LOS ANGELES TIMES CARTOON: He Owes Everything to His Cryogenic Implant

Jerry Brown Becomes California's Longest-Serving Governor

 

I draw cartoons for The Los Angeles Times about issues related to California and the Southland (metro Los Angeles).

This week:

This week marks an important date for an iconic American politician. No, I’m not talking about the 50th anniversary of the assassination of JFK.  Jerry Brown, 75, is about to become the longest-serving governor in California history.

The former “Governor Moonbeam,” formerly a lightening rod for his alleged 1970s-era flakiness (though, in fairness, he didn’t deserve it), is now widely viewed as effective, mature and effective in Sacramento. Though I have taken issue with some of his policies, most notably kowtowing to well-connected big energy companies, including firing a conscientious regulator, I have generally been relatively impressed.

Considering my view of most politicians — they’re lying scum — “relatively impressed” is as good as it gets.

It’s hard to believe, after this long strange journey, that the phrase “Governor Brown” not only no longer shocks, but is something we expect, like the setting of the sun in the west. Californians like him, his policies, not as much.

To mark Brown’s historical moment, I drew from “The Jetsons” and “Futurama” for a tongue-in-cheek look at what a perpetual Brown governorship might look like. Cryogenically preserved in a jar, with cryogenic Sutter the Corgi at his side, a slightly dystopian California’s future Dear Leader rules benevolently, issuing diktats and 500-year plans (get it) from a telescreen near you.

I, for one, welcome our future non-corporeal overlord.

LOS ANGLELES TIMES CARTOON: Will Porn for Food

Will Porn for Food

 

 

 

 

I draw cartoons for The Los Angeles Times about issues related to California and the Southland (metro Los Angeles).

This week:

According to a porn industry trade group, L.A. County has seen a 95% plunge in film-production permits in 2013 compared with the same period last year. This follows last year’s passage of Measure B, which mandates that porn actors use condoms on set.

County officials have declined to send inspectors to porn sets due to an outstanding lawsuit. A judge has ruled that unannounced on-set inspections may violate the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure. Nevertheless, the chilling effect remains. Apparently the business has migrated from the San Fernando Valley to Ventura County.

When an industry collapses, the first thing I think of as a cartoonist is of panhandlers with “Will ____ for Food” signs. So that’s where I started with this cartoon. Since the aesthetics of porn tend toward the undignified side, a story like this is comic gold. These things pretty much draw themselves.

Still, this is serious business.

The county is losing hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual tax revenue. As for the purpose of the law — to encourage safe sex — this measure appears to be completely ineffective. The movies are still being made, those rascals still aren’t being wrapped and viewers won’t get the voter-desired safe-sex message. As far as I can tell, the only thing that got accomplished by Measure B was to scoot the sets a few miles north and west.

“I wouldn’t mind using condoms more,” performer Lily LaBeau told Slate. “It’s just not what people want to see.” There’s no empirical data to support or deny that claim. But that’s clearly the mainstream view within the industry — and they’re voting with their feet to prove they believe it.

Best editorial cartoons of the year 2013

I’m about to submit my five so-called best editorial cartoons for the year 2013. Got a favorite? If so, please post it in the comments section below. I will rely on your choices and submit them to the book.

Posting bug fixed

If you’ve had problems posting a comment, please try again. Should be OK now.

SYNDICATED COLUMN: “Captain Phillips” is a Beautiful Lie

“Cinéma Vérité” as Political Propaganda

Paul Greengrass is a gifted director who specializes in historical reenactments, a once marginal genre that in recent years hits the sweet spot, earning critical plaudits as well as bringing in bank (Greengrass’ “United 93,” Stephen Frears’ “The Queen,” Oliver Hirschbiegel’s “Downfall,” about Hitler’s final days in his bunker). Greengrass’ latest entry in this field is “Captain Phillips,” a retelling of the 2009 hijacking of a container ship by Somali pirates. Tom Hanks stars in the title role.

