DMZ America Podcast: “Foodless in Gaza”

Live 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Israel’s War in Gaza is the focus of this to episode of the “DMZ America” podcast with political cartoonists Ted Rall (from the Left) and Scott Stantis (from the Right). There have been some major developments in the war over the last week:

  • French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France will recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly this September, becoming the first G7 nation to do so.
  • The Agence France-Presse (AFP) journalists’ union said that its reporters in Gaza are starving to death due to Israel’s aid blockade, with some, like photographer Bashar, too weak to work. AFP, alongside BBC, AP, and Reuters, issued a statement noting that Gaza’s journalists face dire hunger.
  • Doctors in Gaza, such as those at Nasser Hospital and Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, are fainting from hunger while treating malnourished patients, with the UN reporting a massive spike in severe malnutrition cases in children under five. Images of skeletal Gazan children are going viral.
  • France’s foreign ministry stated that the famine in Gaza is Israel’s fault, joining the UK and Germany in demanding an immediate end to the “humanitarian catastrophe.”
  • Over 100 aid organizations, including MSF and Oxfam, reported that their staff, including doctors and aid workers, are “wasting away” due to starvation, with 900,000 children facing hunger.
  • Ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas remain stalled.
  • Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu called its bombing of an iconic Catholic church a “mistake.”

Scott and Ted are best friends who pride themselves on finding common ground despite the fact that they’re on opposite sides of the political divide. But agreement has been elusive on Gaza. Scott is an ardent supporter of Israel whereas Ted is a harsh critic of what he calls genocide.

Get ready for a thoughtful yet passionate argument about the crisis in the Middle East.

 

 

 

Transcript: TMI Show – Ohio’s Many Serial Killers – Friday, July 26, 2025

Generated by AI. There will be errors.

Manila Chan: Hello and welcome to another Rumble Premium episode, a special episode of The TMI Show, the Ted Manila Information Show. I’m Manila Chan. That’s Ted Rall. Today’s Rumble Premium episode will focus on a fun Friday topic of serial killers. Ted apparently alluded earlier this week that Ohio is the birthplace of many serial killers and probably retained a lot of them. I never knew that Ohioans were so murderous because Ohio is in the heart of the Midwest, where people think of nice Americans, similar to how we think of nice Canadians. I knew that California, where I’m from, is very murderous, perhaps the most murderous.

Well, we’ll get into that, but that’s also because California is the most populous state. We attract a lot of weirdos from other states. I don’t want to say that our native sons in California are the most murderous. As the birthplace of murderous people, I feel it could be Ohio or Texas, but California gets a lot of these transient murder types. I don’t know if they’re native Golden State murderers. Although we have a lot of murders in general, we do a lot of killing in Southern California, especially. Northern California too, but California is a big place.

Ted Rall: Okay, so let’s address that. California has a big population. It’s one way to keep the population lower, you know, to make sure things don’t get too crowded—by serial killing.

Manila Chan: Right. We get serial killers who are native sons of other states, like Ohio. They’re trimming the herd, so to speak. That’s one way to look at it.

Manila Chan: I want to read this from ABC 5 News Cleveland. Let me read this, and I want Ted’s reaction because, as we found out, California is actually the most murderous state, but Ohio isn’t far behind. Ohio has a reputation, doesn’t it?

Ted Rall: Oh, of being ax murderers and just generally maintaining a longstanding serial killer reputation. It’s a very 1970s thing, I’m telling you.

Manila Chan: According to the local news in Cleveland, they say these are Northeast Ohio’s most notorious serial killers, and this is just the Northeast, Ted. Northeast Ohio has the biggest city in the state. I’ve been to Cleveland. What’s the other big city? Columbus? Cincinnati?

No, Cincinnati and Cleveland. I really liked Cincinnati. It’s a great city.

Manila Chan: These are Northeast Ohio’s most notorious serial killers. You look at these old-timey pictures from 1937. The decapitated body of a woman was found on Lake Erie’s shore. I don’t know why it required two men to carry the bucket of her remains, but okay. It says everyone seems to be binging on documentaries about real-life horror stories these days. This story was published in 2022, during the throes of COVID, so I guess everybody was watching Netflix documentaries about Ted Bundy and similar cases. They go on to say you don’t have to go far to discover grisly crimes that seem too awful to be true. Northeast Ohio has been home to a number of serial killers. For background, the FBI defines serial murder as the unlawful killing of two or more victims by the same offender in separate events. Here’s one example: the Torso Murders.

Ted Rall: I know the Torso Murders. They’re unsolved, I believe.

Manila Chan: The Torso Murders wreaked havoc across Cleveland in the 1930s. The first victim is believed to have been found in September 1934, with the last being found in August 1938. The killer’s signature was removing the head from the body. According to author James Badal, there were 12 murders committed—six men and six women. Of the official 12 victims, only two were positively identified: Edward Andrassy and Florence Polillo. They were identified because they had police records, according to Badal. He believes victim number 11 wasn’t actually a victim. She was a body that had already been embalmed. I suspect the murderer had access to it and spread the pieces around just to fool the police. No arrests were ever made.

Ted Rall: That’s awesome. I love that guy’s style. Think about it—just to mess with the cops, he gets a stray random torso. It’s great. It reminds me of a case where the woman’s body was already embalmed, meaning he had access to a morgue or a mortuary.

Manila Chan: Did they ever look into the mortician or the embalmer?

Ted Rall: There was a possible suspect, a guy named Francis Sweeney, but there was no proof. No one was ever indicted. They investigated quite thoroughly, but they never solved the case. You know, 50% of murders in this country go unsolved, so this person was good at what they did. This reminds me of a roommate I had who dated the daughter of a notorious gangster in New York City, the head of a gang called the Westies, active in Hell’s Kitchen, the west forties, the western part of Manhattan. It was an Irish gang. There was a semi-fictionalized movie about them, focusing on three women who ran the gang and protection rackets while their men were in prison or dead. Long story short, this Westies guy had an amazing scam. He killed someone, cut off their arm, and kept it in his freezer. Every time he sent one of his gangsters to assassinate someone, he’d say, “Bring the hand.” They’d shoot the victim, leave the gun at the scene, take the dead man’s hand, and leave its prints on the handgun or knife. The cops thought they were dealing with a serial killer who had killed over 150 people, but it was just the hand. When the gangster was killed himself—his body was found face-first in a urinal at an Irish bar, gracing the front page of the New York Post and the Daily News—they broke into his house and found the arm in the freezer. They were like, “Oh, what a mad genius.” That’s kind of like what the Torso Murderer did.

Manila Chan: I feel like the Torso Murders—do you think Cleveland PD has the resources to bother looking into something from 100 years ago?

Ted Rall: This happened between 1934 and 1938, so what’s the point? The suspect is no doubt dead, so there’s no one to catch. The danger is past. There would be no reason to dedicate even one minute to this. What for?

Manila Chan: You don’t think it even deserves closure? These people have families. I would want to know who it was. I would want to know what happened. I think once it’s gone this far, it’s a historical question, not a crime question anymore.

Ted Rall: The purpose of law enforcement is to catch criminals. This criminal is 100% dead. If this criminal was as young as could be, let’s say they were 14 in 1938, they’re dead now.

Manila Chan: I had never heard of this, so the whole idea of murderous Ohioans is a new concept to me because I just figured I knew my people in California. I know that we’re murderous. I know five or six people who have been murdered. I was forgetting the number. To be murderous in California makes sense, but the Ohio thing shocks me. Why? Because you’re all so nice?

Ted Rall: Because you always thought Ohioans were nice, balanced, Midwestern people? You knew about Jeffrey Dahmer, but you thought he was a one-off psycho serial killer.

Manila Chan: Yeah, I thought he was the one-off.

Ted Rall: No, there are quite a few. I have a list if you want to hear it.

Manila Chan: I do. If you have more, that’s news to me.

Ted Rall: Here, let me give you some, and then we can get back. This guy might be on your list. He’s a Clevelander: Anthony Sowell, born in 1959, had a troubled upbringing, served in the Marines from 1978 to 1985, but was thrown out for rape in 1989. Between 2007 and 2009, not long ago, he murdered 11 people in Cleveland, luring them to his house with promises of drugs or alcohol. He strangled them, often raped their corpses, and stored their bodies in his home and backyard. The discovery of decomposing remains in 2009 shocked the community. I should think so. He was convicted of 82 counts of murder, rape, and abuse. He was known as the Cleveland Strangler, and these were missing Black women.

Manila Chan: What was his name? Anthony Sowell, right? Did you say Samuel Little?

Ted Rall: Anthony Sowell, S-O-W-E-L-L.

 

Manila Chan: Now who’s this guy, Donald Harvey?

Ted Rall: I have this guy on the list. Samuel Little, from about ten years ago, in the same little town where three cops were just ambushed and killed, the Lorain area.

Manila Chan: Okay, so this guy, Samuel Little—in this photo, you can see him. According to the FBI, Samuel Little confessed to 93 murders, including a few in Northeast Ohio. Authorities said he has been matched to 50 cases, with 43 cases still pending confirmation. Little told investigators he strangled Roberta Tanderek in September 1991 and dumped her body in a wooded area of Firestone Metropark. She was found a few weeks later by a man walking in the woods. The body of the 34-year-old mother was badly decomposed, and the cause of death wasn’t determined. Based on the information provided by Mr. Little, Akron detectives plan to meet with the Summit County medical examiner to reexamine the case. So I suppose, Ted, to your point, they’re only looking into Mr. Little because he was active in the 1990s.

Ted Rall: He’s dead now. He died in 2020 in prison while serving multiple life sentences.

Manila Chan: This photo was from 2013. Speaking of a Clevelander, Cuyahoga Falls isn’t far. Does it count if you’re from Ohio but killed in Kansas?

Ted Rall: We’re talking about serial killers who are from Ohio. Robert Berdella, born in 1949 outside Cleveland, moved to Kansas City, Missouri, where he ran a booth at the Kansas City Renaissance Festival. He had a history of animal cruelty and odd behavior. Between 1984 and 1987, he kidnapped, tortured, and killed at least six men in Kansas City. He documented his atrocities in journals, using drugs, electric shocks, and injections to subdue victims before killing them. The escape of a survivor in 1988 led to his arrest. He was convicted on multiple counts, received multiple life sentences, and died in prison in 1992. He was known as the Kansas City Butcher.

There are a lot of these guys. I’m not going to get into Dahmer because everyone knows about him.

Manila Chan: That’s the only one I knew of from Ohio.

Ted Rall: He’s very famous. But you’ll like this one. Gary Heidnik, born in 1943 in Eastlake, Ohio, inspired the character Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs. He had a traumatic childhood marked by abuse and mental illness, served in the army, but was discharged for being crazy. In Philadelphia in the 1980s, he kidnapped, tortured, and raped six women, killing two by starvation. He could have gotten a job in the IDF. He missed his calling with electrocution in a basement dungeon. His crimes came to light in 1987 when one of his victims escaped. That’s how he got caught. Convicted in 1988, he was sentenced to death and executed by lethal injection in 1999. Another native son of Ohio.

Native son of Ohio, Michael Madison, born in 1977, had a criminal history including drug and assault charges and grew up in a troubled environment with limited education. Between 2012 and 2013, he killed at least three women in East Cleveland, sexually assaulting and strangling them. Neighbors reported a foul odor, leading to the discovery of bodies in 2013. He received a death sentence, which is still in effect. He’s awaiting execution.

Let me tell you about a personal one. Eugene W. Gall Jr. is a notorious figure linked to a series of violent crimes in the Dayton area during the late 1970s when I lived there. I was in high school and graduated in 1981. Born in Hillsboro, Ohio, Gall’s case stands out for its brutality and controversy surrounding his parole eligibility. His criminal history began in the late 1960s or early 1970s with reports suggesting he committed multiple rapes in the Metro Dayton area while working at a steel mill in Middletown, where JD Vance grew up. In 1970, he was indicted for raping a young girl in Franklin Township and, facing overwhelming evidence, was sentenced to Lima State Mental Hospital before being convicted of armed robbery, abduction, and rape. Sentenced to three to twenty years, he was paroled after just five years in April 1977. He was back at it within months.

On October 20, 1977, I remember this vividly, he abducted 14-year-old Beth Ann Mote while she walked to Oakwood Junior High School in Oakwood, a Dayton suburb. Manila, I was 14 at the same time and walked from my house up Far Hills Avenue about a mile and a half to Fairmont West High School. Beth Ann Mote lived just south of Fairmont West High School and walked about a mile and a half to Oakwood High School on the same road, Far Hills Avenue, Route 48, so you can see why this was chilling to me. A tiny girl at four foot ten and seventy-five pounds, Beth Ann was forced at knifepoint into his car, raped, and stabbed to death in a wooded area of Miami Township. Her body was found a week later in a back alley in downtown Dayton with her school books.

On March 7, 1978, he raped a 13-year-old girl at gunpoint in Dayton. On April 3, 1978, he abducted four Beavercreek schoolchildren from a bus stop, raping two. Two days later, on April 5, 1978, he kidnapped 12-year-old Lisa Jansen in Cincinnati while she walked to school, drove her to Kentucky, raped her, and shot her in the head, leaving her body in a ditch. Arrested the day of Lisa’s abduction after robbing a Kentucky grocery store and shooting state trooper Gary Carey, who survived, Gall faced charges in both states. In Ohio, he acted as his own attorney—you can imagine how that worked out—but it’s always a good move. He pled guilty to kidnapping, raping, and murdering Beth Ann Mote and received a life sentence plus fourteen to fifty years. In Kentucky, he got the death sentence for Lisa Jansen’s murder, which was overturned on appeal, and he served eleven years for the trooper shooting. His Kentucky prison term sparked a 2016 appeal for jail credit in Ohio, which was denied by the courts. His background includes a very violent childhood and brain damage from an injury causing seizures. A lot of these people have brain injuries. In a 1972 declaration of incompetence followed by two years in a mental institution, he was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic. His mental illness was noted by experts, but the state went after him for severe penalties.

Parole hearings, including one delayed to July 2031, have faced opposition due to his permanently dangerous psychopathic label, with the victims’ families, prosecutors, myself, and Clovis arguing against the idea that he should ever walk free. The establishment narrative portrays Gall as a clear-cut monster, but critical examination reveals gaps—his early parole despite mental health issues, the possibility of unreported victims, and reliance on his confession raise doubts about investigative thoroughness and systemic failure. His case, centered around Dayton, Kettering, and Oakwood, underscored a dark chapter in local crime history. About ten years ago, I was reading the Dayton Daily News, and it said they were considering him for parole and that he might be released in Dayton. I was like, “Oh my God.” The idea that he should ever walk free—Robbie and I talked about it. The idea that that guy should ever walk free, I mean, he’s a complete maniac.

Manila Chan: This goes to what we were talking about on the live show about how there are no mental health institutions for psychopaths like that. America has a big population—over 300 million people, I don’t care what their immigration status is. Let’s say we overestimate; the census says around 320 to 330 million, maybe as high as 350 million. It’s a big population. In every population, there’s always a percentage of people who are mentally disturbed and psychopaths. In fact, there are psychopaths walking around us every day. The difference is those we pass by who don’t murder us can keep it under control, but then there are those who flip out and feed into their psychopathy, whether it’s eating people, raping, or dismembering—who knows, whatever their thing is. I don’t know what that number would actually be, but I’m going to say at least 2% of the American population are psychopaths.

Ted Rall: I thought it was sociopaths.

Manila Chan: Well, I think there’s a difference.

 

Ted Rall: There is a slight difference; even psychologists have a hard time distinguishing. Let me tell you about some notorious cases from my hometown. There’s the China Arnold case. China Arnold was a Daytonian who, in 2005, murdered her 28-day-old daughter, Paris Talley, by putting her in the microwave.

Manila Chan: Is that what you call someone from Dayton—a Daytonian?

Ted Rall: Someone from Dayton is a Daytonian.

Manila Chan: I’m an Angeleno from Los Angeles.

Ted Rall: She was a Daytonian. But that doesn’t make her a serial killer. There was also a mom in DC in the past year or two who put her kid in the oven, but that doesn’t make one a serial killer.

Manila Chan: No, it’s not a massacre. Some notorious murders.

Ted Rall: Back in the late 1800s, a Daytonian doctor named Dr. Oliver Crook Haugh killed multiple wives and patients. It all came to light when he set his house on fire after his wife threatened to divorce him for all the killing he was doing. He was executed in 1907 by electric chair. Also, there was the still-unsolved case of the Dayton Strangler, who operated between 1900 and 1904, murdered five women and one man, including 11-year-old Ada Lentz and Elizabeth Fulhart. The victims were mutilated and discarded in public places like cisterns. The cases were unsolved despite multiple arrests. A serial killer from Waukegan, Illinois, Alton Coleman, with his girlfriend Deborah Brown, conducted a six-state killing spree focused on Ohio. In Dayton, they were linked to murders during a seven-week rampage targeting their victims with beatings and shootings. He identified himself as a Black nationalist. The most recent mass murder in Ohio was the Dayton shooting at Ned Peppers Bar in the Oregon District in February 2019. A 24-year-old named Connor Betts used an AR-15 and killed nine people, including his sister. He was killed on the spot. No one really knows why he did that. His sister was part of that. These are just some random mass murderous people.

Manila Chan: They all have a thousand-yard stare. That’s the look of executed death row serial killers in U.S. history. The guy on the far left is like a dreamboat. He’s kind of handsome.

Ted Rall: I thought that too. I was like, “God.” That’s like a James Dean look going on there. I mean, I’d reconsider my heterosexuality for that guy. That psycho killer was very handsome.

Manila Chan: I asked Grok why so many serial killers and mass murderers hail from Ohio. Grok says the notion that Ohio produces an unusually high number of serial killers and mass murderers is somewhat overstated, though the state does rank in the top tier for serial killers in several analyses, typically top five to ten, depending on the dataset and whether measuring absolute numbers or per capita rates. For mass murderers, often defined as those killings of four or more people in a single incident, a mass shooting would be a mass murder, but a serial killer is someone who strikes over and over. Allegedly, like Gilgo Beach.

Ted Rall: Allegedly.

Manila Chan: Ohio experiences incidents at a rate comparable to other populous states but doesn’t lead nationally. Below, I’ll break down this data from reliable sources, then explore potential explanations based on criminological patterns and regional factors. Serial killers are typically defined as individuals who murder three or more over a period of time with a cooling-off period between killings. The U.S. has the highest number of documented serial killers globally, an AI estimate says 3,600, and state rankings vary by source due to differences in databases, like the FBI, Radford University, or media compilations, and inclusion criteria, convicted versus suspected.

Ted Rall: We have to be inclusive in the murdery community.

Manila Chan: I don’t know how you’d be inclusive in the murdery community. How do you do that? Show some DEI? I guess. Here’s the comparison of top states based on absolute numbers of known serial killers, not per capita, as larger states naturally have more because we have more people, like California. So data is aggregated from multiple sources for a balanced overview. Thank you, Grok. My home state is number one by pure numbers for obvious reasons. Like I said, we are the most populous state. The estimated number of serial killers is 1,777. That’s a lot of serial killers. Even for a big state, that’s a lot. I kind of think it’s disproportionate. I’d have to scroll down to see these numbers beforehand. That is a ton of serial killers. I’m shocked. Other sources say 15 to 18. Maybe this includes unsolved cases? Why does California have almost 2,000 serial killers? That can’t be right. I’m going to check.

Ted Rall: While you’re doing that, another source says California has a known 15 to 18, with notable examples like Ted Bundy, who was also active in multiple states, the Zodiac Killer, and the Golden State Killer.

