, I have to say, where did I just see it? Thank you everybody, first of all, for going on to, there it is. What nonsense says USA sex predators flee to Israel? Oh, boy, are you right. So listen to this. I was in prison with a pedophile, this disgusting, horrible pedophile. He had graduated from Harvard and Harvard Law School, and he was an attorney in Moscow. To make a very long story very short, he was an aficionado of the ballet. And so he offered to pay the tuition for a twelve-year-old Russian boy, but he insisted that the boy live with him. The parents were like, oh, I don’t know about that, but they were poor. And this kid was, like, a once-in-a-generation gifted ballet guy, and so they allowed their twelve-year-old to move in with a guy, Ken, Kenneth. So, twelve hours later, Ken was raping this kid, and this went on for five years. Finally, the kid told the FBI what was happening. They issued an arrest warrant. By then, Ken was back in Philadelphia where his parents were exceedingly wealthy, big humanitarians. They donate to the museum, whatever. He ran immediately to Israel, and the Israelis would not extradite him because the US would not. The Israelis don’t extradite Jews. It’s a law in Israel. They don’t care what he’s accused of. They’re not extraditing any Jew. So we asked for the extradition. They said no. And then Interpol came up with an idea that was absolutely genius. I love when I hear about these brilliant operational ideas that people come up with. This was my favorite thing to do with the CIA was just to sit around thinking up ideas with my colleagues. They decided to sponsor a ballet show in Cyprus, and they used a dummy email account to email him an announcement of the ballet to lure him. And they lured him to Cyprus, and they grabbed him at the airport. And the Cypriots extradited him. And he got twenty years. He’s still in that bastard. But the Israelis will not extradite Jews. Period.

Ted Rall: That’s pretty gross. I mean, I just, yeah. I think, look, I think we’re done here. So, what’s going to happen? I mean, by September now feels really far away.

John Kiriakou: It does. I agree. And it’s not, it’s four and a half, five weeks.

Ted Rall: So the UN is going to come here to New York and fuck up all the traffic, and no one’s going to be able to move. Every year. In that traffic, it’s going to be a lot of new allies of or at least friends of Palestine.

That’s right. How many countries do you think it’s going to be? It’s going to be like our migration over to Rumble. Everyone’s subscribing over there. Palestine’s signing them up.

Oh, and by the way, I did want to ask you a little bit about this statement that broke. I don’t know if you had a chance to hear it because it just happened right before we went on the air. But Arab and Muslim states, a member of the Arab League, the EU, and 17 more countries have supported a declaration signed at a UN conference that was hosted by Saudi Arabia and France that basically is calling, this also includes Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. They’re calling for Hamas to disarm and give up power and basically turn over all authority to the Palestinian Authority, which, of course, is Mahmoud Abbas who’s, what, 92 or something like that.

John Kiriakou: I always say he’s sixteen years into a four-year term.

Ted Rall: Nice. He and Zelenskyy have a nice democracy. They’re working on this. And, anyway, so they, yeah. He’s over there. So Mahmoud Abbas, the sort of head of the, I guess it’s like the Vichy kind of government of the West Bank. They’re corrupt. They don’t really do anything. But, basically, that’s what all these countries are calling for. Like, they don’t want to recognize Hamas. I mean, that’s not going to happen, right? I mean, because, first of all, that’s Fatah, and they can’t rule in Gaza. The Gazans don’t want them.

John Kiriakou: No. The Gazans have made it clear by voting Hamas in and the PA out. The PA is not the answer to this problem. You know, Haaretz, two or three weeks ago, ran this article saying that one of the things that’s being discussed, and I think it isn’t actually being discussed. I think they just put it out there to see what the reaction was going to be, was to have Hamas disarm and then to have Saudi Arabia administer Gaza while Israel continues to actually own Gaza. And then after a day, nobody really commented on it.

John Kiriakou: And can I say something too about Cyprus, this thing that the Israelis said about Northern Cyprus being an Israel problem? They mean something actually contemporary on that. The Greeks, I am utterly ashamed to say that the Greeks and the Cypriots are 1000% pro-Israel. And the reason that they’re pro-Israel is several-fold. Number one, it’s because the Israelis and the Turks hate each other. So if the Turks hate Israel, then the Greeks have to love Israel because the Greeks hate the Turks. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The other reason is because the Cypriots are sitting on an ocean of natural gas, and it stretches into Israeli waters. And so the Greeks, the Cypriots, and into Palestinian waters, Gaza waters. And just like one little vein into Lebanese waters. So the Greeks and the Cypriots don’t have the money to lift this gas, but the Israelis certainly do. And so the three countries have entered into this joint venture that’s already well underway to lift this gas, and it’s going to make Cyprus one of the wealthiest countries in the world over the course of years.

So we just, I’m not going to say celebrated, I’m going to say commemorated the fifty-first anniversary of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. The Turks invaded Cyprus, killed thousands of Cypriots. Seventeen American citizens are still missing from the Turkish invasion fifty-one years ago.

Ted Rall: Yeah. This was the seventies. 1974.

John Kiriakou: And, I never understood what Turkey was after, besides just territory. There were a lot of moving parts in this thing. So these were literally the final days of the Greek military dictatorship. And as it was in its death throes, it overthrew the democratically elected government of Cyprus and installed a strongman by the name of Nikos Sampson, who had been an assassin in sort of his previous life. So Sampson announced a military dictatorship in Cyprus. The Turks saw that as the green light to invade and overthrow Sampson, which they did in a matter of days. So the democratically elected president returns to Cyprus. He’d only been in exile a week, and the Turks never left. And they’ve just kept one third of Cyprus, the northern third of Cyprus. So what we’re seeing here with the Israelis saying we have a problem with Northern Cyprus, there is no such thing as Northern Cyprus with a capital N. The Turks call it the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. It’s not recognized by any country in the world except Turkey. It’s Turkish annexed or Turkish occupied Cyprus is what it is. And so because the Israelis and the Greeks and the Cypriots are all in business together, the Greeks and the Cypriots went to the Israelis and said, hey, we need your help on Cyprus. You need to say the right thing about the Turks. And so the Israelis hate the Turks like the Turks hate the Israelis, so they jump in on the side of the Greeks and the Cypriots. It’s awful.

Ted Rall: Let’s, I do want to answer this question by Gadna. Why would anyone trust Saudi Arabia to administer Gaza?

John Kiriakou: They wouldn’t is the short answer. They wouldn’t. I wouldn’t.

Ted Rall: Okay. Yeah. Can we explain what happens with countries recognizing Palestine? It’s really, I mean, it is symbolic. It doesn’t change the facts on the ground. And there is the concern that, you know, in the case of the future Republic of Palestine or the present Republic of Palestine, depending on how you want to look at it, it’s divided. There’s two governments. There’s the Hamas government and there’s the Palestinian Authority. That’s kind of an issue because you’re supposed to know who you’d be able to talk to. But, you know, I guess, that’s not being, but, I mean, what happens is it’s legitimate. So the big thing is if you’re a country that has a deal with Israel or is thinking of making a deal with Israel, once you recognize Palestine, you have to go through all of your trading agreements and everything that you have with Israel to see if anything in there is wrong or illegal or challenging to Palestine. So a good example of that would be, let’s say, Israel produces wine. They produce it in occupied territories, for example, in the Golan. Very high quality. I’ve had this treason wine. It’s really good.

John Kiriakou: It’s quite good.

Ted Rall: So the Golan wine, for example, you would not, if you’ve recognized Syria as an independent country, which most of the world does, well, you can’t import that wine into your country. And it’s just a million little things like that. And they add up. And there’s more to it than that too. If there’s a genocide taking place in your country, and you’re recognized by another country, you can call their ambassador and say, listen, I need your help. There’s stuff that we need, we need your cooperation. Can you help us with intel? Can you stop, derecognize Israel? There’s lots of stuff. Like, suddenly, the doors are open. You’re not isolated.

Ted Rall: It reminds me a little of a strange meeting I had with the Afghan ambassador to Uzbekistan during the Taliban period, and this was in February. So he was a Northern Alliance guy. So he had the embassy in Tashkent. And so I asked him, like, well, you know, technically, you’re supposed to be getting support from the US. And he said, oh, yeah. He goes, we’re supposed to be. And I said, what kind of support do you get? And he opens up his desk drawer, pulls out a yellow envelope, and he’s like, here you go. I open it up, and inside, there’s a map of Afghanistan. And I’m like, it’s just, and he goes, that’s the only support I have ever gotten from the US government. Like, that’s it. And I go, well, it’s a pretty good map but it’s out of date. He said the Soviet ones are better. And he’s like, and I was like, so how do you pay for all this? And he was hemming and hawing. And I was like, you guys mine rubies. And he’s like, yeah, in Badakhshan. So that’s how they were subsisting.

Ted Rall: But I mean, so I don’t know. I mean, what do you think? Is it, what’s the practical meaning of recognition for the Palestinians?

John Kiriakou: I think it opens the door for Palestine to be a member state in a lot of different international organizations, which gives them a voice on the international stage that they otherwise wouldn’t have had. It makes them eligible for financial aid, both from international organizations and from individual countries. And, you know, we used to have a Palestine liaison office here in Washington. Donald Trump closed it in his first term and expelled the Palestinian diplomats. I would love to see Palestinian diplomats on the circuit again in Washington or in London or Madrid or Canberra or anywhere else where they’re recognized. It’s important.

Ted Rall: And they could eventually have, like, one of those rotating seats at the Security Council, at the UN.

John Kiriakou: Exactly right. So they would be the representative of the Asia group on the UN Security Council. Oh my God, could you imagine? Huge. Absolutely huge. When I was at the CIA, it was Libya’s turn. And we went apeshit over the notion that Muammar Gaddafi would be represented on the United Nations Security Council. And so we started this international lobbying effort, and we got the Asia group to deny seating Libya on the Security Council, and Egypt got it two terms in a row. Ridiculous. Because there were no other countries in all of Asia that should have been represented on the UN Security Council.

Ted Rall: By the way, really, I think good point here from Skye. After September, the US will be the only permanent member of the Security Council not to recognize Palestinian statehood. That is a very good point. That’s a very important thing. Israel’s going to be a pariah. The question for President Trump and for the United States, and really, frankly, Trump, we shouldn’t pick on him on this because Democrats are equally guilty of having supported Israel.

John Kiriakou: Absolutely.

Ted Rall: And this whole genocide started under Biden, and he encouraged it, and he funded it, and he armed it. So, you know, Trump just happens to be holding the bag right now. But the question for the US is going to be, do we want to be at the pariah table with little Israel, or do we want to be with everyone else?

John Kiriakou: Well, you know, in these votes in the UN General Assembly, it’s not just us and Israel. It’s also Nauru and, occasionally, Costa Rica and one of those little countries in the Pacific that I can’t pronounce. So we’re not always standing alone. Like Vanuatu.

John Kiriakou: Vanuatu. Where would we be without Vanuatu?

Ted Rall: I think Vanuatu is the closest to the international dateline. So on New Year’s Eve, they always are like, well, Vanuatu celebrated twenty-three and a half hours ago. You’ve seen that.

Unbelievable. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I’ll answer you a little bit on this question. I’ll be in New York City Labor Day Weekend. How bad will traffic be for the UN?

Ted Rall: Horrible, except if you’re sitting on the Upper East Side. The East Side in Manhattan is terrible. If you’re, like, somewhere else, honestly, if you’re up, like, I’m on the Upper West, I had a UN badge, and I had trouble getting to the office even with the UN badge. And I was walking, so it’s going to be bad on the East Side.

John Kiriakou: Stay away from the East Side.

Ted Rall: Yeah. And it’s always, it’s kind of like in general. That’s good advice anyway. Labor Day, but all the rich people will be gone. So in other neighborhoods, it’ll kind of help. It’s kind of like a great time to visit town. And the weather should be a little bit better.

Oh my God. So alright. What do we think of Gaddafi? I love that question. I think Gaddafi was super, I mean, no one got screwed more than Gaddafi, right? I mean, he, and what happened to him is so important as a lesson for other rulers. I mean, George W. Bush said, listen, you know, if you drop your nuclear program, and if, you know, we’ll cut a deal with you, we’ll bring you in, we’ll legitimize you, we’ll forget all about Lockerbie, the whole nine yards. And then he did as asked. And the next thing you know, Hillary Clinton comes in as Secretary of State. There’s this radical jihadi movement out in Eastern Libya, in Benghazi. And the US finances it, runs interference for it, provides air support with NATO, and we helped kill Gaddafi and get him sodomized on live television.

John Kiriakou: My boss, Steve Kappas, deputy director, the associate deputy director for operations and a mentor of mine, flew out to Libya to meet with Gaddafi and Gaddafi’s intelligence chief, who actually graduated from the University of Michigan, and convinced him to give up his weapons of mass destruction programs, saying, you don’t want to end up like Saddam Hussein. We’re going to kill Saddam Hussein, he told Gaddafi in 2002. We’re going to kill him. You don’t want to end up like that. Just give up your weapons of mass destruction, and everybody’s going to live happily ever after. And Gaddafi gave up all his weapons programs, a rube. And we allowed him to be killed anyway.

Ted Rall: And he got played.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. He got played. We just lied to him. And then, you know, the way he was killed was so horrific. It was so grotesque.

Ted Rall: And people think that’s just the locals who did it, but that’s not true. I mean, it was a US drone that fired a missile at his motorcade and maybe at his car specifically, but his car was driven off the road. He and his entourage were forced to flee. They hid in a drainage pipe, a culvert kind of thing. And then the jihadis found him and killed him.

Ted Rall: Yeah. So, yeah, let’s talk a little bit about, do we want to talk about this? I mean, what’s so remarkable about the mass shooting that took place at 345 Park Avenue here and 51st Street is that it’s not remarkable. You know, this guy came in, he claimed, it reminded me of the shooter at the University of Texas in Austin in 1966, the Texas watchtower shooter. He suspected there was something wrong with him, that he was hearing voices and having violent urges. And in his suicide note, he requested that his brain be examined for signs of trouble. In fact, they did find a tumor that was pressing up against his amygdala. And that’s, so this guy yesterday, his suicide note said that he believed he had CTE. I don’t know if he had ever been diagnosed formally or not. He was a high school football player. He went to the NFL building HQ, and basically went to the wrong floor, killed four people, including an off-duty New York City police officer who was working security at the desk. And, you know, the thing is, though, it’s one of those things where if you say, well, what could you possibly do about it? I mean, I think nothing. I mean, you know, guns are legal. AR-15s are legal. They’re, we’re washing them. They’re all over the place. You know, he drove here from Nevada. He parked in front of the building in his BMW and walked in. I mean, this can and will happen over and over again. And it’s almost like all you can do is just shrug, and I think that’s what’s so remarkable about it is how unremarkable it is. And, you know, he apologized in the note that he left, which just, to me, made it that much more sad.

John Kiriakou: Mental illness, whether it’s caused by CTE or something else, is a horrible existence. And he really believed that he had CTE, and he really believed that it was because he played football in high school.

Ted Rall: So it seems to be kind of a political act, basically.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. It is.

Ted Rall: It is. It’s a political act.
John, should we talk about this story out of Iran? So, obviously, the Iranians are still smarting from their twelve-day, fourteen-day war with, I guess, twelve-day war with Israel. And they’re licking their wounds, but their nuclear program, whatever it was, appears to be largely intact. But the Iranians took note, and they’re starting to think, and they obviously are investigating what happened. And part of their investigation finds that their GPS was manipulated by the US or Israel or some kind of other bad actor to screw up their targeting abilities. This might help explain why they were so caught with their pants down and unable to defend themselves and fire back against the Israelis who had complete command of the skies over Iran, which blew me away.

John Kiriakou: This has been a rumor really since the twelve-day war that something was wrong with the GPSs. You’re not allowed to use Waze in Iran because Waze is owned by an Israeli company. But any GPS, the Iranians were right.

Ted Rall: Waze was purchased by Google. It’s now part of Alphabet.

Ted Rall: Correct. It was founded by an Israeli company. That’s right. So I always hated it. I never understood it. I didn’t understand, like, how the interface makes no sense to me. Maybe you have to read from right to left or something.

John Kiriakou: Maybe. But I think they’re worried about GPSs in general now just because they believe, probably rightly, that the US and Israel have the technology to interface with the satellites and target Iran.

Ted Rall: Well, there are satellites, right? I mean, Bill Clinton, this was military and covert technology until Bill Clinton decided to publicize it, I think wisely. He was convinced that this was going to open up all sorts of technological innovation, and it has. I mean, if you think about something like real estate listings, you can see a map of where the house is or whatever. It’s amazing. But that technology, it’s American, and it can be, and was, weaponized against the Iranians. So now they’re looking for a Chinese or other alternative. This story is not about Iran. This story is about the US having technological dominance. And that dominance being undermined by the US’s willingness to weaponize that dominance for short-term gain, losing sight of the long-term impact, which is that if you come off as a non-neutral arbiter, you’re not, the rest of the world isn’t going to want to trust you anymore, and then you’re going to lose your advantage. I mean, you know, we invented the phone. That’s why our country code is one. We have, I mean, this is exactly, it’s analogous to the dollar. We weaponized the US dollar. So now Russia, everyone else who’s thinking, well, one day, I could fall afoul of the United States. You don’t know. And then they could just decide to turn off the spigot and screw us and steal our reserve currency. Like, we can’t have that. So, you know, we’re getting SWIFT or all these systems that if you want to control them and take a little piece, you can’t, like, put your thumb on the scale. I mean, the example I’m thinking of is, like, how did Constantinople become rich? Well, it’s right on the Bosphorus, and they just collected tolls from the Silk Road and just waited for ships to go through, and everybody had to pay. And what made it work was they let everyone through, and they charged everyone. If they had started to say, like, fuck those Sogdians, let’s nail them, then that would have worked. Other people would have been like, well, we have to overthrow Constantinople, or we have to do an end-run. We have to figure another way. The US just doesn’t, I don’t know. It seems really, really shortsighted.

John Kiriakou: Very, very shortsighted. And we had the same conversation last week about sanctions. Countries have gotten to the point where sanctions just simply don’t hurt them anymore because we’re so heavy in the way we levy sanctions against countries that they’re forced to come up with a way around them. And let me interrupt our conversation for one second. Just as we were going on the air, Prime Minister Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, announced that Canada would recognize Palestine.

Ted Rall: Holy shit. That’s amazing. I just had a little tingle there in my upper back. That’s so great. It’s happening.

John Kiriakou: You’re right. There’s a hole in the dike.

Ted Rall: The flood, and it’s coming. It’s a seismic shift. It’s a tsunami.

John Kiriakou: It is.

Ted Rall: And Canada is also, I mean, diplomatically, a very important country. I mean, you know, Canada is the country that when you’re a backpacker and you want to travel to, like, you’re an American backpacker and you want to go to Afghanistan and not be thought of as an asshole, you wear the Canadian flag on your backpack. Canada is considered neutral.

John Kiriakou: I did that. I sewed a Canadian flag on my backpack in ’85. Everyone thinks Canada is chill.

Ted Rall: I’m wondering what Canada’s strike means here. Canada is following orders. From whom, I wonder?

