I wrote this back in March 2020.
The people who were wrong still have their jobs. I still get the insults.
I wrote this back in March 2020.
The people who were wrong still have their jobs. I still get the insults.
What, exactly, is wrong with Joe Biden?
It’s probably not Alzheimer’s. I wrote a syndicated column bearing the headline “Biden obviously has dementia and should withdraw from the race” in March 2020. Democratic gaslighting aside, he has been sick for a long time. As I witnessed as caretaker for my mother, who died a month before I wrote the above, Alzheimer’s tends to progress faster than what we’re seeing, especially at Biden’s advanced age.
Biden’s affliction is some other form of dementia, defined by the CDC as “not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities.”
Many things can cause and present as dementia: hearing loss, traumatic brain injuries, liver disease.
One cause is the degenerative nerve disorder made famous by Michael J. Fox, Parkinson’s disease.
According to Johns Hopkins’ website: “Parkinson disease causes physical symptoms at first. Problems with cognitive function, including forgetfulness and trouble with concentration, may start later. As the disease gets worse over time, about 4 in 5 people develop dementia. This can cause profound memory loss and make it hard to maintain relationships.”
Unfortunately, the White House has been opaque to the point of absurdity on the question of President Biden’s health. Like the citizens of a dictatorship with state-controlled media, speculation is our sole recourse.
The New York Post, the right-wing Murdoch-owned tabloid that broke the Hunter Biden laptop story more respectable outlets wouldn’t touch, reported two days ago that a doctor whose expertise is Parkinson’s met Biden’s personal physician at the White House on January 17th: “Dr. Kevin Cannard, a Parkinson’s disease expert at Walter Reed Medical Center, met with Dr. Kevin O’Connor, and two others at the White House residence clinic on Jan. 17, according to the records, which emerge as questions continue to swirl about the 81-year-old president’s mental health in the wake of his debate debacle last week with former President Trump.”
The Post report continues: “[Dr. Cannard’s] most recent paper was published in August 2023 in the journal Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, and focuses on the ‘early-stage’ of the crippling disease.”
Dr. Cannard and the White House are refusing to answer reporters’ questions about the meeting.
[Updated 7/8/24 1:40PM EDT: Dr. Cannard visited the White House eight times over the past eight months, according to new reporting from The New York Times.]As with other diseases, a patient of Parkinson’s may suffer all or some symptoms. President Biden certainly checks off a lot of the boxes. Here’s the complete list, unedited, from the Mayo Clinic website:
I haven’t seen any sign that Biden has a tremor. But the rest—the shuffle, the stoop, the vacant stare, the rigidity of his arms, the vanishing, once-legendary smile he visibly forced out during his recent interview with George Stephanopoulos, the voice so painfully soft listeners have trouble hearing him, the flat affect and lack of inflection—fit to a T. They have been there for years. His handwriting has indeed become smaller and scrunched together.
Individually, there are other possible causes for these symptoms. In February, the White House said that the President had not been officially found to have Parkinson’s.
But that doesn’t mean much. According to doctors, Parkinson’s is hard to diagnose. There’s no test that can give a conclusive result. Biden’s personal physician has not recently evaluated him for Parkinson’s.
I’m a columnist and a cartoonist and a talk radio host, not a doctor. But I’d bet my next paycheck that the President has Parkinson’s.
Parkinson’s does not get better. Biden will only get worse.
The time will come, probably within days or weeks—not months—when Biden will have to either resign his office, “temporarily” step aside from his duties and turn over his responsibilities to Kamala Harris as Acting President, and/or release his claim to the delegates pledged to his nomination as the Democratic nominee.
At that time, Congress should launch a thorough investigation into the origins of this unprecedented, avoidable political crisis. How long have officials and family members known that Biden was unable to fully carry out the job as president? Was it, as I suspect, from the beginning of his campaign back in 2019? In 2020, when he called annoying voters “lying dog-faced pony soldiers”? Or in 2022, when he called out at a rally for a lawmaker who had died—after he’d memoralized her?
Who has been replacing him? Which people in Congress, the DNC, the media and in his Administration have been enabling this charade, which amounts to a coup d’état?
A poignant coda: On July 2nd President Biden signed the National Plan to End Parkinson’s Act, the first federal law that addresses the disease and allocates increased funding for research. He did not make a public comment.
(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis. His latest book, brand-new right now, is the graphic novel 2024: Revisited.)
An anxious America is hanging on tenterhooks to see whether Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. will be able to hang on to the Democratic nomination, and whether he might even be compelled to resign amid a whirl of news stories following his disastrous debate performance, indicating that he has been mentally and physically incapacitated, and not fulfilling the duties of the Presidency, for many months and probably years.
Political cartoonists Ted Rall and Scott Stantis (from the Left and Right, respectively) delve deep into U.S. history to contextualize this serious political crisis. Can Biden hang on? Who is really in charge of the government? Will Kamala Harris take over and, if so, when and how? Are there other options? What would be her chances against Donald Trump in the general election? Should there be, and will there be, any accountability for the men and women in the government and the media who carried out and abetted the 2020 coup d’etat in which a man pretended to be president while an unelected cabal of shadowy figures determined policies of war and peace?