Manila Chan: The Zodiac and Golden State Killers were more like movie-style killers because they had their special insignia, right? They would leave weird little clues. So they’re the stuff of movies. Texas comes in as number two, but they’re also a very populous state, supposedly with 984. I don’t know these names—Dean Corll and Henry Lee Lucas? Florida is not a surprise, with 933 according to World Atlas. There’s a woman, Aileen Wuornos, but Ted Bundy was executed there. So does he count as a Florida man? It’s hard to say.

Ted Rall: He was a busy boy all over the place. Illinois is number four with 680. New York comes in at number five. We have Joel Rifkin and David Berkowitz, Son of Sam. Ohio is number six. I looked up per capita, and I have to apologize and withdraw my offline comment to you about California being high per capita. I was wrong. You’re going to freak out, Manila, about this. The number one in the nation for per capita serial killers is Washington, DC, due to a small population and significant serial killer activity. Number two is Sarah Palin’s home state of Alaska, approximately 15 serial killers per million residents based on 51 serial killers between 1900 and 2014, with a small population amplifying the rate. Notorious killers include Robert Hansen, the Butcher Baker. He’s got a little bit of a game going for him.

Manila Chan: I do like the alliteration. For people not following, after that, it’s Nevada, Oregon, and Louisiana. But DC and Alaska? Here’s why Ted knew this would freak me out: DC is a very dangerous city. Per capita is how you calculate your chance of getting struck by lightning—your personal chances of being serial-killed. My chance of being struck by lightning is less than being serial-killed in DC, for example. They calculate based on per capita. I didn’t know Alaska would be number two per capita. But if you think about how remote and desolate it is, you can take reprieves between murders. It’s much harder to do that in DC because there are cameras on every corner. So that’s kind of shocking to me. I thought for sure LA would be higher.

Ted Rall: According to Grok, you are significantly more likely to be killed by a serial killer in Washington, DC, than to be struck by lightning. The odds of being murdered by a serial killer are one in 165,000. That’s not very comforting. With a few million people in DC, if there’s a million people in a city with those odds, that means at any given point, seven or eight of them are going to get killed by a serial killer, not a random act, but a deliberate serial killer. The odds are one in 1.5 million.

Manila Chan: That’s why I don’t know the exact numbers, but I knew off the top of my head that my chances of being killed by a serial killer in DC far surpassed that of being struck by lightning. Nine out of ten people who get struck by lightning survive, by the way.

Ted Rall: Really? Okay. Let’s do some historical stuff. This fascinated me. In Ohio, we’re not serial killers come lately. We don’t just do it in the ‘80s and ‘90s, millennial style. We have a sense of history. Our sense of serial killing and mass murders predates Ohio entering the union as a state in 1803. On March 8, 1782, American militiamen committed a huge war crime. They slaughtered 96 Christian Delaware Native Americans—29 men, 27 women, and 40 children—in Gnadenhutten. But that’s a mass murder, not a serial killing.

Manila Chan: That’s true.

Ted Rall: Also, on September 15, 1812, there was the Copus Massacre. Native American warriors and their British allies killed three settlers while injuring others during the War of 1812. Those are mass murders, but I thought that was interesting. We do have some other historic murders.

Manila Chan: I’m a little surprised to find that, out of the 50 states and U.S. territories and districts, including DC, Ohio even falls in the top ten. I’m seriously shocked. I’ve had a good time every time I’ve been to Ohio, and everyone was always nice. I didn’t get serial-killed. Meanwhile, I’m roaming around DC, and I have around a one in 150,000 chance of being serial-killed.

Ted Rall: Yeah, just from having been in DC for a long time, you’re much closer to being serial-killed. You’re kind of overdue for it. You’re kind of jumping.

Manila Chan: I probably should find a serial killer and just say, “Okay, I’m here. Alright, dude. I know I’m due my odds.”

Ted Rall: The problem is, how do you walk on the street and know you’re looking at a serial killer? Look at this guy. If you go into DuPont Circle and you’re like, “Yoohoo, any serial killers? Hello, serial killers,” what? This guy’s wearing Joe Biden Ray-Bans. He looks like he could be in a band from the ‘80s or one of these millennial hipsters, maybe a bassist for James Taylor.

Manila Chan: That’s what I was hearing about some of the victims, I guess. That’s horrible. Sometimes in their mugshots, they have the death stare, that thousand-mile stare. But other times, the problem is, how do you know when you’re looking at a serial killer? You don’t. This guy, I mean, how do you know? He’s just a guy. Jeffrey Dahmer’s neighbors didn’t know he was doing that. They were friends with him. David Berkowitz’s neighbors didn’t know he was doing that. Look at this guy. He just looks like any guy. There’s concern that David Berkowitz didn’t do all of those, though. This guy has a pitiful look on his face. He doesn’t look like a serial killer.

This is a compilation of serial killers in the twentieth century in the U.S. Obviously, Ted Bundy—they did a whole Netflix special on him, and they used Zac Efron to play Ted Bundy because, by that era’s taste, people thought he was a hottie.

I’m sure, by the standards of that era. By today’s standards, they picked Zac Efron to play Ted Bundy. I guess he was a good-looking man and very charming. He’s on screen right there. He has a unibrow. I’m kind of not into that. And secondarily, the murderous thing—not into that either. But the unibrow would really annoy me. I’ve not dated people for a lot less than the unibrow. That seems like a fair assessment here. Forget the murderous thing, Ted—the unibrow.

Ted Rall: Yeah, murder. I’ve got to get going, but I want to leave. I’ve got to get my stitches out. We were talking about Dr. Pimple Popper because of it. I had a really gross, deep thing that had to be removed surgically.

Manila Chan: Don’t show us. Nope, not it.

Ted Rall: I do have one more. Tom Dillon, born in 1950 in New Philadelphia, Ohio, in Southeastern Ohio. He was an ordinary guy who worked as an engineer and enjoyed hunting, but his mental state deteriorated. Between 1989 and 1992, he murdered five men in Ohio. He targeted hunters and fishermen, using a rifle to snipe the victims in rural areas. No one figured out that the crimes were connected until he started writing to the police to make fun of them. Finally, in 1992, a friend turned him in, and he died in prison in February 2011. He was known as the Ohio Sniper.

Manila Chan: The cops couldn’t figure it out. He was sniping hunters in the woods? He was a hunter himself and then decided to hunt the most dangerous game?

Ted Rall: Hunt the hunter? Yeah.

Manila Chan: Well, there you go. Apparently, I’m in DC about to be serial-killed.

Ted Rall: Be careful. The sadistic, crazy ones come from my neck of the woods. They do all the weird stuff.

Manila Chan: Thanks for tuning in, everybody. Adios. We’ll see you back on the live show. I hope you enjoyed the premium.

Ted Rall: Adios.

Manila Chan: Bye.

 

Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou – Friday, July 25, 2025

Generated with AI. Errors are inevitable.

Ted Rall: Good afternoon. Thanks for joining us. You’re watching DeProgram with me, Ted Rall, editorial cartoonist, and CIA whistleblower, John Kiriakou over there. I’m pointing the wrong way because on my screen, you’re right.

John Kiriakou: That was right. He’s backwards.

Ted Rall: Nice to see you, John.

John Kiriakou: Ted, kudos on that music.

Ted Rall: I wish I could take credit for it. I picked it from YouTube’s officially sanctioned copyright-free music, so we shouldn’t have any copyright problems. As someone who makes a living on intellectual property, I’m always very respectful of other people’s copyright. John, we have a lot to talk about, so we should probably dive right in. France, as we anticipated, has decided to formally recognize Palestine as an independent state, exchange ambassadors, and the whole thing. We’re going to get into that and all the political ramifications. We’ve got to talk about the Democrats who are raising the alarm about masked ICE agents and their unmarked vehicles. They’re going to try to conduct some oversight from the minority side of the aisle. I’m not sure if they’re going to get anywhere with that. Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer says she didn’t take the fifth on anything, that she answered every question fulsomely, wholly, and honestly. She seems to be jonesing for a pardon, but like the cartoon of the fat lady raiding the refrigerator, she might be looking for love in all the wrong places here. Trump wants to sign an executive order making it illegal to be homeless. I’m already working on a cartoon about this. He can do an executive order for everything. We will talk about the ramifications of that. So let’s get into it. French President Emmanuel Macron had a conference scheduled that was supposed to concern the Israel-Palestine crisis, but it fell apart. It looks like he decided to turn a lemon into lemonade and pull the trigger on something he’s been toying with for a long time, which is to join the ranks of many countries like Spain, Ireland, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, and most of the world that have already formally recognized the Republic of Palestine. I’ve been arguing, John, with my friends that this is a big deal. We’re going to look back and say this was a turning point for Palestine that’s hard to overstate. This comes down to the fact that France, until very recently, was the most important diplomatic country. All diplomats had to be fluent in French, no matter what country they were from. Until maybe the 1920s or 1930s, you weren’t considered an educated American if you weren’t fluent in French. My friend Scott Stantis says, “was” is the keyword. It’s true that maybe France’s influence has waned, but I don’t think France can be ignored. I think much of the world, when it comes to diplomacy, is going to be looking to France.

John Kiriakou: I think so too. Among European countries, especially European Union countries, France is a major leader along with Germany. The Germans have thrown their lot in with the Israelis. The French are showing real leadership here. I think you’re right, Ted, that we’re going to look back on this decision as a turning point. It’s one thing for the Irish to recognize Palestine, which they did back in February. All that did was piss off the Israelis, but it threw a bone to the Palestinians that was worth its weight in gold. We expected that to happen because the Irish have been oppressed throughout their history. France, though, is one of the historic colonial powers in the Middle East. That’s why they speak French in Syria and Lebanon, for example. For the French to go out on a limb like this and say, “Enough is enough. We’re recognizing the state of Palestine,” which includes an exchange of ambassadors and presumably French diplomatic support at the United Nations, is huge. France has a Security Council veto. I wish they could veto the American vetoes.

Ted Rall: I wish they could too. This is huge. The question now is, who’s next? Luxembourg, Italy, and Portugal seem to be lining up. There will be others. France is a G7 country and a permanent member of the Security Council. France is a colossus here and a major power in the Middle East. I don’t think you can overstate this. It’s probably the most important move of Macron’s presidency. That and his recent lawsuit against Candace Owens, although we can talk about that later. Not surprisingly, Benjamin Netanyahu was displeased by this move. The way he expressed his displeasure on X was particularly interesting. He deplored the fact that France was recognizing a Palestinian state right next to Tel Aviv. Well, the Palestinian state was always going to be right next to Tel Aviv, unless he knows something about the laws of physics or he’s engaged in ethnic cleansing, because they want this state to be either on an Indonesian island or in a piece of Albania that would be lopped off. He doesn’t want it there. If he were a temperate person leading a normal government instead of a gangster regime in Israel, he would have said something like, “Of course, we would be the first to recognize a lawful, duly elected Democratic Republic of Palestine, and we would be proud to work hand in hand to help rebuild as neighbors and friends. We just can’t possibly work with Hamas, who’ve attacked us without provocation.” That’s what you would hope he would have said, but there’s no pretense here. He didn’t say “recognize a terrorist state” or “recognize a Hamas state.” He said, “recognize a Palestinian state right next to Tel Aviv.”

John Kiriakou: I remember when I was a kid watching an episode of 60 Minutes in which Yitzhak Shamir, who was defense minister at the time, showed the 60 Minutes crew from a helicopter historical Israel, without the West Bank. At the narrowest point, it’s nine miles across from the West Bank to the Mediterranean Sea. He said, “We can’t live with that. They can cut off the nine miles and choke us, and it would be the end of Israel. So we have to have the West Bank.” Even as a teenager, I was like, “Are you guys out of your minds?”

Ted Rall: They want Lebensraum. It’s amazing how much they sound like the Germans. I’ve had pro-Zionist friends criticize me for that comparison. I’m like, “Well, if the jackboot fits, wear it.”

John Kiriakou: Hans Eli makes a good comment here, Ted. We should probably address it, especially the last sentence. The world isn’t always going to prop up Israel. I think that’s what we’re seeing the beginning of right now. These are the first cracks in global or at least Western support for Israel. The United States will try. The United States is going to be the last country to support an independent Palestine. This is the beginning of it. Like Ted said at the very beginning of the show, I don’t think we can overestimate the importance here.

Ted Rall: I think Hans Eli is right. I agree with Hans’ question. The first part of it as well: isn’t the Israelis’ unwillingness to go along with the two-state solution and trying to go for the whole schmear what’s causing this? They’re unwilling to have any kind of state solution. They like the current state of affairs. It will lead to a one-state Palestinian solution. Israel, I’ve often thought, was an outdated, obsolete solution to a nonexistent problem now. Maybe it made sense in 1948. I actually don’t think it made sense in 1948. In 1948, the Brits were withdrawing from the Raj in India, their most important colony. Within twenty years, pretty much every major European power was out of Africa or on their way out. The colonial experiment that this really was goes back to 1920 and the Balfour Declaration, which was a British colonial adventure at the peak of colonialism. By the time it was done, colonialism was out of fashion and done. Here we are. It’s the last settler-colonialist experiment. You could argue that Puerto Rico is a colony or Guam, but Puerto Rico is not a settler-colonial experiment. It’s the locals who live there. We just govern them. That’s not saying it’s right or wrong.

John Kiriakou: Even the Puerto Ricans are split. A third want to be a state, a third want to be an independent country, and a third want to leave things just the way they are. Lulu brought this up, which I was about to mention: Israel was the last country to support apartheid-era South Africa. They know how to pick them. It’s like, “Apartheid-era South Africa, and we’re going to be their last friends.” We are going to be their last friends. It’s going to be sooner rather than later. It’s going to be really hard for each European country to sustain the domestic unpopularity of the state of Israel.

Ted Rall: John, I have to ask you about these horrific photos that have surfaced of tiny children who have become tinier due to famine, reduced to skeletons. It reminded me of the famous footage from Ethiopia during the famine half a century ago, Somalia, places like that. You could argue that all famines are man-made—Irish potato famine, etcetera. This is the most man-made famine outside of the Warsaw Ghetto that we’ve seen in a long time. Five miles away from where these people are, where surgeons are collapsing because they themselves are starving to death, and BBC journalists are starving to death and dying, people are eating couscous and hummus and drinking sweet red wine. There’s plenty of food. There’s no shortage of food.

John Kiriakou: I said that earlier today in an interview. There’s plenty of food. We see these pictures of children starving to death. We’re seeing reports of surgeons in the middle of performing surgery, passing out and fainting from a lack of food. There’s plenty of food. The Israelis just won’t allow the food in. When they do allow the food in and people mob the distribution centers, the Israelis then open fire on the crowds, which they’ve done at least three times in the last two or three weeks.

Ted Rall: It’s almost every day, John. It’s sickening. Here’s a good point.

John Kiriakou: I was talking about this with a friend of mine, Brouillard. What about the Egyptians? The Egyptians are under real pressure today to open the border. They have said they’re not opening the border under any circumstances. They open the border, they will be complicit with the ethnic cleansing. They’re between a rock and a hard place. Do you just let people starve, or do you jump in on the side of the Israelis and cleanse Gaza? Those fucking Israelis. They did this on purpose.

John Kiriakou: The Egyptians aren’t stupid.

Ted Rall: That’s why they built that berm over a year ago, because they’re worried that the Israelis will throw open the border, and they won’t be able to resist. Their troops aren’t going to want to and will not shoot 2 million people.

John Kiriakou: For the last couple of years, I’ve donated money to a Palestinian medical relief organization—not a lot of money. If I have an extra $50, I send it in. I got an automated email from them telling people to stop donating because there are no hospitals in Gaza now. There’s nothing to donate to.

Ted Rall: This reminds me of 1996 to 2001, when the Taliban were running Afghanistan the first time. There were Clinton administration trade sanctions against the Taliban, but they always said, “No, no, no. It’s not medical supplies or food. We don’t prohibit that at all.” When I was there in 2000 and visited a hospital, the doctors—and I found this to be true at other hospitals too—said, “We haven’t seen a Band-Aid since the early ‘90s.” It’s field medicine, like you’re outside a MASH unit, but you’re inside. You have a roof that may or may not leak. It’s a nice tent, basically.

John Kiriakou: That’s what you’ve got.

Ted Rall: These pictures landed hard with me in a surprising way. Pictures are worth a thousand words. I get the impression this is going to change things. It makes a difference. I think Macron saw those photos and was like, “This is it. Done.” He was already on the way, and I think that’s it. No one cares anymore about October 7 or the Holocaust. It’s like, “You’re out of excuses. You have to stop.”

John Kiriakou: Ted, I have a friend. We’ve been friends for twenty years, and he’s not just a Zionist; he’s a dual U.S.-Israeli national. He posted on Facebook yesterday about incidents in the last twenty-four hours: Rhodes, Greece, Israelis blocked from coming off a cruise ship; Sidos, Greece, Israelis targeted by angry Greeks; Cyprus, Israelis had tomatoes thrown at them. It was like ten things. Gazans would love to have some tomatoes thrown at them. I took a picture of a child starving to death in her mother’s arms, nothing but skin and bone, and he blocked me. That’s what we’re up against here.

Ted Rall: They don’t care if children are starving to death. I’m still haunted by that Bret Stephens column from a couple of days ago. He talked about how some people point to the genocidal comments made by high-ranking Israeli officials in the days after October 7, but they were just being intemperate, spicy, angry about October 7. If that were true and that was not the official policy of the Israeli government—which we know it is because all the journalists have reported that it is—those people would have been fired. If President Kiriakou of Israel didn’t let those people stay on, it would be like, “What are you doing? That’s not who we are. Please leave your ID at the door.” They left them in. We’re talking about Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, who were successfully prosecuted for felony hate crimes against Palestinians years before becoming ministers in the Netanyahu government. These are very bad people.

Ted Rall: They should be in prison. People went to prison at Nuremberg for less. Julius Streicher just ran a newspaper—a nasty piece of work, but it was just a newspaper.

John Kiriakou: That’s absolutely right. I’m worried about where this is going. A whole lot of people are going to starve to death—women, children, the elderly, all civilians. They are not right now. The U.S. is not going to put pressure on Netanyahu. We know what our government is like, and I’m not saying this is specific to Donald Trump. The Democrats are exactly the same way. It’s not going to get better in the near term.

Ted Rall: Even AOC can’t be counted upon to resist sending war funding to Israel. From a fiscal conservative standpoint, you should be able to say, “Little birds, we’ve been feeding you since 1948. Time to fly the nest.”

Trump says this is interfering with peace efforts. There are no peace efforts. There’s been two delegations in Qatar. We should talk about that.

John Kiriakou: The U.S. walked out yesterday, saying that Hamas is not serious about hostage releases. Seriously? That’s what the talks are about, hostage releases. Why is it that we call Israelis held by Hamas hostages and Palestinians held by Israel prisoners? When they haven’t been charged with any crime, they were just scooped up because they happen to be Palestinian. Israel is a nation-state, and we love them. It’s like why, if it’s Iran, it’s the regime, but if it’s France, it’s the government—all this loaded language. There are no peace talks right now. They’re on hiatus, and they weren’t accomplishing anything anyway.

Ted Rall: There’s a piece in the Times today about Russia and Ukraine, and it brought up a good point: peace negotiations haven’t really begun in earnest. That’s true about Israel and Palestine. Back during the Henry Kissinger era, shuttle diplomacy was arduous. Whatever bad things you want to say about Henry Kissinger, he was a hardworking dude. He went back and forth all the time.

John Kiriakou: Philip Habib in the ‘80s, same thing. It was a prolonged process to end a complicated war between nation-states. Hamas was really a government—a real government. The Israelis use the Hamas Ministry of Health numbers. They accept Hamas numbers on people killed or wounded. It’s only the Zionists in the United States who pretend they’re not true. They’re an undercount.