John Kiriakou: No. That doesn’t make sense to me.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Well, you can pipe in. We’ll put that up if you reply to us. But yeah. So, exactly. Houdini is like, always say you’re Canadian overseas. Like, oh, like, yeah. I like hockey. But yeah. So we’ll see what happens here. Oh, so, yeah. So there’s so much cynical cynicism here where I’m not buying it. These elites that back to the other side already can’t do good. Look, it’s not because they’re good people. It’s because they read polls. And, like, they know that basically the world isn’t this, I mean, if they were good people, they would have come out against this shit on October 8, 2023. I mean, you know, this is like, because it was already obvious what the Israelis were going to do from within hours. I mean, they were having a great time. You know, they were looking forward to it.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. So, you know, I wonder if some of this is a swipe at Donald Trump too from the Canadians. I wonder.

Ted Rall: It could be. Well, they have reason to be pissed, right. I mean, I don’t know. I’m not ruling out that Donald Trump is going to distance himself from Israel. I don’t think he’s going to, like, recognize Palestine, but I think the weapons flow has to come to an end.

John Kiriakou: It does. Alyssa Slotkin, some people have mentioned Alyssa Slotkin in the chat. She’s the senator from Michigan, former CIA colleague of mine. Alyssa’s complicated. She’s Jewish. She was not endorsed by any of the Jewish groups in America in her campaign, but she won. She won relatively easily in a year when Donald Trump carried her state. But she said that she would be willing to vote for a cutoff of offensive weapons to Israel. That’s not going to happen. We saw a week ago, there was a vote to cut off offensive weapons to Israel, and it got, like, six votes in the House. So it’s just not going to happen.

Ted Rall: Well, I don’t think it’s going to happen quickly, but I think by Christmas time, we’re going to see some movement. It’s going to slow down or something.

John Kiriakou: Do you think that if it keeps happening, if country after country, not including, of course, Hungary, Italy, Germany, the United States, but if these other countries continue to recognize Palestine, do you think that this could threaten the Netanyahu government?

Ted Rall: Yeah. Because somebody’s going to have to take the blame for losing the international community. And that has to be Bibi, right? I mean, I did a deep dive into Israeli opinion polling, as you know, because you read my column. And 76.5% of Israelis, as of June, totally have no problem with the genocide. They’re like, okay with it, and they don’t think that the needs of the Palestinians and their misery should even be taken into consideration in military planning. So this is, you know, let’s be clear here. Even what passes for the Israeli left, they’re not demonstrating against the genocide. They’re demonstrating because the hostages haven’t come home. And also they don’t like Netanyahu and his corruption. But that’s what this is about.

Right. So looking at it from the standpoint of the Israelis who basically have their heads up their asses while the whole rest of the world is appalled and disgusted with them, and they don’t see it. But I do think, from their point of view, if they’re involved in an existential battle to expand Israel, dry and get Gaza for themselves, which obviously all Israelis aren’t stupid, they know that’s what this is about. And that project is going to be deeply hampered by losing US and international support.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Who else are you going to blame? I mean, you can’t a la carte it and say, well, this is Ben Gvir, but not Netanyahu. It’s like, it’s all of them. The government’s got to go. I mean, it’s not like they’re going to be replaced with liberals. There aren’t any anymore in Israel.

John Kiriakou: No. If there’s a ceasefire, does Bibi go to prison?

Ted Rall: Well, if Bibi is out of government, goes to trial. And then probably he goes to prison, I think.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. And this is a good point. Oh, thank you, Candace Drake. Thank you very much. Where did I just see it? We’re getting so many comments I can’t keep up. HubDroid, Mixtene. Don’t think they can admit wrongdoing on anything. It’s a mountain of war crimes. That’s exactly right.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. Well, that’s for sure. And that’s why Netanyahu can’t risk not being prime minister.

TedRall: Here’s a big question for you. You know, back in the old days, people like Idi Amin would go into exile in places like Saudi Arabia.

John Kiriakou: I saw him in Jeddah in the vegetable market. What? I was like, oh my God. That’s Idi Amin. And he was there with his wife, like, taking care of ears? Seriously.

Ted Rall: Right? What a monster. You know, there’s a famous story. I forget if it was Time or Newsweek, but one of them interviewed him, and on the back porch of his presidential palace, he was presented with a plate of human ears with tomato garnish and said, like, this is a delicacy in our country. Would you like one?

John Kiriakou: Oh my God. I remember reading an article once saying that in a conversation with a reporter, he was talking about the saltiness of bushmeat, and he said monkeys are salty. Leopards are very salty, but nothing is as salty as a human being.

Ted Rall Yeah. He was a famous cannibal. Did you ever see that movie with the French brothers? It’s in the Criterion Collection. It’s just called Idi Amin Dada. It’s one of the most amazing films. It’s a documentary.

Ted Rall: So this is an amazing film. Right? So basically, for six months, these two French brothers were given unfettered access to Idi Amin. They followed him everywhere. And this was right after the Entebbe mission by the Israelis.

John Kiriakou: Their nephew’s brother was killed. And it had changed him, apparently.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Idi Amin, like, for the filmmakers had his army recreate the Entebbe mission, and they bring out helicopters and shit. You got to watch it. It’s like, and also, he swims. Is it the Zambezi? He’s swimming, like, next to crocodiles and, like, every morning. And he, like, pushes them out of the way. Like, get out of the way, you fucking rascals. And but the most, to me, the, it’s completely, you can’t take your eyes off it. But the best moment for me is that there’s a cabinet meeting, and you could hear the air conditioner, like, rolling. And he’s going around the room, and it’s kind of got that sort of East German kind of decor, like, you know, sort of that Lives of Others kind of vibe. And he’s like, okay. So the secretary of territory, minister of transportation, sorry, minister of education, you’re doing a good job. Keep it up. Defense, everything’s looking good. He’s going around, and he’s like, transportation. And the guy starts quivering like a leaf. And he’s like, you know, the service in the, still getting complaints about the bus service in the capital. Just, you have my number. My four-digit number, and he tells it, like, 3224. You, I tell you. You have a problem. You call me. Morning, day, or night. You get it. Have you ever called me even one time? You never call, and nothing ever gets better. And then the scene cuts, and there’s the guy’s body floating in the river. It says, the next day, transportation minister so-and-so was found floating in the Zambezi. I mean, it’s unbelievable.

Ted Rall: But, anyway, so okay. Well, so does Bibi Netanyahu, can he fly to, would the Saudis take him in as the prime minister of a Jewish state?

John Kiriakou: Never. No. Never.

Ted Rall: So there’s some decency. There are limits. There are rules.

John Kiriakou: And you know what? I think that the reason why they wouldn’t ever do it is because their own people would overthrow them if they did something like that.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Wow. Yeah. No. He’s more likely to end up, you know, in the US.

John Kiriakou: I was in Old Town, Alexandria, Virginia one time. Now this is twenty years ago. And I saw Pervez Musharraf and his wife just window shopping up and down King Street. He’s like, so this is where you ended up, you war criminal.

Ted Rall:  He’s a yeah. I could go on about him. You know, because, I’ve, you know, I’m a commentator. I don’t really break news. The news that I broke ever was the Pervez Musharraf coup. So I was down the street in Islamabad, at a cafe just eating. And there was, I just gotten down the Karakoram Highway, taking, like, three or four weeks with my friend. And so we’re, like, hanging out. We finally arrived in Islamabad, and there’s gunfire down the street. And, you know, small arms fire. And so I asked the waiter. The waiters always know everything. I said, what’s going on? He goes, oh, they are overthrowing the government. I’m like, what? He goes, yeah. Nawaz Sharif, he is finished. Like, he is, like, he will be killed. I’m like, what? It’s like, right now? It’s like, yeah. That’s them now. So I got up with my camera and went and took a bunch of photos and talked to some soldiers. And, indeed, like, Nawaz Sharif’s in the van. Like, while I’m talking outside. I’m like, outside the van, they’re taking him off to be tortured. They did torture him. And, so, Pervez Musharraf, you know, and I knew because when we came down the Karakoram Highway, we saw Taliban soldiers all over the place, and we were stopped at a checkpoint. And we’re like, and they’re like, oh, you’re in Afghanistan. I’m like, this is the KKH. We’re not in Afghanistan. We’re in Pakistan. And the guy starts joking, and he goes, sometimes Afghanistan comes to you. And, because Pervez Musharraf came to power by an alliance with the Taliban. And he allowed the Taliban to enter Northern Pakistan to go as proxies to fight the Indians and basically say, we didn’t attack you guys. We don’t know anything about it. It was called the third Kashmir war with the Kargil conflict.

Ted Rall: You know all this. But this is for the audience. My God. And it’s like, yeah, fucking Pervez Musharraf. I mean, after 9/11, Pakistan was so responsible for what happened to us more than any other country. Do they get justice? No. They got a raise.

John Kiriakou: Nope. That was it. They got a raise. And like every exiled Pakistani leader, he’s now in Dubai, which is exactly where, what was her name, went? Prime minister, oh, come on. We were just talking about it last week. Why am I having a, which country? Pakistan.

Ted Rall: Oh, Bhutto.

John Kiriakou: But, yeah, Prime Minister Bhutto and her husband, back and forth between Pakistan and Dubai, presidency and exile, crimes against humanity and all that stuff. Lovely fellows all around and ladies.

Ted Rall: Yeah. She’s dead. Musharraf’s dead. They’re all dead now.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. A bullet to the brain is what did her in.

Ted Rall: Yeah. Well, that it is, I mean, Pakistanis are spicy. It’s a tough gig.

John Kiriakou: Across them. No. It’s a tough gig.

Ted Rall: I mean, every moment I was in Pakistan, I had the feeling that a riot could break out any second. Someone could just walk down the street and start screaming something in Urdu. And the next thing you know, people are out there with sticks and shit, and you had guns out there. Like, it’s on. And you don’t even know what’s going on.

Ted Rall: Alright. So alright. Where’s Hamid Karzai?

Hamid Karzai is still in Kabul living happily next to the Taliban, and he’s got balls of steel.

John Kiriakou: But his brother’s got a restaurant in Baltimore. If anyone wants to go check it out, it’s actually pretty good.

Ted Rall: I do like Afghan food quite a bit. But not the Afghan food there for the most part. Just because it’s, no.

John Kiriakou: The Afghan food in America is head and shoulders better than any Afghan food.

Ted Rall: Cuban food sucks in Cuba. It’s terrible in Cuba. Like, how much zucchini can you eat? Or boiled chicken. And bad yellow rice.

Ted Rall: Alright. So take on Imran Khan.

John Kiriakou: I actually like Imran Khan. I liked and respected him. His problem is that anytime he has a problem, whether it’s riots in the streets or an ingrown toenail, he blames the United States.

Ted Rall: I think we’re going to leave that there for the deprogramming for today. Just a reminder to everybody, in case you missed it, it would mean a lot to
John and me, and in the most important way, which is to say financially. If you guys were to watch this same exact show, the same exact way over on Rumble instead of YouTube, you know, obviously, if you can’t for whatever reason, we love you on YouTube too. But we get paid a zillion times more over on Rumble than we do. It’s pennies in comparison on YouTube. There’s no comparison. So, you know, if you go over to Rumble and just watch us exactly the same way, it’d be much appreciated. You don’t have to remember this weird URL. Just go to Rumble and search for
John or my name, and or the show, and it’ll come right up. And so thank you very much. We’re here Monday, Wednesday, Friday, eastern time. We’re going to be going in two weeks to a Monday through Friday schedule. So, hopefully, you guys will stick around for that. We love this show, and we love you guys. We have the best fans and the best watchers and viewers. So and we’re fans of you guys too. So it’s a mutual admiration society.

John Kiriakou: Anyway,
John, always a pleasure. Hang in there. And is, always is. Time flies?

Ted Rall: It does. Alright. Thanks, everybody. Oh, Canada. That’s right. Kudos to the Canadians.

 

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “UK To Recognize Palestine”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Get insider CIA dish on a pair of stories on today’s “DeProgram show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou,” streaming live at M-W-F 5 pm ET and available 24-7. Chime in with your questions and comments for John and Ted!

  • UK to Recognize Palestine: Prime Minister Keir Starmer says the UK will formally recognize Palestine at the UN this September—unless Israel halts its Gaza genocide and manmade famine. Which countries are next? Can Israel stop this move and should they care?
  • Iran’s GPS Switcher: Iran plans to abandon U.S.-run GPS, possibly in favor of China, after U.S.-Israeli nuclear site strikes. Tech sovereignty is spreading. What are the global tech fallout risks as distrust of the U.S. spreads?
  • Is Israel Losing the Right? U.S. evangelical and conservative support for Israel, previously reliable, is on the wane. GOP stalwarts like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are criticizing its Gaza war as genocide.  US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, visits a West Bank town attacked by settlers. Joe Rogan is boycotting Bibi. Can Israel get its right-wing groove back?
  • Tom Sylvester’s CIA Exit: CIA’s Deputy Director of Operations retires after losing a prestigious London post due to controversial book quotes. His exit sparks leadership concerns. What’s next at the CIA?
  • Sandy Grimes’ Legacy: The CIA mole hunter at 80, famous for exposing Aldrich Ames. Her counterintelligence work reshaped the agency. What’s her legacy?

TMI Show Ep 191: “Beach Day Canceled!”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

“The TMI Show” with hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan, brings you the latest about the massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake that hit Eastern Russia. This #6 biggest quake EVER, following a 7.4 foreshock, triggers tsunami warnings across the Pacific Ocean, from Japan to Chile. In Russia, tsunami waves smash boats and sweep away containers. Japan evacuates over 2 million people as waves smash into the northern coast, with warnings lingering in Hokkaido and Tohoku. French Polynesia braces for 4-meter waves in the Marquesas Islands, while Chile, Peru, and Ecuador face threats to their coasts. The Philippines and Indonesia issue alerts, though some were later canceled. Guam and Micronesia dodge\ the worst. This disaster echoes a 9.0 quake in the same spot that killed 10,000 people with a 45-foot-high wall of water in 1952,

What is a tsunami? Is climate change causing more tectonic activity? Are governments doing enough? We’ll fill you in.

Plus:

• Palestinian Statehood: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announces Britain will recognize Palestinian statehood in September unless Israel stops its genocidal policy of starving the innocent civilians it’s trying to murder in Gaza. This big move could change the Middle East forever. Is it a game-changer or political posturing?

• Brain-Eating Amoeba Tragedy: A South Carolina boy, 12, dies from Naegleria fowleri after swimming in Lake Murray. This rare, deadly amoeba thrives in warm freshwater, killing every victim except four survivors in the US since 1962. Are public waters safe?

• Iran’s GPS Changes Directions: Iran is switching China’s BeiDou system after US-Israeli attacks expose vulnerabilities from relying on US technology. This move signals a global tech realignment, challenging Western tech dominance. Could this reshape the digital space?

• Australia’s Social Media Ban: Australia’s world-first ban on social media for kids under 16 now includes YouTube. The law aims to curb harmful content, but does this censorship make sense? Other nations are watching.

 

TMI Show Ep 190: “World to Israel: Drop Dead”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Over 60,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in Gaza since October 2023, and at least 145,870 more have been injured. Those numbers are an undercount because Israel has destroyed hospitals and other healthcare infrastructure. Entire families have been wiped out, with 1,860 children under 2 among the dead, and at least 10,000 additional bodies are rotting under rubble. Famine deaths are spiking—130 and counting—because Israel is deliberately starving the civilian population. Once a vibrant territory, Gaza’s cities are now rubble. Diseases like polio are resurfacing. 88% of the population is crammed into a tiny ghetto created by the IDF along the border with Egypt. A ceasefire collapsed because Israel resumed bombing and killing, leaving hope for peace in tatters. Now that the world is turning against the Jewish state, does it have a future?

Tune in to “The TMI Show” as Ted and Manila unpack this tragedy with their signature no-BS analysis, tackling the human cost and global fallout.

Plus:

• Manhattan Mass Shooting: Shane Tamura, 27, killed four, including an NYPD officer, at 345 Park Avenue. The gunman, armed with an AR-style rifle, died by suicide on the 33rd floor after driving his BMW from Nevada. Motive is unclear.

• UK’s Palestinian State Debate: Britain is leaning toward recognizing a Palestinian state, driven by public outrage over Gaza’s starving children. PM Starmer faces Labour Party pressure but hesitates, wary of complicating ceasefire talks. Trump’s neutral stance gives Starmer room to maneuver.

• Trump’s Russia Ultimatum: Trump slashed his 50-day Russia ceasefire deadline to 10-12 days, threatening sanctions on oil buyers like India and China. Russia’s battlefield gains continue, unfazed. Economic escalation risks U.S. alliances and global trade.

• Shaolin Abbot Scandal: Shaolin Temple’s abbot, Shi Yongxin, is accused of embezzlement and “improper relationships.” The “CEO monk” allegedly violated his celibacy vows and stole cash. Investigations are underway, shaking the iconic monastery.

 

Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou – Monday, July 28, 2025

Generated by AI.

Hey there. It’s DeProgram. I’m Ted Rall. That’s John Kiriakou over there. Thanks as always for joining us here on DeProgram, where we try to deprogram you from all the corporate mainstream propaganda that’s in the media and everywhere else. It’s like the old Palmolive commercial: propaganda. You are soaking in it. Alright.

John: Yeah. It’s like a commercial. Yes. Yes. It’s like I’m old. I remember that stuff.

Ted: Alright, so today, we’re going to talk about the starvation crisis in Gaza, the prospect of even more sanctions against Russia—I guess they found some lying around between the sofa cushions that they hadn’t used yet—Trump’s visit to Scotland, rumors that Ghislaine Maxwell, whose name I still can’t pronounce, could be pardoned by Donald Trump, ICE raids here in New York City—things are going to get spicy here, I have a feeling, this week—and the ceasefire deal between Thailand and Cambodia seems to have been at least in part prompted by Trump’s tariff threats, which is one of the strangest combinations of stories I’ve ever heard. Yeah. John, shall we just get into the situation in Gaza?

John: Yes. Two Israeli human rights organizations today issued a joint statement saying that the Israeli government is committing genocide. They used the word “genocide” for the very first time. Wow. The New York Times dismisses this announcement by saying that these are liberal groups in Israel and are frequently in opposition to the Israeli government. But listen, genocide is genocide, and they compare what the Israelis are doing in Gaza to what the Germans did to them in the Second World War, minus the ovens. I think this is a very, very important development. In the meantime, the Israelis deny, deny, deny that there is any such thing as genocide. They say that they’re fighting a war with Hamas. Well, if you’re fighting a war with Hamas, why are so many children starving to death? And if you’re not committing genocide, then why would you make this grand announcement today that you’re allowing shipments of food? If there wasn’t a starvation policy, you would need to make an announcement that you’re sending in planeloads of food being dropped on pallets and parachutes. Not to mention, it’s a starvation policy that was announced immediately after October 7, 2023, and by the very same people who are still in the government.

Ted: That’s right. And who never retracted those statements or even apologized for them. So, John, one of my favorite comments that came out in the last day was from everyone’s favorite prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. He said that, in response to the pressure, Gaza would receive minimal humanitarian aid. That’s more than yes. I mean, minimal. Yes. Because there was no food. None. The policy is to starve civilians. It is. It’s to kill people. It is. And so, I mean, aside from the question of how do you get up every morning and live with yourself, I mean, there’s the question of the messaging. Right? I mean, it’s kind of like that was greeted totally without commentary by outfits like the New York Times. Like, it’s blasé. Like, no big deal. I mean, as the occupying power, Israel has a responsibility to provide ample sustenance, food, water, power, and everything else for the people in the Gaza Strip. And they’re like, well, we’ll provide minimal. Like, that’s okay.

