Can Left and Right Create a Populist Front?

•
In times of crisis—and who can doubt that we are living in one now?—political people ask themselves whether they are about to witness a dramatic ideological realignment and, if so, whether the reconfiguration of the left-to-right spectrum of U.S. electoral contests opens up new possibilities for themselves and the issues that motivate them. We are currently undergoing a major realignment, perhaps as significant as the one that began in World War I and culminated with the 1932 election of FDR and the status quo that Americans have lived with all their lives. In that earlier shift, Democrats abandoned their conservativism and became a liberal coalition of working-class people, labor unions, ethnic minorities, and marginalized identity groups, while Republicans embraced big business, libertarianism, and an aggressive, militaristic, materialistic posture toward foreign policy. In the years following the 9/11 attacks, who could have imagined that—at least in their rhetoric and campaigning, if not in actual governance—Republicans would identify themselves as isolationists and…
Read More

A Vote Is Such a Waste

•
Imagine if we decided to stop fighting wars and spent that money on healthcare instead. What if we watched one less hour of TV or doomscrolling and dedicated the same amount of time to exercising every day? Every minute we waste on something stupid could be redirected to productive activity; every dollar we squander can be invested wisely. I am reminded that the passive decision to yield to inertia has as much impact as the active move to change direction, when I read about the prodigious amount of money and time we pour into electoral politics. More than $10 billion has been spent on ads for the 2026 midterms so far, with the full cycle projected to reach about $11.6 billion. This already exceeds the final ad totals for 2020 and 2022 and is on track to surpass the $11.2 billion spent in the 2024 presidential election. The 2022 midterms saw ad spending of about $8.9 billion. Americans who have…
Read More

A Missed Chance To Look Terrible

•
Trump’s decision to back out of his planned public execution of the Fort Hood mass shooter is sad for America. Not because it wouldn’t have been a gruesome spectacle that eroded whatever is left of the country’s international standing—it would have. Not because Nidal Hasan won’t still be killed on December 3—he will. “Many very good and well-meaning people would rather not watch him die, through streaming or through any other visual device,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, a medium befitting the gravity of the subject. He will die, as scheduled, by firing squad, but this event will not be streamed.” Does Trump really believe watching the livestream is mandatory? If so, someone should tell him. He could use a break. He should have stayed the course. Conducting this state murder-by-firing-squad in the most public of all forums would have been a glorious victory for transparency and honesty. When might the dark stars align again to give us a defense…
Read More

What Is the Death Penalty For?

•
Once again, the debate over capital punishment is raging, driven by the staggering incompetence of Tennessee’s would-be prison executioners, who have repeatedly failed to kill Christa Pike for a murder she committed 30 years ago, and by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s shocking announcement that the military plans to livestream the firing-squad execution of Fort Hood mass shooter Major Nidal Hasan. Largely missing, as usual, is the question that ought to be paramount in the mind of any citizen considering the wisdom of a government practice or policy: what is the death penalty for? Clearly, killing killers is not about keeping society safe from convicted murderers. Serial killer Ted Bundy escaped from jail twice in 1977. The 2015 Dannemora break by Richard Matt and David Sweat in upstate New York, Danelo Cavalcante’s escape in Pennsylvania in 2023 and parts of the Texas Seven escape in 2000 all made news precisely because 99.999% of murderers remain behind bars. A 2024 study found…
Read More

It’s Pete Buttigieg’s Nomination to Lose

•
It’s that time again, and I know you’re excited: time to start handicapping the 2028 presidential campaign. First, for my left-of-the-Democrats readers—in other words, my fellow travelers—a disclaimer: handicapping the dancing bears of electoral democracy should never be construed as an endorsement of the two-party trap, the Democratic Party in particular, capitalism, or the current system. Those things suck and should be destroyed. I do this for the same reason sports fans try to predict which list of current players wearing the uniform of a city they’ve never lived in will defeat which other team. Like sports, American politics is fake and corrupt and relies on blind team loyalty, and it’s fun to predict the outcome. Okay. This time, I’m turning my attention to the contest for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. The person to beat, I believe, is former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. As we know from the past, even the best of the exceedingly bad candidates who have…
Read More