Watching this film left me with an uneasy feeling, like I’d digested a delicious meal devoid of nutrition. It was a fun drama. But I didn’t learn anything. Why not?

This is solid Hollywood filmmaking. Tight scripting, sharp editing and unpretentious cinematography deliver a story that keeps you in your seat long after you began having to pee. Hanks delivers one of his finest performances, driving a stake into his rep as an always-playing-himself actor; Barkhad Abdi is a sensational revelation as pirate leader Abduwali Muse.

But what does this film mean? What message does Greengrass convey to his audience?

In random order, here are the takeaways: leadership is tough. Bravery exacts a high cost. In an interconnected world — we watch Phillips email his wife after the pirates’ first attempt to board the Maersk Alabama — it’s nevertheless possible to be alone, isolated and vulnerable. Intermodal transport, an industry in which vast ships carrying thousands of tons of goods are piloted by an unarmed skeleton crew, is surreal. If nothing else, “Capitain Phillips” is worth watching because it opens a window into the lonely lives of the men and women responsible for keeping our store shelves stocked.

Pull out of the multiplex parking lot, however, and you quickly realize the real revelation: “Phillips” is pro-government propaganda.

Greengrass has created the most frightening kind of propaganda — so effective that for most people it will become the definitive historical account of an event. Unlike the hilariously shrill propaganda flicks of the past, from “Triumph of the Will” to Cold War-era artifacts like “Rambo” and “Red Dawn,” the new breed pretends not to editorialize. Affecting a quiet, Zoloft-inflected tone and economical, apparently straightforward scriptwriting, this movie plays it close to the vest, coming off as deadly fair and serious. Which makes it easy to miss what is left out.

This new cinéma non-vérité uses high art to sanitize history in order to elevate the imperialist, militarist geopolitical agenda of the U.S. government in its post-9/11 war on terror.

            Kathryn Bigelow never scratches the surface of Osama bin Laden’s motivations in “Zero Dark Thirty.” He’s just a target, a cipher in a beard, so we don’t care when he dies. Her film is thrilling yet vacuous.

It is far from settled history that United Flight 93 was brought down by the passenger revolt — the 9/11 Commission Report leaves open the possibility that it was shot down. But that would prompt uncomfortable questions. Greengrass’ film, which unquestioningly accepts the “let’s roll” scenario, all but sets it in stone for posterity.

Ben Affleck’s “Argo” is devoid of political context, especially the historical basis for the Iranian revolutionaries’ contempt for the United States. Best not to mention the coup, the shah, corruption or torture.

American movies are about choices. Will the protagonist choose right or wrong (and which is which)? In “Captain Phillips,” however, the ethical quandaries rest not on Hanks’ character, who handles his ordeal as courageously and competently as you could expect, but on Abdi’s shoulders. It’s more than a little odd.

“We are just fisherman,” Abdi explains after seizing control of the vessel. Fortunes reverse after crewmen hidden in the engine room capture him and trade him for their captain, who offers them $30,000 in cash and a lifeboat to leave the ship. Disgusted that the Somalis won’t settle for less than “millions” and physically brutalized, Hanks spits “you are not a fisherman!” at Abdi an hour later into the movie.

It’s a puzzling narrative choice. Not only is Abdi’s a supporting role, we don’t see much deliberation. Muse is in it for the big bucks all along. So are his colleagues.

Passing up the obvious chance to use this mother of all culture clashes as a means to discuss race and class, Greengrass has nevertheless succumbed to the hoary colonial instinct to ask, almost out loud, why $30,000 isn’t enough to sate a gang of starvation-thin guys from one of the world’s poorest countries. The closest we get to an answer is a tossed-off aside by Abdi that the fish “left” Somali waters.

The background, mentioned only obliquely in this movie about Somali piracy, is that Somalia’s fishing industry had been decimated. After Somalia collapsed into the sectarian civil conflict in the early 1990s, the absence of a strong central government — coupled with the indifference of the international community — opened a vacuum for opportunists. Foreign trawlers and other vessels dump industrial waste, toxins and even nuclear waste — including uranium — off the Somali coast. Foreign fishing ships use drift nets to steal the fish that survive.