John: Even before hostilities, Ted, there were five hours a day of electricity and two hours a day of water. That’s all the Israelis allowed. And now, even Donald—so, you know, we of course, France has already decided to acknowledge Palestine as a state. I think that’s a big deal. That recognition is a huge deal. There’s pressure now on Keir Starmer, even in the UK. Now, I think I’ve always thought that the UK would be the second to last to go. The US would be last. So, I mean, the very fact that Starmer hasn’t rejected this idea out of hand, I think, is massive.

Ted: You know, John, those two Israeli groups declaring that this is genocide—that is a big deal. Of course, and of course, they’re liberal groups. It’s going to start with yes. Of course. Obviously. Yeah. What? You think Ben Gvir is going to call it genocide? That’s right. Maybe eventually we’ll get there. But right now, this is where it starts. I mean, it is a big deal. I mean, there’s definitely—you know, you can sense the shift in the—you just feel it. Right? I mean, the ground is falling out from under, you know, from support for the far-right regime of Netanyahu, specifically, and Israel in general.

John: You’re absolutely right. Keir Starmer already has a reputation for being weak and ineffective, not just as prime minister, but as a leader of his own Labour Party. So if we expected leadership from Keir Starmer, we’re likely to be disappointed. However, with that said, you make an important point and a correct point that I too would have believed that the Brits would be the next to the last country to turn away from the Israelis and in favor of the Palestinians. I’m going to change that now, and I’m going to say that the next to last country to turn away from Israel will be Germany. The Germans are irrational in their support of Israel, as irrational as American policy is, and they’re going to be with the Israelis until the bitter end.

Ted: And that’s because of their history. They feel like they’re the ultimate guilty liberals.

John: That’s right. That’s what it is. They’re the guilty liberals. Like, oh, look what we did. We have to make it right, so we’ll help the Israelis do it to the Palestinians, and that’ll put us right with the Israelis. It’s insane. Stupid policy.

Ted: Yeah. No. I mean, of course, obviously, look, I could understand the discomfort. But, I mean, it’s going to become—we can see already, like, Hakeem Jeffries and people like that. They’re having to backpedal. All these politicians, they were in a safe place. Right? And that was true in Germany too. It was always safe to support Israel. You and I both know, John, ten years ago, if you criticized Israel, you were in tremendous danger. You were jeopardizing your reputation, your job. You know, you’d be accused of being anti-Semitic. I know when I did anti-Israel cartoons thirty years ago, I got accused of being anti-Semitic. So nothing’s—you know? But now it’s safer. It’s safe.

John: Yeah. Right. Thanks to those photos that are coming out. Photos. It’s the photos that have done it. And you know what’s funny too? No one cares about starving and dying adults, by the way. No. It’s the children. It’s the children. And for the first day or two after those photos ran, there were a lot of complaints in the UK that the BBC had either doctored the photos or took the photos in other countries during famines and said they were Palestinians. Now, right. Not true. These are legit photos taken by BBC photographers of Palestinian children.

Ted: Yeah. They are. And there’s evidence too. But, you know, look. It’s look. In fairness, deep fakes are a real thing. We’ve seen tons of photos of, like, old disasters repurposed to present as something that’s contemporary outside of the Middle East crisis. So it’s not, like, impossible that such a thing would happen. Right. But the Israeli government, they have some balls. The official spokesperson today went on and said, this is fake news. These photos are faked. There is no famine in Gaza. This is the official policy, the official statement of the government. Scandalous. They’re kidding. Right? I mean, who did they—I mean, how much more full of shit could you be?

John: And, I mean, the denials only make their situation worse.

Ted: I mean, the Israelis are rightfully in a no-win situation, but the only thing they could really say is, you know, this whole Gaza humanitarian fund foundation thing didn’t work out. We’re going to let the UN back in and, you know, let the chips fall where they may. And then there was that article over the weekend in the Saturday New York Times media dump, where they revealed that actually, everything that Israel said about Hamas stealing aid was not true.

John: It’s not true. So yeah. They were just making shit up.

Ted: Yeah. But it and, you know, it just appears, like, so the Times dutifully released it on the Saturday. But when nobody’s been seeing it. Well, supposedly. Right? But that’s not really true anymore. I don’t think the New York Times understands that. I think, like, they think nobody read it. Actually, Saturday’s a major news day on the Internet now. Good. You know, they’re all old down there on Eighth Avenue and 40th Street. They’re very, very old. Not the people who work for them, but the editors who make the call. They don’t get it, and it’s kind of great.

You’re fine. Donald Trump today said that there should be more aid going into Gaza. He was asked if the photos were faked. He said they looked real to him.

John: Good. That’s actually a major announcement from Donald Trump for him to say something like that. But then, you know, we look back to just what was it, Ted? A week, maybe a week and a half ago when Benjamin Netanyahu was in Washington, and half the Senate showed up to take a selfie with him with Cory Booker, who I briefly flirted with the idea of supporting in a presidential run. That’s gone from my head. But him, like, lamely trying to hide his face, like he was having second thoughts just as they were taking the picture, it enrages me. I can’t believe that this guy is not treated like a war criminal. Well, yes. I can believe it. It’s the United States. And then we impose sanctions on the UN special rapporteur for torture. It’s just—I just can’t believe it.

Ted: Well, I mean, if there’s hope, is that really—I mean, things really are changing. Yes. I mean, fast by the day. I mean, if I’m the Israelis, I’m nervous as hell right now.

John: Absolutely. Because there’s no endgame for them. They know what they want to do. They want to kill every Palestinian. The ones they can’t kill, throw out. But that’s not a viable policy. It’s a crime against humanity. You can’t do that.

Ted: There’s a really great, well-written piece in Times of Israel, which is, of course, as you’d expect, a pro-government and very Zionist publication. But, basically, it’s saying that it’s claiming that Israel has never had an articulated policy throughout the conflict in terms of war aims. And that’s true. However, we know that there are war aims. Sure. I mean, the Israeli generals, they’re not bad generals or tacticians. Right?

John: Yes, sir. They know what they’re doing. And there was a minor Zionist party that is part of the Netanyahu coalition. The head of this party, whom I had never heard of before, said yesterday, look. The policy should be to either kill or expel every Palestinian, and we shouldn’t be afraid to say it. It’s like, well, you’re the only one who’s not afraid to say it. It is a war crime and a crime against humanity and the legal definition of genocide, but don’t let me stop you from saying it. It’s a violation of international law for an official of a government to even articulate such a statement.

Ted: That’s right. He could be prosecuted for that in the future.

John: Yes. He could. Of course, we would put sanctions on the court that prosecuted him. So, right. Yeah. Of course. Because it’s the judges you have to blame. Y

Ted: Yeah. So how much—so, I mean, okay. This is the tough question. I don’t think it’s probably unanswerable. Maybe we should both try to answer it or just punt. What happens next here? I mean, are we going to—how much longer is this going to go? I mean, my feeling is Israel’s got, literally, the amount of time that they have before they cave in and let the UN back in is measurable in days.

John: Seriously. I have to agree with you. There’s pretty much nothing left to destroy. All there is left to do is kill as many people as you can kill. As we said, that’s not a viable policy. And the only way that the Israelis can get out of this is to turn back to the United Nations. Declare victory, declare Hamas destroyed, and turn it over to the UN. And then you can engage the Saudis and ask them to join the Abraham Accords, and you can negotiate some deal later.

Ted: But if the Israelis knew what was good for them, they would declare victory and go home. They could offer Hamas’s leadership exile. Right?

John: They could—that’s a good idea. We will let you leave.

Ted: Yes. And you can go to a third country. I don’t know. To be determined. But we promise we will not send the Mossad after you to assassinate you later on.

John: Right. Nick has a good question there, Ted. What about the American leaders of both parties who are complicit in this genocide?

Ted: That’s—you know, seriously, that is a great question. It seems to me like, if you are the country that is the number one supporter—I mean, look. I guess it’s a question. What is the role of the United States in this World War II analogy? Right? If Germany is Israel, then the United States is a close ally, like it’s an Axis member, like fascist Italy or imperial Japan or perhaps Hungary or Romania—any of those, like fascist Axis or the collaborationist Vichy regime in France. That’s right. They were all prosecutable. They were all legally vulnerable. We focused on Germany at the end of the war—mm-hmm—for obvious reasons. But, hey. You know, the leader of Vichy France was condemned to death, and then his sentence was commuted to life in prison because he was 5,000,000 years old. He was, like, 86.

So, you know, but I think—yeah. No. I think, honestly, the political leaders of the United States—certainly the president, certainly the leaders of Congress—they should be held to account legally for their role in this. I mean, they sent the weapons. They sent the money. They provided logistical support. They provided intel. I mean—yeah. It’s people keep—you know, like, John, one of the rules that, like, the Zionists who try to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism say is if it’s antisemitism, if you hold Israel to a different standard than you hold other countries. Okay. But the difference is okay. When Myanmar commits atrocities against the Rohingya people, we’re not paying for them or sending weapons. It’s horrible, and it should be condemned and stopped. But it’s not really our thing. It’s not our responsibility. Right. It’s everybody’s business, but it’s not a special—Israel is the number one recipient of foreign aid. We run interference for them in the UN Security Council. We provide them with crazy amounts of intel and weapons—$4,000,000,000 a year, ever since Camp David. And by the way, is it—I mean, if Jimmy Carter were here, I think he would say, like, the reason that we’re bribing the Israelis and the Egyptians with $4,000,000,000 a year is to say, cut the shit and live in peace. Well, the Israelis broke their part of the bargain. The Egyptians didn’t. That’s right. The Jordanians didn’t. No. Everyone’s doing what they’re supposed to do, but the Israelis just do whatever the hell they feel like. I mean, really, it’s part of their national personality, if you believe it’s the thing.

John: It is. It is. That’s absolutely true. And you absorb that as you walk around Tel Aviv or Jerusalem or anywhere else in Israel. You just can feel the vibe that people emit as you’re over there walking around. Every Israeli that I ever knew—that’s not true. Almost every Israeli that I ever knew wanted to utterly destroy the Palestinians, kill them all, or exile them all, and let the Israelis live happily ever after. Almost every Israeli I know. Even my American friends who are Jewish and who consider themselves to be Zionist—there’s one guy who I’ve been close to for twenty years, and I’m just about ready to unfriend him on Facebook because I just can’t take his Zionist propaganda anymore. And then he starts off every post by saying, if there’s any antisemitism, you are permanently blocked. Well, any criticism of Netanyahu to him is antisemitism. Ridiculous. And I mean about time. I mean, I try not to do that because I like to keep lines of communication open, but sometimes there’s really no choice because it makes you literally insane.

Ted: Yeah. So, I mean, we’re—it’s just, you know, I look. I have to agree with you about the Israelis that I’ve met too. I knew one or two who were very compassionate to the plight of the Palestinians, viewed them as human beings, believed that we needed to—that the Israelis needed to live side by side in peace and friendship and harmony with them. But very—that’s really exceptional. Right? That most of them really view them as rats and vermin to be exterminated—just like it is, like that old joke, like, you know, what is Iraq doing on top of our oil? It’s like—what are these fucking Palestinians doing, you know, like infesting our land? Like, why are they here? Our holy land.

John: Yeah. Yeah. You know, honestly, the only people who are really the only Jews who I know who are really great on this in the United States are people associated with Jewish Voices for Peace or Code Pink or any of the other myriad groups—and those are big groups. Yeah. And they’re big groups, and they’re increasingly vocal. And I think it’s absolutely wonderful. Nico Pelleg is doing yeoman’s work as the head of Palestine House here in Washington, DC. It just opened a couple of weeks ago, and it’s small. But my goodness, it’s a start.

Ted: What is Palestine House? I

John: t is a meeting space slash gallery for pro-Palestinian human rights groups, Palestinian artists, Palestinian musicians. They have programming there several nights a week. It’s up on Capitol Hill. And one of the city’s big property developers who happens to be Lebanese-American donated the building. And they have a small endowment, so they’re able to make a go of it. And yellow banana—even Tucker Carlson sounds sane to me now. Oh my god. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had that conversation with friends just in the last two weeks.

Ted: Well, Tucker has changed too. He’s changed. He’ll be the first to say so.

John: Yes. Oh, thank you, Dana. Tucker, once he was free of the bonds of Fox News, was able to be himself, his libertarian self. And while he’s still completely wrong, for example, on the issue of abortion, I love the guy. I consider him to be a friend, a loyal friend, and he’s 100% right on Palestine. And we should join forces. You know, I take a lot of heat about this too, and I know you do as well, Ted. But parties be damned in our country. We should join forces with everyone who agrees with us. We can get so much more done than if we impose these ideological purity tests that do nothing but divide us. I feel really strongly about that.

Ted: I totally agree. You know, I think about the—I know a lot about the French Resistance. You know, during the time when the Nazis invaded France, monarchists fought alongside communists and socialists. It was like the idea was like, we have an infestation here of Nazis. We can’t be worrying about each other. We will—yeah. My favorite example of this was, what was his name? The leader Shah Massoud, the leader of the human civilization alliance. Yeah. Ahmed Shah Massoud. Did you ever meet him, by the way?

John: Once. Right before he was assassinated. Yeah.

Ted: That was on 9/10—right when that happened.

John: Sure was.

Ted: So, Ahmed Shah Massoud was the legendary general from the Panjshir Valley, Tajik, from the Northern Alliance. And he unified the anti-Taliban, the anti-Soviet resistance. Right? And he famously convened all these tribes and factions who all hated each other. And they all got together, and he held up a cup of tea, toasted everyone, and said, first, we kill the Russians, then we kill each other. And remembering that order is very, very important. Right now, we have a major problem. I mean, on a foreign policy front, we’re knee-deep in militarism, adventurism, and Zionism, and complicity with genocide. We’ve got whoever—everyone is against that, left, right, whatever—we’ve got to get together. Here in the United States, we have rampant billionaires and corporations underpaying everyone, screwing us all, taking away our healthcare, left, right, middle. Everybody’s got to fight for ordinary people. Mmm. I mean, we’ve got to get together. I mean, there is a place to unify between the left and the populist left and the populist right, for sure. I mean, the populist right has been betrayed by Trump, and they know it.

John: Yeah. That’s absolutely true. Reid makes a couple of good points here too. Tucker is not going to cross the Rubicon because his kid actually does work for things. That is true. And it’s not just Palestine that he’s right on. He’s also talking about Zionist manipulation in the United States. He and I had a long conversation about that, actually, about Israeli intelligence operations in the United States and how the Israelis, for decades now, have been spread out all over the country trying to infiltrate our defense contractors and steal our defense secrets because we only give them 95% of what we have. They want the other 5%—that’s the Israeli way.

Ted: Yeah. It’s the Israeli way. Yasutake is joining us. Alright. Got it. Alright. Are we deprogrammed on Gaza right now?

John: Yeah. I’m all fired up about Gaza. There will be.

Ted: Oh, me too. And by the way, seriously, for people who are coming to this point of view belatedly, welcome. Welcome. And thank you. And better late than never, and we’re not going to give you shit.

John: You know, but seriously, welcome aboard. We have to put an end to this shit.

Ted: And if it’s—you know, look. We all have been propagandized, so it’s not shocking that it takes some people longer to be depropagandized than others. Alright. So Russia. Donald Trump had set a fifty-day deadline, which some people had interpreted as basically like a wink, wink, nudge, nudge to President Putin. Like, you guys can do some mopping-up operations there in preparation for a ceasefire negotiation. But I’m really looking for you after fifty days to sit down with the Ukrainians and sit down and work out some things. With the operative phrase being after fifty days. After fifty days. Well, this is kind of like one of those things—like, I had a credit card where they used to say you had twenty-eight days to pay. And then, like, one day I get a late notice after I paid ten days afterwards, and it was like, but I thought—oh, yeah. We changed that. You didn’t read that 5,000-word thing that we sent you. Yeah. So that’s kind of like what happened to Russia. I mean, Putin just got his notice, like, oh, no. Fifty days has been revoked. Now is now. I am impatient. Now. It might be ten to twelve days, maybe. Maybe. So okay. So then Trump’s saying if the Russians don’t hop to it and make peace with Ukraine, and the Ukrainians do appear more willing to talk and get serious than ever before, but who knows with them? Okay. So what exactly is the threat here to Russia? I don’t really get it because they’ve already slammed them with sanctions. They got you and me fired. Yeah. I mean, it’s like, what more do they—I mean, what more could Trump do? I know we still buy stuff, particularly energy from Russia. But, you know, the Russians can—they have other markets. It’s oil. You know, it’s like I used to work in banking, and we used to say, you know, we have the one product everyone wants, money. And it’s like, well, when you sell oil, you have another product everyone wants. I mean, if you’re Putin, are you losing any sleep?

John: No. Because the Indians and the Chinese have said, whatever oil you have, we’ll buy it. Right. And after that initial shock, you remember right after the Ukraine invasion, Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, said that the Russians were surprised at the quickness with which the US was able to impose sanctions, and we kind of knocked them off kilter for three or four weeks. And then they realized they don’t really need the United States, including the American banking system. When they can turn to the Indians and the Chinese and everybody else in the world that doesn’t want to fall into line behind US sanctions, they realized they’re actually not having too tough of a problem with it. Well, not to mention, it terrorized the rest of the world. Right?

Ted: Like, it did. You know, President Xi and Prime Minister Modi of India, they looked at that move and they said, the fuck—the Americans are feckless and reckless. Right? They will kick anyone out of the monetary system. You know, Bretton Woods be damned. They don’t care. They’re going to politicize the US dollar and the reserve currency. We better get our own deal going.

John: That’s right. And just wait until the BRICS countries make their own unified currency. It’s going to be a major change in global—it’s an atomic bomb.

Ted: That’s right. I mean, it could really tilt the US into a depression within days.

John: That’s right. It really could. So the Ukrainians finally saw the writing on the wall with Donald Trump, and the Russians saw an opportunity that hadn’t been there before. And so they’re not afraid of sanctions. We can sanction them from now until kingdom come. They don’t care about the sanctions because they don’t need us. Right. It’s really as simple as that. So, I mean, obviously, that said.

Ted: Yeah. In a way, Trump is pushing on an open door. Right? I mean, Russia doesn’t want this to go on forever. They’re not stupid. It costs money and time, and they’re not really getting anywhere. I mean, the lines aren’t moving very fast. I mean, pretty much this is—you know, it is what it is. You look at a map of where the front lines are. This is where it is. And you might have some land swaps to make things a little more even so we don’t end up with a Thai-Cambodian situation. But it is what it is. And I know Putin gets that. I mean, so yeah. Like, so I guess the question is, is peace, is a ceasefire, is a deal possible this year?

John: Yeah. Sure. Sure. But there has to be something really special in it for the Russians because they’re just not feeling under any pressure.

Ted: Mmm. Yeah. They’re just not—I mean, certainly an end to all the sanctions would be a start. Right? But then I think reintegration—I, you know, honestly, I bet G8 membership would be just the tasty treat that Putin would like.

John: I would agree with that. I would agree. Remember the G—and Donald Trump has said it should be the G7. Do you remember the G7 plus one? That’s just—your that was offensive. That was offensive.