Ted Rall: The Israelis are sitting on thousands of uncharged political prisoners, subjected to all sorts of humiliating treatment. In any lopsided military conflict, most of the burden of making peace falls on the superior military force. They’re going to have to make most of the concessions if you want a ceasefire. People will say, “End of World War II, unconditional surrender.” I would have never agreed with the policy of unconditional surrender. I think it dragged World War II on much longer than it needed to.

John Kiriakou: Those days are gone. That’s not how conflicts end anymore.

Ted Rall: Now, like Saddam Hussein, you go hide in your spider hole, leave weapons behind, and an insurgency pops up. Nobody ever admits they were defeated. Hell, Trump didn’t admit he was defeated.

John Kiriakou:: Tom Ford. Good eye. How in the world did Robin Hood know that these were Tom Ford glasses? I never heard of Tom Ford till I bought these glasses. I was like, “Okay, what’s the big deal about Tom Ford?” I don’t know, but I like them.

Ted Rall: Are they pricey?

John Kiriakou:: They kind of were.

Ted Rall: Glasses cost ridiculously. These were $1,200.

John Kiriakou: They don’t look like much. These were only $700. To me, that’s a lot.

Ted Rall: It’s absurd. Let’s talk about the ICE thing. Democratic House Representatives Robert Garcia and Summer Lee wrote a letter to Kristi Noem at the Department of Homeland Security, demanding that she provide all internal DHS memos and policies concerning how ICE is supposed to comport themselves, how they’re supposed to dress, whether there’s a certain color of mask they’re supposed to wear—white in the winter, pink for the gay ICE members, I don’t know. They’re trying to get all that info. Does DHS have to reply?

John Kiriakou: No, it’s an executive branch function. They don’t have to reply. One of the things I learned when I was on Capitol Hill at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is that most of the time, cabinet members just ignore us. We would write letters to the secretary of whatever, assistant secretary, FBI director, or CIA director. They would just ignore us. What are you going to do? Is it worth going to the mat over the fact that they ignored the letter from your staff member? No. I don’t think they’re going to get any satisfaction here. I’m still laughing, though, Ted, at the reporting in the LA Times that tow truck operators are following these ICE officers and towing their cars because they always park illegally, thinking they can do whatever they want because they’re ICE. As soon as they get out to do their raids, the tow trucks tow their cars and impound them. They can’t extend any professional courtesy to these random, unidentified people. How are we supposed to know they’re federal law enforcement officers?

Ted Rall: Are ICE officers really law enforcement officers?

John Kiriakou: That’s a good question. They’re not really law enforcement officers, just like Bureau of Prisons guards are not really law enforcement officers. They’re either series 1810 or 1811. In this case, they’re both 1810s, which means they’re allowed to be armed, but they’re not going to pull someone over for speeding or disrupt a shoplifter at Walmart if they happen to be there. Could they? I’m not even sure.

Ted Rall: There was a strange experience at the University of Cincinnati where a campus policeman pulled over someone on a city street for running a stop sign, and it led to a violent incident where the dude shot the motorist—one of those shootings of Black motorists by a white cop. I was like, “Can the University of Cincinnati rent-a-cop really play real cop? Aren’t you like Paul Blart, Mall Cop?” If they want to be treated like real law enforcement officers, they’ve got to wear uniforms, show their faces, and show ID. As far as I’m concerned, they’re just random thugs.

John Kiriakou: I have to agree. They went to FLETC. Houdini, they’ve gone through FLETC, which is the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. I went through FLETC before my CIA days. I was an 1810, so we did the handgun training, but I was 100% not considered law enforcement. Coming through FLETC does not necessarily make you law enforcement. I had a beautiful, shiny gold badge that I kept in a leather case. I regretted having to turn it in when I went to the agency, and it got me out of a couple of speeding tickets. I didn’t consider myself law enforcement, and I would not have tried to stop a shoplifter at Walmart. I would have said, “It’s not my job. Let the next guy do it.”

Ted Rall: ICE people want our sympathy too.

John Kiriakou: I told you on the morning of January 6, I had to go up to Capitol Hill to meet with Bruce Fine. We knew all hell was going to break loose later in the day, so I wanted to get into Bruce’s office, sign this document, and get the hell out. When I parked my car, there were all these guys taking off their Bureau of Prisons logo polos and putting on black shirts. I was like, “Shame, shame, shame. You clowns aren’t law enforcement.”

Ted Rall: Not as soon as you do that. It’s gross.

John Kiriakou:: Can I interrupt you? In all seriousness, what do you think about this Candace Owens situation? Candace Owens has been on this rant for the last three years, saying that Emmanuel Macron’s wife was born male. She even did a documentary about it, claiming there’s no childhood history, no documents, no photos. Of course, none of that’s true.

Ted Rall: That can’t be true. It’s just not true. I realized my son doesn’t even know where I was born. I’m like, “You don’t know shit about your family.” So I decided, as a gift, to create a giant family tree. I went down a rabbit hole through French and German government genealogy sites. You can go back four or five hundred years. In France, Germany, and most countries, we know where you were born, when you were born, when you got married, which church you got married at, who baptized you, where and when you were baptized. It happened in 1611. In France, I guarantee you that Mrs. Macron is not a dude-looks-like-a-lady situation.

John Kiriakou: She looks like a woman and was clearly born a woman.

Ted Rall: She was very cute when she was young and has a son.

John Kiriakou: Not to mention she met her husband when she was his teacher. The Macrons, through their attorneys, approached Candace Owens a year ago and said, “Stop doing this. It’s not true. We’re going to sue you.” She doubled down. Nobody knew this until a couple of days ago that she had been warned to back off. She said she doubled down because she converted to Catholicism, and her Catholic faith demands that she out this man masquerading as the First Lady of France. The Macrons filed the defamation suit now.

Ted Rall: Where?

John Kiriakou: That’s a good question. I’m not sure. Where would be better for them? England. That would be the best.

Ted Rall: I really wish I’d sued the LA Times in England. I could have because of the internet, even though it would have required me to go to England quite a bit. We have a couple of paid donations here with questions that we should answer. We’ll go in reverse order. Obscure Orca asks, “John, what’s your take on NATO bombing if you could stop it?”

John Kiriakou: I was stationed in Athens at the time, and it was absolutely miserable, not just to be an American diplomat in Greece, but to be an Orthodox Christian American diplomat while the United States government was bombing an Orthodox Christian country that the Greeks considered to be brothers. It was miserable to the point where one of my uncles attacked me verbally at a dinner, and I could barely respond to him. He was like, “Why the fuck did you blow up the Hugo factory? What the fuck were you thinking?” I said, “Theo, that wasn’t me.” I almost didn’t want to answer him. I said, “They converted it to manufacture tanks,” which was true. The bombing of Yugoslavia was wrong, wrong, wrong in the first place. We created this fake rump country called Kosovo that has never otherwise existed through the course of human history. It just so happens to be holy ground for the Serbian Orthodox Church, where most of the Serbian Orthodox monasteries are located. We’re like, “Yeah, tough luck. We’re going to take this land away from you. We’re going to give it to these Muslims that you’ve been feuding with for the last fifteen hundred years, and there’s nothing you can do about it. Oh, and by the way, we’re going to bomb you too just for the hell of it.”

Ted Rall: What about the argument that this was to stop the genocide in Kosovo?

John Kiriakou: Less so the genocide in Kosovo than what was happening. It was Kosovo by then. What we should have done was create a safety zone. Nobody ever said anything about it being an independent country five minutes later. I had access to the information at the time, but there was no information. Why did we not work with Boris Yeltsin to figure this out? Why were we at odds with the Russians over this? This is the nadir of our relationship with the Russians.

Ted Rall: We installed Yeltsin. The Russians will never forgive us.

John Kiriakou: Coming back to serving in Athens in ‘99 while we’re bombing Yugoslavia, every year we have to vacate the embassy on November 17 because it’s the date of the uprising against the military junta that we installed. There’s a massive demonstration that marches from the Polytechnic University, where the uprising began, to the American embassy. We evacuated the American embassy at least a dozen times that year because these demonstrations were gigantic. At the time, right before the Greeks converted to the euro, they had these 100-drachma coins about the size of an Eisenhower silver dollar. They would fling them, and they had some heft. They would smash all the windows on the front of the embassy. Then they would fill balloons with red paint and launch them with slingshots. The next day, the embassy is peppered with red paint splotches, and the windows are all broken from 100-drachma coins. It was awful. It was miserable.

Ted Rall: We’ve got to answer USC_er_21, who donated $5. Thank you, USC. I don’t want to put you in jeopardy, John, but what’s your take on South Park going after Trump?

John Kiriakou: I DVR’d it. It was freaking hilarious.

Ted Rall: I haven’t seen it yet. I’m going to watch it.

John Kiriakou: You’ve got to see it, Ted. I won’t spoil it for you, but the creators of South Park just signed a $1.5 billion streaming agreement. God bless them.

Ted Rall: It’s always for the high-quality animation.

John Kiriakou: I still watch South Park. I’ll admit to you, I watch Family Guy, The Simpsons, South Park, and Bob’s Burgers. I love all the animated shows. Thank you, Caleb, also. South Park is by far the most cutting-edge. When I watch Family Guy with one of my housemates, I always say, “Oh my god, how can they get away with a joke like that?” But South Park, it’s like, “Oh my god.” It’s shocking to me that they’re able to do what they’re doing. It’s all for a good laugh. It’s all comedy, but I love it. I think it’s great.

Ted Rall: My favorite thing those two guys did is still Team America: World Police. I’ve seen it more times than I can count. It’s one of the funniest movies I’ve ever seen in my life.

John Kiriakou: Absolutely hilarious. I wish I could be creative like that.

Ted Rall: I think I could. I wish I was in the writers’ room.

John Kiriakou: You deal in sharp comedy. You’re a political cartoonist. You have to have that kind of biting sense of humor.

Ted Rall: So many of your colleagues are just wussies because they worked at daily papers and were scared.

Ted Rall: I’ll never forget. I got a job interview at the Asbury Park Press. He’s dead now, so I’ll name him. Executive editor Ray Ollwerther brings me into his office. It’s going well. I’m there for a good hour, feeling like I’m going to get this. I’d been drawing local cartoons for Central New Jersey for a year, so it wasn’t like I was blowing in off the street. We’d been dating; now are you going to put a ring on it or not? Everything’s going great, and then Ray leans back, points out the window, and says, “There’s just one more thing. Am I ever going to look outside that window and see people protesting because of one of the cartoons you drew?” I was flummoxed. I said, “I hope so.” I was honest. I said, “It’s not my intent when I sit down to make that happen, but I don’t care if it does. People are going to do what they’re going to do. People get mad at stuff I never see coming, and other stuff I think is going to blow up the world gets no reaction. Don’t you have security?” I thought, “You think that’s the wrong answer?” I never got the job. I had another interview like that at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, same thing. At the Sacramento Bee, Howard Weaver said, “What I have to figure out is if we’re going to let the good burghers of Sacramento wake up to ground glass every morning on their opinion page.” In other words, if he hires me. I’m like, “I hope so. That’s what it’s for.”

John Kiriakou: I purchased their South Park Mormons episode that people are talking about in the chat, and the lice episode. So funny. I still laugh out loud every time I watch it.

Ted Rall: If the animation were better, I would have seen every episode. The animation’s a little rough.

John Kiriakou: I think that’s part of the charm.

Ted Rall: It’s their twenty-seventh season. They kind of got it figured out.

John Kiriakou: It’s crazy.

Ted Rall: Let’s see what else we’ve got to talk about here. Ghislaine Maxwell. I can never pronounce her name. She’s still hot in her prison photos. I’m a little confused by this, John. I know the heat is on the Trump administration over Epstein. I get it. Is this just window dressing? Are they pretending to look into it? It looks like she requested the interview with the DOJ, and they complied and had a wide-ranging conversation with her about anything and everything. She answered everything. If she committed perjury, she would have to face prosecution, which could extend her sentence. That indicates someone who’s probably telling the truth. When you take a risk, it’s like suing for defamation; you subject yourself to discovery. What is this about? Why did this interview take place, what was the desired outcome from both sides, and what’s the actual outcome?

John Kiriakou: This has to be speculation because we really don’t know. Do you remember last week, Ted, when we talked about the comment the Attorney General made about the videos being just child porn and that they’ll never see the light of day? Pam Bondi said, “We will never release.” I said, “We don’t want to see the child porn. We want to know the names of the men committing crimes against children.” It could be that she’s naming people who would be on those hard drives. Apparently, that happened, according to the counsel. Much of the reporting has been on these allegations—and they’re not a stretch by any means—that she wants some sort of commutation, even a pardon. Trump, being Trump, wouldn’t rule it out.

Ted Rall: Why would he give it to her? Doesn’t he want her to shut up?

John Kiriakou: My brain can’t wrap itself around what would possess Donald Trump to throw her a bone. Wouldn’t he pardon her for being quiet, not blabbing everything? It turns out we were right about it depending on what your definition of a list is. Some of the names popping up are Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and a handful of others well-known to every American. The question remains: who were the guys committing crimes against children?

Ted Rall: This reminds me of the Mayflower Madam case in the ‘80s. Her famous little black book made its way into the public eye. She had her johns in there, her girls in there, but also her dry cleaner and her Chinese food place. That’s what people do. If you’re looking for a spreadsheet that says “My Child Sex Clients.xlsx,” it’s not in there.

John Kiriakou: That’s not really the issue. Like all administrations, they’re playing it too cute.

Ted Rall: Was Maxwell railroaded?

John Kiriakou: I don’t think so. I think she was guilty. There were a whole bunch of people who were guilty. They shouldn’t have gone after just her and Epstein. I think she got what she deserved.

Ted Rall: She procured for Epstein. We know that. What this looks like to me is they partied a lot. They had lots of young girls around. They passed them around. It’s not necessarily about a honeypot operation or Mossad. It’s probably just gross dudes drinking, doing drugs, and having a good time, doing shit that’s illegal and immoral sometimes—not all, some of them. It’s like you’re at a party, and there’s something going on in another room. Maybe you don’t go into that room, or maybe you do. I think that’s what it was like.

John Kiriakou: I think you’ve hit it on the head. There’s another thing too, a minor point I’ve often wondered about. Pedophiles are almost always locked up in low-security prisons. They’re not eligible for minimums because they’re pedophiles, which means they’re dangerous to society, but they don’t go to mediums or maximums because they’ll be attacked, killed, beaten, or tortured. She’s at a minimum-security work camp. How the heck did that happen? Why were the rules waived for her? Why is she getting special treatment?

Ted Rall: I don’t know. That’s the whole thing. If there may not be a conspiracy, when things don’t make sense, people fill in the blanks. In all fairness, weird shit happens in the real world. How the Concorde crashed is strange—not a conspiracy, just a piece of metal fell off a plane in front of it, went into the engine, and blew it up. Now we can’t fly supersonic transport anymore.

John Kiriakou: Michael Gardner says rich people get different rules even in prison. Absolutely true. There was a guy in the next row of cells over from me, a quarterback for the New York Giants in the early 1970s. He was in for twenty-five years for running a massive Ponzi scheme. Let’s say he made $100 million and paid $50 million in restitution. He still had $50 million left over. This guy was a real scumbag. He paid off all the Mexican and Black gangs to ensure his safety—$500 a month to the MS-13 shot caller, $500 to the Crips, $500 to the Bloods, $500 to the Mexican Mafia. He hated the food in the cafeteria. Everybody did. He hired one of the Hispanics to be his personal chef. Other guys’ side hustle in prison is stealing food out of the cafeteria, and the guards look the other way. He would spend his $500 a month in the commissary and buy the rest on the black market stolen from the cafeteria. He had this personal chef make him three meals a day. Rich people are different. There are different rules, even in prison.

Ted Rall: I wonder how it was for Martha Stewart?

John Kiriakou: Everybody loved Martha Stewart. She taught them how to make soap and little handicrafts. I think Martha Stewart’s experience in prison was kind of like mine. I’m still in touch with a lot of the Italians. I spoke to two of them last night on a Zoom call to say hi. There was a crooked congressman from Ohio who went to prison a couple of years before I did. He was in my prison.

Ted Rall: I remember that guy. Not Jim Traficant, but the district immediately south of him.

John Kiriakou: Clyde Hall. How in the world did you pull that up? Must be an Ohioan. I haven’t thought of that name in a decade. He got out of prison and said, “They say you don’t go to prison to make friends, but I came out having made some of the best friends of my life.” I remember thinking at the time, before I was ever in trouble, that he was nuts. He’s not nuts, and I understand it now.

Ted Rall: Is it trauma bonding?

John Kiriakou: In part, it could be, but the people you trauma bond with, you tend to walk away from. These guys were genuinely good guys. Some of them did very bad things. I remember one saying, “The cops found a body in a barrel in my storage unit. I don’t know how that body got in there.” I said, “I’m not judging you. Seriously? It could happen to anybody.” He goes, “A hundred people had access to that storage unit.” I said, “Don’t worry.” We’re still in touch. It’s a strange place.

Ted Rall: How do people get so jacked like bodybuilders?

John Kiriakou: There’s literally nothing to do but work out. I saw three guys who were the most perfect human specimens I’ve ever seen. I made sure to walk five miles a day around the track. When it snows, they close the track, and you’re only allowed to walk around the basketball court, so you walk around 500 times. When I first arrived, I was walking around with a captain from the Bonanno family, a very senior guy. It was the first really great advice anybody gave me in prison. I’d been there about two or three weeks. It’s pouring snow, 10 degrees, and we’re walking around the outside basketball court. He said, “How much time do you get?” I said, “Thirty months, feels like thirty years.” He said, “Let me give you some advice. If somebody asks you how much time you have, say five years.” I said, “Why?” He said, “There are guys in here with twenty, twenty-five, thirty years. If they hear you have thirty months and you’re pissed off about it, they’re going to kick your ass. Tell them five years.” Does anybody ever ask to see your paperwork to find out if you’re a child molester? Only when you first arrive. I had to give my paperwork to the shot caller for the Aryans. He read it and said, “Intelligence Identities Protection Act. What the fuck is that?” I said, “It’s like a conspiracy charge.” He goes, “Okay.” I sat with the Aryans for a while until the Italians took me at meals. Some guys will sit with the Aryans, and the shot caller will say, “Who the fuck are you? Give me your paperwork.” The smart ones will go sit with the pedophiles without saying anything. Some will claim they can’t find their paperwork or have their lawyer write a letter. It’s like, “No. If you know what’s good for you, you’re going to move to the pedophile table right now.” They always do.

Ted Rall: How bad are the showers? We’ve all seen the movies.

John Kiriakou: That was one of the very few questions I asked my attorneys. They scheduled a lunch a couple of weeks before I left for prison with a former professor from George Washington University who played fast and loose with a National Science Foundation credit card and got two years. The first question I asked him was, “What’s the situation with the showers?” He said, “Don’t worry about that. It’s nothing like what you see on TV. You’re going to a low or minimum, and they’re all individual showers, completely enclosed with shower curtains, same with the toilets. Don’t worry about it at all.” He was exactly right. I never saw a guy naked in prison—well, that’s not true. We had one strip search once. You do not walk around exposing yourself unless you want every bone in your face broken. There was an Afghan child molester who came into my cell just before I left. I have an entire chapter about him in my second book. He went out to play soccer one day, came back, and his clothes were dripping sweat. It was disgusting. He goes up to the four-foot-tall fan, airing out his balls. I walked past and said, “Sheer, you’re going to get your ass kicked. This isn’t a fucking country club. You’re in prison.” He’s like, “Fuck you. I don’t answer to you.” Four guys were on him like white on rice. They left him in a bloody pulp on the floor. Not surprised at all. Told you. Moron. Lifting up his balls and airing them out. We’re like, “What are you doing? Are you out of your mind?” It’s always weird to me when people are in situations like this and don’t know how to act.

