EXCLUSIVE: Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline Still a Dream

Presidents and Bankers, But No Action on the Ground

KARA-TEPE, AFGHANISTAN—There is no pipeline. There probably won’t be one. Yet the pipeline-that-will-never-exist is one of the main reasons that hundreds of thousands of Afghans and two thousand American soldiers are dead.

Among my goals during my late-summer trip to Afghanistan was to find the construction site for the Trans-Afghanistan oil and gas pipeline (TAP). Also known as Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan, TAP would carry the world’s biggest new energy reserves, which are in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan’s sections of the landlocked Caspian Sea, across Afghanistan to a deep-sea port in Pakistan. (A modified version of the plan, TAPI, would add an extension to India.)

Some background:

The idea dates to the mid-1990s. Unocal, owner of the Union 76 gas station chain, led a consortium of oil companies that negotiated with the Taliban government. Among their consultants was Zalmay Khalilzad, who later served as Bush’s ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the United Nations. (While in Kabul, Khalilzad engineered the U.S.-backed coup that installed Hamid Karzai—also a former Unocal consultant—over the wishes of the loya jirga.

As you’d expect, political instability has been the primary obstacle preventing a “New Silk Road” of oil and gas to flow across Central and South Asia. The planned route for TAP follows Afghanistan’s “ring road” from the northwestern city of Herat across soaring mountains and bleak deserts through Kandahar province, the heart of Taliban territory. Hundreds of warlords and regional commanders would have to be paid protection money.

[The most comprehensive history of TAP is my 2003 book “Gas War: The Truth Behind the U.S. Occupation of Afghanistan.”]

Unocal pulled out in 1998, citing the civil war between the Taliban and Northern Alliance. But logic can’t kill a dream.

In February 2001 the new Bush-Cheney Administration invited Taliban representatives to Texas for new talks. When the Afghans insisted upon higher transit fees than the White House oilmen were prepared to offer, things turned ugly. “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold,” a frustrated U.S. negotiator snapped at the Talibs on May 15, 2001, “or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”

The last Bush-Taliban pipeline discussions took place on August 2, 2001 in Islamabad between Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca, a former CIA employee, and Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan. (By the way Zaeef’s memoir “My Life in the Taliban” is riveting.)

The 9/11 attacks, planned in Pakistan and carried out by Pakistani-trained Saudis and Egyptians, provided the pretext for invading Afghanistan. Was TAP the only motivation? Certainly not: Afghanistan also offered a “dry run” invasion of a defenseless Muslim nation pre-Iraq, as well as a chance to exert geopolitical muscle-flexing at the expense of regional rivals Russia and Iran. But TAP was part of the calculus.

Since 2002 the presidents of Turkmenistan, Pakistan and Afghanistan have repeatedly met to talk about TAP(I). The Asian Development Bank has financed feasibility studies for the $8 billion deal.

“Of late, Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov has spoken often of TAPI,” U.S. government-backed Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported September 14, 2010. “He has contacted the leaders of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India since the start of September to arrange meetings in New York and Ashgabat. Berdymukhammedov is calling for a summit of TAPI leaders in Ashgabat in December.”

Politicians want the pipeline. Bankers want it too. But has ground been broken? A number of mainstream news accounts said yes, that the 52-inch pipe was already being laid along the highway that runs north from Herat to the Turkmen border.

I wanted confirmation. And photos. Something to shove in the faces of those neocons who dismiss TAP as a conspiracy theory.

Unfortunately, all the journalists in Afghanistan are embedded with soldiers, running around the mountains near the Pakistani border in a war that is irrelevant to the Afghan people but looks good on the nightly news. They’re too busy supporting the troops to do any real reporting. So, accompanied by fellow cartoonists Matt Bors and Steven Cloud, I set out up that road from Herat two weeks ago.

My goal: the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. Not on paper. In real life.

It’s a hot, dusty drive. There isn’t much to see: desert, scrub, goatherds, adobe-style mud-brick villages. The Koshk District, the region’s major population center, is so infested with Talibs that Afghan national policemen are afraid to drive through. I can tell you what you don’t see: the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. There’s no construction of any kind alongside that highway.

There was, however, fun to be had.

We stopped locals to ask them about TAP. Finally, one geezer brightened up. He had seen it! Our Afghan driver got excited. He turned to us: “It was here! But the local people stole it.”