Ted: And it wasn’t—it was like Gilligan’s Island and Russia and the rest and the rest. Yeah. And all the rest here on Gilligan’s Isle. Yeah. Yeah. They—you know, they by the way, I don’t know if you know that. Right? The rest were the professor and Mary Ann. And then they changed it in season two. And they—yeah. They negotiated a deal. And Mary Ann’s the only one who ever made any money from that show. Her agent negotiated, like, some insane deal for residuals and syndication. Back then, they were like, syndication? What’s that? And she lived in total luxury the rest of her life. Yeah. Which is fine. Yeah. She did. A year ago. Russia, though. I mean, so do you think—so be that might be enough, right, to bring to get it done with Russia. But then are the—you know, can Trump lean on the Ukrainians and force them to sign a deal? I mean, he can, but he’s getting pressure from the militarist forces and the supporters of Ukraine politically breathing. You know, he’s got Lindsey Graham and people like that breathing down his neck.

John: Yeah. So which way how does Trump fall on this? He has to do—I want my Nobel Peace Prize? Right. Or do I want to suck up to Lindsey Graham? Like, what is it? I think he wants the Nobel Peace Prize, which is why he called the Cambodians of the Thais over the weekend and told them to cut it out. And now they announced the ceasefire.

Ted: Yeah. Let’s just stop—let’s just skip to that. Let’s talk to that. Let’s talk about that because I thought it was an interesting story. Right? So back in 1907, the French—they were the colonial power. Thailand was independent. Right? But Cambodia was a French colony. And they signed a border deal. They declared they find the border mostly along a river, but with an exception. And the way that the treaty looked—the text of the treaty basically put these temples inside Thailand. And then, but the map that accompanied it put the temples inside Cambodia. So Cambodians are like, we’re going with the picture, and the Thais are like, we’re going with the words. I love this soul thing. And so they’ve been at it for years over this. Although, most of the time, no one cares. Basically, for five days, there’s been fighting across the border with heavy artillery. So—and some F-16 action. The Thais, as we talked about last week, obviously, have the military advantage overwhelmingly. And, basically, over the weekend, Trump said, we have an August 1 deadline for all of the tariffs with every country on Earth. And if you two rascals don’t cut the shit, you guys will get hit by massive sanctions—I mean, by massive tariffs and break it to none now. So Thailand, I got it. They have a lot of trade with the US. Yes. Cambodians don’t have shit.

John: No. They sell us empty tickets.

Ted: Yeah. So I think with the Cambodians, they just want it to be over because they’re getting their asses kicked. Right?

John: Agreed. Okay. Yes. That was my take.

Ted: So the Thais wanted to be—the Thais were motivated by—but whoever heard of ending a war with a threat of tariffs? I mean, it’s kind of brilliant.

John: It is brilliant, actually. And it has worked. I mean, listen. This whole tariff thing, you and I both said was nuts when it was first announced. It was going to crash the international economy. And son of a gun, if it’s not working out, you know? Yeah. Yeah. Sorry, Jay. We’ve been talking about other things. But anyway, tying this crash lobby in the past. I’m sure it’ll come up again. Time this back to Ukraine and Russia. Somebody pointed out that the Pentagon has this plan going into 2026. Of course, it does. That’s what the Pentagon does. It does near-, medium-, and long-term planning.

Ted: Yeah. They have plans to invade Liechtenstein.

John: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They’re called off-the-shelf plans. They come up with a plan to invade XYZ country, and they just put it on the shelf. And someday, if you need to invade that country, you pull it off the shelf and you do the invasion. Of emergency, please brief us. Yeah. Yeah. That’s right. So, I think that the Ukrainians are exhausted. I think that they don’t fully trust Donald Trump to keep funding them and sending weapons, and they also realize they’re going to have to concede some territory at least to the Russians. But the Russians—I don’t understand what the motivation is to keep fighting unless the Russians are serious about overthrowing Zelensky, taking, you know, Odessa someday. Who knows?

Ted: I don’t know. Just if they offer—it’s not acting rationally. Because, I mean, Russia has been kind of fighting with one hand tied behind their back. Yeah. I mean, they have not committed the full weight of the Russian military to this project. They’ve treated the Russia-Ukraine war as kind of like an important project, but one of many, not like an existential fight for the Russian Federation. This is not total war for them. It’s like something they’re just doing on the side kind of, and that’s why they’re not—I mean, if they threw everything they had at the Ukrainians, they would overthrow Zelensky and overrun the entire country.

John: Absolutely. It would be—so what’s going on? I don’t know. I’m wondering if they’re trying to put so much pressure on Zelensky that the Ukrainians rise up and push Zelensky out. Let Zelensky take his money and run to London, and then they might be willing to sit down and negotiate a settlement with whomever steps in and fills the void. I don’t know. I don’t know. Otherwise, the Russian position over the last several weeks does not make sense to me.

Ted: Yeah. This is the old Cold War thing about a mystery wrapped in an enigma.

John: That’s right. Yeah. A riddle wrapped in a mystery wrapped in an enigma. Russians are hard to figure out sometimes.

Ted: And sometimes they are also the most straightforward people in the world.

John: Yeah. Sometimes they are. No. Yellow banana, that’s one of the issues. The Ukrainian constitution election. Yeah. The Ukrainian constitution says that in a time of war, elections can be postponed indefinitely. If Zelensky declared martial law, and then he said, well, under martial law, you can’t have an election. So I would love to have an election, but because of the thing that I declared, we can’t have one. Yeah. Do it. And there’s no—and there’s no, by the way.

Ted: The US had elections during the Civil War. Just saying.

John: Yes. Yes. We did. Yeah. Yeah. I think, Pamela, I think that’s right. The Duran—you know, those guys in the Duran—they know more about Russia and more about the Russia-Ukraine war than I think anybody else on the planet practically. They’re saying that the Russians want to demilitarize Ukraine, and they use that term to denazify the Ukrainian military. I think it’s the same thing. And, I think—so we’re—so we’re moving, like the far-right—yeah.

Ted: Opponents, like the Azov-type people.

John: Correct. Yeah. I don’t know. I mean, it just seems like—that’s—does Russia really want to micromanage another country’s military like that? God forbid. I can’t imagine. Have anything better to do? Unless they push the Costa Rican model where, you know, Costa Rica just doesn’t have a military. It just doesn’t exist. They have a national police force, but there is no military. There’s no navy. They have a little coast guard with one boat in the Atlantic and one boat in the Pacific. But that’s it.

Ted: Well, but the West would never tolerate that because Ukraine’s a major weapons purchaser.

John: It is. And a major weapons manufacturer.

Ted: What—what weapons do they make? Oh, they are prolific with the nine-millimeter and the Kalashnikov; they have factories just pumping them out. Yeah.

Ted: So this is a Soviet legacy?

John: Yes. Yes. Just like it is with the Romanians. Yeah. The Romanians make billions and billions of nine-millimeter ammunition every year. That’s super interesting. So Cambodia and Thailand—it—I would say, like, okay.

Ted: Yes. It’s fragile. It just—the ceasefire just went into effect. Like all ceasefires, this is one of those—we’ll stop fighting now; details to be worked out later in terms of this 1907 border conflict. But my feeling is that this is over for now. What do you think?

John: Yeah. I think so too. Yep. And there’s no—there’s no upside to it. Well, you could pick up some temples. I guess you get the temples. Yeah. You get the temples. Who doesn’t want their own Buddhist temple? I’d take a Buddhist temple. They look cool. Yeah. Speaking speaking of Buddhist temples, do you remember the giant Buddhas in central Afghanistan? Yeah. In Bamiyan. The in Bamiyan that the Taliban blew up, like 1,500-year-old Buddhas? The Greek government, in the depths of its economic depression, tried to buy those Buddhas just to save them. Oh, wow. And with the intention of then donating them back to a post-Taliban Afghan government. Yeah. Then Mullah Omar was like, fuck you guys.

Ted: Well, I remember—like—yeah. At the time, I mean, I think it’s important to remember that not to at all—you know, I can’t sign off on what they did. But the rhetoric was really interesting because it was 2000, and Mullah Omar, the one-eyed leader of the Taliban at the time, said, look. You guys don’t care about our children who are starving to death due to sanctions. So why on earth should you care about this big sandstone thing? We’re blowing it the fuck up. And I remember thinking like, man, that’s brutal. ISIS had the same mentality in Syria and Palmyra and all that. But I could see it. You know? Like, you Westerners, you care about this 1,500-year-old thing, but you don’t care about people right here and now.

John: Yeah. Isn’t that the truth? First, I want to thank USC. And to answer his question, you know, my first couple trips with the CIA, I went to little, teeny, tiny, piddling countries that nobody would even pay any attention to. And we would have these massive, gigantic American embassies that would take up, like, an entire city block. And I remember asking—I forgot what country I was in. It was, like, Ethiopia maybe. And I was like, why do we have an embassy that’s this gigantic in Ethiopia when we don’t have any national interest here? And the station chief told me, because we have to make sure it’s bigger than the Russian embassy. I mean, that’s what it came down to. So it is the size of our national penis. That’s exactly what it is. You go to any African country, and our embassies are absolutely gigantic. And it’s because the Soviets had big embassies, so ours had to be bigger. It’s not the size of your consular representation—that’s how you use it. That’s great. So Reid’s points out that a lot of independent journalists and YouTubers are visiting Afghanistan lately. I’ve been watching them.

Ted: I’m jealous. You know? I love Afghanistan. I think it’s honestly—couldn’t possibly right now—is the safest it’s ever been in our lifetime. I

John: I’m absolutely sure that’s true.

Ted: Yeah. I think you could even travel on the Central Highway. The highway is a misnomer. But I bet you could do that and be okay.

John: Oh, the US embassy in Cairo. Oh my god. There’s a lot I probably shouldn’t say about the US embassy in Cairo other than, yes, it’s an enormous facility, and the Russian embassy is equally enormous. It’s ridiculous. Rita has this question. Why is it forbidden to take a photo outside the embassy overseas? Not everywhere. Well, I mean, it’s not laws that you can’t take photos. Their policy—the State Department’s Office of Diplomatic Security doesn’t allow photos because they can be used to case the embassy. So they have people on the roof, and they have people looking at the closed-circuit TVs, and they’ll run out and grab your camera. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Ted: Yes. Well, certainly, I’ve been to a lot of former Soviet Republics; you can’t take any pictures or in any authoritarian state; you can’t take any pictures of any public buildings at all. In Turkmenistan, I got into trouble taking a picture of a post office.

John: Well, I got in trouble in Saudi Arabia one time taking a picture of a sunset that just happened to have the Ministry of Interior off in the distance to the left. Did they try to take your camera? They did. Yeah. And I stood my ground, and it was a standoff for a half hour, but they finally backed down when I pulled out the black passport. I bet they did. Yeah. I bet they did. And I genuinely was not—I don’t care what the Interior Ministry looks like. I was genuinely taking a picture of a desert sunset. Yeah. No. I believe you.

Ted: Alright. So let’s talk—should we talk about Trump? He’s in Scotland. His mom is born and raised in Scotland.

John: Yeah. But how incredibly rude is it and what a gigantic violation of protocol that he goes to Scotland and then summons Keir Starmer to fly to Scotland to greet him. It’s like, come here, dog. The ball—and Starmer did. He got on a plane and he went. I was crazy. Yeah. Well—yeah. Shocked by it. Yeah. So, yeah, it’s interesting. Why do you think there are so many people in Scotland who are protesting him over Epstein? I mean, he’s got all—people are lined up along the side of the road everywhere Trump goes saying that, you know, calling him a pedophile and saying that he’s—why do they care about the Epstein files? I don’t think they do. I think this is just an easy swipe that they can take at him. They protest him every time he goes to his golf club in Scotland. And I think this Epstein thing has made it so easy to criticize him. I mean, here we are weeks into it, and there is still zero White House strategy with over how to deal with this. And then today, when he—well, they played for time by shutting down Congress early. That’s exactly what it was. They played for time by shutting down Congress until September. But also—not going to work. No. It’s not going to work. And—and then—it’s just like the countdown at the front at the beginning of our show. We’re just watching that countdown. They’re just waiting. Yeah. It’s like waiting for this stupid statement that, you know, are you going to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? And he says, well, I have the power to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell. It’s like, oh my god. Like, have you learned nothing over the last two weeks? That’s exactly what you shouldn’t say in response to a question.

Ted: Why not?

John: Because Ghislaine Maxwell is a convicted pedophile serving twenty years in prison. His base is more anti-pedophile than any other presidency in American history. And what does he gain by pardoning a convicted pedophile?

Ted: I think I know the answer to that question. Which is that he—it’ll look like he’s being transparent. I’m pardoning her. Well, one of two things. Right? I think he’s trying to figure out what to do. Right? But if he pardons her, maybe he pardons her in exchange for a gag order. Like, she agrees to shut the fuck up. Otherwise, she’s going to have a drone up her ass one day. Or—and it also—it fits in with his narrative. Right? There’s nothing to see here. There’s nothing in the files. There was no—there was nothing in there. Therefore, she never should’ve—people have asked—she’s never been—should then she should—she’s never have been convicted. Right? And it’s like, yes. She never should have been convicted. So it plays into that narrative. Right? It’s like—yeah. It keeps your story straight as well; I mean, it’s a crooked story, but as straight as you can possibly keep it. I think that’s what he’s thinking.

John: That could be it. I would say his thinking is incorrect, but that could very well be it. Yeah. Bothers me very much.

Ted: Well, I mean—and then the other—the other approach could be to say, hey, I’ll let her go, and that’s part of my transparency operation. Maybe she doesn’t have much to say, at least not about me or anyone I care about much. And that will show that I didn’t—that we didn’t have—we, the establishment, have—didn’t have Jeffrey killed and Maxwell buried in prison. Like, we’re letting her run around. She can go be on The View, whatever she wants to do. And I’m going to show, like, I didn’t do anything wrong. I have nothing to fear. Yes. I think that’s—he’s toying with those two possibilities. That’s a good thought. And he likes to—and another thing is he likes to blab because it’s—I think it’s part of his test marketing. He likes to dip his toe in the water. He raises the flag to see if anyone salutes. Right? This is like, let’s see how people react. If people freak out and say, like, what the fuck are you talking about? You can’t pardon her. Then it’s like, you know? I never said that. I would have never done that. Which is a very common thing that the White House does. I mean, every president does this. You release this rumor just to see what the response is going to be to the rumor.

John: So it—that could be it? That could be it? Let’s—I want to answer Golar’s question. That’s a good question right there. If they—if they release the only person charged—well, someone else was charged too, but he died. Then where’s the justice for the victims? Well, that’s the whole point is, then there’s no vic—there are—there were no victims really, and the only person who is responsible has died. And because there were no victims, then we release the only person charged. I mean, I don’t believe in any of this. But—and Trump mentioned Larry Summers today? I missed that. That’s Larry Summers, former president of Harvard, who thinks that women don’t know math. Yeah. And former Secretary of the Treasury and current douchebag on top of it. Negative. Negative douche. Everybody who’s ever met Larry Summers says he’s one of the most awful human beings they’ve ever encountered. Yeah. Yeah. I’ve heard similar things. Well, I—I heard the other day that John Kerry was somehow involved as well, which doesn’t surprise me one iota.

Ted: Really?

John: No. No. There’s—yeah. Listen. I worked for Kerry for two and a half years closely—closely with Kerry. Kerry’s a scumbag, and he’s a fake progressive. There’s nothing—literally nothing progressive about him at all. And then he’ll do just stupid shit after stupid shit. Like, for example, I’ve been working for him for a year, and he bought a yacht. And it wasn’t just a yacht. It was like an ocean-going ship. Right? And the sales tax on it—or not the sales tax, but the mooring tax on it—was $6,000,000 in Massachusetts. So he registered it in Rhode Island, which doesn’t have a mooring tax. And what he did—he has a big house on Beacon Hill in Boston. He’s got a giant ski lodge in Idaho. He’s got 120 acres in Western Pennsylvania. He’s got houses all over—a house in Georgetown. So he bought a—he bought a wife. Well, no. He’s got as much money as she does.

Ted: Oh, is that true? Oh, yeah. Yeah. He’s—he was little Heinz is from the Heinz ketchup. Yeah. John Heinz’s wife. She’s lovely, by the way.

John: Yeah. So Kerry bought this little tiny condo in Rhode Island so he can have a Rhode Island address and save $6,000,000 by docking his ocean-going ship there. And then there was this uprising, and even staff members—we went to the chief of staff, really good guy who’s actually a member of the Kennedy family. And we said, David, this is a really bad look. You know, we’re supposed to represent him. And we’re out there, and people are bashing us over this over this failure to pay the mooring tax. And eventually, Kerry moved the ship back to Massachusetts and paid the 6,000,000. So disappointing. Do you want to answer Reid’s question? I missed Reid’s question. You got it there? Oh, oh, oh, oh, what mister Kiriakou, why don’t you—thank you. Oh, that—that actually is cool. So so Reid, a couple of nights a week—or so before I left for prison, I was at my wit’s end trying to save myself. So I wrote him an email to his private personal email address, and I said—well, by then, he was Secretary of State. So I said, Mister Secretary, I’m begging you to help me. Please ask the president if he’ll commute my sentence. The conviction would still stand, but I could work and earn money for my family and keep my family together and put food on the table. And he waited two or three days, and then he wrote back. And all the email said was, please do not ever attempt to contact me again. And that was the last time I heard from him.

Ted: That is cold. Yeah. I’m sorry, John. That’s brutal.

John: It was awful. It really was. And no—no explanation. No reason. That was it. Please do not ever attempt to contact me again. Wow. Mmm. Is Mike Baker a real ex-CIA agent? You have a minute? So I replaced—we’ve got time. I replaced Mike in Athens. And Mike’s a good guy. He was a legit counterterrorism case officer, operations officer. And he did something that was really, really—like, really stupid. He and another colleague of ours were doing surveillance on a terrorism suspect. And you know, the best security in the world is probably old Greek ladies peering through their drapes from their houses. And this old Greek lady kept seeing these two men sitting in a van day after day after day, so she calls the cops. And the cops come and surround the van. Right? Mike and his pal can’t get out. Oops. They finally open the door. The cops pull Mike and the other guy out. And inside the van, they have like three different changes of disguise each. They have like six different ID cards, all from different countries and in different names. And so they use their get-out-of-jail-free card and said, call my boss in this certain section of the embassy. They were expelled from Greece. And then Mike—when Mike went back to headquarters, he was called into the Director of Counterterrorism Center’s office, and Mike was kinda bragging to people that he was gonna get an operation for standing up to the Greeks like that. And instead, they told him, we want your resignation by the end of the day, and that was the end of Mike. Yeah. I ended up working with his wife for several years afterwards, but yeah, Mike was the real deal. He just made a really stupid mistake, and he paid for it with his career. The thing about Mike too—you know, Mike was a good-looking guy. I guess he’s still a good-looking guy. No. This is well before COVID.

He was a good-looking guy, so he went into male modeling. And he made a couple hundred—couple thousand bucks, you know, modeling, whatever. And then he tried to get his own show at Fox News, and it just didn’t work. He ended up pairing up with a KGB officer and opening a security consulting firm in London. I remember they did security for Madonna’s wedding to Guy Ritchie. But Mike never really made money like he thought he was going to, and he never went back to the agency. Got you.

Ted: John, let’s talk about ICE. It’s in four minutes; it’ll be 6:00 Eastern time here in New York City. A major protest is scheduled at that time in City Hall Park in Lower Manhattan. ICE is bringing the big show from LA to New York. They’re going to be flooding the zone according to the Department of Homeland Security. They’re bringing in their military hardware. They’re going to be grabbing and snatching as many brown-skinned people as they possibly can.