Ted Rall: I like this question: where are criminals actually respected, with child molesters at the bottom? Who’s on top, or does it work that way?

John Kiriakou: It very much works that way. The chomos are at the very bottom. The rats are barely above them. The Italians were at the very top.

Ted Rall: Of all the gangs—and they’re considered a gang—are they mafiosas or Italians, or is there a differentiation?

John Kiriakou: There’s a difference. You have to be connected in some way. The Italian network is very strong. They’ll know weeks in advance that you’re coming to the prison.

Ted Rall: That’s a good question: how did things change during and after your imprisonment? I assume your prison was like the California system I’ve read about, where everything is racially segregated.

John Kiriakou: Absolutely everything. At higher levels, you cannot have contact with other races because you’re branded a race traitor and treated accordingly. You can’t be friends with a Latino or play cards. I made a conscious decision when I first arrived to ignore those racial divisions. At the end of my sentence, the Black shot caller, a guy named Ali from Newark, at the tail end of a twenty-five-year drug charge, came over to hug me and tell me how much he respected me. I wrote his resume for him. I helped him because I refused to respect those racial divisions.

Ted Rall: Did you get any shit for that from whites?

John Kiriakou: No. I got shit from the Hispanics. I was like, “You guys all hate each other. The Mexicans hate the Puerto Ricans, the Puerto Ricans hate the Dominicans, the Dominicans hate the Costa Ricans. It’s ridiculous. You all look exactly the same to me, and you all hate each other.” I never understood it. The Italians were by far the most respected. Of all the gangs—MS-13, Bloods, Crips, Mexican Mafia, Burachos, Norteños—your prisoner number ends with a dash-47, which means organized gang. The Italians were also 47s, by far the smallest and most highly respected. Was there a charge that was most respected in the hierarchy of robbery, murder, rape? RICO. RICO usually had murder attached to it, usually conspiracy to commit murder, because a guy will murder somebody, and twenty people get charged for it as part of the conspiracy. They didn’t like these big rich white-collar criminals. They were viewed as soft. “You thought you were going to get away with it? Poor you. You got caught. Now you’re in prison. Oh my god.”

Ted Rall: It’s a class thing.

John Kiriakou: The only guys where nobody gave a shit were like arsonists. I knew three arsonists. People were like, “Arson. Did you kill anybody? No. Okay, nobody cares.” Insurance fraud, mortgage fraud. One guy was in for property fraud, which I’d never heard of before. He forged papers transferring ownership of a golf course to himself and tried to charge people. He’s like one of those squatters with fake deeds. It’s a big deal, like how car theft is akin to horse theft, stealing a man’s livelihood. Stealing a man’s home is the same way.

Ted Rall: What are your thoughts about all the recent trade deals?

John Kiriakou: I told my sister the other day, I can’t believe Trump is actually getting away with it. People are saying, “Oh my god, he’s nuts. The tariffs, 100%, 50%.” He’s coming to deals with all these countries, and they’re deals that favor the United States.

Ted Rall I can’t believe I’m saying it. I don’t have anything to add to that. That’s very true.

Ted Rall: Donald Trump issued an executive order stating that he’s very upset about the explosion of homelessness. The executive order understates the problem. It says there are 250,000 homeless people in the United States. There are actually 770,000, by a factor of three or four. That number was 550,000 for years, then shot up over the last four years since COVID, as prices shot up and people got priced out of housing. That’s not counting the millions who are couch-surfing, the hidden homeless. He doesn’t care about that. He said it’s a bad look in DC for foreign dignitaries to see tent cities as they drive in from Reagan Airport. He’s right. He says it’s disturbing and dangerous for law-abiding citizens to see people pissing and shitting outside.

John Kiriakou: Nobody wants to see that, but that’s capitalism for you. You can’t keep cutting the budget and starting with services.

Ted Rall: Donald Trump is really good at diagnosing problems. For example, factories in the Midwest have closed, we haven’t retrained anyone, and everybody’s depressed, poor, and addicted to opiates. That sucks. He’s right. That’s not a small thing. Being able to diagnose the problem is very important. I didn’t see Joe Biden or Kamala Harris doing that. Good for you. But Trump’s very bad at coming up with the cure and the treatment. Here, his thesis is that the vast majority of public homeless people are mentally ill, emotionally disturbed, drug addicts, or some combination thereof. That’s probably true. If they aren’t before they get on the street, they rapidly deteriorate. I’ve seen that happen in my neighborhood here in New York. The question is, what do we do about it? His answer seems to be forcible commitment. I’m not the kind of liberal who’s going to say someone has a moral and legal right to sleep outside in Manhattan when it’s five below zero. I want them picked up, dragged off, and taken somewhere safe, nice, and warm. I don’t want them abused, treated like shit, humiliated, attacked, or raped. The problem is there are no facilities here. We’ve got drug addicts and mentally ill people. He’s like, “Reopen the insane asylums,” like the old Creedmoor scandal from the ‘70s, where people were chained to their beds. The point is, Mr. President, there are no facilities. Where are you going to put them? This reminds me of the mass deportations. There are no facilities to handle mass deportations or the mass removal of the homeless from American city streets. Where are you going to put them? That goes double for drug addiction. There’s no treatment available. If you want to create a massive infrastructure, a massive safety net to deal with these people, God bless you. I will help you, support you, and scream to the heavens what a great president you are. I don’t see that happening.

John Kiriakou: I don’t see it happening either. Our viewers are making really good points. There’s a tent right behind the Executive Office Building and another one now at Union Station, same idea. My guess is he’ll find some pretext to move them out. Reagan—well, it started under Carter—when the Supreme Court ruled that people could not be held against their will if they were not a danger to themselves or others. But a lot of them are a danger to themselves or others and are deserving of mental health care. What do we do? Do we make it easier to force people into mental health care?

Ted Rall: Then there’s lots of abuse. When I was a little kid, my neighbor decided it was easier and cheaper than paying alimony to have his wife, who was perfectly wonderful and sane, forcibly committed. She spent six months at the local insane asylum in Dayton before she managed to get out. That kind of shit used to happen all the time.

You don’t want to make it too easy, but you don’t want to make it too hard either. California suffered with that for many years.

John Kiriakou: In the 1970s, they changed the law so the police couldn’t forcibly commit you. Can you imagine the cops ringing your doorbell and by force taking you to a mental institution with nothing you can do about it?

Ted Rall: In a sense, that does happen now. I don’t know if you’ve seen the Netflix movie I Care a Lot. It’s a real phenomenon. Nursing homes conspire to get power of attorney over people who are perfectly fine, targeting them because they’re rich to take their money.

John Kiriakou: They do. We spend scandalously little money on mental health.

Ted Rall: Even though mental health parity is in the Affordable Care Act, it’s completely unenforced.

John Kiriakou: In most counties in America, there are more mentally ill people in the county jail than in mental hospitals. There just aren’t many mental hospitals, and the ones that are there suck ass.

Ted Rall: I had a friend who discovered her ex-husband had committed suicide. She walked in on him. He had almost hacked his own head off with a butcher knife in his kitchen. Unsurprisingly, she freaks out, runs into the streets of Brooklyn screaming, “I want to die.” NYPD shows up, understandably thinking they have a mentally distraught woman on their hands, which they did. They dragged her off to Bellevue and put her in a padded room. She saw her phone, called her sister, who came to visit and said, “Honey, I know you’re really upset, but listen. They’re going to keep you here unless you can pretend you’re okay. They’re going to keep you here indefinitely, maybe forever. You have to get it together, stop crying, stop sobbing, and be like, ‘I’m good now. I can go home.’ Keep it together so they’ll let you go.” She did, then fell apart later. That’s how it works. There was an episode of Lou Grant on Hulu years ago where an investigative journalist got himself committed to a mental hospital to write an article from the inside.

Ted Rall: That’s what happened with the Creedmoor documentary. He couldn’t get out. They drug you. They drug seniors in old folks’ homes too to make them compliant. They weren’t great before they showed up, and they’re definitely not great after.

They did it to my mom. I watched them do it. I knew they were doing it. When they say you need an advocate when you’re in there, they’re not wrong. You need to be there all the time.

There’s a border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia going on right now. It’s not like war in Southeast Asia has ever been a problem for the United States, so maybe we don’t need to talk about it. In all seriousness, Thailand deployed an F-16 across the border into Cambodia and took out artillery positions. They claimed they were retaliating. This boils down to a treaty from 1907 by the French colonial power that set the border. As a graphic artist, this is fascinating. The text of the treaty says the border follows the natural flow of the river. But the drawing that went with it, that some Frenchman in 1907 drew, doesn’t really do that. It puts this temple on the Cambodian side of the border, and the Cambodians are like, “Thank you.” Everybody went with the drawing. As a graphic artist, I agree with that 100%. But under most treaties, you look at the words. The Thais are like, “We’re looking at the words. Fuck the drawing.” That’s what this is all about—art versus text. It’s about this temple. It seems like maybe not a big deal, but it’s not not a big deal either.

John Kiriakou: I didn’t even realize the Cambodians had a military.

Ted Rall: The Khmer Rouge got overrun by the Vietnamese. That was a long time ago.

John Kiriakou: It must not be much of a military. They still have all those mines all over the place. When I first saw this, I was like, “Wait, what?” They’re firing at each other across the border too. This happens between India and China every few years.

Ted Rall: There was a major war over it in 1962. A few years ago, drunken border guards got out of control. That’s why Putin never wanted a NATO country on his border. He knows about drunken border guards. The next thing you know, you’ve got French nukes headed your way with Article 5 of NATO.

John Kiriakou: We were asked earlier in the chat about Trump’s reversal on NATO. He used to hate it; now he loves it. Trump’s always flip-flopping like a fish on a dock. I think he really believes Vladimir Putin would do what he told him to do. He’s so angry that Putin won’t go to the negotiating table and settle this thing with Ukraine that now he’s got to embrace NATO. Otherwise, he’s out there all alone.

Ted Rall: This is what we were talking about earlier. Diplomacy takes fucking work. I know neither of us supported Bill Clinton’s actions against Serbia, but I have to hand it to him. The story about how the Dayton Peace Accord came to be is great. He cleverly brought the three leaders of Serbia, Croatia, and Kosovo to Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Having grown up there, I’m pretty sure Bill Clinton was aware that it was one of the most boring places in the United States. He’s like, “You guys work it out, then you get to go home.” He left them there. They were kind of kept prisoner. He gave them soccer balls. They were getting desperate. Finally, he said, “There’s a French restaurant called L’Auberge, just south of downtown Dayton. It’s the only French restaurant in Dayton. You fellas can go down there and have a good meal, but you’ve got to sign the agreement.” Slobodan Milošević and the rest were like, “Man, I’ve got to have a good meal. Dayton sucks.” They signed. I grew up a quarter of a mile from L’Auberge and walked by it every day from my mom’s house to school. They had a seating chart showing where all the diplomats sat, where Clinton was, what type of wine they had. I laughed at that. French food diplomacy. They were hungry and couldn’t eat the shitty base food anymore.

John Kiriakou: Totally true. 2 Toes says it’s a surprisingly excellent museum. It’s big. It’s not a pop-in for thirty minutes. It’s a half-day event, and it’s good. It’s got a strong aeronautics aspect and amazing space stuff.

Ted Rall: Someone lived in Dayton then. The story back then is that Milošević insisted something needed to be signed. I think it was Clinton, but who knows? All we know is people were hungry, and they ended up at L’Auberge.

John Kiriakou: Indeed. It was a boring place.

Ted Rall: Let’s talk a little before we wrap it up about the homeless executive order. This could be an opportunity for Democrats to say, “Mr. President, you’re right. Homelessness is a national shame for the world’s richest country. We shouldn’t have anybody sleeping outside. Let’s work together on this.” That can’t happen, right?

John Kiriakou: No. There was a piece in the Post today saying it’s all fine and good to sign an executive order, but this is a state issue. He might be able to fiddle with what little federal funding there is, but there’s nothing he could do to force tent cities to be removed or force people into mental institutions. If he wants to propose taking abandoned or mothballed military bases and turning them into housing for the homeless, where they can undergo job training or get mental health care and be reintroduced into society, that’s something else. I think this is mostly talk.

Ted Rall: I don’t think this is one of those things that can get done this way. Maybe we should answer this last question and then start our weekends. What do we think about Trump saying Obama could be arrested over the Russia election scandal? Thanks to Donald Trump going to the Supreme Court, a president can’t be arrested for anything. Issue done. Closed. All Obama would have to argue is that he did it in the exercise of his functions as President of the United States.

John Kiriakou: John Brennan is another issue. Just before we started this show, I interviewed Matt Taibbi for my other podcast, Deep Focus. I lamented that the Justice Department has referred misdemeanor charges against Brennan and Comey related to allegedly lying to Congress. He said that’s true, but he’s hearing now that they are actively pursuing felony conspiracy charges against at least Brennan and maybe Brennan and Comey. I’ll go to Brennan’s trial every single day with a big fat grin on my face. Karma is real, and she’s an evil bitch.

Ted Rall: That’s a perfect place to start our weekend. John Kiriakou, thank you so much. As always, it’s a pleasure to be here with you. That was so fun.

John Kiriakou: It’s always fun. We’re deprogrammed. We’ll be here again next week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM Eastern. Maybe we should try for every day the week after.

Ted Rall: We could try that. Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM Eastern. Please like, follow, and share the show. Seriously, please share it. Find the link and pass it around. It’s a massive thing for us. The numbers are going the right direction, but anything you can do to make them go faster would be much appreciated. Thanks for your questions. It’s always fun to answer them. We have the best viewers. Love you guys. Take care.

John Kiriakou: Thanks, everybody.

 

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “France Recognizes Palestine”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

On “DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou,” where fearless political cartoonist Ted Rall and courageous CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou dissect the world’s most urgent controversies, it’s another busy news day where there’s much to be unspun.

  • France’s groundbreaking decision to recognize Palestine at the UN takes center stage. President Macron says the move is designed to support Gaza’s civilians amid famine hitting civilians, aid workers and journalists because Israel refuses to allow food into the Occupied Territory. Israeli and U.S. leaders, including Trump and Rubio, have condemned it as reckless, arguing it bolsters Hamas and undermines peace efforts. Netanyahu says Gaza is “too close” to Tel Aviv. France, however, sees it as a step toward a two-state solution, potentially inspiring other G7 nations.
  • Democratic lawmakers, including Robert Garcia and Summer Lee, raise rhetorical alarm over masked ICE agents using unmarked vehicles, citing constitutional concerns and public fear, as reported by The Guardian. DHS defends the practice, claiming masks protect agents from gang threats, while critics argue it enables impersonation and erodes accountability under the Fourth Amendment.
  • Next, let’s look into Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent DOJ interviews, where her attorney confirmed she answered all questions honestly, fueling speculation what exactly she shared in terms of Epstein-related testimony. No clemency offers have been made yet, but a House subpoena signals growing pressure to uncover more about Epstein’s network. Trump has deflected questions about a pardon, calling it something he “hasn’t thought about,” while critics question the timing of the meetings.
  • Finally, Trump’s provocative plan to forcibly hospitalize mentally ill and the homeless sparks debate, with Democrats decrying it as a civil liberties violation. Trump says it’s about public safety but faces backlash for its authoritarian overtones.

Tune in live at 5 pm ET or stream 24/7 on DeProgram for unfiltered insights into these seismic issues!

https://rall.com/deprogram-france-palestine-maxwell-trump-policy

Make Funny, Make Money

In media, does satire generate profits? Or do profits permit satire? Causation is elusive. But there is a correlation between how much money a media organization generates and how much funny it publishes or puts on air.

When print newspapers were dominant and highly profitable, satire was a significant part of their content. Based at The Washington Post through the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, Art Buchwald’s syndicated column appeared in more than 500 newspapers worldwide. His droll takes on Beltway politics and everyday absurdities reached millions of Americans and was extremely influential. Mike Royko of The Chicago Daily News and Sun-Times blended populist snark about institutional corruption and sarcastic ethnic humor in hundreds of newspapers, inspiring a generation of journalists. Other influential widely-syndicated columnists included those who blended gossip, news and jokes like Herb “Baghdad by the Bay” Caen of The San Francisco Chronicle, satirist of suburban life Erma Bombeck of The Dayton Journal Herald (which I delivered to my neighbors) and, in the 1990s, Dave “I am not making this up” Barry of The Miami Herald.

By the late 2000s, when I worked as Editor of Acquisitions at the United Press Syndicate, editors’ appetite for humor had vanished. Barry, I said ruefully, would never have had a career had he been younger. Indeed, he never returned to the Herald after he took a sabbatical in 2005.

At this point, print media circulation had been declining steadily for years. As legacy outlets looked for people and topics to cut, humor was one of the first targets. Editorial cartoonists, who had numbered in the hundreds, have been eviscerated.

Until half a century ago, big-city newspapers devoted a lot of space to comics. Sunday comics sections often ran 8-to-16 pages. Strips like Blondie and Doonesbury were widely syndicated, with Peanuts appearing in over 2,600 newspapers at its peak. Today, a Sunday section might include 10-to-15 strips.

The alternative newsweeklies where my career began—papers like SF Weekly, Boston Weekly Dig and The Village Voice—added more humor writers and cartoonists as they expanded in the 1980s. At their peak, in the late 1990s, a paper like the New York Press might run as many as a dozen edgy Gen X strips like my Search and Destroy and Ruben Bolling’s Tom the Dancing Bug. You could tell how well a paper was doing by how many comics it published. When the Internet—specifically, Craigslist—decimated the weeklies’ ad model, satire disappeared first. Alt weeklies have all but vanished.

Editorial decision-making being roughly as transparent as the White House, it’s impossible to say with certainty why satire got a harder swing of the budget-cutter’s ax when times turned hard. Comic strips and humor columns are popular with readers. But many editors have told me that they see these features as non-essential compared to hard news and opinion. Others said that humor generated too many complaints. Newspapers are trying to brand themselves as “serious journalism” to differentiate themselves from entertainment-focused digital media.

Perhaps because the websites of legacy newspapers are as funny-free as their print predecessors, newspaper profits have continued to decline as they’ve moved online.

The book publishing industry, still dominated by print editions, is profitable but threatened by rising operational expenses, including printing and distribution challenges. Returns of unsold books, a long-standing industry issue, make for razor-thin margins. And book publishers aren’t hot on humor. Only a few percent of trade books fall in the niche humor category. And forget edgy topical humor. When I tried to sell my prose Trump parody book Dinner at Mar-a-Lago, publishers liked the writing. But they were as afraid of angry MAGA readers as the president of Harvard.

Just when we need satire more than ever, we get hardly any.

Where there’s expansion and increasing profits—whether it’s cause or effect—you will find humor.

Comedy shows are a cornerstone of the exploding medium of video streaming, where platforms are investing heavily in original material like Netflix’s Squid Game, HBO Max’s Abbott Elementary, Amazon Prime’s The Studio and Hulu’s Common Side Effects. Leading the industry, Netflix released nearly 40 stand-up specials in 2024. The Daily Show, Last Week Tonight and South Park are still going strong. Comedy animations like Bluey and Family Guy top the Nielsen ratings.

A useful test for a correlation between satirical content and financial health is legacy broadcast television. They’re still making billions—but fewer billions. Continuing a years-long trend, total TV station revenue is anticipated to drop more than 9% this year.

The shrinking of legacy network TV profits has created a complicated picture. Networks like ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox run more weekly hours of satire than they did in their heyday of the 1970s and 1980s. But they’re far less prominent. Though Saturday Night Live ran and still runs in the late night, comedies like All in the Family, The Jeffersons, Maude, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour and The Carol Burnett Show ran in prime time. Satire reached massive audiences in an era with only three major networks. Seth Meyers and Jimmy Kimmel can’t come close in their time slots. And if you believe CBS, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is no longer financially viable—it reportedly generated $60 million in revenue but lost $40 million annually due to high costs, including large writing teams, celebrity guests and elaborate sets.