Time magazine reported in 2009 that Somalis turned to piracy after Western ships made it impossible to fish: “A United Nations report in 2006 said that, in the absence of the country’s at one time serviceable coastguard, Somali waters have become the site of an international ‘free for all,’ with fishing fleets from around the world illegally plundering Somali stocks and freezing out the country’s own rudimentarily-equipped fishermen. According to another U.N. report, an estimated $300 million worth of seafood is stolen from the country’s coastline each year.”

Desperate Somali fishermen formed vigilante flotillas to go after foreign fishing vessels. Some robbed the poachers at gunpoint. This turned out to be much more lucrative than fishing. Piracy became a $50 million a year industry.

If Abduwali Muse isn’t really a fisherman, he didn’t have that option to begin with.

Postscript: Somalis who still try to fish are harassed, questioned and detained by American warships assigned to the Horn of Africa to deter pirates. (In “Captain Phillips,” this Navy practice is whitewashed.)

Two or three additional lines of dialogue would have enlightened American movie audiences about the complexity of the piracy issue. Exposing the antagonists’ motivations would have made “Captain Phillips” a smarter movie, a tragedy in which opposing forces, neither side evil, are forced into a clash in which at least one side must die. Greengrass gives us all the moral nuance of cowboy-versus-Injun movie.

“Capitain Phillips” is the triumph of suburban schlubs and high-tech military hardware over hollow-eyed black men in rags, horribly unfamiliar with basic oral hygiene.

By the way, if some of the Maersk Alabama’s crewmen are to be believed, Phillips was a lousy captain who imperiled them by skirting too close to the Somali coast. Deborah Waters, an attorney representing 11 crewmen who are suing Maersk, said: “He told them he wouldn’t let pirates scare him or force him to sail away from the coast.”

Maybe, maybe not. Only those who were there know for sure.

Making films is also about choice.

When you make a film based on history, it’s impossible to include every detail. Nor should you try.

Still, basic background facts are crucial to understanding the event being depicted. Omitting or spinning issues (why Somalis resorted to piracy) strips them of context. Deploying a matter-of-fact tone makes these cinematic lies (because the Somalis are poor and greedy) credible.

It is unforgivable to promote America’s we’re-the-good-guys party line at the expense of the victims of the system. (Muse, politically voiceless in this film, is serving 33 years in federal prison.) Dressing up a perversion of truth in pretty lighting, and stuffing tainted dialogue into the mouths of great actors, results in an affront to art as well as history.

(Ted Rall’s website is tedrall.com. Go there to join the Ted Rall Subscription Service and receive all of Ted’s cartoons and columns by email.)

COPYRIGHT 2013 TED RALL

Poor Tajikistan Poised to Become Oil Power

In a little-noticed development, landlocked, impoverished Tajikistan has struck it big in an oil and gas field in the country’s southwest:

Independent estimates from Gustavson Associates currently place Bokhtar’s unrisked mean prospective recoverable resources at 114 trillion cu ft of gas and 8.5 billion bbl of crude oil and-or condensate.2

As such, Tajikistan’s gas and oil reserve base could ultimately prove to be on par with that of the world class offshore discoveries being made in Mozambique and Tanzania.

The poorest nation in the former USSR is about to confront the notorious “energy curse.” Will they follow the example of Turkmenistan, which is wallowing in poverty as political elites steal natural resource revenues? Or Kazakhstan, which is also corrupt, but has increased average salaries tenfold in the last eight years?

Watch this space — our next war may be in Central Asia.

 

Anyone who thinks Hillary Rodham Clinton isn’t evil

should look at this photo:

That’s Uzbekistan President Islam Karimov. He is known for, among other things, personally boiling political dissidents to death. And personally supervising the Andijon Massacre, where hundreds of mostly peaceful demonstrators were gunned down by the security forces for one of the most repressive regimes in the world.

With friends like that, do you want this woman to be our next president?

css.php