John: The Washington Post told people, stay out, stay out of the area. It’s going to be hell. Yep. And yeah. And I have several friends who are like, oh, should I tell my friends not to go outside?

Ted: I’m like, yeah. Tell them to take the couple—take the week off from work. You know? So it’s going to be ugly. It’s—you know, most of this activity is going to be happening out in the outer boroughs and Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn, where they have a much bigger minority population. You know, I’m reminded of that quote from Casablanca where Humphrey Bogart advises the Nazi major—you know, not that probably it wouldn’t be good to invade certain neighborhoods in New York. ICE is getting ready to invade certain neighborhoods in New York. I have a feeling they’re going to find it about as spicy as they found it out in LA. The locals don’t like it. We don’t like it here. And it—I mean, I wouldn’t be surprised if there were clashes this week. The New York Times said this afternoon too that the level of raids that are expected in New York will dwarf the raids that we saw in Los Angeles.

John: Wow. This is—this is big. It’s just going to be very big, and we should probably expect to see some violence. I would think so.

Ted: And you know, I should remind people that here in New York City, you know, due to the Supreme Court ruling, this used to be a city where it was illegal to own a handgun unless you were a celebrity. That’s not true anymore. You can legally go out to Tennessee, buy a gun, bring it back. Hell, go to Long Island and buy a gun. And then—people just cross the border into Vermont and buy a gun. It’s really easy. I’m not encouraging it, but I mean, I do think it’s likelier than not. I mean—I should point out it’s also been a long, hot summer. We’re now in the fifth consecutive week of over 90 temperatures. It’s been a nonstop heat wave with no end in sight. We have heat index values of over 100 degrees every single day. My—I’ve got my AC going twenty-four seven. Someone asked if I had AC going for my cat. Yeah. But mainly for me, you know, it’s—it—but it’s like—yeah. My cat’s a Russian Blue, so he doesn’t really like the hot weather. But it’s definitely—it’s horrible. So—and I think there’s also going to be a lot of resistance. There’s organized resistance here. Yeah. You know, advocates for—for—for—and I think a lot of non-immigrants, non-migrants will help their migrant fellow New Yorkers. I mean, I would. It’s against the law, but I would. I would. Yeah. There’s no choice. You morally, I feel like I have to. John, did you hear about the case about this 82-year-old IRA veteran?

John: Yes. Oh my god. So what the fuck?

Ted: So—oh my god. This dude is 82 years old. He was convicted back in 1983 of trying to buy rockets to attack in New York because, you know, in New York in the eighties was a wild time. You could hang out at Studio 54 and buy rockets to attack the Brits. I’m sure it was probably just a fucking usual FBI entrapment sting operation. Yeah. But anyway, the point is he was trying to buy it. He was the leader of this thing. And then the Good Friday Accords came. And as part of the Good Friday Accords, all these charges were dropped. He was released from prison. He was given a green card allowed to stay in the United States. Anyway, the Trump administration just sent him a deportation notice. They said, you got to get the fuck out. He’s 82 years old, hasn’t committed a crime at all since 1983. And he’s got all sorts of heart problems, and he’s on Medicaid and everything else you can imagine. Yep. And he needs that. I mean, I guess Ireland has national healthcare. He’ll be fine. Yeah. But, I mean, they want to kick him back to Ireland, and he’s like, fuck you. Alright. Whatever. But, I mean, what’s going on, John? Is this just—like—are these letters being auto-generated for everybody who’s got a criminal record?

John: No. They must be. They must be because otherwise, I don’t understand the strategy here. If you want to raid all of the restaurants in New York City and grab the sous-chefs and the dishwashers, that’s one thing. But if you’re—if you’re expelling a Chilean torture victim, which was what they did last week, and an Irish freedom fighter for all intents and purposes, then who’s making that decision? I can’t imagine that they’re sitting around a table, you know, some conference room table in Washington with a stack of files saying yes, no, yes, no about who they expel. This has to be computer-generated. There has to be, like, this giant computer-generated list of everybody who’s ever been accused of a crime and is here on a green card, and then they’re being expelled. I just—otherwise, I don’t understand it. Yeah. And Houdini makes a point there too. This way they can say, oh, we’re not just expelling brown people. There have been white guys too. Yeah. Right. But, I mean, 82 years old. Yeah. 82 years old. Like, he’s a real threat to our society.

Ted: Yeah. Well, maybe, you know, they say it. It’s like when they turn 83 is when people get really crazy. Never know what—never know what they might do. Yeah. Crazy. Well—so—I don’t know. Alright. So I guess we’ll—we’ll watch that. We’ll know more about it later in the week when we have our—we’re here Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM Eastern. And I’m trying to think, is there anything else that we missed here? Not really. Right? I mean, I—I’m a little scared. The ICE-ing weekends are slow, but there was a lot to talk about today being a Monday. Yeah. For sure. There’s a lot. It’s going to be—it’s going to be a busy and very hot summer.

John: Yeah. Yeah. Always. So, let’s see. Let’s put—oh, let’s put—let’s put this up. This is kinda cool. Thank you for the $10 donation. Much appreciated. The German chancellor announced an air bridge to Gaza today.

Ted: What’s an air bridge?

John: But stress the importance of Germany’s friendship with Israel and the need to remember October. Who can fucking forget the October seventh attacks? People just—they don’t stop talking about it. I mean—an air bridge is a direct path into another country’s airspace where you’re guaranteed safety. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Like, they’re in an air bridge. Cyprus to Gaza, and the Israeli Air Force won’t shoot you down. That’s an air bridge. Right. What we need is a bridge bridge.

Ted: What we need is an open border. That’s right. I mean—that’s right. Obviously. That’s right. Alright. Well, I guess we are going to declare ourselves sufficiently deprogrammed for today. Thanks, everybody. Thanks always for joining us. Much appreciated. Please like, follow, and share the show. Seriously, please do. If you’re not already doing it, it just takes a second of your time, and it really makes a huge difference. And we really are super moved by John and I talk about this by the incredible participation in the chats and just the enthusiasm. You guys are amazing. Lovely. Thank you for these smart, well-informed, relevant questions. It really keeps things going. Thank you for that. Hear hear. And so, please, check us out here on our various websites and stuff, but we’ll see you Wednesday, 5 PM Eastern time. Same bat station, same bat time. Take care. And if you’re undocumented, get documented. And if you can’t get documented, hide.

 

Israel No Longer Has a Right to Exist

In certain traditional societies, troublesome individuals who were perceived as threats to communal harmony were labeled as “witches.” To restore calm, accused witches were sometimes reintegrated into society via a ceremony of ritual cleansing. Other problematic people, particularly those whose socially unacceptable behavior persisted, were banished or killed.

As a political entity, Israel is a witch. Its conduct is incompatible with 21st century civilization.

To whatever extent it ever had one, Israel no longer has a right to exist.

The Netanyahu government’s cynical exploitation of Hamas’s October 7, 2023 raid is the last straw. With gleeful bloodlust that appears to have no limits, Israel has intentionally slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent Palestinians. It has reduced a bustling territory filled with high-rises and seaside resorts to rubble. It has cruelly imposed a blockade of fuel, water and food that has resulted in outbreaks of long-vanquished diseases like polio and meningitis. It has created a man-made famine a few miles away from where Israelis gather at LGBTQ-friendly restaurants to eat rich meals and drink sweet wine fermented from grapes cultivated on the soil of occupied land.

The argument that Israel, or any other nation-state, enjoys an inherent “right to exist” has always been absurd. From ancient empires like Parthia to 20th-century constructs like Czechoslovakia, countries exist so long as they are able to establish and defend their borders. When they cannot, they vanish.

Sometimes a country becomes so troublesome to its neighbors that the global community determines that it, like an alleged witch, must be excised to achieve calm. Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany’s voracious expansionism were so disruptive that rivals with economic and political systems that were diametrically opposed to the point of recently having clashed militarily, including the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., formed alliances in order to destroy them. The Napoleonic Wars united powers with conflicting interests, such as Britain (a constitutional monarchy), Russia (an autocratic empire), Austria and Prussia because the defeat of Napoleon was seen as essential to curb France’s disruptive dominance and restore regional order.

Governments often act without their people’s blessing. That is true of the stateless noncitizens of Gaza. Hamas has not held an election longer than most Gazans have been alive.

If the government of Israel did not represent the will of its people, Israel the country could be forgiven. Israel, however, is a democracy. Netanyahu, a right-wing extremist, has been prime minister for 16 years over multiple terms, making him Israel’s longest-serving leader. His brutal treatment of the Palestinians in Israeli-occupied Gaza and the West Bank is popular with voters.  A June 2025 poll found that 76.5% of Israeli Jews “think that Israel should not take the civilian population’s suffering into account at all, or should only do so to a fairly small extent” in military planning. “Despite the desperate humanitarian crisis, a survey conducted in May by the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University found that 64.5% of the Israeli public was not at all, or not very, concerned about the humanitarian situation in Gaza,” reports The New York Times.

Considering that the Israeli public supports the genocide in Gaza, the fact that IDF spokesmen dismiss media photos of starving, skeletal Palestinian children as “fake” is cause for a kind of optimism. When Netanyahu says “there is no starvation in Gaza,” at least he’s aware enough of international opinion that he feels compelled to lie.

You hear about demonstrations in Tel Aviv against Netanyahu. But those protests do not agitate against the genocide of Palestinians. Israel’s few leftists, who march against Netanyahu and the war, focus on the twenty or so remaining hostages held by Hamas, and the suffering of Israeli soldiers.

It is easy for culturally isolated Israelis, whose official language of Hebrew is spoken nowhere else on earth, to ignore their country’s war crimes. “The mainstream domestic news media has rarely provided vivid coverage of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza,” notes The Times. The last surviving relic of British imperialism, Israel is an apartheid state that repeatedly ignores resolutions passed by the United Nations which it uniquely owes for its creation and brushes off negative public opinion in the United States upon which it is dependent for its economic, military and diplomatic survival. Like Germany in the 1930s and 1940s, it has normalized lawlessness, dehumanized and murdered people to steal their land, and committed itself to aggressive military expansion with no end in sight.

Israel is a terminally ill society.

It is cruel.

It is heartless.

Unlike Germany, which was decimated at the end of World War II, accepted defeat and cleansed itself via decades of atonement for Nazism, Israel is unlikely to be militarily crushed or spiritually reborn. It has little prospect of rehabilitation.

Israel is dangerous. In the last few months alone, Israel has bombed Iran, bombed and carried out the indiscriminate pager bombings in Lebanon, further emboldened murders of Palestinian civilians by fascist “settlers” in the West Bank, and overthrown the government of Syria, where it inexplicably installed a radical ex-Al Qaeda jihadi to replace a secular leader—and then bombed Syria again. Even by the standards of the Middle East, no other player is as destabilizing or violent as Israel. How long will it be before Netanyahu or his successor uses one of Israel’s illicit nuclear weapons?

The state of Israel is a troublesome witch. It has to go.

Let’s be clear. Abolishing Israel—ensuring that, from the river to the sea, Palestine is free—does not imply or necessitate the removal of any of its residents. Jews, Arabs, Christians and other groups lived peacefully side-by-side in Ottoman-era Palestine. The German people survived the end of Hitler and are thriving today. The Soviet people survived the 1991 collapse. So it will be for the people of the nation-state that ought to become the former State of Israel sooner rather than later.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “Never Mind the Democrats. Here’s WHAT’S LEFT.” Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com. He is co-host of the podcast “DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou.”)

Transcript: TMI Show – “ICE vs. NYC” – Monday, July 28, 2025

Ted Rall: Good morning. I’m Ted Rall, and over there is Robby West, filling in for Manila Chan, who’s off spelunking. You’re watching the TMI Show, the Ted Manila Information Show, for Monday, July 28, 2025. Thank you so much for joining us.

Robby West: Good to have you, Ted. I just want to give a big shout-out and thank you to the people over on YouTube. We hit monetization over there on Saturday.

Ted Rall: Woo-hoo! It’s been a long time coming.

Robby West: We came through. My wife, I am pleased to announce, was the one-thousandth subscriber to the TMI Show.

Ted Rall: Really? Was that intentional, or was that a coincidence?

Robby West: Oh, it was 100% intentional. I said, “Hey, you need to do this.” Being the nice wife that she is, she actually subscribed. The very first show that popped up for her was the story we did about a whites-only community in Arkansas, which, my wife being Black, she thought was kind of, what’s the word, crazy.

Ted Rall: The story we did or them doing it?

Robby West: A little bit of both. She was just like, “What are y’all doing? This is crazy.” Keep in mind, we live in Montana, which is probably the whitest state in the entire country.

Oh, it is. We’ve got some Native Americans scattered in, but for the most part, it’s pasty white like me. I think a lot of that has to do with winter being here nine months out of the year. But, you know, it is what it is.

Ted Rall: There’s definitely some history there. Everyone, thank you so much for joining us. Please like, follow, and share the show. We again thank you for the monetization, but it’s just the beginning. It literally starts out with pennies.

Yep, and then it moves on to single-digit dollars. On YouTube, you don’t start to see real money until you get 10,000 or more subscribers. We’re at a thousand. We’re like a baby show, but we’ve been doing this for the better part of a year, ever since we got banned by the sanctions from our last gig. It is what it is, but here we are. Let’s get right into the headlines. There’s, as always, a lot to talk about.

Ted Rall: New York City is about to face a huge influx of ICE raids and agents. They’re going to flood the zone, according to DHS. Protesters are gearing up, so we’re anticipating a clash like we saw in LA between Angelenos and ICE, but here in New York. There are protests scheduled for today, both in the middle of the day and this evening after work. I think things are going to heat up, really, in the outer boroughs. It’s not about where the official protests are going to happen.

Robby West: Robby and I will talk about that. We might even disagree. There might be some disagreement. You never know.

Ted Rall: The Trump administration is deporting an old IRA veteran who’s been living peacefully here in the US for over thirty-five or forty years. He’s a great-grandfather, but Trump’s decided that now he’s a terrorist, even though all had been forgiven, and there’s peace in Northern Ireland. They’re going to deport his sick old self back to Ireland. Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to a ceasefire. We’re going to talk about what that means and what was the role of Trump’s tariffs in this border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia. It’s so strange. Finally, this would have been a Manila topic, but I’m curious to see what you have to say about the way people manage their time. There are people like me who are really obsessive about finishing a task. I can’t be interrupted. You can’t talk to me while I’m working on it. Then there are people like my mom, who was a teacher and could be writing something while three students were talking to her at the same time. She was the ultimate multitasker. There’s a new study out talking about what they call monochronic and polychronic people. You might want to look that up if you’re interested. That’s our show, so let’s get to it.

Robby West: Imagine that we had jaws.

Ted Rall: First, it was LA versus ICE. Now it’s NYC versus ICE. The Trump administration announced that ICE agents are about to flood New York City to crack down on undocumented immigrants. Over the weekend, protests took place across the United States over Trump’s immigration policies and Trump’s one big beautiful bill. Under the one big beautiful bill, ICE will become the biggest military or police force in the United States. I’d say paramilitary because that’s really what they are. Demonstrators say they believe the bill will hurt working-class families of all races and are calling for the whole thing to be repealed, which is not likely to happen. The protests are happening after Attorney General Pam Bondi announced last week that the DOJ, the Department of Justice, is suing New York City and Mayor Eric Adams over sanctuary laws.

Just to bring this back a little bit, a year ago, Eric Adams was facing federal corruption charges because he is corrupt. The Trump administration said, “We will make those charges go away if you agree to cooperate with ICE and not enforce your sanctuary city laws.” Adams said, “No problem. Come in and take any brown people you want away, but not me because I’m brown.” They did that, but now, even so, Trump is still suing him because now he wants the unenforced law to go away as well as the enforcement. The lawsuit is alleging that the city’s sanctuary policies are still interfering with the enforcement of federal immigration law. It should be pointed out that last week, an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer was essentially assassinated in Upper Manhattan. Another protest is scheduled for 6 PM at City Hall Park in Lower Manhattan tonight. Humphrey Bogart’s line to a Nazi officer in Casablanca comes to mind: “There are certain sections of New York, Major, that I wouldn’t advise you to try to invade.” Robby, here’s the deal. It’s always hard to anticipate protests or how intense they will be or not be. This could all fizzle easily. But my gut tells me this won’t fizzle. ICE is coming to the nation’s most liberal city, with 11% Republicans, as we were talking about before the show. They’re going to go to the outer boroughs—Brooklyn, Bronx, and Queens—that have tons of immigrants, many of them undocumented, and some green card holders as well. For the most part, these are big minority communities. They’re going to come in there, and those neighborhoods are very protective of themselves. They’re going to get some support from leftist, full-fledged US citizens. I think it would not be shocking—in fact, it’ll be shocking if there are not violent clashes between ICE and New Yorkers in the coming week.

Robby West: I’m sure you’re right. To my detriment, I’ve never been to New York. I’ve never been to LA. Just a couple of questions because you’ve been to both. You live in New York right now. Which city seems to be feistier? Which one has the more volatile population? If it comes down to brass tacks, which population is more likely to stand up and actually fight, LA or New York?

Ted Rall: I spent a lot of time in LA too. I’ve lived in LA, not as much as New York. I know New York a lot better, but I’ve worked in LA. I was at the LA Times. I was at KFI radio in LA. I would rate them about equal. They’re both equally feisty. New Yorkers really don’t like nonsense. In both cases, we tend to view things on a very personal level. When you live in close contact, elbow to elbow on the subway, in a city of eight million people, more so than Angelenos. Los Angeles is a city of neighborhoods where it’s grids separated by big boulevards. Inside those grids are very individual neighborhoods that are like a city within a city, and those people feel a bond to one another. New York also has neighborhoods and ethnic enclaves, but our affiliations are like, if you’re a fellow New Yorker, I tend to feel bonded to you regardless of your race if you’re in trouble, just because it’s such a hard, expensive city to live in. It doesn’t always mean we stick together.

Robby West: Here’s the interesting part about this that I don’t understand about your city. Mamdani ran and won primarily because of the cost of living in New York, specifically rents and wages not keeping up. He ran on economic populism. So how can you, on one hand, say you’re being priced out of the city, which is true, that your wages are not sufficient, which is true, and that the rents are screwing you, which is true, while at the same time, go to war for a demographic of people that’s directly responsible for higher rents, lower wages, and pricing out of the city? You said New Yorkers famously don’t tolerate bullshit. Isn’t that the definition of bullshit? You want people to stand up and fight to protect the same people who are screwing them.

Ted Rall: Robby, as you know, we’ve talked about immigration, and I agree with you that the law of supply and demand indicates that the more workers you have coming into the country, the more it has a downward effect on wages overall for everybody. In a city like New York, though, it doesn’t feel like your job prospects are being harmed by immigration. Let me explain why. First of all, there’s no place in the country that’s easier to find work. There’s always a job—maybe not a good job, but there’s always work. That’s why people live in cities—it’s easier to find work.

Robby West: Sure, you have work, but do you have a living wage? For example, I could go to Alabama and work on a cotton field because I’ve done that. Finding work’s not the problem. The problem is finding a job that will pay me a wage so I can provide for my family. If I’m competing against the entire third world, how can I do that?