Optimism abounds in the rapidly-expanding $30 billion-a-year podcast industry, and comedy is the cornerstone of the sector. Shows like The Joe Rogan Experience, SmartLess, and My Favorite Murder (which blends true crime with humor) consistently rank among the most popular programs.

Do more profitable media companies run more satire because they can afford it? Or is comedy profitable?

Yes and yes.

Satire is risky because it often pisses off advertisers and viewers. Editors and producers fear that more than cancer. Things seemed to be going well at my interview for the cartoonist job at the Asbury Park Press when the executive editor turned to me with that here’s-the-clutch-question expression. “Will I ever look out there,” he said, gesturing out his office window to the parking lot below, “and see people protesting one of your cartoons?” I replied something about not being able to guarantee that such a thing would never happen. That, they decided, was a risk they couldn’t afford to take.

Profitable organizations can weather a post-backlash downturn. But satirical content is cost-effective compared to content like drama, sports and hard news. And it attracts the younger, engaged audiences sought by advertisers. Had the Press taken a chance with me and other hell-raising types, it might have a brighter future today.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “Never Mind the Democrats. Here’s WHAT’S LEFT.” Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com. He is co-host of the podcast “DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou.”)

TMI Show Ep 188: “Gaza: Now It’s U.S./Israel Against the World”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

After nearly two years of brutal genocide by Israel against the beleaguered population of the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip, the world is at a turning point: support for Israel has never been lower, and it’s only going to get worse. “The TMI Show with hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan,” drops truth bombs on the world’s hottest issue that the mainstream media is terrified of!

France’s bombshell decision to recognize Palestine as a state, announced by President Emmanuel Macron, is a major game changer certain to prompt other big countries to do so and demand an end to Israel’s ethnic cleansing. In the boldest move of his presidency, Macron formally declared France’s commitment to a “just and durable peace” in the Middle East, making it the first G7 nation—and permanent member of the Security Council—to take this step. The announcement, set for the UN General Assembly in September, highlights famine among Gaza doctors and journalists, images of staving and dying babies, and has infuriated the Trump administration as it runs interference for Netanyahu’s far-right extremist government.

Plus:

  • President Trump’s new executive order attacks “endemic vagrancy” by redirecting funds to forcibly rehouse the homeless, including addicts and the mentally ill, in treatment centers that don’t exist. The controversial plan prioritizes involuntary commitment and “assisted outpatient treatment.” It’s a right-wing move to whitewash gangster capitalism and address public safety at the expense of individual rights.
  • Thailand and Cambodia are teetering on war after deadly border clashes killed 12 Thais, with F-16s and artillery escalating tensions. The century-old dispute has flared since a May skirmish. Thai politics are also reeling after PM Shinawatra’s ousting over a leaked call.
  • The China-EU summit exposed trade frictions, with Ursula von der Leyen slamming China’s subsidized electric vehicles. President Xi Jinping deflected, urging closer ties amid U.S. tariff threats. It’s a high-stakes economic showdown.
  • A test of the four-day workweek trial resulted in happier, less burned-out workers with no pay cuts. Over 90% of companies kept the 32-hour schedule. Could this reshape the global workplace?

Transcript: TMI Show with Ted Rall and Robby West – Hulk Hogan RIP

Generated by AI, so errors will occur.

On a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show, hosted by Ted Rall with guest host Robby West, the duo mourns the passing of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan, dedicating the episode to his legacy and legal impact. They discuss Hogan’s rise to fame, his scripted WWE rivalry with Andre the Giant, and the rebranding from WWF to WWE, which boosted its entertainment appeal. The conversation turns to Hogan’s infamous lawsuit against Gawker for posting a private sex tape, resulting in a $115 million judgment (later settled for $31 million) with help from Peter Thiel, highlighting privacy versus press freedom debates. They also touch on personal media defamation experiences, cultural shifts, and the Epstein files controversy, exploring a potential populist left-right alliance over issues like Gaza and transparency.
Ted Rall: Hey, everyone. Thanks for tuning in. You are watching a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show, which normally airs Monday through Friday at 10 AM Eastern Time and features me, Ted Rall. I am the T in TMI. Manila Chan is the M. But today, you only have the T, not the M. You have an R. You have guest host Robby West. He is the producer of the show. Thank you very much for joining me to do this. And just as we got ready to go on the air, we received the news that legendary wrestler Hulk Hogan had passed away. So we thought we would dedicate this segment and the entire show to Hulk Hogan, his legacy, and discuss his life in detail. Additionally, I am particularly interested in the legal ramifications because he established some highly significant libel and defamation laws. Let’s dive into the discussion. Robby, do you watch wrestling?

Robby West: I did watch wrestling when I was a kid back in the eighties. Growing up, I followed Hulk Hogan, Andre the Giant, and Randy Savage; you could see all of them energetically performing, shouting, and hitting each other with chairs during their matches.

Ted Rall: So Donald Trump? Yes, he was part of that scene. Pretty much.

Robby West: Yes, because he was present at those events. I wasn’t a big wrestling fan myself, but when you grow up with cable TV in the rural South, you tend to watch whatever is broadcast. For instance, WKRG Channel 15 down in the Florida Panhandle always aired wrestling, which was as popular there as NASCAR events. So it was one of those two dominant forms of entertainment. That experience served as my introduction to Hulk Hogan. I recall that he had a notable rivalry with Andre the Giant, which stands out in memory.

Ted Rall: That rivalry was, of course, entirely scripted, as is typical with WWE. It’s interesting to note that they used to be called the WWF, but they had to change their name because they were sued by the World Wildlife Fund, which shared the same acronym. The WWF, meaning the panda conservation group, had priority since they were established first. As a result, the wrestling organization rebranded from WWF to WWE. In a strange way, this redefinition helped position them more clearly as an entertainment entity. The term World Wrestling Federation might suggest a legitimate sport organization, whereas World Wrestling Entertainment explicitly clarifies its nature as staged performance. I initially thought that this change might cause many fans to stop watching. But surprisingly, they grew even bigger than before as a result, and I believe people fully embraced this shift. Essentially, any pretense that it was anything other than scripted entertainment was eliminated. I think audiences preferred this transparency, enjoying it without the fiction of it being a genuine sport. I must admit, I don’t watch wrestling myself. However, one aspect I’ve never fully understood is the concept of awards in this context. I’m not sure if calling it fake is the right term, since the action happens, real injuries occur, and the physical effort is authentic, but I don’t grasp the awards system. For example, you win a championship belt for winning a match, yet the match was pre-scripted. There’s no scenario where the outcome wasn’t predetermined. So how can you truly be said to win anything? I understand that outcomes in other sports can be fixed too. But there’s a distinction between two athletes competing, where judges might make an erroneous call leading to the wrong person winning, which is one issue. In contrast, when the entire event is rehearsed and planned in advance, it feels different. For instance, it’s like saying Robby and I are going to wrestle, and then you are designated to receive the title. That doesn’t make sense to me.

Robby West: Well, it’s somewhat similar to elections in the EU or Ukraine. The winner is often predetermined unless an extraordinary event occurs; the voters, or the people in those states, have little real influence. Yes, that’s exactly like the situation with a candidate in Romania who kept getting elected despite being the wrong choice, prompting the European Union to essentially suspend the elections. It’s comparable to France as well. For example, Le Pen was almost certainly going to win. And then, back when I was a kid—no, more precisely, when I was in elementary school—we nearly had a riot because there was a heated argument among the kids. The debate was whether wrestling was fake or not. Of course, one group insisted it was absolutely real, while the other group argued it was obviously staged. So we went to the playground, and it turned into a chaotic brawl. It was wild, and the contention was intense. When I was growing up, wrestling, football, and church were the major activities in the Deep South.

 

Ted Rall: Oh, I’m sure that’s true. Yes, and it’s funny to reflect on this. I never watch any sports now, but I can definitely see the appeal of wrestling. I think it’s worth considering how this works as a form of entertainment, like any other medium. So, how do you think someone like Hulk Hogan achieved such fame? I’ve never seen him wrestle in my life, yet I knew everything about him. I knew who he was and why he was famous. Even though I never watched, I was aware of Andre the Giant because of the Obey stickers. Those stickers were everywhere. How does a personality transcend wrestling to become a mass pop culture figure, even for people who have never stepped inside a wrestling arena?

Alright, let’s shift our focus. I want to highlight that his real name was Terry Bollea. He apparently died of a heart attack at the age of 72. This serves as a reminder that such health events can happen to anyone. You mentioned that he died a millionaire. One reason he died with significant wealth, though I’m unsure how much he saved from his wrestling career, depends on his earnings and how well he was paid, and he had a financial manager to handle his assets. Alternatively, in some cases, managers might steal the money. In other instances, they do an excellent job. If someone has a vice, like a cocaine habit, that money can disappear quickly, or it might be lost on poor investments or taken advantage of by friends. I keep thinking of the band Blondie. They famously snorted $10 million worth of profits in a single year in 1980, and they and their entourage ended up with nothing for a while. So things can get pretty chaotic at that level of fame.

He was the plaintiff in a notorious lawsuit. What happened was that at one point, he had a friend, Bubba the Love Sponge, another Florida personality with a podcast, with whom he did radio. They were hanging out together. I’m not sure if the following incident occurred on more than one occasion; I have the impression it might have. But Bubba suggested to Hulk Hogan, or Terry, hey, would you like to have sex with my wife? I don’t know if alcohol or marijuana had been consumed, but the point is that he did. Terry was present during this event. Some people describe it as a threesome. Others say Terry just watched and derived pleasure from it. Either way, what is known is that surreptitiously, Mr. Sponge videotaped Hulk Hogan having sex with his wife, not Hulk Hogan’s wife. I’m uncertain if Hulk Hogan was married at the time; I got the impression he was single. But anyway, this is a rather sordid story.

Bubba the Love Sponge’s video, I don’t know if he had a falling out with Hulk Hogan or not, but I’m unsure if it was leaked, stolen, or sold. You might remember the website Gawker, which was a news site very prevalent around ten to twenty years ago, run by an English individual. Gawker obtained the video and posted it. Obviously, it served as clickbait for them. Hulk Hogan sued in the state of Florida for defamation. And you know, as you know, as I know personally, it is very, very difficult to sue for defamation in American courts against a media company. Media companies have created numerous legal obstacles and have influenced judges’ temperaments, making them generally predisposed against defendants and in favor of plaintiffs in defamation claims against organizations like newspapers, websites, magazines, TV stations, and radio stations.

This trial was really sensationalistic, and a lot of people thought that Hulk Hogan would not move forward because of the Streisand effect. The Streisand effect is named after the singer Barbra Streisand, who sued paparazzi for taking photos of her secret beachfront enclave. Basically, nobody really saw the photos that appeared in the magazine. But after she sued, everybody went to look at the photos and discovered where she lived. So the Streisand effect means that by complaining about a wrongdoing, you might end up drawing more attention to it. I was worried about that when I sued the LA Times. Not everybody saw the scurrilous smears they published about me. And by suing them, I risked bringing further attention to something that many readers might never have heard of otherwise. So that’s like—

Robby West: I have a quick question. If he did it, and he obviously did, then if a news organization published a video, what crime do they commit? I mean, it wasn’t a lie that something actually happened. So explain this to me. I don’t understand it.

Ted Rall: Let me see if I can find a good summary of the lawsuit. Yeah, the claims included invasion of privacy. For example, in someone else’s house, there’s an invasion of privacy when he’s there having sex with his wife. There is an expectation of privacy when you are having sex behind closed doors, even if someone else is watching, because he didn’t consent to being videotaped.

Robby West: So it was a hidden camera then. Yes, it was a hidden camera. He didn’t know he was being videotaped. Gotcha. Okay, that I don’t fully understand. So it’s an ambush.

Ted Rall: This was in February 2006. The woman’s name was Heather Clem. He said that, and anyway, he also sued for infringement of personality rights. When you are a celebrity in particular, you are deemed to have personality rights; I think at this point, both of us could probably be considered to have them, though not quite on the same level as Hulk Hogan. And Hulk Hogan wouldn’t have the same level of personality rights as, say, Obama. But basically, it is scaled based on your level of celebrity. You have the right to control your public persona and image within reason. For instance, if you go shopping, the paparazzi can take your picture because you’re in public. But a photo of you naked and having sex with someone who is not your wife is particularly damaging to your brand. He also sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress, which most lawyers will tell you is a legitimate claim, but judges and juries tend to view it as a throwaway argument. Like, “oh, too bad for you, you were sad.” But you probably would be sad if you were Hulk Hogan and woke up one morning to find your group sex tape had appeared on the internet. Not just on the internet, not even on a porn site, but on a legitimate news organization.

So anyway, Gawker’s attorneys argued that he had originally sued for copyright infringement, but that was withdrawn. During the trial, Gawker argued that Hulk Hogan had made his own sex life a public matter. However, on cross-examination, when Hulk Hogan’s lawyer asked whether a depiction of his genitalia had any news value, editor AJ Daulerio said “no.” Then Hulk Hogan stated that comments he made in interviews were done in his professional wrestling character, which is not his real personality. So this was an exposure of his real personality that diluted his brand as an entertainer. Nick Denton was the CEO of Gawker at the time, and he tried to appeal, but ultimately, a Florida jury in 2016 ordered them to pay Hulk Hogan $115 million, including $60 million for emotional distress. The jury also awarded him an additional $25 million for punitive damages. So the reactions to this case depended on what you think is more important: your right to privacy or a news organization’s right to publish material it obtains.

News organizations, as robust as the New York Times, argued this poses a threat to freedom of the press because they simply received and published it. Probably this case would not have gone Hulk’s way if he hadn’t sued in Florida. But he was very popular there, the jury liked him, and the Floridians had a dim view of what was done to him. For example, they might think, hey, someone offers to let you sleep with his wife, and then secretly tapes it to give to Gawker. So it was a really interesting case. Anyway, it’s kind of crazy that when Gawker’s editors, including publisher Nick Denton, testified, they were really snotty about the whole thing. They brought their New York attitude to it, acting like this was ridiculous, that Hulk Hogan was just a wrestler, and that he brought it on himself. They didn’t care that he was upset.

Robby West: It completely misread the population. Yes, that might have worked in New York, maybe. Yeah, it probably would have worked there because nobody cares, even though people like wrestling here. But I think privacy rights are not considered that important. Back in the nineteen eighties, we had community access cable, and there was pornography on it in New York City. Someone sued under obscenity law and took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Community access cable standards are based on community values, and the Supreme Court officially ruled that New York City doesn’t have community values. Therefore, the porn stayed. And so now, I would venture to say that even if you live on the Upper East Side, you probably wouldn’t be too happy about having something like what happened to Hulk Hogan occur to you. You know, it’s easy to laugh when it’s not you.

Also, part of the controversy I should mention is there was a political aspect to this. You’re going to love this. So you know who Peter Thiel is. He is a very famous right-wing billionaire tech figure, co-founder of PayPal, and former board member of Facebook. Anyway, he was hanging out with his Australian buddy, Aaron D’Souza, and they were discussing how this might be their opportunity to destroy Gawker. Gawker was liberal-leaning, and more to the point, Gawker had outed Peter Thiel as gay. Peter Thiel was really angry about that and held a grudge, saying this is nobody’s business but his own. So he was waiting for a chance to get even. He decided to finance Hulk Hogan’s case because there’s no way Hulk Hogan, even as a successful wrestler, had the money to outlast a big media organization like Gawker. So they decided to give him millions, $10 million, to fund this lawsuit.

Anyway, this dragged on. In May, Hogan sued Gawker again because they leaked sealed court documents in which he used racial slurs. The transcripts were then published by the National Enquirer. The WWE fired him for being racist. Gawker claimed they didn’t know anything about it, and the case didn’t go anywhere. Long story short, Gawker ultimately failed. They said they couldn’t afford to pay the $140.1 million judgment or the $50 million bonds needed to appeal. So they filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, put themselves up for sale. Gawker was a large group that included Deadspin, Gizmodo, Jezebel, and Lifehacker. The Spanish company Univision ended up buying them. After the sale, they negotiated, and in the end, Hulk Hogan received $31 million.

Robby West: Isn’t Peter Thiel also one of our favorite werewolf, J.D. Vance’s big financial backers? Yes, that is correct. Because one thing—and I don’t know what it is about attorneys from New York or just people from out of state in general—back in the early two thousands, when Jeb Bush first ran for governor of Florida and got soundly defeated, he was running against Lawton Chiles, if I recall correctly, back in the nineties. They were doing a debate, and Lawton Chiles, who sounded a lot like me with that Florida cracker accent, was on stage. I remember watching this debate, and Jeb looked over at Lawton Chiles and said Florida no longer has room for old southern politics. And Ted, you could have heard a pin drop; it went completely silent. My dad looked at me and said, “that stupid Yankee has lost.” And it sounds like that’s kind of what happened here with these attorneys who came down for Gawker. They just viewed the electorate as backward and unsophisticated, which, to be fair, might be true. But if that’s who you’re drawing your jury pool from, it’s probably not a good idea to insult them and pretend it’s raining.

Ted Rall: Totally. Yes, that’s exactly right. And I mean, look, honestly, I was extremely concerned. As you know, I understand what it’s like to be defamed by a media organization. And I’ve worked throughout media my entire life. I started out at a small community newspaper. I’ve worked at big city dailies and national magazines. I’ve been on radio stations, big and small. I’ve been on television and worked for ABC News. You name it, I’ve done it. I’ve been an editor, a writer, a cartoonist, an illustrator, and a copy editor. I’ve seen it all. And I gotta tell you, I could not, for the life of me, understand what Nick Denton was thinking when he posted that video. It had zero news value whatsoever.

Robby West: It might have had news value, let’s say for argument’s sake, if it involved a different person, like Jimmy Swaggart or a TV evangelist. That would make sense.

Ted Rall: Exactly. Or let’s say J.D. Vance, whom you mentioned. Right? Like, anyone who’s a public figure with a conflicting image. So I remember a friend of the show, Scott Stantis, my best friend, and I arguing about Larry Craig, the Idaho senator who was caught soliciting men in the Saint Paul Airport bathroom. He claimed he had a “wide stance” because he was reaching into the stall, playing footsie with the person next to him. That’s how he got caught. Apparently, there’s a well-known gay meeting spot in that airport bathroom. Who would have known? Anyway, the point is, he asked why Craig got in so much trouble. I said, because he was an anti-gay married senator from Idaho who constantly criticized gay people. That’s why. And like, well, how come? I said, it’s like in England, it’s always a Tory MP you find in a scandalous situation, like hanging from the ceiling with a ball gag and a spatula involved. It’s never a Labour MP.

So the point is, of course, that’s right. And like Hulk Hogan, his brand was never I only have sex with my wife.

Robby West: His brand was wild man wrestler. No, his brand was an alpha male, I’ll beat your face in jock. That completely disrupted his brand. Now who would have thought? Yes, his friend. Yes, 100%. His friend should have been completely ashamed. It’s like, no, I guess, Ted, it would be like me, coming out as the right-winger here on “The TMI Show,” if it came out that I was secretly supporting Kamala Harris for president the entire time. Just something off-brand. Or, you know, being a Christian, if I found out I was having an affair with my neighbor while my wife and kids were home.

Ted Rall: Or, let’s say for me, if you found out I’m having a torrid affair with Ann Coulter, or I’m moving to that whites-only community in Arkansas we talked about this morning, and I’ve applied to join there. That goes against brand. Right?