“They stole the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline?”

“Yes! They used it to make a mosque. He is going to show us.”

I was happy. What a story! I took out my camera, ready to document the amazing tale of the Our Lady of TAP mosque, indirectly financed by American hubris. We followed the man down an alley and across a small garden. He walked us into what can only be described as a modest building. Less charitably, as a dump.

I am not charitable.

He gestured. There it is! Said his gesture. There, indeed it was: a dumpy little building, which I’ll call a mosque though there was no way to identify it as a house of God, with pipes holding up the corners and serving as rafters. Small pipes. Very small pipes.

Nine-inch pipes. Maybe eight.

“That’s not an oil pipeline,” I told my driver. “What we’re looking for is big. I made a big circle with my arms. “BIIIGG.”

He pointed again. He smiled as if to say: Look harder.

“This pipeline came from Turkmenistan,” said my driver. “I was a boy when the Soviets built it. For oil.”

“No. This is a water pipe,” I said. “Or maybe sewage. Besides, we’re looking for something new. Not Soviet.”

Because it seemed rude not to, I snapped a few photos and tipped the old guy. It was like that scene in “Spinal Tap” when the mini-Stonehenge drops from the ceiling. I stifled a laugh as we got back into our car.

An hour later, we were under arrest. But that’s another story.

(Ted Rall has recently returned from Afghanistan to cover the war and research a book. He is the author of “The Anti-American Manifesto,” out this week from Seven Stories Press. His website is tedrall.com.)

COPYRIGHT 2010 TED RALL

This Week’s Anti-American Book Tour Schedule

This week features three radio interviews, all available via livestreaming, plus a solo live appearance in New York City, at the Brecht Forum. The focus will be my new “Anti-American Manifesto.”

I’m kind of surprised this book hasn’t become a big national story, but whatever. It’s also kind of a relief.

It’s also kind of nice. It’s OK to talk about revolution now!

Wednesday, September 22
Radio Interview
KGNU Morning Show, Colorado
10:35am-11:30am East Coast time

Thursday, September 23

Radio Interview No. 1
“News Dissector” Radio Show with Danny Schecter
10-11 am Eastern time

Radio Interview No. 2
KOPN Chautauqua, Columbia, MO
6-7 pm Central time

Friday, September 24
LIVE APPEARANCE
Brecht Forum
451 West Street
New York, NY 10014-2041
(212) 242-4201
Event begins 7:30pm

Anything But the Obvious

I’m on the mailing list for Adbusters, an anti-consumerism magazine that began promisingly but has become a dead end, a monthly exercise in design fetishism that embodies the advertising it pretends to critique.

They sent out an email today that concluded with the following very sad paragraph:

“It strikes us that this is the same personal dilemma that each of us struggle with: deep down in our guts we know that the world demands a radical transformation of the global system. And yet, it seems impossible, perhaps even foolhardy, to topple consumerism and corporate capitalism by confronting it head on. Is there a way out of this impasse? What should we do this November?”

Behold the liberal mentality: we need revolution. Can we do something besides revolution?

Like chemotherapy, revolution is hard. It doesn’t usually work. Sometimes it makes things worse. But if you have certain kinds of cancer, there’s no way around it.

The U.S. has a cancer. So does the planet. That cancer is capitalism. It’s killing us. It has to go.

Whether impossible or foolhardy, there is no way to destroy the capitalist system without attacking it directly, by revolution. Those who are tired of trying to think their way around the obvious truth should read my Anti-American Manifesto, which came out a few days ago.

What should we “do” this November? Certainly we should not vote. Voting isn’t doing anything. We should revolt. But why wait until November?

Ted Rall

On the Air Friday

I’ll be doing my first on air interview about the Manifesto tomorrow/Friday on
KPFA, Berkeley CA. Time is 12:20-1pm West Coast time. I will be taking calls. Livestream through their website.

I, Robot

If there’s anything more amusingly pathetic than Obama’s “feel your pain” tour, I don’t know what it is.

Live Radio with Matt Bors and I

Check out our live interview for one hour starting at noon Pacific time/3 pm Eastern on KPFK. It’s live-streamable at http://www.kpfk.org. We’re taking calls too.

css.php