Ted Rall: That’s the issue. Everybody’s experience is unique to themselves in New York and everywhere else. My general sense is that if you’re looking for work here, you can probably find a job that, by national standards, pays well. It’s not hard to find a $20 or $25 an hour job in New York City—almost anyone can, without a fancy degree. Psychologically, most New Yorkers don’t view Mexicans or other immigrants as hurting their job prospects. They’re taking entry-level jobs, like in the kitchen of a restaurant, that most white New Yorkers, for example, wouldn’t want anyway. There’s also the sense that, even in New York City, I ought to be able to earn $25 an hour and pay my rent. Those wages aren’t really that unreasonable. The rents are unreasonable. I’m paying $5,100 a month in rent—that’s ridiculous. If you saw my apartment, you’d say, “Okay, Ted, that’s a nice apartment,” but be serious. If I said it’s a $2,000 a month apartment, you might say that seems about right, or maybe $2,500. The “rent is too damn high” resonates, whether it should or not, in New York.

There’s a sense of community here too. This is the traditional gateway to immigration in New York City. Everything about the city reminds us—we have the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor, Ellis Island is right here. We have tons of recent immigrants, people who barely speak English, but their kids all speak English, and we know them. Unlike a place like Montana, we see the immigrant experience every single day. I go to my falafel place and get a shawarma from a Palestinian guy who speaks English but also Arabic, and his kid is at Cornell, totally Americanized, skateboards, and everything. That’s the immigrant experience—we see it every day. If they were going to Rikers Island and picking up members of Tren de Aragua involved in violent crimes and deporting them back to Venezuela, no one would care. We have homegrown criminals; we don’t need to import them. But that’s not what’s happening here. When you’re going into a restaurant in Queens and rounding up a hardworking lady who’s just trying to make ends meet, it doesn’t seem right. The way ICE comports itself has a huge effect here. This is a city where you worry about crime. If you have random dudes with police jackets bought on eBay, driving around in vans, wearing masks and balaclavas in 95-degree heat, kidnapping people without identifying themselves, they’re going to get a reaction.

Robby West: Of course. I don’t support what ICE is doing, but I oppose the way they’re doing it. A police force is not an army.

Ted Rall: It’s not a police force either. It’s a paramilitary force, the kind of thing the United States hasn’t traditionally had. The KKK would’ve been an example of a paramilitary force—vigilantes. This is the kind of thing you see in third-world dictatorships, where you’re crossing a border, and some guy’s like, “Let me see your passport.” I’m like, “Who are you? You’re not wearing a uniform, you have no official status, you just have a shitty grin.” That’s not getting you anywhere with me.

Robby West: I agree. I support the mission ICE has, but I oppose the way they’re doing it. They should be able to go in, wear a uniform, identify themselves, say, “This is who I am, this is why I’m here, you’re here illegally, I’m sending you home,” and they should have just cause.

Ted Rall: Just cause is that if someone’s here illegally, that’s it. You can’t just approach someone and say, “Oh, you have brown skin, prove you’re an American.” We don’t have an ID law in this country. Well, we’re about to deport an old white Irishman, so let’s drop the race card because that doesn’t really fly. We know the raids have mostly been about profiling, not about specific evidence like, “Robby El Westo is here illegally, reported by his wife who doesn’t like him anymore, let’s go check him out.” That’s okay—they’re following the law. But how they do it matters. They should start with the baddies first.

Robby West: Here’s why they’re not going to—because the prison complex gets paid by having that body in that cell. Let’s pretend that’s not going to happen because it’s not. Another question, Ted, showing my ignorance here—I’ve never been to your city. In South Texas, with its high Mexican population, they turned out in overwhelming numbers to support Trump because those legal Mexicans oppose illegal immigration because it’s driving down their wages. Are you seeing that same effect in New York? Are the legal immigrants happy about these mass deportations because it’s going to increase the money in their wallets?

Ted Rall: It’s a mixed bag. There’s always a tendency for older legal immigrants to pull up the ladder into the treehouse and say, “We got ours, and we don’t want to share now.” There’s definitely some of that. Most people who are legal immigrants in the United States did not come here legally. Most overstayed visas, had fake green card marriages—nobody came here really legally. The people who came across the Bering Strait didn’t come here legally. The people who came to Ellis Island showed up without a visa because they wanted workers and paid them nothing. It was just like what happened with Biden.

Robby West: But here’s the big difference. With Biden, you come across the border, and it was legal. Non-enforcement does not make it legal. A president is not a king. A president cannot repeal law; he can choose not to enforce it. He can say, “Come in, wait here, we’ll process you later.” Then a new president comes in and says, “You’re going home now, your time is up.” Of all Trump’s many flaws—and there are many—I’m not a Trump supporter. I’m a right-winger, but I’m not a Trumpie. I fully support Trump on his mission of deporting illegal immigrants, full stop.

Ted Rall: We have a viewer question worth talking about. Backside of Nowhere says, “I’d really like to know why ICE isn’t busting employers of the undocumented.” Because they’re bribed. There was a really interesting piece in yesterday’s New York Times about a company, I think in Kansas, that hired a lot of undocumented workers and was trying not to. They subscribed to E-Verify, which checks if someone is authorized to work in the United States. This company was like, “We did everything, we don’t want to hire illegals, we used E-Verify.” But a lot of illegal immigrants have fake IDs or stolen IDs—identity theft. ICE came and arrested a bunch of their employees, and it almost destroyed their business entirely. They asked the federal government, “What should we do to avoid this happening again?” They were told, “Just keep using E-Verify.” Even businessmen trying to do the right thing and follow the law aren’t being helped by the government to figure out a system that works. If there was no demand, there would be no issue.

Robby West: One of the reasons this is such a major issue is that both political parties are guilty. Reagan granted amnesty in the eighties with the promise from Congress that they would secure the border—it never happened. Republicans want cheap labor, Democrats want votes. The ultimate loser, as Larry was talking about last week on our show about economics, is the American worker because immigration deflates wages, while inflation drives up the cost of living. Neither political party cares, and that’s where you get a Donald Trump. If Donald Trump fails, mark my words, it’s going to get violent. I don’t want that to happen, but it will.

Ted Rall: Speaking of violence, I want to issue this warning: the federal government should not come to New York this way. Come correct, or don’t come at all. Don’t come here with ICE, with armored personnel carriers and goon squads. New York doesn’t play. We’re not going to tolerate it.

Robby West: It fizzled out in LA—what makes New York different?

Ted Rall: It’ll probably fizzle out here too, eventually, because getting tear-gassed is no fun, and we don’t have an organized left to keep it going. But it’s going to be ugly optics.

Ted Rall: The president seems really interested in provoking visuals that he thinks will play to his base—sending in the goon squad into sanctuary cities like LA and New York, showing liberal protesters with their signs running away from tear gas. He doesn’t care about the support of New York and LA, which he doesn’t have anyway. Is this really playing with the right-wing base? Polls show Trump is losing ground and is underwater now on the immigration issue, which was a super strong issue for him. If he’s perceived as kicking ass and deporting like crazy, why is he losing ground there?

Robby West: With the Trump cultists, sure, they’ll cheer it—they’ll get the Benny Johnsons and those types. But people on the right, like me, on the populist right, understand what this is. This is Trump trying to deflect from Epstein. He’s trying to change the conversation. It’s not just him keeping a campaign promise. He’s only deporting a third as many as Obama did, but there were no optics. Obama didn’t send goon squads to major cities; he went to places like Arkansas to a chicken plant nobody sees. This is all theater. I’m telling the people on the right, this is a distraction. Trump’s had a really bad couple of weeks—there’s a major split, probably a civil war, in his base. Yesterday or Friday, when John Kiriakou was on Redacted with Thomas Massie, that’s the split right there. That’s what has Trump doing this—he’s trying to change the conversation.

Ted Rall: I’m not sure this is that, but if it’s playing that way, in politics, perception is reality. I

Robby West: f I were President West and my campaign promise was to round up every single illegal migrant, I wouldn’t send in an army to do it because it’ll just drive people underground and cause a problem. I would make the economic case. I’d address the country: “The reason why your wages suck is the same reason why sand is cheap. The dignity of labor no longer exists. Your work is not worth what it should be. Meanwhile, our government is $37 trillion in debt, and we’re paying for it by printing more dollars that further devalue every dollar in your pocket. So I’m hurting you two different ways.”

Ted Rall: Let’s talk about that IRA veteran. The Trump administration is deporting an 82-year-old former leader of the Irish Republican Army, who has lived peacefully since the end of the resistance against the British occupation of Northern Ireland. Gabriel Megahey, 82 years old, lived in New York City for decades after Northern Ireland gave up its fight for freedom. A June 20 letter from the Department of Homeland Security warned that his parole was being terminated thirty years after he and other IRA members were allowed to stay here in the USA. The Belfast native was convicted in 1983 in Brooklyn federal court for conspiring to buy missiles to shoot down British helicopters amid the violent clashes in Northern Ireland known as The Troubles. At the time, the feds considered him the officer commanding of America and Canada for the IRA. Megahey, known by the nickname “Skinny Legs”—you don’t get to choose your nickname—was described by then-US Attorney as the most culpable of these defendants, part of a network of men who sought to use this country as a base for terrorist activities.

Megahey, who first moved to Jackson Heights, Queens, in 1975, insisted at his sentencing, “No one wants peace more than us.” He got out of prison in 1988. Megahey and four other IRA members were allowed to remain in the US as part of the Good Friday Accord, the April 1998 agreement that ended decades of violence in Ireland. Now a grandfather of 14 and great-grandfather of five, who moved to Delaware in 2019, he is reeling after DHS warned that he’ll be fined and criminally prosecuted if he stays in the US. The letter stated, “DHS is terminating your parole. Do not attempt to unlawfully remain in the United States. The federal government will find you. Please depart the United States immediately.” Megahey, who relies on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to pay for expensive medicine to treat his heart, faces the loss of benefits. He declined to comment but said he had no regrets: “I’d do it all again, but I wouldn’t get caught next time.”

Robby West: There’s something to be said for honesty, I guess. The way I see this is double jeopardy. He went in, did his time, and was allowed to stay. I’m a hardliner on immigration, but I also value civil liberties. He’s already been punished—what’s the point? He’s an old man. Some people try to find ancient Nazis, 102 or 103 years old—what’s the point? Just let him be.

Ted Rall: In the case of the Nazis, you could say they were free eighty more years than they deserved to be and don’t deserve to be free one day longer. But what about this guy? I completely agree with his cause. Northern Ireland should not be part of the UK—it should be part of Ireland. Anyone who looks at a map can see that. The IRA’s cause was just and noble, and the only problem is it came to an end because they lost. The war ended, the resistance lost, the oppressors won. The IRA didn’t kill Americans—they killed Brits. It was a resistance army. New York was very supportive of the IRA in the eighties. I remember going to IRA bars where they tithed a percentage of the profits to the IRA. I was laughing at the idea that this guy was trying to buy missiles in New York City—what was he thinking? It was a wild place in the eighties, but holy shit.

Robby West: If I were going to reconstitute the Confederate army, I wouldn’t go to New York City to do it. I’d try somewhere else—Pakistan’s a good spot. I smell a computer-generated letter. DHS went through everyone who’s ever been convicted of any crime and has a green card or served time, and they’re like, “We can technically revoke your parole.” They’re doing a sweep without taking individual cases into account. The dude’s 82—it’s basically a death sentence.

Ted Rall: Ireland has national healthcare—he’ll be fine, but it’s absurd.

Robby West: He’s already been punished. If you’re going to deport him, do it then, not now. He must not have gotten his citizenship, or this couldn’t happen. He’s a green card holder. I’m a hardliner on immigration, but the dude’s already been punished. Double jeopardy is called that for a reason. The government doesn’t have the right to take your property, life, or liberty after you’ve paid your debt to society. They don’t get to do that twice.

Ted Rall: Anamondo Rake says, “I don’t think this immigration show is for Epstein; Tulsi and the Russia show is for Epstein.”

\

Robby West: The Russia show—Americans have kind of lost the plot with it. They’re bored with it, to be honest. This is about catching headlines on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. It’s about showing American troops on the streets of an American city clashing with American citizens for the benefit of illegal immigrants. It’s all to generate headlines. He’s trying to change the conversation—it’s a distraction.

He needs to create that wedge. The fact that Cenk Uygur and I are agreeing on anything is absolutely insane. To make sure that agreement ends, he’s doing this. I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.

Ted Rall: By the way, completely out of left field, from the YouTube feed, Tony J says, “Civil fortitude is still pretty common,” and Backside replied, “Civil forfeiture should be unconstitutional.” Absolutely. Civil forfeiture is a multibillion-dollar-a-year business for American government agencies, mostly law enforcement. They sit on the side of the highway, wait for people to drive by with fancy cars they want to add to their police department, pull them over on a pretext, and if they find cash, they say, “You have a lot of cash, you must be involved in something illegal.” They impound your car and cash, never charge you, but keep the property. You have to go to court to get it back, and it often costs more to hire lawyers than it’s worth, so people walk away. It’s a disgusting practice. The US Supreme Court has expressed concern but hasn’t put an end to it, and they should. That is theft.

Robby West: Where’s Mamdani on all this with ICE coming to the city and immigration? Is he over the morning?

Ted Rall: We’ll hear from him. He’s going to be anti-ICE. Even anti-illegal immigration New Yorkers aren’t going to be into ICE acting the way they are. Only 1% of New Yorkers will defend ICE. If you show up and arrest someone who’s undocumented, fair and square, like a man, wearing a uniform, no mask, they’ll have more support or at least tolerance. That’s not how they’re doing it. Mamdani’s going to have to thread this needle carefully because the real estate interests are already up his ass over Israel and stuff. He’ll have to express concern, show support for the detainees, while not coming out as pro-illegal immigration because that’ll be a bad look. He’ll have to find a middle ground.

Robby West: Is there a middle ground? Either you support open borders or you don’t.

Ted Rall: There is a middle ground. You could say, “A nation-state should control its borders, but we have a history of not doing so for a long time. If people are already here, we don’t want to disrupt their lives and destroy families. If you can prove you’ve obeyed the law and done everything right, we’ll provide a path to citizenship, but we’ll start controlling the border today.” That’s a middle ground.

Robby West: If that’s the case, I advocate for deporting every single illegal immigrant to New York City. God be with you.

Ted Rall: At this point, we could probably use the population since so many people have left. Let’s get into this situation in Southeast Asia. Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in a breakthrough to resolve deadly border clashes that entered day five. According to the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Anwar Ibrahim, who chaired the talks as head of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional block, also known as ASEAN, both sides have reached a common understanding to take steps to return to normalcy. This is not a peace accord, just a ceasefire, with details to be worked out later. The Prime Minister of Cambodia, Hun Manet, and Thai acting Prime Minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, have agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire effective from midnight local time in Thailand and Cambodia on Tuesday. This border clash has been an ongoing controversy since the French drew the border in 1907. There’s a variance between the text of the original border agreement, which favors Thailand, and the map that goes with it, which favors Cambodia. Cambodia wants to go with the map, Thailand with the text. At issue are several thousand acres that include key Buddhist temples, so they’re fighting over religious stuff too. Trump threatened both countries with sky-high tariffs starting August 1 if they didn’t agree to a ceasefire. Cambodia has almost no trade with the United States, so they didn’t care. Thailand has a lot of trade with the United States, so they did care. Cambodia agreed because they’re the weaker side. Thailand’s fielding F-16s against Cambodia, which just has artillery. It’s a very poor country compared to Thailand. Everyone had a motive to come to the table.

Robby West: Cambodia is war-torn, landlocked, with no natural resources. It has good tourism—Angkor Wat is breathtakingly spectacular. Have you been there?

Ted Rall: I have. It’s stunning. It was very dangerous when I went. I went on a bus full of tourists, and the bus after mine was raided by Khmer Rouge fighters who killed everyone on board. It’s important to catch the right bus.

Robby West: Pol Pot was just a nut. Does the government control most of Cambodia’s territory now, or is it still lawless?

Ted Rall: The government is weak, but it’s not a failed state, and there’s no civil conflict now. The Khmer Rouge are finished. The Vietnamese finished them off.

Robby West: The Vietnamese don’t get credit. No Western country would take out the trash with the Killing Fields and genocide, so the Vietnamese did it, just four years after defeating the United States.

They kicked major ass. If you have a veteran army, you might as well use it before you lose that knowledge.

Ted Rall: Arguments about punctuality are common, but experts say they’re often about something else—the different ways we relate to time. Social scientists have worked for decades to understand our varying approaches to the clock. In the 1950s, anthropologist Edward Hall coined the terms monochronic and polychronic to describe different cultural attitudes toward time. In Northern Europe and the US, which Hall called monochronic societies, people emphasize deadlines and work sequentially, completing one task before moving to the next. In Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East, polychronic societies, people are more comfortable shifting gears in the middle of a task and less rigid about sticking to a schedule. In those countries, if you ask, “What time does the bus leave?” they might say, “Oh, 3:00,” but it could be 6:00, 7:00, or maybe not until tomorrow.

Hall’s insights have inspired generations of organizational theorists and management experts. While he originally made observations about societies, others have noted that people’s individual time-use styles vary within a society. Studies suggest that people are most creative, motivated, and productive when they can work in their preferred style, whether dipping in and out or focusing laser-like on a single task. Becoming aware of your own relationship to time can make your life easier and help you negotiate conflicts with those around you. One way to gauge your time value is to notice how you respond to interruptions. If you’re preparing a presentation and a colleague calls to talk, do you pick up and say you’re busy, or make time for what might be a twenty-minute conversation? If you’d send that call to voicemail, you’re likely monochronic, said Donna Ballard, a chronemics expert at the University of Texas at Austin. People who manage their time as a series of tasks to tick off a to-do list live by the clock and prioritize obligations over relationships during work hours. For someone like this, an interruption is almost by definition irritating, said Alan Bluedorn, professor of management at the University of Missouri and author of The Human Organization of Time. Polychronic people give primacy to experiences and relationships that don’t always fit into prearranged schedules. The other day, a cousin of Ms. Kelch was visiting from out of town, and although she had an assignment for work, she put it off for a day to go on a hike together. Not every deadline is truly urgent, she said. When interruptions come up that I feel are valuable enough, it makes me reprioritize.

Robby West: Monochronic here for sure. Especially when I’m working, as you know, I tend to have busy days. If I’m editing clips or making videos, that’s always when my wife comes in and says, “Hey, Robby, let’s talk, we need to connect on an emotional level.” It’s like, “No, we really don’t. I need to get this done.” I’m behind on the TMI Show, Deprogrammed, or DMZ—I’ve got stuff to do. She asks, “When are you going to be done?” I say, “1:00 in the morning. I have time for you between 1:00 AM and 1:30 AM.” That’s my day—that’s your window. My wife, as y’all know, is Black, and she runs on what’s called CPT—Colored People’s Time. 2:00 might mean 2:15, 2:30, or maybe 2:40, but never early.

Ted Rall: I’m familiar with Black People’s Time. When my mom and I visited the Caribbean for the first time, in Turks and Caicos, we arrived at the airport in Providenciales. A guy comes over and says, “Do you need a taxi?” We said, “Yes.” He says, “Wait here.” My mom’s like, “Where’s he going?” I said, “He’s going to see if he can find more people to take several groups at once in his van.” She’s like, “How long is it going to take?” I said, “Probably a while—it’s like herding cats.” She’s like, “Can’t we go now?” I’m like, “Do you know how to drive the van? Do you have the keys? We have to chill. You’re on island time. Enjoy the ocean breezes and relax because it’s not going to change anything.” It would help if there were Mai Tais. My

Robby West: wife is early if it’s something really important, like picking someone up from the airport—she’s always there early. She’s a medical coder, so she has deadlines and quotas. That’s great.

