Friedman’s Advice for Snowden

Once again, multimillionaire New York Times columnist Tom Friedman weighs in with wisdom that could only come from the confines of a spectacular private estate:

To make a second impression, Snowden would need to come home, make his case and face his accusers. It would mean risking a lengthy jail term, but also trusting the fair-mindedness of the American people, who, I believe, will not allow an authentic whistle-blower to be unfairly punished.

Which reminds us — again — just how colossally dumb Friedman is.

“The American people” don’t decide criminal cases. Judges and juries do. And they’re not allowed to let people off the hook for illegal actions because they think those actions were morally right. Snowden committed a number of illegal acts, any number of which carry long prison terms. If he faces trial in the U.S., he will be found guilty and sentenced to significant prison term. This isn’t a movie. And I’m not even going to get into the fact that the U.S. government wants to get even with him for embarrassing them, and send a message to future whistleblowers.

Besides, it’s far from clear that “the American people” support Snowden. A July 24th ABC poll found that 53% of the public supports charging Snowden as a criminal. Granted, all you need is one hold-out juror to walk free.

What exactly would be a fair punishment, anyway? In my view, Obama and his minions should be in prison for the NSA programs Snowden revealed. Snowden deserves a medal and compensation for the stress he suffered, and those Russian hotel bills. To me, there’s nothing fair or moderate about the idea of Snowden serving a single minute of prison time.

“The fact is, he dumped his data and fled to countries that are hostile to us and to the very principles he espoused,” Friedman writes. Well, yeah. Because, if you’re on the lam from Country A, you don’t go hang out in nations that are friendly to Country A. What’s galling is the implication that there is something immoral about Snowden’s refusal to turn himself in.

Why should he enable his own oppression? Why should anyone? Especially when the system he is challenging is lawless?

Why should Snowden voluntarily submit to punishment he doesn’t deserve?

Why should he trust the American system of justice, which found Bradley Manning guilty of similar “crimes,” after torturing him?

To which I add: Snowden does a lot more good to the American people by remaining free in Russia, where he can be interviewed and explain the data he is leaking, than behind bars.

Friedman’s analysis is infantile and absurd, and he deserves to be fired for this column alone.

Small Toon Made Big

If you have trouble reading Friday’s cartoon, you can zoom in here to see the details. Use the command + and command – to zoom in and out.

Try zooming in.

 

Barf

At 3 PM Eastern time Obama is giving a speech to restore public trust in the NSA’s domestic spying program against the American people. This should be entertaining.

Exclusive NSFWCORP Cartoon

Check out my cartoon exclusive to NSFWCORP. But do it quickly since the link will be locked again soon.

And subscribe! They pay good cartoonists a good rate for original work.

Bezos Buys Dog

You know you’ve got a problem when your glory days are 40 years in the past. The purchase of the Washington Post by Jeff Bezos has sponsored a legion of articles referencing Woodward and Bernstein, but nothing much since. There’s a reason for that: there hasn’t been much since. Washington Post has been in the doldrums for nearly half a century. It was inevitable that something had to give. Yesterday it did.

In public statements Bezos says that he doesn’t have a master plan for changing the paper, but that is pretty difficult to believe. Last year in an interview he predicted that newspapers would never appear in print 20 years from now. I find that hard to believe as well. I think the future of print newspapers looks a lot like the present does in Japan today: the product that appears in print is for the elites and they pay top dollar for it. Don’t be surprised if newspapers start to sell for $10 or $15 a copy in 10 or 15 years. There won’t be much advertising. Individual subscribers will pay.

If I were the new owner of any newspaper, I would accept a simple truism that media barons from Tina Brown to Michael Bloomberg to Katherine Graham never seemed to: the Internet is for breaking news. Print is for analysis. Analysis comes in long form. Give me 10,000 words about what yesterday’s news means and why I should care, and please put it in print because it’s easier on the eyes than it is on the tablet.

When publishers start to understand that, and the fact that bland doesn’t sell and that edgy does, that mainstreaming is boring and alternative is mainstream, they will start to turn a profit.

SYNDICATED COLUMN: Lefties Against Obama

http://24.media.tumblr.com/694c98f16360c78e9059513a15569fe3/tumblr_mr0pfmzLsv1r1g8zro1_500.png

 

Think the President is Socialist? We Wish!

Memo to Republicans: you don’t have a monopoly on hating President Obama.

I dislike America’s two-party system for a lot of reasons. Mostly because the duopoly is undemocratic: no two political parties can represent the diversity of opinions held by a nation’s voters. We’d need dozens of parties to approximate adequate representative government. Another reason, one that deserves attention, is that it reduces political dialogue to binary imbecility.

Democrat or Republican. Liberal or conservative. If you’re not one, you must be the other. If you don’t vote, people — apparently rational, functional people who manage to drive their cars without ramming them into walls — tell you with a straight face that your non-vote is a de facto vote for the candidate you would have voted against (had you voted). Because you’re not allowed to hate both. Because, in under our idiotic one-or-the-other political system, even if you hate both parties, you’re supposed to hate one party more than the other.

Which is why, for the last four years, Obama-hating has belonged to the racist right.