Robby West: So it’s like, hey, they need cartoonists. And that is newsworthy. Well, it’s news, so I don’t think it’d be off-brand. Here’s what I’m thinking about this, Ted. I could 100% say I’m already disqualified. Had you, however, you can go in because you have a couple of things going for you. One, you probably don’t have to worry about someone playing the polar bear game with you on the subway. So you know, I got some black dude just rabbit-punching you. In this whites-only community, they need someone to handle their newspaper. They’ve got to have commentary and cartoons.

Ted Rall: I can prove, by the way, I’ve been working on my genealogy. I can prove that my lineage goes back at least four hundred years in France and Germany as Christian. So they’d be okay with me.

Robby West: Yes, we’re into politics. Yes, I’d be able to trace my genealogy back to about the late nine hundreds so far reliably.

Ted Rall: Oh, that’s amazing.

Robby West: And like, true story, I don’t know if the name rings a bell, but Captain David Morgan—he is my direct ancestor. He’s like my grandfather. So badass. Oh, 100%. So whenever it says that my ancestors literally came and conquered this continent, I’m not saying that. No, I know.

Ted Rall: I believe you, and that’s true. There’s a lot more of you in the South who can say that than in the North.

Robby West: Well, because it’s just so old. It’s old. It’s big.

Ted Rall: Yes, it’s also where some of the earliest settlements were, and then people didn’t really move much once they stayed. They got to the South, like in Georgia, and tended to stay or not go too far. But people arrived in New York and tended to disperse. So, getting back to Terry Bollea, it was crazy to me at the time how many of my friends in the media rolled their eyes and thought he had no case, that he shouldn’t have complained, that he had nothing to bitch about. Literally, I’m sorry, in this case, the only person—it’s not breaking news that a guy has sex. Right? And it’s just not. And this was between the only three people involved. You know, it was between him, the wife, and Bubba the Love Sponge, who liked to watch and film it and ought not to have filmed it.

Robby West: Did the wife know it was being filmed?

Ted Rall: I don’t know. That’s a really good question. She was involved, but I thought it was really disgusting what they did to him. And I think that if I’d been on that jury, because I followed that case very closely, I would have ruled in his favor and hit Gawker hard. I’m really happy about what happened to them. They were a disgusting publication with terrible news judgment, willing to ruin people’s lives for nothing, just for fun. They thought, let’s just mock this dumb wrestler. What’s he gonna do? But it goes back to the Peter Thiel thing. Like, oh, they outed him as gay. Okay, I don’t like Peter Thiel’s politics at all. But is it really anyone’s business, my business, your business, who he sleeps with? It’s really not. And it’s like, why are you outing people? This is his personal life. Well, he’s a rich guy, and he’s famous. So what? Leave him alone. And so I don’t blame him. Also, this part really drove me crazy. A lot of my friends were mad because Peter Thiel gave all this money to Hulk Hogan, without which he never could have prevailed. It’s like, well, listen to yourselves. You’re admitting that an ordinary guy, even one as well-off as Hulk Hogan presumably was, doesn’t stand a chance against a media organization when he sues for libel. Only with the equalizing influence of a billionaire can he maybe prevail. So I don’t see that as a grave injustice to Gawker or any other future defendant. I view it like Sarah Palin needs an infusion of cash to take on the New York Times. They treated her unfairly, and it was wrong. And I don’t care if you’re on the right or the left. I want to see defamation plaintiffs prevail. If I had that cash infusion, I would have prevailed against the LA Times. As it is, I gave them a great run for their money, and they couldn’t believe how hard I was to defeat. But it took five years. The thing is, if I’d had a Peter Thiel, it would have happened, and I would have taken the money. People might say, ew, that’s disgusting. Who cares? It’s like, those guys have filthy money. Why can’t I have filthy money?

Robby West: That’s one of the things I wanted to ask Achilles about on yesterday’s show. They’re talking about the LA Times going into an IPO. Personally, I hope the LA Times dies a miserable death, especially because of what they did to you specifically.

Ted Rall: Thank you. Well, it’s true. And I’m not the only one. When an organization behaves like that, you can be sure it’s not an isolated incident; they’ve done it to many, many other people. I got to know some of the others they mistreated. For example, there was a guy, a sports writer named T.J. Simers, who was in his sixties. The LA Times paid him a lot of money, but they decided they didn’t want to pay him that much anymore. Instead of talking to him like a human being and saying the newspaper business is struggling, we need a new arrangement—he had a contract—they just fabricated excuses and fired him. So he sued for age discrimination and won. When they did discovery, and I know this for a fact, the LA Times’ internal communications came out. And perhaps the most revealing one, especially for a jury in a city that is 50% Latino, was when they were discussing internally the young Latino sportswriter they got to work for one-sixth of his salary. The editors said, okay, so before we get rid of the old guy, is your Hispanic replacement ready? That’s charming. Yes, that’s just who they were. And the LA Times workers, there was no solidarity whatsoever. I think about the first paper I ever worked for. My editor got fired because she refused to fire me over a cartoon the paper had approved. I was 16 years old at the little Vandalia Chronicle in Ohio. When this happened to me at the LA Times, internally, they were all upset. Everyone thought it was bad news, but they were terrified. Not one person who worked at the LA Times ever tweeted to say what happened was wrong, and they knew it was wrong. So there was no solidarity; their union didn’t back me up because they were scared and sucking up to management. Forget them.

Robby West: Really, what’s the point of having a union if it just collaborates with the boss to screw the workers, like talking about Hulk Hogan sleeping with someone else’s wife? What’s the point of paying union dues?

Ted Rall: Yes, you’re 100% right. In Japan, they have a different system with official unions that have a seat on the board of directors. It’s a much more cooperative culture, and it works a little better. But here, a union should be oppositional. That doesn’t mean they have to be mean or rude or deliberately sabotage management, but they should oppose, be militant, and push for their workers’ interests only. And it is definitely in the workers’ interest that the company stay in business and remain profitable. So there’s a balance; you don’t want to go too far. But no, I agree. The LA Times union was not really a union. They were constantly posting things like, we’re so grateful to our management for supporting us in this difficult time. I’m like, what is wrong with you people? Anyway, in terms of the LA Times, they got away with it. And in a sense, I held them to account by making it hard for them. I think they would think twice before doing something like that to someone else again.

Robby West: Well, I sure hope so. And the thing is, more to the point, I know we’re drifting a bit from Hulk Hogan here, but it’s a premium episode. Who cares? I think it just shows how our culture, for lack of a better word, has imploded. Because last night when I was at church, I was talking to another churchgoer, and he asked, Robby, why do you think Biden didn’t release the Epstein files and that Trump is involved? I said, because it’s bigger than Trump. I explained that whoever is in these Epstein files will include people from both parties, people in business, finance, and industry. This is bigger than one person; it encompasses the entire upper echelon of the American leadership establishment. That’s the problem. Forget any foreign funding that might have come through foreign influences or intelligence agencies. I said Trump is lying. He’s doing this to protect the powerful, and he’s destroying his entire coalition to do it. In a big way, it’s like what the LA Times did to you. They circled the wagons. Management knew they were wrong, but they chose to side with the establishment and screw the little guy.It didn’t matter if they were right or wrong.

Ted Rall: And to put a finer point on it, once they committed to that action, there was no going back. Like, because now, when you’re talking about a defendant like the LA Times, they committed to a series of lies they had to keep doubling and tripling down on to cover up their cover-ups. Similarly, Trump knows what’s in those files. AG Pam Bondi has told him. He may have looked at them himself, though I doubt it since he’s not a big reader. But Pam Bondi has fully informed him of the contents. He knows he’s in there. I don’t think for a minute this is about Trump personally committing sex crimes. It doesn’t fit what we know about his personality.

Robby West: No, he likes middle-aged Eastern European models, not someone like Dolph Lundgren. And corn-fed women. Yes, there’s that. Now this is so much bigger. And talking about brand, I was discussing the Hulk Hogan brand, how people always knew who he was. Dan Bongino, I don’t think he realizes—well, maybe he does—but he completely destroyed his brand. When he’s done with the FBI, there’s no going back to Rumble anymore. His show is finished because he went against brand, unlike Hulk Hogan. You know, if you’re a wrestler, a big alpha male, no one’s surprised you’re with women. If he was with a man, people would be shocked. Yes, very much so. Dan Bongino came in, before his appointment, saying the Epstein files are out there, we need the truth, and so on. And now he’s saying, oh, there’s nothing there, it was a suicide. Everyone knows he’s lying. He was putting on a show as a truth-teller who worked for the Secret Service, willing to sacrifice everything for justice, truth, and exposing corruption.

Ted Rall And then a month in, you know Bongino is the only possible source of the leak that AG Bondi told Trump he was in the files, which came out a day or two ago. We know that comes from him. The base must know that. Bongino’s fans must know that. Does that buy him any currency?

Robby West: It will with the Trumpers. So it would have bought more currency if he’d called a press conference, released it, and exposed Trump. That’s what would save Dan Bongino. Just do a press conference, drop the truth bomb, commit political suicide, and set Washington DC on fire. He’d be a hero on the left and right, lionized. Instead, he’s like Hulk Hogan’s friend who betrayed him. That’s Dan Bongino. He is the jerk.

Ted Rall: So yes, that’s what happened here. Obviously, Bongino goes to work for the administration. Yes, he’s been told he’s number two after Pam, with a lot of power, but number two isn’t number one, and even number one isn’t number one because that’s Trump. So number one is Trump, then there’s Kash Patel, then Pam, then him. So he’s really at least fourth in the pecking order. I’ve always said you can’t really affect real change from the inside, only personal change.

Robby West: Unless you’re willing to set yourself on fire on a pyre. If you’re willing to self-immolate. Like, for example, I would like to—or what you’re really doing is declaring to the people, listen, my fate is in your hands. Now if you like, I sided with you, the people, against my former bosses, the government. Now I’m on your side. If you see fit to buy my book, support my podcast, and donate to my legal defense fund, then I’ll be okay. Because I’ve never been in this position, Ted. I never will be. I would like to think I have enough spine that if I were in Dan Bongino’s place with all this going on, I would have the guts to go on national TV and tell the truth. So, here’s what’s happening. When this is done, I guarantee you I’ll be charged under the Espionage Act and go to prison. Basically, do a John Kiriakou. I would like to think I have that kind of courage. I think I do. I don’t know, I’ve never been tested. I would like to think I’m that much of a disagreeable person to burn everything down, using myself as the match. It’s rough. Yes, it is. Because that’s the only thing that can change us. Because change really happens when people are willing to say, damn the consequences, this is wrong, what’s going on is wrong, this has to change, and then you’re willing to either literally or figuratively set yourself on fire to be the change that makes it happen. I’m not advocating going out and self-immolating at Walmart. But what I am saying is that if you’re in a position of power and know the system is completely corrupt, and you promised to clean it, you have a choice. Are you going to gain more power, side with the bosses, or sacrifice everything on principle? And nobody else can do it. We had a press conference because you can’t suppress that. No, you can’t.

Ted Rall: Yes. So what do you think is going to happen here? In the end, you and I both know Trump is going to fire Dan Bongino. You know he’s going to throw him to the wolves. And I guess the other question, there are a bunch of things here. Let’s handicap what will happen with the Epstein files. Speaker Johnson seems to believe that by kicking the can down the road to Labor Day, adjourning Congress early, he can suppress this whole controversy, keep it under wraps, and that people will forget about it. Something else will come up in the headlines to overshadow this, and people will forget, as they have about so many things regarding Trump and others in the past. There’s reason to think that might be true. My instinct says not this time.

Robby West: Not this time. And do you know why? Because the Republican Party is going against its brand. We just talked about that, but take the scenario from Idaho with the anti-gay senator who turns out to be involved with young boys. I mean, I felt sick thinking about it. The Republican Party champions itself as the party of family values, traditional Americana, and protecting children and the unborn. The Democrats never promised to do any of those things. The Republican Party does. So then you have a president who ran on that promise—Trump—talking about the media all the time. Yes, QAnon, all that stuff, Pizzagate. He talked about QAnon. Yes, he owns it. So Trump ran on transparency and draining the swamp. How do you drain the swamp? By going in, cutting down trees, draining the water, and slaying the alligators. That was his brand. He promised transparency. The alligators—no, you don’t. And so this guy at church I was talking to yesterday said, could you please tell me any time when Biden, running for president, promised to release the Epstein files? He said, well, he didn’t. Okay, but Trump did. Not only did Trump promise it, Kash Patel did. Dan Bongino did so on TV all the time. The entire world knew Trump knew Epstein. We always knew they hung out together. There were all those photos. There’s nothing new about those photos. So, curious, what did MAGA World think when Trump said he’d blow all this out of the water, but they also know Trump had an association with Epstein? What did they think the truth was about that association?

Robby West: I think most people are willing to overlook that because rich people hang out with rich people. They just do. It’s a very small circle of friends. Yes, Trump was a donor before he was a politician. So what do you do? You network, you go to all the parties. He invited Bill and Hillary Clinton to his wedding. Everyone knew.

Ted Rall: And Epstein was a neighbor down there in South Beach, Florida, living just two miles away from Epstein.

Robby West: Yes, so as far as that, no one cares. The issue is that Trump promised to be transparent and to drain the swamp, not only to drain the swamp but to make America great again by dismantling the deep state. Yes, and his whole thing about the 2020 election isn’t calling out of brand. Trump always talked about how he was a winner. Well, when he lost, he suddenly became the biggest loser and claimed it was stolen. So it’s like, you can’t be both. You lost, take your lumps, but he never could accept defeat. Then he ran again, saying we’re going to expose everything, we’re going to reveal the corruption. And then he starts telling blatant lies, and you see the control coming from the top. And one day, it’s like someone flipped a switch. You have Charlie Kirk and Cat Turd on Twitter and all these other people talking about how the Epstein files must be released. And then suddenly, oh, Epstein’s a non-story anymore after Trump complained. People are smart enough to realize this. And Ted, I think here’s the opportunity your side of the aisle has now. We have on the right a small group of people in Washington, DC, who are standing up, who are fighting. They’re probably going to face primaries. I guarantee you they are. Marjorie Taylor Greene is going to face a primary. Thomas Massie is going to face a primary. Rand Paul is going to face a primary. It’s up to your people on the left now, for at least some who come in through primaries or are elected, to say, I’m going to put principle over politics. I’m not going to stand with the party. I’m going to stand with these MAGA types on the right and collaborate, because the margin is so small, you don’t need a big majority. All you have to do is obstruct a must-pass bill, like one for automobile states.

Ted Rall: Marjorie Taylor Greene is from Georgia. I don’t know if Georgia is one of those states where Democrats can vote in a Republican primary. I don’t know the answer to that. So in that situation, you’d want to see some strategic voting. Although I gotta say, you and I both believe in a left-right alliance of convenience among populists. But I don’t think the Democratic Party or even the progressive wing of the Democratic Party sees it yet. Some people do. I see it. David Sirota sees it. Cenk Uygur sees it. Others see it. But that’s kind of the intellectual vanguard of the mainstream left in America, and they usually don’t listen to us.

Robby West: I disagree. They end up taking over everything. I disagree, and I think it’s going to be one issue. And this might surprise you, Ted, about how this alliance can come about. It’s because of the genocide happening in Gaza. People are noticing that. Like, AOC actually says she’s opposed to the genocide, but she’s going to keep sending money to Israel for their defensive use to kill Gazans. People see that. So if you start getting people on the left who are sick and tired of this Israel-first mentality, where American tax dollars are used not only to commit a genocide but then you start asking questions. It’s like, Epstein. Epstein. What kind of name is that? Oh, it’s a Jewish name. Oh, it’s a Jewish state. It’s the Jewish state committing a genocide. Then people will start asking questions, which you’re not supposed to do because Ben Shapiro says that makes you a Nazi if you ask questions. Well, who else is he calling a Nazi? Tucker Carlson for asking questions. So then you start getting this conversation going back and forth. We don’t have to agree on everything, but what we can agree on is no one should agree on everything. No, I agree. So we can agree on maybe we should defund Israel. Maybe we should cut them off. Yes, and the way I look at it is if they want to kill Palestinians, they can do it without my money. I agree. And I think that’s going to be the bridge, Ted. Really, honestly, I could be wrong, but I think that’s the way people are willing to start coming together, like the way Mamdani did. I don’t agree with that man on anything. But if I lived in New York, I would have voted for him because when he said, no, I’m not going to Israel, I’m staying here, whether he realizes it or not, that is an America-first position. Of course, take care of your home first by definition. Yes, that’s what we’re asking for.

Ted Rall: Yes, America First is not inherently a right-wing thing. No, not at all. But we’re told it is. Yes, I know. It’s like, I gotta say I never really understood the rabid internationalism on, I think it’s fair to say, the neoliberal Democrats like the Hillary and Bill Clintons of the world, who are aligned with a lot of corporatists. You can sort of see why they like it that way. Their money goes all over the place and lives in the Caymans, Luxembourg, and Switzerland. So they’re citizens of the world. I don’t think those people really care that much what happens to one country more than another.

Robby West: No, they’re globalists. They’re not Americans. They float around. Yes, they’re globalists. By definition, if you believe the entire idea of a nation state is obsolete, then why would you identify as an American? It’s like what we talked about earlier on this morning’s show. What is an American? You know, I think we could do a whole other hour on that. Oh, easily.

Ted Rall: The idea of the nation state, which is relatively new, really only 200 years old in its modern configuration. But it’s like if you’re going to get rid of a system or want to get rid of a system, you better have some idea how you want to replace it. I’m looking at you, George W. Bush, overthrowing Saddam. The globalists don’t. I can see in some airy way how and why we should have one world government. Like, we can address the great inequalities of wealth between the North and the global South. But the point is, I don’t see logistically how you’d be able to hold a whole world government together at this stage. I don’t think our communications technology is good enough. And when you’re in a world with thousands of languages and cultures, I don’t know how you could ever have a global system, sort of like in the lexicon of Star Trek. Everybody formed one world government once we went into interstellar space so we could have one government to represent us to the rest of the galaxy. We can’t do that yet.

Robby West: No, that’s going to be a really hard sell. That’s going to be a hard sell in Pakistan. I know if you go into a short lecture on them about gay rights and feminism. I mean, let’s be honest.

Ted Rall: Or it’ll be a hard sell in Greenwich Village when the Pakistanis are trying to sell Sharia law. So either way, most cultures don’t get along with each other. People have a hard time here in the U.S., and we all speak the same language supposedly. Yes, that’s just the whole problem. And it’s weird because Hulk Hogan was kind of a throwback to Americana. Now, you’re talking about a big, strong, individual, larger-than-life figure with a brand. That was his brand. And then, about a year and a half ago, this guy—something that really impressed me—was he converted to Christianity, and he and his new wife were baptized. When he was asked about it, he said that all his life he realized it was nothing, and that the strongest he’s ever been is now by surrendering to Jesus. And as a Christian, that resonates. It’s like, hey, truly, welcome, brother. That’s huge. I just think that as the country becomes more diverse culturally and ethnically, as the culture gets more diluted, as Christianity retreats, I don’t see another Hulk Hogan. I don’t see another symbol people can look at and say, that’s the guy, without any negative judgment one way or the other. It’s like, that’s Hulk Hogan. I don’t see the next Hulk Hogan. I don’t know if you’re ever going to have another Hulk Hogan.

Ted Rall: Well, I think that’s a really good place to leave it. And I don’t know that I’m going to argue with you on that. I think that’s exactly right. You’ve been watching a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show with me, Ted Rall, and Manila Chan. She’ll be joining some other episodes in the future. Filling in for Manila is producer Robby West. Robby, as always, it’s a real pleasure to do this with you. If you’re watching, please like, follow, and share the show. If you’re watching one of the clips, please check out the full show and subscribe. We’re very close to that magic 1,000 subscribers threshold. We need to start earning some money. And if you’re on Rumble, come over because you’re going to see a lot of spicy content here on Rumble that you won’t see on YouTube. We’re here Monday through Friday at 10 AM Eastern Time, 7 AM on the West Coast. So check us out, and take care.

Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou – “Why is Iran Burning?”

Transcript generated with AI. So there may be errors.

Ted Rall and John Kiriakou discuss critical issues on the Wednesday, July 24, 2025 episode of Deprogram.

Watch/listen here.

Kiriakou shares Congressman Thomas Massie’s efforts to release Jeffrey Epstein files via a discharge petition, facing resistance from House Speaker Mike Johnson, who altered rules to curb subpoenas. They speculate on Trump’s involvement in the Epstein case, doubting direct culpability but suspecting he’s protecting someone close. In Gaza, they condemn ongoing violence as genocide, citing starvation and IDF tactics. They address Kilmar Albrego Garcia’s wrongful deportation and unfair labeling by officials. In Ukraine, Zelensky’s unpopularity and potential CIA-backed coup are highlighted. They also touch on Iranian arson fires, possibly Israeli-orchestrated, and Greek protests against Israeli tourists. The show’s name changes to Deprogram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou for clarity.

Ted Rall: Hey, everyone. Thanks for joining us. You’re watching Deprogram with me, Ted Rall, and John Kiriakou. Lots to talk about. John and I are having quite a day, but, hey, so is the country. John, you were just on the phone with a guy who’s been in the news lately. Maybe you want to tell us about it.

John Kiriakou: I was asked at the last minute to appear on a show called Redacted on the Unified Television Network, not realizing that I was going to be asked to appear alongside Congressman Thomas Massie. So I got on, and as soon as I got on, Massie got on, and he was absolutely fascinating. The whole thing was about Jeffrey Epstein. I’ve been trying to talk a lot about Jeffrey Epstein because these political developments surrounding the Epstein situation are complicated. He made them more complicated with what he said. He used to be on the Rules Committee. The Rules Committee is the single most important committee on Capitol Hill because the members of the Rules Committee decide what bills go to the floor for a vote and what bills are just killed. Because he’s an independent thinker, he was removed from the Rules Committee and is no longer a member. But he says he’s a smart guy.

My time on the Rules Committee taught me how to write a discharge petition. A discharge petition is a very rarely used parliamentary trick in the House of Representatives. I remember it being used once when I was in college in 1986. What a discharge petition is, is this: Let’s say there is a bill to make Ted Rall Day. Okay? And most—well, that would be unopposed. You’d think.

Most people want a Ted Rall Day. Right? But there’s this one asshole on the Rules Committee who says, you know what? I don’t like Ted Rall. He made fun of me in a cartoon one time, and I’m not going to allow this thing to go to the floor for a vote. So Congressman Kiriakou then writes up what’s called the discharge petition. A discharge petition, if it gets a majority, that’s 218 votes, forces the bill out of the Rules Committee, whether they like it or not, to the floor for a vote. Until 1933, you needed 25% of members of Congress to vote yes on the discharge. They changed the rules in 1933, so now you need 218 votes to force a bill to the floor. Thomas Massie just now said that he has a bill to force the administration to release every scrap of paper that exists related to Jeffrey Epstein to the public, including videos, hard drives, black books, files, emails, and everything they have. And Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, said, oh, no. No. We can’t do that. That’s going to embarrass the administration. And the president has already said that there are no files. We can’t contradict the president. So Massie went to Hakeem Jeffries, and Hakeem Jeffries says, you know what? I can guarantee you every single Democrat in the House of Representatives. Meaning that Massie has to come up with five Republicans. He’s one. That’s four more. Marjorie Taylor Greene said yes. That makes three more. So he’s in talks with the Freedom Caucus. That could be as many as six more, which would give him enough to discharge the bill from the Rules Committee.

Ted Rall: So what did Mike Johnson tell him today?

John Kiriakou: Mike Johnson said, if you persist with this, I’m going to change the rules, which haven’t changed since 1933. And I’m going to make it so that you need two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives, not 50% plus one. He can do anything he wants because he’s the Speaker of the House. Another thing Massie said, which was so interesting to me, is that he wants to subpoena people in the Jeffrey Epstein orbit. When I was a senior staff member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I had subpoena power. It’s not something you want to do every day. It pisses people off to receive a subpoena. But if you have somebody that just refuses to testify, you have to issue the subpoena and force them to come and testify before your committee. So Massie issued a whole bunch of subpoenas for all these different people to come before the House and testify as to their role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes or in not helping to end Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. So what happened? Mike Johnson changed the rules. And so now the only people who can issue subpoenas in the House of Representatives are Mike Johnson’s attorneys. No member of Congress can issue a subpoena as of today. Only Mike Johnson’s attorneys. So the fix is in, man. We were saying the day before yesterday when Johnson announced that he didn’t want any votes on Epstein, so he’s just going to shut down the House of Representatives until September so that there won’t be any votes. Now you can’t even issue a subpoena, let alone have a vote. One other thing Massie said that was very interesting: despite this announcement that the House will shut down, it actually won’t shut down because Johnson doesn’t trust Trump to not make recess appointments. They’re all the same party. They’re all Republicans. It’s shocking to me. So Johnson came to an agreement this week, and folks, this is not reported in the media. This is breaking news from Thomas Massie’s mouth. Johnson came to an agreement with John Thune, the Majority Leader in the Senate, that every eight days, they will gavel the House and the Senate into session and then immediately gavel it out of session. The whole process takes five seconds. So this is like the guy in the bottom of the hatch on Lost who has to keep pushing the button. That’s exactly what it is. So that way, they’re in recess, but they’re really not in recess. That way, they can’t vote on Epstein, but Trump can’t make any federal appointments. Shocking.

Ted Rall: Well, just in case you were bored, John, this has broken in the New York Times while you were talking to Thomas. AG Pam Bondi informed Trump in the spring that his name appeared in the Epstein files, according to three people with knowledge of the exchange. The disclosure came as part of a broader briefing on the case by the FBI and prosecutors. It was made by Bondi during a meeting that also included the Deputy AG, Todd Blanch, and covered a variety of topics. She meets regularly with Trump, officials said. They informed Trump that his name, as well as those of other high-profile figures, came up during their reexamination of the Epstein files that had not previously been made public. Trump has already appeared in documents related to the investigation. Steve Chung wouldn’t answer any questions about this briefing and basically reminded everyone that this was supposedly fake news. This has all previously been reported by the Wall Street Journal. But this is a bona fide scandal, John.

John Kiriakou: It is. It is. Wow. Well, I mean, it’s like what we thought it was. The only answers here were that it had to be either the president himself who was somehow implicated to some extent. I have to admit that doesn’t really pass the smell test that the president is a pedophile. No. I don’t believe that. There’s no evidence of that. Of course, anything’s possible, but I just don’t think so. Most things are usually the way they seem. Although every now and then, you’re like, what? So this could be one of those times. But it’s got to be someone close to him. It’s got to be someone he cares about. Interference for.

It has to be. And I’ll tell you what, it has to be Dan Bongino that leaked this to the New York Times. For sure. There is no other possibility.

Ted Rall: So Elon Musk told the truth, which then makes me think, how in the world did Elon Musk know that Donald Trump was in the Epstein files when Musk should not have had access to law enforcement information? That’s a good question. Although, apparently, Doge and Musk had their noses in all sorts of holes that they weren’t supposed to be.

So, I thought we were going to be just talking about sending Congress home early and what a bad look that was. Massie was quoted in this morning’s media, probably from stuff he said yesterday to reporters, saying that MAGA World isn’t going to forget about this just because six weeks go by. This really does remind me of Watergate summer when things dragged out. It was no air conditioning in that Senate hearing. Everyone’s hot and sweaty. It was boring. And this low-level functionary named Paul Butterfield comes in and says, and then the tape recorder in the Oval Office. And people are like, what? There’s a tape recorder in the Oval Office? Reporters go scrambling out the door. I remember that. And I always thought that if Nixon hadn’t dragged his ass on this whole thing, we would have never gotten to that point. The more Trump does this, the more it’s staying in the news. I know he’s hoping there’s going to be an asteroid hit or Jesus is going to finally come back and say hi or something’s going to happen that’s going to wipe this off the headlines, but I don’t see it.

John Kiriakou: No. I don’t either. And I’ll tell you what, Massie said some other things that made me want to yelp out loud. He said that this discharge petition, he wrote it, but it’s co-sponsored by Ro Khanna. He said that he and Ro Khanna have a lot of respect for each other. They work together on a lot of legislation, and they are of one mind on this issue. Frankly, I was enjoying listening to him. I’ve been to a couple of baseball games with Thomas Massie. He is a lovely man. You don’t have to agree with everything he says. He’s very constitutionalist, but that’s cool. He is such a patriot. He said a couple of things that were fascinating. The lesser one first: he said that there is a kind of phony 501(c)(3) nonprofit that all of a sudden started broadcasting TV commercials against him in his district. It took his staff all of fifteen minutes to trace the registration of this 501(c)(3) back to the White House. Just like that. It’s like, no. You can’t do that. You’re not supposed to do that. But this organization, called something like the Make America Great Again Patriots, has already spent $1,800,000. So he’s in serious trouble. He’s being primaried in Kentucky. I went back on Friday and looked at the polls. There’s not a whole lot of polling in these individual congressional races so far. But his constituents love him, and they want him to stand up like this. The more interesting thing he said was in response to the last question of the panel. The host said, so Congressman Massie, you find yourself at odds with the administration a lot, like, all the time. And he laughed and said, yes. And remember, I was the only Republican who voted against Mike Johnson for Speaker. So everybody’s mad at Massie. He’s the Barbara Lee of the right. Or maybe Rand Paul. But Rand Paul is kind of a phony, though. Massie is a true believer. He’s really doing it. So she says, is there any chance that you might consider running for president under Elon Musk’s new America Party? Maybe you and Ro Khanna could do something together. Unity ticket. He says, never say never. That’s always the right answer. And I was like, oh my god. Any other politician would say, I’m a Republican. I’m a lifelong Republican. I stand with the Republican Party. I’m going to work to change the Republican Party from within. That’s not what he said. He said, never say never. My mouth dropped open. It’s an honest answer.

Ted Rall: Deanna Montoya is asking, so neither of us, we’ve said this already, think that it’s likely that Trump could have sexually assaulted a young girl. Let me tell you why I don’t think that’s true. Thousands of pages of biographies of Donald Trump. I wrote a biography of Donald Trump. I don’t recommend that you buy it. It’s really not one of my best books. I have better books if you want to buy one of my books. But I learned a lot about him. He’s led such a public life that it’s really hard to believe that if he had these predilections or if he was really particularly interested in unusual sex, we wouldn’t have heard about it by now. It just doesn’t seem likely. Think about Matt Gaetz; he was only a congressman, and everything came out. Larry Craig, Mr. Wide Stance at the St. Paul Airport, just a senator from Idaho, and we found out everything. So with Donald Trump, who’s the most public person in the United States and has been for decades, I think we would just know. We know he likes to sleep with porn stars now and then and other random women besides his wife, or sometimes the random woman becomes his wife. But that’s not really unusual for dudes in general and for dudes at that level. They have their wives and families and love them, and they also have sex on the side sometimes, but they do it with adults. That’s my take. I’m not saying I have a crystal ball here. If I did, I’d be buying more stocks.

John Kiriakou: I agree with you. I think if he had done something like that, it would have come out by now, even just as a rumor. We also have the statement from Stormy Daniels that he was 100% vanilla, that there was nothing special or out of the ordinary. He was the missionary man, totally ordinary. And he made that comment when he was still friendly with Epstein. He said, Jeff’s a good guy. He’s a fun guy. He loves women just like I do. He loves them young, but he loves women. I think there was a lot behind that statement.

Ted Rall: Here’s the thing too. We do live in a world where perhaps it would be nice if you knew about sexual assault and pedophilia, you might step up and try to stop it or even report it to the authorities, but I suppose that’s too much to hope for in this case.

John Kiriakou: So now we have this speculation game. I’m not going to throw out names here, but we’re all going to be wondering, who is Trump covering for? Is it one person? Are there multiple? There has to be. Because otherwise, this doesn’t make any sense. If he had nothing to hide, he would have ordered the release of the information. He campaigned on ordering the release of the information. He released most of the JFK documents. He released the MLK documents. He’s in the process of releasing the RFK documents. But then all of a sudden, like magic, there are no Epstein documents. There were no files until there were files, and then there’s no files again. I love Speaker Johnson’s comment that only the best files, the proper files, the reliable files should be released.

Ted Rall: And who’s going to get to decide that? Is it going to be you, John, or is it going to be me, Ted? I don’t think so. It’s going to be them, and the truth will out. This is going to come out. Sometimes it takes years, decades even, but the truth always comes out. Always.

John Kiriakou: I remember six weeks before my release from prison, I called my wife. I was allowed to call her every other day for fifteen minutes. So I said, how was your day? She said it was great. And I said, really? It was great? Why was it so great? And she said, because the Senate torture report came out today, and it proved that everything you said was true. So I had to wait from 2007 to December 2014, but my truth came out. This Epstein truth is going to come out, especially when you have people on the inside of the system who hate that it hasn’t come out yet. Bongino’s furious to the point where he’s talking about quitting. Kash Patel is in a real situation right now where his reputation’s on the line, and Donald Trump’s only going to be president for three and a half more years. And then what does Patel do? You have to be on the side of righteousness here. Otherwise, you’re going to ruin yourself.

Ted Rall: Shall we switch over to Gaza? Things in Gaza. It’s hard to know where to start. I could start with Bret Stephens’ rancid column in today’s New York Times, where, again, he’s turning cartwheels to redefine what’s going on there as a non-genocide. In a way, it doesn’t really matter what it’s called, but it is a genocide. He quotes the UN definition of genocide and carefully analyzes it, ignoring the whole “in whole or in part” part of that phrase. You don’t need to kill every Jew like the Nazis wanted to for it to be genocide. They were trying to get most of them to leave, actually. And they herded them into ghettos. The point is, if you go after a significant part of a population and your purpose is to kill them or just get them to leave, that’s still genocide. Even if you don’t kill anyone, you can still be committing cultural genocide by driving a population out of their homeland. But what blew me away is the starvation reports are escalating now to the point where the doctors, who are exhausted beyond belief treating the endless flow of casualties into what’s left of these hospitals in Gaza, are now themselves succumbing to starvation and are literally fainting and passing out while they’re operating on people. That’s because they don’t have enough food or water. Were you the one telling me yesterday or the day before about these games that the IDF play?

Ted Rall: Yep. Absolutely sick. The doctors report that the IDF, literally, for fun, the snipers will be like, today is shoulder day. Let’s shoot everyone in the shoulder. Today is knee day. Let’s shoot everyone in the knee. And then everybody comes in with the same identical injury—abdominal wound, buttock, head wound, all on the same day. It was on the BBC, reaffirmed in the New York Times. The Israelis are taking the piss. They’re having fun.

John Kiriakou: They are. You’ve read the genocide statutes. I’ve read the genocide statutes. I don’t care what people’s political positions are. This meets all of the legal definitions of genocide. It is a genocide. Period.

Ted Rall: There’s no question. It’s sort of like how people with borderline personality disorder will justify anything they do because you triggered them. If you hadn’t said this or done that or remembered to take out the trash, I wouldn’t have burned the house down. Israel is basically a borderline country. They’re saying, well, look at what happened on October 7. Therefore, everything that follows by definition is not our fault. That’s completely absurd and ridiculous. That’s a mental illness.

The only good news, I suppose, is that belatedly, not just two years late but decades late, the world is starting to see it, and people aren’t afraid of Israel anymore. People are willing to speak up. I don’t know that AIPAC is going to keep its power even with all the money they have.

John Kiriakou: I was disappointed in these recent votes in the House of Representatives over military aid to Israel. A friend of mine in Code Pink posted something on Facebook from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez explaining why she voted against a bill that would’ve allocated $500,000,000 for Iron Dome. It’s okay to allocate money for guns to shoot the Palestinians, but your objection is that the money was going to be spent for the Iron Dome. That’s so typical of the Democratic Party, and both parties, these pro-Israel lefties. The ideology just doesn’t make any sense to me.

Ted Rall: Part of it stems from this ridiculous idea that governments and companies have where they’ll say, the money is in a separate pot. So the Iron Dome defense money is in this pot, and the genocide money is in another pot. That’s just fiction because money is fungible by definition. If you pay my cable bill, it’s easier for me to pay my phone bill. It’s like SS guards at a death camp killing people, and we say, we don’t want to finance that because that’s bad. But we don’t want them to fall off the watchtower, so we’ll pay for a little bumper to shore things up. We don’t want them to get shot by the resistance, so we’ll buy them some body armor. If you provide defense for a belligerent, you are assisting that belligerent. Legally, you become a belligerent. Bruce Fein explained this to me. For example, the government of Belarus allowed Russian troops to invade Ukraine through Belarus. That makes Belarus a belligerent, and so it would be subject to war crimes charges after the war. It won’t be, but that’s just an example.

With the doctors falling down, it’s just going to get worse and worse. Another thing that was funny about that stupid column in the Times today was he said, if they were really committing genocide, it would be hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands. First of all, it is hundreds of thousands. They just haven’t found the bodies, but it’s arithmetic. There were 2,300,000 Palestinians there before October 6, 2023. We’re down to about two million now. 2.3 minus 2 is 300,000.

John Kiriakou: You’re right about the bodies. Most of Gaza has been leveled. It’s rubble. You can see it in the overhead photography. Nobody has any idea how many tens of thousands of bodies are underneath those buildings. Hundreds of thousands of bodies. The bodies aren’t counted by the Gaza Health Ministry unless they’re recovered and identified. So you have to know, like, that’s John Smith, his birth date is such and such, his occupation was whatever. You’ve been to wars, I’ve been to wars. It takes a long time to find out. When a body—I’m speaking to you inside a nine-story building right now. If someone dropped a bomb on this building, there’s probably fifty, sixty people here now. I think it would take weeks even for the NYPD to find everyone.

They just found a body in Pacific Palisades yesterday, in the LA Times. They’re going through these houses that turned to ash. They just got around to this one block, and sure enough, there was a burned body in the ruins yesterday. This was months ago. I guess we’ll just keep an eye on this story, obviously. It’s an ongoing catastrophe.

Ted Rall: So let’s talk about Kilmar Albrego Garcia. I’m glad to see this. His lawyers are aggressive. This is, of course, the guy who, by all accounts, is a green card holder deported to El Salvador. There was a specific court order preventing that from happening, which ICE and the Trump administration either willfully or accidentally ignored, deported him anyway. Then they found out, and they made all sorts of ridiculous maneuvers to try to prevent that. When they did bring him back, they came up with some charges that may or may not be valid to say that he’d been involved in smuggling illegal immigrants and possibly working for MS-13, which, apparently, the truth is that he left El Salvador originally because he was afraid of MS-13. The Salvadoran authorities even said he doesn’t fit the profile, nothing they believe. They don’t believe he’s a member. He doesn’t have the right tattoos. Nothing fits. He’s kind of just a mild-mannered dude who may not have been the best husband. Anyway, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem went on Twitter to call him a monster. Now his lawyers are in court, and they’re asking the judge to issue an order telling the Trump administration to stifle it so that they stop prejudicing Kilmar’s ability to get a fair trial in an American court of law. This is long overdue. I don’t even understand why district attorneys go on the air and give a press conference and say, we just indicted this real son of a bitch for committing horrible crimes. At most, they should just say, we’ve arrested this person. These are the charges. We’ll keep you posted. They editorialize. They queer the jury. They queer the judges. When it’s the cabinet secretary using the power of the US government to say that you’re a monster, how the hell are you supposed to get a fair trial?