Ted Rall: My ex-wife was a chronic optimist. I’d say, “Meet me downtown at such-and-such time.” She’d show up late, and I’d ask, “What time did you leave?” She’d say, “Twenty minutes ago.” I’m like, “It’s a thirty-five-minute trip. Why did you leave in twenty minutes?” She’d say, “There was that one time I made it in twenty minutes.” That one time requires perfect synchronicity of the subway gods. In the real world, you have to allow extra time for delays.

Robby West: Your ex-wife would’ve fit right in here in Montana. There are no subways, but you could be delayed by a bear or a herd of cows stopping on the road. Cowboys will drive them out, so there’s not as much man-made obstruction. A bear might take a crap in the middle of the highway—it happens—but you can drive around it or take pictures. Being an optimist with travel is good in the summer. Wintertime is different—if a drive normally takes twenty minutes, you better figure an hour because it’s cold, the roads are icy, people spin out, and you have to go slow. My default setting is “on time is late.” For my wife, especially her family, on time is way too early.

Ted Rall: As Shakespeare said, “Know thyself.” It’s really important. When I get interrupted in the middle of a task, especially tech stuff where I’m thinking about five or six things at once, it’s maddening. It’s like, “No, no, no, leave me alone.” I need large blocks of uninterrupted time. I don’t understand people like my mother, who could talk to six people at once. I’m a very single-minded, task-driven individual. You give me a task, and I do it.

Robby West: My boss, the same lady I ripped into a couple of months ago, asked during my review, “Robby, what can I do to make your job more enjoyable and help you be more productive?” I said, “Tell me what you need me to do and stay the hell out of my way.” That’s in my review. She asked, “What support do you need?” I said, “The support I need is for you to stay the hell out of my life.” That’s it.

Ted Rall: That is support. I don’t think polychronic people are bad—they’re better suited for certain jobs, like air traffic control. You can’t have someone like me saying, “Wait, I’m working on this one thing, I can’t step away.” That wouldn’t work.

Robby West: A hundred percent. Polychronic people tend to be more artistic, able to process more information faster. It makes me jealous, but that’s not how God made me. I’m a single-minded dude—I think about one thing at a time, solve that problem, then move to the next.

Ted Rall: That’s how I am too. Robby, that leaves it for today. Thanks for sitting in for Manila Chan, who’s off spelunking. She should be back tomorrow. I’m Ted Rall. Please like, follow, and share the show as much as possible. Vote early and vote often.

Robby West: Thank you so much for being here. Bye.

 

TMI Show Ep 189: “NYC vs. ICE”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

The war between America’s cities and ICE deportations moves from LA to NYC this week.

On “The TMI Show” with hosts Ted Rall and Robby West filling in for the spelunking Manila Chan, we follow the latest in Trump’s mass deportations and the reaction to them! Now the spotlight is on New York City as ICE agents gear up to “flood” the Big Apple, where they say they’ll arrest undocumented immigrants (and probably some legal Americans with brown skin). Republicans are pumping $170 billion into DHS, making ICE the biggest enforcement force in the U.S.

Protesters are furious, saying it’ll wreck working-class families. In NYC, now in Week 5 of a heat wave, tensions are sky-high. Ironically, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is suing the city and Mayor Eric Adams—who is unpopular because he sold out to Trump on immigration—claiming that sanctuary laws block federal immigration enforcement. A Customs and Border Protection officer has been shot in Manhattan, with many New Yorkers unsympathetic. City Hall Park protests begin in Manhattan at 6 p.m. tonight—it could be the beginning of a Long Hot Summer!

Plus:

  • The Trump administration is deporting Gabriel Megahey, an 82-year-old former IRA leader living peacefully in the U.S. since the Good Friday Agreement decades ago. Facing loss of benefits, he’s defiant: “I’d do it all again.”
  • Thailand and Cambodia agree to an “immediate and unconditional” ceasefire, a major breakthrough after deadly border clashes, announced by Malaysia’s PM. What effect did Trump’s tariff threats have?
  • Ever wonder why punctuality and tardiness sparks fights? Experts reveal how “monochronic” and “polychronic” time styles shape our lives and creativity.

Transcript: DMZ America Podcast – “Foodless in Gaza” – Saturday, July 26, 2025

Generated by AI.

Ted Rall: Good morning. Thanks for joining us. You’re watching the DMZ America podcast. Coming to you from the left, I’m editorial cartoonist Ted Rall.

Scott Stantis: For those of you who wonder about the behind-the-scenes stuff, nothing is more interesting than watching two old guys try to figure out a tech problem. Like, you weren’t there, and then you were there, and I don’t even know.

Ted Rall: You have to tell me what you did to be there.

Scott Stantis: I unplugged all my microphones and all the audio stuff, and now I’m just doing this through my computer. So if it sounds a little hollow, I apologize for that. It’ll be as hollow as your voice, Scott, will sound as hollow as America’s soul.

Ted Rall: For the record, I’m just using the computer mic too. Hopefully, we’ll sound about the same, which I think is more important because it’s weirder to have one host sound really different than the other host. Anyway, let’s get into it. So, Scott, you and I have long disagreed about Israel and its policies, and generally, the way they do things. This week, there are a lot of developments in the Gaza conflict, which has become by far Israel’s longest war. Israel is a small country that has short wars. This war has dragged on nearly two years. It will be two years this October 7. It just seems like there’s no end in sight. Ceasefire negotiations are basically at a complete standstill and have effectively broken down. There’s no end in sight there. There are widespread reports of major famine in Gaza. There are photos of skeletal babies all over the internet, and groups like Doctors Without Borders report that their own doctors are literally starving to death and passing out while attempting to treat patients and conduct surgery due to famine themselves.

Even the BBC and other major media organizations have said that their reporters are starting to die of starvation in Gaza. The food distribution networks have pretty much been taken over by a US-Israeli joint private organization called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, GHF. It was predicted that it wasn’t going to go well, and it hasn’t. Every time there’s a food distribution point, there are shootings. There are different narratives, but there’s no question that dozens and sometimes hundreds of people are killed every time they open the gates. It’s not being well managed. Most notably on the diplomatic front, France has joined the ranks of nations that have diplomatically recognized Palestine as a state, and they’re going to exchange ambassadors and so on. Lots to disagree on here, Scott. We always try to find common ground even though we disagree politically about a lot of things, and we usually succeed in doing that.

Scott Stantis: I think so. It has in our private conversations. I don’t see why it won’t here. If anybody’s looking for us to start calling each other names, I think that’s extremely unlikely. You can tune away.

Ted Rall: If you’re here for a thoughtful conversation about a very difficult subject, please like, follow, and share the show as much as you can. It really helps us out, helps us justify doing this. If you have a question or a comment that you would like us to react to, post it in the live chat if you’re here live, and if we like the question or really hate it enough, we will answer it. That’s super exciting, isn’t it?

Scott Stantis: It’s awesome.

Ted Rall: So, Scott, let’s get into it. Let’s start with France. Emmanuel Macron had teased that he might recognize Palestine. It’s not the first country in Europe to do so. Spain and Ireland already have. Spain’s an important country, but somehow it didn’t really make a huge splash when they did. Ireland has a history of not liking colonization, and they’ve been oppressed, so you can see why they feel like they have common ground. But France, in my opinion, is a big deal, and here’s why. France is a major diplomatic power. It is a permanent member of the UN Security Council with veto power, just like the US does. It is a G7 country, and until maybe about sixty or seventy years ago, French was the lingua franca of international diplomacy. If you were a diplomat from any country on earth, you had to be fluent in French, and you would meet your counterpart and speak in French. It’s impossible to overstate the iconic, historical role of France in international diplomacy. France is not just another country. France was also, alongside Germany, one of the two countries that founded the European Union. I think this is going to open the floodgates. Already, about 153 of the world’s 197 nations or so recognize Palestine, but those are mostly in the developing world. France joins Russia, China, India, and other major countries, and this means they can call more credibly for intervention in Gaza, maybe sanctions against Israel.

Scott Stantis: Let me jump in on this, Ted, because I just want to say, first of all, France is not important anymore in the sense that you describe it. It was an important diplomatic country back in the seventeen hundreds when we wore powdered wigs. Happily, we don’t do that anymore. I find it laughable, and I’m not trying to sound like an asshole, but this is a laughable turn of events because it’s like saying I’m going to recognize Clovis. What am I recognizing? There’s nothing to recognize. There are no defined borders. There’s no defined government. What are you recognizing? It’s preposterous on the face of it because there’s nothing to recognize. I’m just laying down a very practical groundwork here.

Ted Rall: It was a big deal when the United States recognized Israel in 1948 because their borders were, let’s just say, fungible at that time also.

Scott Stantis: Yeah, but Israel, the 1947 map, established Israel and Palestine, and it was preposterous. If you look at it, it looks like the markings of a giraffe. It was just pockets here, a majority of Jews here, a majority of Palestinians here. It was this weird patchwork. But don’t forget, Ted, in 1947, think about what the world was like. Germany, France, Italy, even England, but certainly the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Russia—they had lost millions of people and had the shit bombed out of them. The only country truly standing was the United States, and so we could dictate that type of thing. You’re right about the fungibility of the border back then, but they did establish it within forty-eight hours. There was a war, and Israel kicked ass, very quickly.

Ted Rall: The events, when you read a history of Israel by a Zionist, by the way, are astonishing when you realize how day by day, how quickly events were moving at that time.

Scott Stantis: The French movement, you called the other day very excited. You said this is the beginning of the end of Israel as a country that has widespread international support.

Ted Rall: They’re on their way to becoming an international pariah, much the way that South Africa was under apartheid. I predicted this would happen a long time ago. I was early. This may be the beginning of the end of Israel as a welfare state. They get billions of dollars of aid from the United States, not to mention support from the United Nations and so on.

Scott Stantis: It’s not the beginning of the end. It can’t be. That’s absurd.

Ted Rall: It’s the beginning of the end of them as a country that has widespread international support. They’re on their way to becoming an international pariah, much the way that South Africa was under apartheid. I do think we’re headed that way. I think this is part of that. We’re going to look back at this moment and say, this is really a big deal.

Scott Stantis: Let’s jump now to current events and what’s happening today. You and I disagreed. I thought that the response to October 7 was not just a response to that one heinous attack where they murdered and raped thousands of people, especially young people.

Ted Rall: At most, 1,200. One is too many.

Scott Stantis: Yeah, but it was a lot. It was brutal. It was a heinous attack. But this wasn’t just a response to that, Ted. It was also a response to the continual attacks from Gaza, launching missiles into Israel. If they were lobbing missiles into New York or into Hoover, Alabama, where I live, I’d have a growing disdain for the people who were doing it. Couple that with October 7, and you have—

Ted Rall: This has to be obviously—you can’t be so context-free here. Hamas was installed in large part by the Israeli government, by the Netanyahu government. The Netanyahu government literally delivered millions and millions of euros in cash to Hamas higher-ups. They installed them. They wanted them as a divide-and-conquer strategy against Fatah in the West Bank. That’s been the Israeli strategy in Palestine all along. Israel’s been blockading and oppressing Gaza for a long time. The joblessness, the poverty, the misery in Gaza predates October 7. Here you have people who are completely enclosed by Israel’s security wall. They can’t come and go without Israel’s support allowing it, and for the most part, they didn’t allow it. They’re miserable in there. Every now and then, Hamas lobs some Roman candle over the wall.

Scott Stantis: It’s not every now and then, Ted. It’s almost daily. That Roman candle blows up.

Ted Rall: If you look up the actual casualties on the Israeli side, I think more Israelis get struck by lightning. One to three per year is too many, but that’s kind of like a drop in the bucket compared to traffic deaths or something. They’ve been doing that for years, but that’s a reaction to Israel. Israel has created a blockade. This is Israel’s fault.

Scott Stantis: Let’s go back to Yasser Arafat, the PLO. He got 90% of what he wanted in Oslo and then walked away from it and declared an intifada. The borders were open. There was a de facto two-state solution. The border was pretty porous because Israel used Palestinian labor to grow its economy.

Ted Rall: That border wasn’t porous. I was there in 2000 in February, a week before the intifada started. That border was not porous. There were controls. I’ve crossed some porous borders, and that was not one of them. A Palestinian from Gaza could pass into Israel on a daily basis, but the PLO and Arafat decided to start blowing up buses. The Israelis insisted that a future Republic of Palestine be completely demilitarized and have no military whatsoever, that the Israelis reserve the right to come and go into the future independent state of Palestine as they please, and they wanted to create Bantustans throughout the West Bank with no contiguous corridor to connect the Gaza Strip to the West Bank. This was a state that was doomed on paper.

Scott Stantis: I disagree. Arafat signed it. Clearly, there was something there that he liked. You start from some place. That’s how things build.

Ted Rall: Where do you want to start this? In February? In 1948? In 1920 with the Balfour Declaration? In 1888 when Zionists first started immigrating to Palestine?

Scott Stantis: I want to go to October 7, 2023. Hell, it was a good day. The fourth crusade didn’t even get to Israel. They ended up in Albania or Algeria and just started killing people there. They said, anyone with a funny hat was dead. Literally, they went to Istanbul and were killing a bunch of Christians because they wore funny hats, assuming they weren’t Christian.

Ted Rall: We can take this back five thousand years. Let’s talk about what’s happening today.

Scott Stantis: Where Ted and I can agree is that I don’t see an endgame. The Colin Powell doctrine—go with overwhelming force, have a stated goal, know what victory looks like, and when you achieve it, get the hell out of there—I don’t see those last two things anymore. I simply see a gutting of a region. You’re seeing abject famine, though I don’t think it reaches the technical definition yet.

Ted Rall: People who are more expert on this than us, like Doctors Without Borders, are saying it is a famine.

Scott Stantis: You’re the only person I’ve ever heard use the word famine so far.

Right, but if you look up Gaza and famine right now, you will find many people saying that. Are there people smarter than us, Ted? Maybe not at this hour because the coffee’s kicking. Those who support Israel, those who support the Palestinian movement, anyone who looks at this situation now has to be aghast and say enough is enough. What is the endgame?

Ted Rall: What do you think is the goal here? Nobody except the Israelis really knows for sure what the Israelis are up to. Certainly, we heard some bloodthirsty rhetoric after October 7 that we’re going to kill them all, turn off their food, turn off their water. That’s being dismissed by supporters of Israel as intemperate language, reacting in rage to the atrocities of October 7, 2023. Let’s say that were true, but those people never retracted those statements, and they were allowed to remain in government. If I worked for President Stantis and went off on some wild intemperate tirade and said, we’re going to kill all the Canadians and turn off their food and medical care, you’d be like, “Ted, you gotta walk that back, or I’m going to fire you.” If you didn’t do that, it would be because you agreed with what I said.

Scott Stantis: The political background of this is that Netanyahu stays in power and vis-à-vis stays out of jail because of an alliance with profoundly religious right-wing parties that are just batshit crazy. To your point, Ted, some of the language used by not just those parties, but the settlers, who are, in my view, illegal and crazy, is dehumanizing of Palestinians. A lot of them are from right here in New York. I was talking to my wife this morning about this issue, and it’s like, “never again” until it does. There may be an addendum to that slogan. This is now reaching a point where it’s heinous. You asked me several times, Ted, when is enough enough? We’ve reached that point.

Ted Rall: Here’s the thing that’s honestly peculiar. You and I, we’ve studied history. We know a lot about war. I can’t say that I’ve seen a lot of wars that really follow this kind of trajectory. It starts out not that unusual. They don’t commit a lot of ground troops. They bomb the shit out of the place by air. We’ve seen that before. Then they send in ground troops to try to figure out the Hamas people who are based in the tunnels underground. That I understand too. That’s kind of like what we saw in the Battle of Fallujah. But then things start to turn hanky because the Israelis keep saying, okay, evacuate from this town, go somewhere else. Everyone packs up and goes. Then they go in and bomb the shit out of that town. In many cases, according to reporters, there’s no Hamas anywhere to be found. Then they send in demolition squads to demolish and detonate any building that survives and carefully, methodically level it. They bring in bulldozers to level it. Then they tell the population, okay, you can go back there, but there’s nothing to go back to. Then later on, they issue another evacuation order for the same place that they already leveled to the ground, and then they bomb it again, but there’s nothing to bomb. The Gaza Strip is a small place, Scott, about the size of Manhattan Island. If you’re bombing every single day for a year and a half, there probably wasn’t much left after three months. The Israeli air force is very effective. At this point, it’s almost like they’re running around in circles.

Scott Stantis: I don’t know if it’s circles, Ted. This is where you and I will find some common ground because we’re not being told. I’m passionate about transparency and communication, especially from the powerful to those of us who are not. I want to know what the hell the endgame is here, and we’re not being told. The only conclusion you can make is that they want to obliterate any Palestinian presence in Gaza. They’re moving in on the West Bank and also on Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.

Ted Rall: They’re pushing the entire population to the south of the border with Egypt, which they did before. Then they let them back north. Now they’re pushing them back down there. The Egyptians think that the Israelis are about to open the door and just expel the population into their territory, and they’re saying, no, no, no, no, no.

Scott Stantis: They’ve done it before in Jordan and Syria, and all three countries have at some point said, okay, these guys are radical, and we don’t want them in our country. Not 2,000,000 people. Starving babies are not radical. I’ve been around babies. They can be annoying, especially when they haven’t eaten for a long time. If you look at a map and you look at the Sinai, you think Egypt has done nothing with it. Is it a practical place to create? It’s large, and you could have a lot. Yes, it’s arid desert, but you can change that. We’ve proven that with Arizona. You may be right. They may just be squeezing them out and saying, okay, they’re gone. It may really become Mara Gaza.

Ted Rall: I don’t think the Egyptians will allow it. The domestic politics of Egypt will not permit it. Al-Sisi can’t allow the Palestinians into Egypt for a bunch of reasons that, as Americans, we don’t think about because it’s not our country. Egypt’s a poor country. If you’re an Egyptian, do you really want to be competing for jobs with a massive new population? Think about the migrant influx and the political consequences we’ve seen here in the United States. It goes quadruple there where people are poor and they’re competing for scarce resources. They’ll view it as a betrayal of their Muslim brothers. Egypt once went to war with Israel to fight for the Palestinians, and now you’re going to let the Israelis get away with stealing Gaza and the West Bank. The Israelis have already stolen 60% of the West Bank. Mubarak was overthrown by a revolution in Egypt. Al-Sisi came in as a result of that revolution. He’s got to know bad things could happen to him if he were to allow this. He’s being squeezed, but he’s got to be more scared of his own people than he is of the Israelis.

Scott Stantis: That’s interesting. I had not considered that. The Egyptian public will not be happy about this at all. You brought up a very practical point that’s happening here in the United States. How many times on your other show, where your producer Robbie, who lives in Montana, talks about immigrants coming in, undercutting wages, and so on? That’s something I hadn’t considered, and you’re absolutely right about it.

You did mention that they just want to level it and annex it. That is the only conclusion we can come to now because there’s proof of nothing else.