In the real world, of course, lots of lefties can’t stand the president. In the mainstream corporate media narrative epitomized by MSNBC on the “left” and FoxNews on the “right,” however, left=liberal=Democrat and right=conservative=Republican. They say it so often and we hear it so much that many of us think it’s true.

In the real world, away from the barking dogs of cable television news, lots of Americans would vote for a party other than the Ds or the Rs. A 2012 poll found that 46% of Americans would support a third party if it were viable. Many on the right think the GOP is too extreme or too soft. That debate, the “civil war” between generic Republicans (e.g., Chris Christie) and the libertarian right (e.g., Rand Paul), gets some play.

Not so much on the left. Thanks largely to the left=Democrat propaganda of the late Air America and now MSNBC, lefties disgusted with the Democrats get zero play.

You’ll never find our views discussed or our champions interviewed, not even on the “liberal” shows hosted by Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert or Bill Maher. But we exist. We are many. Even among self-identified Democrats, 14% of overall voters say they are “very liberal.” Unsurprisingly, this group disapproves of Obama’s job performance, which — contrary to right-wing talking points — has stayed away from policies friendly to his party’s traditional liberal base. Beyond that, about 10% of voters say they’re “disaffected” — so alienated from both parties that they refuse to participate in elections.

Greetings, right-wingers! We live in the same country. You should know about lefties who don’t like the Democrats — hold on to your seats — because they’re too conservative.

So, righties, you hate Obama because he’s a socialist.  Or a liberal extremist. Because the Affordable Care Act goes too far. Because he was born in Kenya (and stole the presidency). Maybe (though you’re only allowed to say this among trusted friends) because he’s black.

Fine. I’m not going to try to change your minds.

Instead, I’m going to provide some perspective. To demonstrate that despite two centuries of puerile choose-one-outta-two electoral politics, America’s ideological landscape is broader and more diverse than you may be aware.

Tens of millions of Americans — progressives, paleoliberals, greens, populists, left libertarians, left anarchists and yes, socialists and communists — hate Obama for being too far to the right. Socialist? We wish! We think he’s a sellout. At best! More like a corporate shill. Definitely a militarist. Possibly a fascist.

Here is a brief summary of the left’s brief against Barack Obama:

He bailed out Wall Street, not Main Street. The banksters who wrecked the economy should have gone to prison; he gave them $7.77 trillion. Distressed homeowners got nothing. Nor did the unemployed. Lefties see Obama as a slave of Wall Street scum like Timothy Geitner and Lawrence Summers.

He didn’t lift a finger to create new jobs. Right-wingers blame regulations and ObamaCare. Not us. Leftists want big jobs programs, like the WPA during the Great Depression, to add tens of millions of un- and underemployed Americans directly to the federal payroll.

He’s a warmonger. He expanded and extended the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. (And lied about ending them. He renamed “combat troops” to “support personnel,” and replaced soldiers with private “contractor” mercenaries. The U.S. will be fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq long after Obama “ended” those wars.) He got us into a new war in Libya. Now it’s Syria. In both cases we are supporting Islamist factions whose values we — not just lefties, but all Americans — do not share.

He refused to investigate the crimes of the Bush era: the lies the Administration used to con us into war in Iraq, torture, extraordinary rendition, spying on American citizens. We believe in accountability.

He expanded the drone wars. Many leftists are pacifists, opposing all war. Others accept the necessity of fighting to defend against an invasion. All agree that drone strikes, managed in secret, devoid of legal authorization and without checks or balances, are the worst kind of war: aggressive, impersonal, sanitized, mechanized, and especially enraging to its victims.

Most leftists are civil libertarians. We believe that personal freedoms are more important than the rights of the state. As we learned thanks to Edward Snowden, Obama has presided over a breathtaking expansion of the post-9/11 police state, violating the inherent right of every American to speak on the phone or write correspondence in private on a comprehensive, totalitarian scale.

Even ObamaCare, bête noire of the right, annoys us.

For us, the profit incentive has no place in something as existentially necessary as healthcare. We want big insurance companies out of the equation entirely. So, even though there are early indications that ObamaCare’s insurance marketplaces will lower premiums for many patients, we shrug our collective shoulders at such incrementalism. We wonder why socialized medicine — doctors and nurses employed directly by the state, hospitals nationalized — or at least a “single payer” option (which Obama promised during the campaign) was never seriously considered.

Then there’s Guantánamo, which he should have closed. Bradley Manning, tortured under his orders. Edward Snowden, who should have gotten a medal, hunted like a dog.

Any one of the above outrages deserves a long prison term.

If you’re a right-winger who hates Obama and the Democrats, remember us. We hate them just as much as you do — but not for the same reasons.

(Ted Rall’s website is tedrall.com. Go there to join the Ted Rall Subscription Service and receive all of Ted’s cartoons and columns by email.)

COPYRIGHT 2013 TED RALL

HARRISBURG PATRIOT-NEWS CARTOON: The Peril of Helpful Assistants

This cartoon is for The Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The story is about a secretary who “helpfully” removed key evidence in the Jerry Sandusky/Penn State pedophilia scandal from PSU offices. I’m pretty sure this is the only editorial cartoon reference to the assassination of Thomas Becket.

The Road to Hell is Paved by Helpful Assistants

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php