The Death of Sarcasm

•
In 2002, I drew a six-panel political cartoon titled “Israel vs. Palestine: Where Do You Stand?” Each panel shows a different speaker making a statement about the conflict, with a bold label underneath that sarcastically identifies the speaker’s supposed position. In the first panel, a man labeled “MODERATE HONEST BROKER” says, “The Arab killers must be killed before they get the chance to kill.” Next, another man says, “It’s always sad when innocent women and children die, but hey—that’s war!” Then a woman identified as a “GARDEN-VARIETY ANTI-SEMITE” says, “i can’t help noticing that Israel kills more Palestinians than vice versa.” The labels escalate, culminating with a person called “THE LIVING INCARNATION OF ADOLF HITLER” saying, “Surely Israel could find a better way to keep itself safe?” The cartoon’s joke is that any statement short of a blank-check endorsement of the IDF is recast as anti-Semitic. At the time of publication, reaction was predictable: supporters of Israel disliked it; those…
Read More

Grand Theft A.I.

•
Last week there occurred a watershed moment in the history of American political cartooning. A major American newspaper, the Baltimore Sun, published an editorial cartoon created not by a cartoonist or graphic artist, but by unidentified staffers using artificial intelligence. One year ago, the Sun fired its Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, Kevin “KAL” Kallaugher. (Disclosure: KAL and I are friends.) Which AI model was used was not disclosed, but more likely than not it was ChatGPT by OpenAI. Why do I think so? I asked various AI models. I’m not a Luddite! As a cartoonist, my reaction was similar to that of most of my colleagues. I checked out the cartoon. It sucked. What the Sun published as a cartoon sucked worse than any cartoon ever drawn by any professional cartoonist could or ever has sucked, which is to say, a lot. This lickspittle slop sucked up to the mayor—no good political cartoon ever supports a politician, only criticizes them—and it…
Read More

Death From Above

•
If you think the Langtang Lirung glacier disaster on the Tibet-Nepal border was bad, wait for Lake Sarez. There is no reason to downplay the August 26th catastrophe, when a large section of glacier and underlying rock at 17,000 feet of elevation failed and plunged almost 4,000 feet into the valley below. The impact registered as a magnitude 5.2 seismic event. Thousands of people died. Himalayan glaciers have been melting at an accelerating rate due to climate change, causing ice avalanches, rockfalls and glacial-lake outburst floods. And the worst is yet to come. A thousand miles northwest across the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt from Langtang Lirung in the Pamir mountains of Tajikistan is Lake Sarez, 10,700 feet above sea level. Experts call it Central Asia’s Sword of Damocles. Lake Sarez formed in 1911 when a massive earthquake (estimated at 7.7) triggered a massive rockslide that blocked the Murgab River, creating the Usoi Dam—at over 1,500 feet high, the world’s tallest natural…
Read More

Better to Lose as Leftists Than Lose as Corporatists

•
People who follow the news are familiar by now with the general dynamic of the civil war within the Democratic Party that has been raging with greater intensity since 2016. Most of the party’s voters lean progressive, which is to say significantly to the left of its ruling elites, members of the Democratic National Committee, and the most powerful Democratic members of Congress. The battle between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton for the 2016 presidential nomination has largely defined this struggle. Tracking polls consistently found that Sanders would have defeated Trump in the general election. Trump himself, and his internal pollsters, believed Sanders, who had pushed for change within his party for decades, would have beaten him. Party elites ignored and denied the evidence, cheated to make sure Sanders was unable to overcome the institutional barriers the party had created through its anti-democratic superdelegate scheme, and we all know what happened that November. The DNC got its way. We got…
Read More

Why Socialism Now?

•
Why is socialism a growing force in American politics for the first time in over a century? It’s not happenstance. Socialism meets the historical moment. The Socialist Party of America founded in 1901 reached its apex of organizational strength, membership, electoral success and national visibility just before World War I, during the 1912 election. The SPA had well over 100,000 dues-paying members, but perennial socialist presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs received about 900,000 votes (6% of the popular vote) in 1912, indicating significant penetration into the broader electorate. Socialist candidates were elected to over a thousand local and state offices, including dozens of mayors, in more than 300 cities—and two U.S. House seats. Why then? The Gilded Age was American capitalism at its worst. Underpaid workers and exploited immigrants joined a socialist movement that drove a wedge through a civil war in the Republican Party caused by Teddy Roosevelt’s third-party run against his protégé, incumbent President William Howard Taft. Child…
Read More
keyboard_arrow_up
css.php