Ted Rall: We’re trying to read the tea leaves. I was thinking about Netanyahu’s statement in response to the French decision. He said, no one should recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv. That’s an interesting way to word it. A Palestinian state is going to be next to Tel Aviv no matter what. If you were not interested in ethnic cleansing and genocide and killing or displacing the entire population of Gaza, 2,000,000 people, then you would say something like, of course, Israel will look forward to working with, recognizing, and being close friends and allies with a free and democratic Republic of Palestine not run by Hamas or terrorists, with whom we can partner and walk boldly into the future together as brothers. But he didn’t say that. He said, no one should recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv. Gaza is always going to be next to Tel Aviv. That’s just geography. That to me signals that they will never allow any kind of Palestinian population there anymore.

Scott Stantis: We’ve reached the point where this is enough. We need to know what you’re doing, and we need you to stop it. We need you to allow Doctors Without Borders and other relief organizations to come into Gaza and relieve the suffering.

Ted Rall: They’re kind of there, but they’re not being given any security guarantees by Israel. Israel’s not allowing proper supplies to come in. Even their own doctors are literally collapsing as they’re trying to take care of their patients because they’re not eating either. Any reasonable person who believes in humanity recognizes that miles away, people in Israel are sipping sweet red wine and eating couscous. There’s no shortage of food. Famines are almost 100% caused by human beings. It’s almost never drought or other pestilence. It’s always humans starving people out. If that’s part of the strategy, if that turns out to be what they’re very consciously doing, that’s not a legitimate strategy for Israel or any country to be deploying in a post-medieval era.

Scott Stantis: Warfare in the twentieth century changed dramatically from World War I to World War II. It went from battleground fighting, flags, and unfurling banners to the bullshittery of World War II, where we’re going to bomb the shit out of everything, including civilians. Part of the stratagem of World War II from both sides, as we were attacking Germany and Japan, was to make the population suffer. Mission accomplished. Is that the strategy here? If it’s a strategy here, then you’ve accomplished it. I’m to the point where tell me what you’re doing. Tell me what’s next. My fear, for someone who loves Israel the way I have, is that the batshit crazy conservative religious parties have such sway and have dehumanized the Palestinian people to such a degree that starving them to death, wiping them off the face of the planet, is the right strategy. Any person with any shred of humanity inside them can’t look at that and say that’s okay.

Ted Rall: I put up a comment: “Fuck Israel and fuck the both of you.” Supposedly, I’ve been lumped in with you, Scott. People are so angry, even though I’m a huge critic of Israel and have been supporting the Palestinians my entire life. Scott, I’m going to diagnose you with a major case of cognitive dissonance here. How can you still love a country that’s doing this? When a country devolves from the high standards of its founding to where it engages in depraved behavior, this is depraved behavior. It’s as depraved as it gets. Children are literally dying for no reason whatsoever. The Israelis are just having fun, and they don’t care. We haven’t heard a single statement of hearts and prayers from the Israeli government or from the prime minister.

Scott Stantis: You are hearing it from the people of Israel. There are protests.

Ted Rall: Not much. There are some, but I’m talking about the government.

Scott Stantis: The core of Israel’s existence, the core of its founding, I still find more than just compelling but important in the world. I cling to the idea and the ideals of Israel, not what’s happening right now.

Ted Rall: When a country devolves like that, at a certain point, you can’t just say, well, you guys were awesome back in 1948 because they weren’t. The Nakba is a real thing, but I don’t want to relitigate the Middle East. The point is you’re judged by what you’re doing now and what you’ve been doing. This is who and what Israel is. After World War II, there was the idea of collective judgment against Nazi Germany. We felt that the Germans had a moral obligation to overthrow Hitler, and we punished them because they didn’t. As we know, it was very hard, dangerous, and scary, so you can see why people didn’t. The idea of collective punishment has been lobbed against the Palestinians by the Israeli government. They’re saying, you guys should have overthrown Hamas because you didn’t do that, and we’re going to bomb you until you do. If fair is fair, the Israelis are being judged by what they’re doing now, and we’re going to hold you all accountable.

Scott Stantis: I’m not sure it’s who they are. There’s certainly a large number of them, but in the elections, it’s not everybody. Can you continue to love a country? You can because in its DNA, I still believe that it is a democracy in a sea of nondemocratic states.

Ted Rall: That’s objectively untrue. There’s the Israeli Arabs who live in Israel proper, and they don’t have the same voting rights and citizenship. They’re second-class citizens under Israeli law to Jewish Israelis. Everybody who lives in Gaza and the West Bank has no voting rights. They’re effectively part of Israel, occupied by Israel, owned and completely controlled by Israel. Israel decides whether you can go visit your relatives in New Jersey if you live in the West Bank. There is no Palestinian state. Israel controls roughly all these millions of people, over half the population that they control can’t vote. How’s that a democracy?

Scott Stantis: You can’t have it both ways, Ted. You can’t say they are part of the State of Israel or they’re part of the State of Palestine. There is no State of Palestine yet. What France is recognizing is symbolic at this point.

Ted Rall: The international community is moving toward recognition of a Palestinian state, but on the ground, there is no Palestinian state. There are no Palestinian coins, stamps, soldiers guarding the border, military, or passport. This is a country whose national policy is to lay siege to this enclave, which is 99% civilian, and starve them to death. How can you still support this country?

Scott Stantis: The country can revert back to what it was. It has the mechanisms in place where they can have religious freedom. You can have mosques in Jerusalem, churches in Jerusalem, as well as temples.

Ted Rall: Except you can have a church in Gaza, and it was even the pope’s favorite church. The Israelis know very well where that church is, and they just blew it to bits.

Scott Stantis: It’s the new warfare. There was a monastery in Italy during World War II as the troops were moving up. The Germans were holed up in it, and there was an interesting debate with the Allies saying, should we bomb it or protect it because it is so sacred? Eisenhower said, they’re shooting down on us, killing American boys. Bomb it. They did, and unforeseen circumstances, it created even better hiding places for the Germans. My point is that the gist and the bones of Israeli democracy are strong, and that’s what I respect. If they do what Zelensky has done, which is have no elections and get rid of democracy altogether, saying we’re at war, then—

Ted Rall: They have suspended elections. It’s not martial law, but as a parliamentary matter, they’ve declared a war cabinet, which allows them to effectively suspend the normal schedule.

Scott Stantis: Didn’t a member of the Liberal Party leave the war cabinet? You can do that. That’s why I continue to cling to the idea and the ideals of Israel, not what’s happening right now.

Ted Rall: You could’ve made the same argument in 1943 as a supporter of Germany. On paper, the Weimar Constitution was never abolished. The Reichstag continued to meet. All the institutions of the German state that preexisted Hitler in 1933 remained in place. When a country ceases to function as a democracy and does evil shit, does it deserve support? It’s like, oh, well, we’re all assholes, but we voted for it.

Scott Stantis: As I mentioned at the top of the show, you asked me how do you support it, at what point is there a critical mass? They’ve gone there now. They are there. They haven’t lost my support yet because my hope is that they will do the right thing. The continued process they’re doing now, clearly causing humanitarian harm, and as long as this continues without a stated endgame, it’s impossible for those of us who support Israel for the reasons we support it to continue to do so.

Ted Rall: What would be a bridge too far for you?

Scott Stantis: The continued process they’re doing now. Just more of the same. They are clearly causing humanitarian harm, and as long as this continues without a stated endgame, it’s impossible to continue support.

Ted Rall: Would you then move to supporting a Palestinian state?

Scott Stantis: I’ve supported a two-state solution. I think that’s the most practical. It makes the most sense. But this fractured Gaza and West Bank makes no sense at all, especially when there’s no way to get from one to the other. It’s not unprecedented. Pakistan and Bangladesh didn’t work out well, as we saw in 1971. The governance of Gaza and the West Bank diverged. They went in their separate directions with very different governments and sensibilities. If I was President Stantis, I would be negotiating for a cessation of hostilities, to allow humanitarian aid in with provisions. If Hamas takes the aid and starts lobbing missiles again, Israel will be forced to respond to that. But right now, you’ve got a humanitarian catastrophe that you have to fix and address.

Ted Rall: Would you agree that it’s Israel’s responsibility in both senses of the word? In other words, it’s their fault, and they have a responsibility for the well-being of the population of the occupied territories.

Scott Stantis: It’s the Colin Powell “you broke it, you bought it” policy. Under international law, if you occupy it, you own it. So, yes, I would. We don’t know what their endgame is, and they haven’t told us. If there is no endgame other than what we can deduce, as you rightly point out, we can only judge on things that are happening right now and what they’re doing right now. What they’re doing right now is heinous. It has crossed a line. If they continue to do that, then they lose my support, and I would imagine many people like myself who are finding it more and more difficult to support them.

Ted Rall: If the goal was to get rid of Hamas, I bet that goal could be attained very quickly. It would look like an agreement to allow the leadership to go into exile.

Scott Stantis: If anyone understands the construct of terrorist organizations, it’s you, Ted. You’ve practically made a career out of it. You recognize that they’re smart enough not to have a Hamas Tower in Gaza City. They have hundreds of locations. They’re fractured, which makes perfect sense under the surface. Asymmetric warfare. They know they’re outgunned by the Israelis. The war on terror sounded great, but what does it mean? What is the end of that look like? Hamas is fractured. You’ve de facto created many new Hamas fighters by your actions here. The children who are suffering now are not going to suffer in silence for their entire lives. Where does this go? Does Gaza get rebuilt? If I was President Stantis, I would approach the Egyptians and say, how do you feel about ceding part of the Sinai, and Israel will cede part of Gaza and southern Israel to make it Palestine—a land swap.

Ted Rall: Gaza is the Palestinians’ home. They’ve lived there for centuries. These people have been there continuously.

Scott Stantis: That’s why I included it. If you look at a map, you can have it along the sea, Gaza, and then go into Sinai. You can have humanitarian aid, Israel will help build a Palestinian state. Obviously, the Palestinians will be there and help do the same. We can talk about desalination, agriculture that is effective in arid countries. There’s a lot you can do going forward to make this a viable, peaceful, prosperous country. That would help Egypt as well. If your neighbors are rich, that kind of helps your property values. My take, my reaction, my hope is for a humanitarian response. We’re not seeing it now. Israel has to tell us what they’re doing. I know I keep coming to that, but I think it’s essential. I don’t know what I’m supporting now, which makes it impossible to support. I’m not in MAGA nation where I can just say, my guy is saying this, so that’s fine with me. I can’t do that, and no thinking person can. Going forward, I have to hand it to you, Ted. You may be right. In terms of Israel’s long-term strategy for Gaza, it’s looking more and more like you may be right. They’re going to level it, annex it, and there will no longer be a Gaza as you and I have come to know it.

Ted Rall: What do you think about the debate about whether or not this officially constitutes genocide? I’m of two minds about this. I read the dictionary definition established after World War II, and I’m like, it’s genocide. But, in a way, who cares? Whether you’re doing genocide evil shit or non-genocide evil shit, it’s evil shit, and it’s the evil shit that I’m focused on, not the g-word.

Scott Stantis: Using the word genocide in this context is explosive for obvious reasons, given the history of Israel and the history of the Jewish people in the twentieth century. I’m loath to use that word, and I don’t know if it applies when you are responsible for creating a famine. We’re not at a famine yet, but we’re close.

Ted Rall: I’m surprised the famine took so long, actually, because not enough food supplies have been entering Gaza for a long time, and the price of food has become absolutely insane there, where people are talking about $50 for a can of whatever.

Scott Stantis: I don’t know enough about the Palestinian diet. What is a staple of that diet?

Ted Rall: The same shit that the Israelis eat.

Scott Stantis: Grain of some kind, I would assume. You bring it in and give it away. You set up structures that demand civility so you’re not having—

Ted Rall: This was all existent until fairly recently. There are plenty of aid organizations that know how to do this. It’s not a new thing to distribute food in crisis and war zones. People do it all the time. There are hundreds of trucks full of food ready to come into the Gaza Strip, and the Israelis didn’t allow it to come in. Israeli settlers intercepted the trucks, looted them, and trashed them as the IDF stood by and laughed. The Israelis are kind of lying, saying that Hamas is stealing the food. That’s not true. Armed gangs are stealing the food, and there are armed gangs that the Israelis are supporting against Hamas. It’s a shit show.

Scott Stantis: America’s never supported somebody and had it come back to bite them in the ass later. Supporting random goons is always a good idea. What can go wrong?

Ted Rall: Even Germany, ironically, one of Israel’s closest allies, and France was a close ally of Israel until very recently.

Scott Stantis: Most Western countries were. They should have, especially countries like France and Germany that were responsible for genocide during World War II. France, the Vichy regime, deported 76,000 French Jews to their deaths, and that’s not even counting Northern France under direct occupation. The French turned to Nazi roundups of French Jews, well over 100,000. The Germans, we know what they did. There’s been guilt. They did that, so they have to be nice to Israel now.

Ted Rall: The French thing is a big deal in part because it’s France saying, okay, this is really, really wrong. It doesn’t change the facts on the ground. Does it make life different for anyone in Gaza or Israel? No. But symbolic gestures matter. Think about the struggle of Charles de Gaulle’s Free French movement, the French government in exile during World War II. The struggle for them to get legally recognized by the United States was huge. Throughout World War II, the Roosevelt administration legally recognized and exchanged ambassadors with the Vichy puppet Nazi collaborationist regime rather than the Free French. It was only in the last couple of months of the war that FDR came around because Eisenhower forced him to.

Scott Stantis: Ted knows why I’m laughing because de Gaulle was so insufferable. The United States government would rather recognize the Vichy regime.

Ted Rall: In fairness to de Gaulle, whose politics were far to the right of my liking, he was trying to defend French sovereignty, and that’s the only thing he cared about. The one thing I admire most about de Gaulle, not just his steadfastness for the sovereignty of France, but also during Algeria. He went to Algeria and said, this is bullshit. This is a dumb war. We’re done.

Scott Stantis: He had support, and a lot of Frenchmen were furious. They tried to assassinate him.

Ted Rall: They tried that a lot. He was hard to hit for a big guy. There’s a museum in France that has a picture of his kepi, that funny little pillbox hat, with a bullet hole that went right through it while he was wearing it.

Scott Stantis: It’d be less impressive if it was somewhere else, like they were getting drunk around a campfire.

Ted Rall: We’re leaving on a happy note, but it’s a sad situation. I do want to hit you up for this. Is there a way forward? The two-state solution appears to be unwanted and dead by all parties now. Israel certainly doesn’t seem to have any interest. The Palestinians don’t have any interest. At this point, everyone’s fighting for the whole schmear. The Israelis want the whole thing all to themselves, and the Palestinians want the whole thing to themselves. Who speaks for the Palestinians?

Scott Stantis: I don’t know if there is anyone. If you establish—they don’t have elected representatives. Even if they did, they’d be dead by now. There’s always a way out. It just seems dark, arduous, and long. The Stantis proposal is a two-state solution if they can partner with Egypt because they need the real estate. It doesn’t need to be a lot. If they could partner with Egypt and create honest-to-God lines on a map, this is Palestine.

Ted Rall: Wouldn’t that set a terrible precedent that rewards Israel for its behavior here?

Scott Stantis: We’ve talked about Ukraine and said the only plausible peace there is to cede the Donbas region, Crimea, and let the borders stand where they are. The Russians have far more of a legitimate claim to Crimea and the Donbas than Israel has under international law. Israel has no legitimate claim to Gaza. Sometimes you have to say, okay, the bad actors, however you perceive them to be, get part of what they want. I don’t think Israel is in any mood to cede or talk about a two-state solution.

Ted Rall: You heard what Netanyahu had to say about not wanting a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv. I thought those words were very carefully chosen. Netanyahu does not speak intemperately, but he’s always careful.

Scott Stantis: You’re right. There is a way forward. Whether or not any of the parties take advantage of it or grasp it or even start discussing it in any serious way doesn’t look that way anytime soon, which is terrible.

Ted Rall: International pressure will continue to build on Israel. At a certain point, the US will probably be Israel’s last remaining ally. Is that going to be enough? How long will the US stand by Israel, and can Israel survive without the US running interference for it at the UN Security Council with their veto, without the US sending them $4 billion plus a year, without the US supplying them with intelligence cooperation with the Mossad and arms?

Scott Stantis: If the current leadership remains in place, Israel will throw up its hands, roll its eyes, and say, okay. They’ll make a nominal concession, and the world will go, yay, we’re moving in the right direction, but that’ll be it. If the current leadership remains in place, I don’t see any serious movement toward what you and I are discussing in terms of long-term peace, and that’s unfortunate. It’s unfortunate for Israel. It breaks my heart because you could live in a region where you have a peace treaty with Egypt, with Jordan, a possibility of one with Syria, and a few years ago, there was discussion of one with Saudi Arabia. Now the Saudis are amenable, but they have a domestic political context to consider. Now we throw in Donald J. Trump and his perfect negotiations, the best deals. He wants that Nobel Peace Prize so badly. This kind of thing can’t just be banged out in a couple of hours in Doha. It would take years of shuttle diplomacy back and forth by careful, considered, smart, calm diplomats. None of those work for the Trump administration. Palestinian and Israeli spokespeople don’t fit that mold at all. It’s heartbreaking. There are times during this conversation, Ted, where I seemed harsh and heartless, and I’m not. I do recognize—

Ted Rall: I know you’re not. I’m glad you said that because I know you really well, and you’re a softie. This has got to be tough for you to see.

Scott Stantis: Of course not. I’m a supposed Christian, by the way, which we always forget. There are a lot of Palestinian Christians we always forget about. My faith and my personality tell me that getting along is far better than not. Because I don’t like you doesn’t mean you don’t have a right to exist. I think the Israelis want Hamas to leave. I think they like it just the way it is because Hamas gives them the cover to do what they want. The hits against Hamas—Hamas may be gone, certainly for the time being. Hezbollah was degraded to an extent. Hezbollah’s puppet masters in Tehran have been shockingly quieted. The ease with which the Iranians have had their nose bloodied shocked Ted and me. We talked about this in a phone call recently. I didn’t see that one coming at all. I thought their Republican Guard was the same as Saddam’s Republican Guard, a million-man army that seems daunting but folds like a house of cards as soon as it gets hit. Iran didn’t scramble their sizable, up-to-date air force. They didn’t put the F-14 Tomcats up there. Their lack of nerve to escalate the exchange with Israel shocked me too. Their response seemed shockingly sedate compared to what Israel’s or the United States’ would have been. Hezbollah is still going to limp along. Hamas is significantly damaged, if not obliterated. But now you’ve created something else. You and I both know the history of the Middle East. When you get rid of these guys, they’re rarely replaced by better guys.

Ted Rall: Almost never. You also know what happens when a whole population is traumatized by having their relatives killed. You’re in a part of the world where revenge is part of the culture.

Scott Stantis: There was a “Mad Men” episode where the Roger character, who fought at Iwo Jima, has a meeting with a Japanese automaker, either Toyota or Honda, in the early to mid-sixties. Roger goes off on them. It speaks to what you’re addressing, which is how do you find forgiveness for people who shot you, tortured your friends and family, bombed you, blew the head off your best friend standing next to you? That’s a huge ask, and we tend to ask it a lot in this world. You and I have a lot of phone conversations we probably should record. The South African reconciliation courts said, what I did was wrong, I feel remorse, and you move forward. That’s a huge ask, but it’s the only way to survive.

Ted Rall: I can’t possibly argue with you about that. So, Scott, you know what time it is.

Scott Stantis: Let’s lay off the music on this one. This has been a difficult topic.

Ted Rall: Agree. As soon as we’re done here, we have to go fuck ourselves.

Scott Stantis: Good point. Hope I can reach.

 

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php