Watch the Video Version of the DMZ America Podcast: here.
Biden’s unsteady performance in last week’s presidential debate has sparked a debate of its own between Democrats, between those who believe the president’s chances of reelection have dropped so dramatically that he should be replaced as their nominee and loyalists determined to stay the course lest the fragile coalition between corporatists and progressives unravel into internecine chaos.
As we await a second post-debate round of polling (the first ones show Trump gaining) that may or may not strengthen one of these positions, the pro-dump-Biden faction isn’t helping itself by floating a list of possible replacement nominees that comprises fairly obscure governors like Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Andy Beshear of Kentucky. These figures would face the challenge of scaling their regional reputations as up-and-comers up to the national stage in a matter of weeks.
Gavin Newsom is the exception. But Newsom underperformed at his recent just-for-fun debate against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis; he would also be hobbled by California’s reputation as a dysfunctional, high tax, low employment, homeless encampment.
Yet it’s also obvious even to the president’s staunchest supporters (albeit in private) that the high number of voters who think he’s too old for his job will only increase following an addled performance that can’t be explained away by a 12-hour cold, a supposed stutter, jet lag that lasts 12 days or the bizarre argument that he’s sharp as a tack between 10 am and 4 pm Eastern time. The party’s credibility has been badly damaged by the debate’s key revelation: the president isn’t all there and probably hasn’t been for most if not all of his presidency.
Now we know why Biden doesn’t give many unscripted interviews or press conferences. He can’t—not even now, when his presidency is on the ropes.
As inconvenient as it is for Democrats this year, presidential elections are always a referendum on the incumbent. Few Americans who saw Biden ramble incoherently for 90 minutes will be willing to re-up his contract for another four years.
At this point, the strongest argument put forward by the supporters of the president for staying in the race is the list of logistical obstacles that would arise by switching him out. With the convention coming up in a matter of weeks, it would be difficult in the time remaining to find a suitable replacement—whether anointed by Biden and/or party leaders or selected through an open convention—who could gather broad support within the party and then introduce that new nominee to the broader electorate.
Replacement would require some complicated procedural maneuvering. After being nominated in a virtual 50-state roll call vote later this month, Biden would have to decline the nomination in order to open the process.
Deadlines for being listed on the November ballot are fast approaching. The first state filing deadline is August 13th, six days before the party convention in Chicago.
Campaign finance laws are another consideration. As of June 30th Biden’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee have a total $240 million in cash on hand, $91.5 million of which is controlled by Biden. While the DNC could presumably pivot to funding another candidate, none of the other Democratic politicians being touted as a possible replacement for Biden can tap Biden’s money seamlessly. One person can: Vice President Kamala Harris, his running mate. She is viewed as more competent than Biden yet polls the same in head-to-head match-ups with Trump.
Biden ought to step aside. Continuing this “Weekend at Bernie’s” candidacy as though nothing has changed would be a transparent charade—damaging to the party, the country and America’s international reputation. Democrats ought to have had an open primary process in the first place—in his diminished state, Biden likely wouldn’t have survived a set of primary debates—and we need an open convention now.
However…
If that’s too risky, or a stubborn Biden insulated by a tiny coterie of insiders refuses to yield, there remains a viable path forward for the Democratic Party.
Biden would need to address the nation and acknowledge what we all saw just over a week ago: that while he’s no longer able to carry out all the duties of his office (especially after four in the afternoon), neither is the president totally incapacitated. Biden would remain on the ballot.
He would announce that Vice President Kamala Harris would step forward in an informal capacity as a sort of “co-president.” Biden would commit to stick around for, say, another year (July 4, 2025 would have symbolic resonance) should the Biden-Harris ticket prevail this fall. During the interim transitional period, Harris would appear side-by-side with him at public appearances, represent the U.S. at international events, and generally shadow Biden during what would be presented as a training period. Over time, we would see less of him and more of her. She would travel extensively and hold numerous press conferences in order to connect with voters. At the end of Harris’ presidential apprenticeship, Biden would pass the baton and resign.
Democrats would call it retirement.
An open transition to a President Harris is the lowest-friction approach Democrats can take that stands a significant chance of avoiding a catastrophic loss to Donald Trump. It would preserve Biden’s dignity, acknowledge political reality, stop making the voters feel like they are being conned, and avoid sidelining a woman of color who has dutifully done everything that has been asked of her.
(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis. His latest book, brand-new right now, is the graphic novel 2024: Revisited.)
The show closes with former director at the National Transportation Safety Board Jamie Finch sharing his expertise on the DOJ’s plan to offer Boeing a plea deal.
Political cartoonists Ted Rall (on the Left) and Scott Stantis (on the Right) simulcast their reactions to the 2024 presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Joining them is Angie Wong, political analyst, fundraiser and Ted’s co-host on “The Final Countdown” on Radio Sputnik.
In a special DMZ America Podcast, Scott, Angie and Ted react to the Trump/Biden debate as it unfolded
Watch the Video Version: here. (Live at 2:00 AM EDT 6/28/24)