John Kiriakou: Even in the Bureau of Prisons, if you are a member of a gang, the last two digits of your prisoner ID number are going to be -47. You see these guys in the Crips, in the Bloods, and MS-13, and they all have -47. I was sitting with one guy one day, and I noticed his badge said -47. I said, how are you a -47? He’s just a typical white guy. He said, they accuse me of being in the mafia. I said, the mafia? You’re not even from a town that has the mafia. And he’s like, I know. And when I complained, they just said, so sue me. But if you have a badge that ends in -47, you can’t go to a minimum-security camp. You’re not allowed to have compassionate release. You can’t do anything. You’re stuck in prison. But they don’t have to actually show anybody any proof that you’re in a gang. Once they say you’re in a gang, that’s it. It’s done. You’re in the gang whether you like it or not. And that’s what Kristi Noem is doing in this case. You just keep repeating the lie over and over, and now all of a sudden, he’s MS-13, whether it’s true or not.

Ted Rall: He’s got great lawyers. The tricky part here is that the Trump administration, as usual, is playing it cute, trying to have everything two or three or four ways at the same time. They want to prosecute him, but they said, well, we won’t prosecute him. We might not prosecute him. In which case, we’ll send him back to El Salvador or maybe South Sudan. Then they’re like, well, but maybe we will prosecute him, but as soon as we convict him, we’ll send him to South Sudan or Libya or El Salvador. Or maybe we won’t prosecute him at all. It reminds me of the shell game guys in Times Square back in the eighties: watch the hand, watch the ball, and you can never watch the ball. When the state declares you an enemy, the amount of chicanery and bullshit they will subject you to is just incomprehensible for someone who hasn’t been through it. It’s not well reported. You find all these things out when you show up, and there you are in the jaws of the state.

There’s no let-up here. These people are relentless. The Kristi Noems of the world and these Justice Department prosecutors, oh my god. They’re just relentless. There’s no getting away. I’m very curious as to how this is going to play out. It’s a fucking embarrassment. I don’t know if they think their base likes this. Do you think their base does like it?

John Kiriakou: I think elements of the base probably do, but the thing is that they’re going to vote for you anyway. They’re going to support you anyway. So why keep pandering to them like this? Either lead or allow them to tell you on what issues they want you to lead. To me, that’s not leadership.

Ted Rall: It’s definitely leadership. It’s just leadership down the shitter. How about Ukraine? America’s favorite democratic leader, who leads the most streamlined democracy in the world that doesn’t have any opposition party and is very not corrupt in any way, shape, or form. We don’t have to have any elections because that just gets in the way of democracy. Anyway, there’s a scandal now in Ukraine, and the bloom is off the rose. I suppose it’s taken a lot longer than I would have expected it to. Zelensky was wildly unpopular before the war, and that was all suppressed, and maybe there was genuine rallying around the flag in Ukraine. You would expect that. But now, the opposition is getting brave. It’s not easy to oppose the state in Ukraine. You may end up under house arrest or worse. It’s a time of war, and they have martial law. They can literally just shoot you at a demonstration if they don’t like you. There have been large mass demonstrations opposing the regime because Zelensky basically put the kibosh on an anti-corruption campaign that was wildly popular and that people were really hoping to see happen. It reminds me a little bit of the kind of stuff that we’ve been seeing with the Epstein files here. It’s just like, yeah, we’re not going to do that.

John Kiriakou: As long as—doesn’t really seem to have a good narrative here. I was asked by a reporter this morning if I thought it was possible that we may be seeing the early stages of a coup, even maybe a CIA-backed coup. I said, if this were a year ago, I would say no. But today, I would say, sure. This could be the start of a CIA coup. It’s not 1963 where the CIA puts a bullet into the back of the head of South Vietnam’s president, but it could be the kind of coup where the US ambassador and the station chief go to see Zelensky and say, alright, it’s time for you to go. Pack your shit, get on the plane, and go to London. Could it be a kidnapping thing like we did to Jean-Bertrand Aristide from Haiti to the Central African Republic? Sure. Just like that. Something’s afoot in Ukraine, and it’s not good if you are a supporter of the Ukrainian government or of US policy. I don’t know what that means.

Ted Rall: You’re the one trained in code, John.

John Kiriakou: I never did well with code. I preferred the disappearing ink. That was much easier for me. Seriously, they do use it. You write a letter in regular ink, and then in between the lines, you write your secret letter in the disappearing ink. You send the letter, they put it into the solution—I forget what it was, maybe hydrogen peroxide. The ink disappears, and the hidden ink comes up. It’s kinda cool. Not at all complicated. It’s like stuff you can see at the Spy Museum in DC. A fun visit.

Ted Rall: Houdini is asking if there’s a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. The pressure is on Zelensky. He’s agreed to get serious, and they’re talking in the next couple of days. The US isn’t invited, but Ukraine and Russia are going to talk.

John Kiriakou: It’s my understanding that Zelensky actually owns real estate because he stole so much money as president of Ukraine. He would likely go to London. J Rock makes a good point here too: I thought the CIA already did his coup. So this is the double coup. They didn’t like the first coup, so they may try a different coup.

Ted Rall: It’s not the first time in CIA history that there was buyer’s remorse on the front of the agency. The coup and the counter-coup. If it doesn’t go well, you just do it again. No big deal.

For people who are wondering what we’re talking about, of course, we’re talking about the 2014 coup. Some people would say it’s not, but it really does fit all the requirements for a coup. Do you think that Russia and Ukraine are able to make any progress? The fighting seems to be—there’s really just not a lot of movement. What movement has been taking place has been to the benefit of Russia, but the facts on the ground haven’t really altered a hell of a lot.

John Kiriakou: This is the prime fighting season. The weather’s good. The spring rains are over, so your tanks don’t get bogged down in mud. This is where the two sides are supposed to be fighting the most so they can dig in in time for winter, and it’s just not happening.

John Kiriakou: Both sides are tired. Both sides are running short on supplies, especially fuel. Who wants this more? The Ukrainians or the Russians? I don’t know.

Ted Rall: I think you and I probably would have agreed that Russia didn’t really want this war. I’ve never seen many belligerents wait eight years to attack. That shows a certain degree of patience unless we have the big procrastinator. But now, if I were Putin, I would feel like I was in a good place to negotiate. Why not say, okay, let’s talk, let’s do this? Russia hasn’t changed their demands at all. I think they’re all achievable, perhaps, except for some random stuff like denazification, which is impossible for the Ukrainians to do and also impossible to define. Demilitarization also has to be a throwaway because that’s ridiculous. But in terms of the territorial concessions, that should not be that hard for Ukraine. I’ve always said to my friends who are pro-Ukrainian, in a way, this war fixed a problem that should never have existed in the first place. These borders were poorly drawn after 1991. If you’re Ukraine, do you want a hostile, restive population of ethnic Russians in Crimea that you basically have to suppress?

John Kiriakou: People in Crimea and in the Donbass are ethnic Russians. They speak Russian at home. Their faith is tied to the Russian Orthodox Church, not the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. They aren’t Catholics in those areas. The Catholics are in the West. So what would Ukraine really be losing? They wouldn’t really be losing anything. And if part of the deal is this fast track to membership in the European Union, what’s the downside? I don’t see the downside. Just sign the deal. Let it go.

Ted Rall: Somebody made a comment about the corruption. There are so many ways to do it. You could have a foreign company serve as a cutout. You could have the money diverted directly into your Swiss bank account. When I served overseas, we saw it nine ways from Sunday. It’s not at all hard.

John Kiriakou: Switzerland’s not as good as it used to be. The Swiss will rat you out now. Now it’s more like the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Guernsey, the Cook Islands. And old-fashioned cash. We know that skids of $100 bills left Afghanistan by plane. If you travel on a diplomatic passport, they don’t search you. You can bring vast amounts of whatever—drugs, money, anything you want in your diplomatic pouch.

I got arrested once with the diplomatic pouch. I was going to Yemen to see some friends of mine in the spring of 1991. I was kind of tired from the war and wanted to go to that vacation spot that is Yemen to decompress for a little while. Friends of mine invited me. I want one of those big pointy hats that the women wear. I collect weird hats.

Those are awesome. I actually bought little ones for my boys. They were young at the time. So I was traveling from Riyadh through Jeddah to Sana, and one of the State Department communications officers asked me if I would take a diplomatic pouch with me. It had some radios in it and some mail. Just mail. So I said, sure, I’ll take the pouch. When I arrived in Yemen, they insisted on X-raying it. I said, no, this is a diplomatic pouch. I’m a diplomat. I have my diplomatic credentials. I had the paperwork with the wax seal on it and all this stuff. And they were like, fuck that. One of them pulled out his jambiya, that curved dagger they carry. He hacked the lead seal off the pouch. I kept saying, I protest. You can’t do this. I’m 26 years old. What am I going to say? I didn’t speak Arabic yet. I had taken six weeks of Arabic familiarization. So they open up the pouch, he reaches in, pulls out this radio, an old-fashioned CB radio, and says, jasus, one of the few Arabic words I understood at the time. It means spy. And then they were on me. So they put me in this cell in the airport, and I was with a Filipino nurse and a couple of Indian guys that had hashish on them. I was in there for about four hours, and finally, the American ambassador came and said, wow, you really threw a wrench into my day. I said, I’m sorry. They should have never opened that pouch. He said, nah, forget it. Let’s just go. So we got in the car, and that was my first experience in a jail cell. It’s always funny when people just don’t follow the rules, and that happens a lot.

Ted Rall: I read the Greek papers this morning, and they were talking a lot about this new wave of refugees. Is that what you’re talking about, Nick?

John Kiriakou: I just figured since you’re Greek, you know all things Greek. Somebody asked me a question today about why Greeks hate the royal family so much. I’d love to answer that question.

Ted Rall: Israeli tourists blocked by locals from disembarking. Spicy. I like it. I’m going to check that out right now. Top story: Greece crowned champion of women’s water polo after victory over Hungary. Greek police have dismissed reports in the Israeli media alleging that a mob carried out a knife attack against a group of Israeli tourists on the island of Rhodes. That’s my ancestral island. Interesting. I’m going to text my cousin and ask him what’s going on there with Israelis.

Question from Adam Feider: When are we going to cover China? There’s a really interesting piece in the Washington Post today about deflation. China’s been in a deflationary environment for eight consecutive quarters, over two years, because of excessive competition. So the authorities are stepping in, and they’re going to start to regulate this so that there are fewer companies in the same sector. I guess the right-wingers would say they’re picking winners in the free markets. Doesn’t seem like a bad idea to me. If you have excessive competition and prices are getting so low that in the aggregate, sectors are wildly profitable, but no individual company can stay afloat, you’ve got a problem.

Ted Rall: Thanks for the suggestion, Adam. We’ll do it soon. I can’t promise it’ll be Friday, but it might be. Pretty crazy. Prince Philip was Greek. Prince Philip was the son of a very minor Greek princess. The Greek royal family, they’re not ethnically Greek. They’re half British and half Danish. That’s why we hated them so much. They were imposed on us by Queen Victoria. Philip was born on the island of Corfu, Kerkyra in Greek, and his mother suffered from severe mental illness. She ended up resigning from her royal duties and became a Greek Orthodox nun and moved to a convent where she spent the rest of her life. Prince Philip left Greece as a child and never returned to Greece ever. It was because he hated Greece and didn’t like the Greeks, and they hated him. There was no love lost between them. He was an asshole.

John Kiriakou: Charles is different. Charles goes to Greece every year or two, and he always goes to Mount Athos, which is called the Holy Mountain. He’s not Greek Orthodox, being the head of the Church of England, but he’s as close to Greek Orthodox as a British royal is going to be. They like Charles. They hated their own royal family, and we threw them out on a rail in 1967, told them never to come back. The first Greek king was King Otto the First. He was Bavarian, German. The guy was king for thirty-two years and never learned to speak Greek.

Ted Rall: That’s how those royals are. There’s a category of dudes whose job is they parachute in to run a cereal company even if they don’t eat cereal. Then they’re off to run a software company. After that, maybe they manage a ball team. These royals are the same way. Poor Marie Antoinette never could have said, let them eat cake, nor would she have because she was actually a kindhearted person. But she never could have said it in court and been quoted because she didn’t speak French. She was Austrian. She only spoke German.

John Kiriakou: We had a king of Greece who was taking a tour of some neighborhood in Thessaloniki, and he was bitten in the leg by a monkey. He pretended it didn’t hurt, and it was no big deal. It got infected, sepsis set in, and he died three weeks later. His brother became king, and his brother didn’t want to be king. He didn’t know what the hell he was doing. He’s like, we should invade Turkey and overthrow Atatürk. He led this army into Turkey, which is now called the catastrophe of 1921.

Ted Rall: Film adventures around that time, like when the Marines invaded post-revolutionary Russia. Disastrous, stupid, forgotten.

John Kiriakou: I don’t know what Houdini is talking about with Pine Gap. I’ll look it up. Pine Gap is a highly secretive jointly operated Australian-US intelligence facility located near Alice Springs. It’s a ground control station for signals intelligence satellites and a key relay station for satellite communications. The base plays a crucial role in global surveillance, particularly for missile launches and battlefield intelligence. We never called it Pine Gap. We always called it Alice Springs. But that was from Grok, and that’s even more than I knew about Pine Gap.

Ted Rall: Personal question for you here. How do you rate the Turkish intelligence?

John Kiriakou: Good in some ways and not good in others. Good in that they are on the Kurds like white on rice. And I don’t mean just their own Kurds. I mean Syria, Iran, Iraq, and all the Kurds. They’re not so good on Greece. Greek intelligence is better against the Turks than Turkish intelligence is against the Greeks. Greek intelligence officers are much more likely to speak Turkish and pass for Turks than Turkish intelligence officers are at speaking Greek. Did I work with them? Yes, I worked with them years ago.

Ted Rall: Not going back to prison. We’ll need two pardons for you.

John Kiriakou: The cruise ship incident on Sidos. I was in Sidos last summer. It’s an amazing place. Protest against Gaza war prevents Israeli visitors from touring Greek island, from the Associated Press this morning. Greek island residents stop Israeli cruise ship from docking. Travel advisory for Greece by Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs as ship is blocked in Sidos. If you’re not a scientist, you have nothing to worry about.

Ted Rall: We would be remiss not to talk about Iran. There’s this really weird situation going on in Iran now where there are arson fires all over the place. My first thought goes to a country that starts with I and ends with L and sounds like Israel. This is a problem in Greece every summer.

John Kiriakou: The Turks come and light fires, and we have these catastrophic forest fires, wildfires. They’ll send operatives into the islands and just light the forest on fire in the middle of the night. You know that the Israelis are watching the same media weather reports that everybody else is watching, that it’s 120 degrees Fahrenheit in Iran, and it’s a tinderbox because it’s so hot and dry. Of course, the Israelis are out there setting wildfires.

Ted Rall: There are no Israeli tourists in Iran, but they have lots of operatives. We know that the Iranians are infested with turncoats who are collecting money from the Israelis. A lot of Afghan refugees have taken Israeli money. Iran deserves some gratitude for the fact that they’ve taken in more refugees than any other country on the planet. They’ve always been very open that way. They allude to it in that movie Three Kings. It’s done without comment, but it’s a very sly, politically accurate thing. I’ve crossed that border from Afghanistan to Iran, and you can tell what a border feels like. Afghans like Iran. The cultural ties go back thousands of years.

So we have these arson fires. It’s psychological warfare. Why doesn’t the Mukhabarat get to the bottom of it and find out what’s going on and stop all this?

John Kiriakou: They are incompetent, underfunded, and focused on domestic political rivals, not counterintelligence. How you can have thousands of people essentially acting as sleeper agents in your country in a time of war is a mystery to me. There was an Israeli announcement yesterday saying that they were able to identify a thousand Israeli citizens passing information to Iran, and most of them were Iranian Jews living in Israel. I think it is ideological in that respect. They’re so upset about what’s going on in Gaza. They catch a lot of discriminatory bullshit on a day-to-day basis from the security forces.

Ted Rall: Are we sufficiently deprogrammed?

John Kiriakou: Do you want to tell our friends here that we’re very slightly changing our name?

Ted Rall: Right now, we had a—I don’t know if you guys have noticed this, but when you go to search for us on YouTube, there’s another thing called The Deprogram that comes up, and it’s in the UK. It’s a different show entirely, and sometimes it’s hard to find us. It’s very frustrating. So I did what we all do in this day and age when we’re trying to solve impenetrable problems. I asked AI what to do. AI said that we should do what we’re doing, which is we have officially changed the name to Deprogram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou. I graciously suggested that John’s name go first, also alphabetical order. But John pointed out that because of the spelling issue, nobody can spell my name. So that’s why my name is first.

Ted Rall: Thank you, Houdini. I would have been happy to have you go first. My pleasure. Please, please, please, please like, follow, and share the show. It really makes a difference to us. We are trying to make some money here. If we get the search terms right, I think it’s going to make a difference, but we count on you guys the most. We’re here again Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM. We’re going to probably step it up to five days very soon, maybe in a week or two. But right now, it’s Monday, Wednesday, Friday, so we’ll see you Friday at five Eastern in the afternoon. Thank you so much for your support. Really appreciate you, and take care. Bye-bye.

 

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “Iran Is Burning”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

On the “DeProgram show” with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, we’re dissecting urgent global crises with unflinching clarity. We confront the escalating starvation crisis in Gaza, where over 100 aid groups, including Save the Children, blame Israel’s blockade for mass hunger. Gaza’s health ministry reporting 43 deaths from malnutrition in just days. We probe the horrific state of Gaza’s doctors, who are too malnourished to remain standing, much less treat patients effectively. The Guardian reports medical staff fainting from hunger, with 21 children dying in three days due to starvation, as hospitals buckle under the crisis.

In the U.S., we examine the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, where lawyers demand the Trump administration and Kristi Noem cease inflammatory rhetoric labeling him a “monster,” raising free speech concerns after a judge barred his ICE detention.

In Ukraine, we analyze President Zelensky’s response to domestic protests over entrenched corruption, as public unrest grows amid wartime struggles, with Zelensky proposing renewed talks with Russia to end the conflict.

We also tackle congressional calls for more Jeffrey Epstein files, amid Trump’s past ties to the financier, fueling debates over transparency and accountability as Congress goes home early to dodge the heat.

Finally, Iran. Why are fires breaking out all over?

TMI Show Ep 186: “Are Lower Prices Bad?”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

China’s cutthroat business world is making prices cheaper for consumers. But deflation could cause a depression. That’s the economic paradox we’re talking about on the “TMI Show with Ted Rall and Manila Chan”!

China’s “involution” crisis: fierce competition and overcapacity are strangling industries. A hot new technology or product sparks a frenzy of copycats, with hundreds of Chinese manufacturers then flooding the market. They slash prices, ramp up production, and battle for survival, often with razor-thin margins or outright losses. Local governments fuel the chaos, backing hometown champs with cash and clout, pushing industries like steel, solar, and electric vehicles into a brutal race to the bottom.

Take BYD, China’s EV giant, which slashed prices on nearly two dozen models in May, only to get a slap on the wrist from a government-linked auto group for sparking “price wars.” Xi Jinping is on the case, vowing to curb this “disorderly competition” and outdated capacity. With Trump’s tariffs slamming exports and a slowing economy piling on unsold goods, China’s facing a deflationary spiral—its GDP deflator has tanked for eight straight quarters.

The People’s Daily warns that price wars could drive out quality players. Can China tame this self-defeating cycle, or is it too late? Could something like that happen here?

Plus: “Black Sabbath” member Ozzy Osbourne’s legacy celebrated after his passing at 76.

House Speaker Mike Johnson sends Congress home early to duck releasing the Epstein files.

Cannabis and psychedelics show promise for eating disorders.

Somerville’s cat mayor race heats up.

Keywords:

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php