For me, the low point of last night’s debate – and the most telling – was the lack of response to the young man who does not have a job upon graduating from college. Neither Obama nor Romney even pretended to have a plan to provide a job for that young man right now. People don’t need jobs five years from now. They need them now.
Ted Rall Column Ends at MSNBC.com
I had really enjoyed my brief tenure at MSNBC’s Lean Forward blog. Good audience, nice venue. Sadly, it’s over now; last week’s column will be my last for them. From now on their blogs will be written by their on-air talent. I assume it’s a combination of cost savings and integration; why promote writers who aren’t bringing in on-air revenue? I dunno.
I have to look at my weekly column to see if it’s worth continuing. The client list has steadily fallen for the last ten years—a reflection of the state of print media—so even though more people read it online than ever before, it has never paid as little. The revenue is back to 1995 levels.
I honestly don’t know what to do—about the column or my career in general. If there is a way to make money online, I haven’t been able to figure it out—nor has anyone I know.
RTTV Interview: Ted Rall on US Double Standards
Check out my interview about double standards as the U.S. applies them to fair elections.
US election double standards
US election double standards
by Anastasia Churkina
RT America
October 13, 2012
NY Comicon Today
If you’re attending the New York Comicon today, I’ll be signing “Billionaires & Ballot Bandits” with Greg Palast from 1 to 2pm at ComicBook.com booth #2249, which is in the small press area. Please note: NY Comicon is SOLD OUT so this is only applicable if you already have reserved tickets. Hope to see you there!
SYNDICATED COLUMN: Big Bird is a 1%er
Romney’s Silly But Salient Point on PBS
“I like PBS. I love Big Bird. Actually, I like you, too,” Mitt Romney told Jim Lehrer in the most quoted line from the first presidential debate. “But I’m not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for.”
Huge news!
If deficit spending will be verboten under the Mittocracy, what will happen to all those out-of-work soldiers and defense contractors? Where will the drones crash after they run out of gas?
But let’s not talk about that either. Apparently I’m the only person in America who noticed that the military-industrial complex is about to go out of business.
People are instead focusing on Romney’s call to cut the $445 million a year the federal government–which amounts to a paltry 1.2% of 1% of the federal budget–contributes to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which subsidizes PBS and NPR.
My fellow political cartoonists are having a field day, echoing President Obama’s hat tip to the O.J. case: “Elmo has been seen in a white Suburban. He’s driving for the border.” The New York Times’ Charles M. Blow riffed: “Big Bird is the man. He’s eight feet tall. He can sing and roller skate and ride a unicycle and dance. Can you do that, Mr. Romney?” A co-creator of “Sesame Street” dismissed Romney as “silly.”
Silly? Definitely.
But is Romney right? Probably.
Candidates and parties aren’t important. Ideas are. If we’re ideologically consistent, if we want to appear credible when we criticize right-wingers like Romney, we left-of-center types have to hold ourselves to the same (or higher) standards as those to which we subject our enemies. We have to admit when they’re correct, even–especially–when it’s about something as trivial as this.
This is a time when we have to give the devil his due.
Until recently I was unaware of the exorbitant salaries received by executives and top employees of federally-subsidized broadcasting networks. In a 2011 op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) pointed out that PBS paid its president, Paula Kerger, over $600,000 a year–more than the President of the United States. “Kevin Klose, president emeritus of NPR…received more than $1.2 million in compensation, according to the tax forms the nonprofit filed in 2009,” wrote DeMint. “Sesame Workshop President and CEO Gary Knell received $956,513 in compensation in 2008.” (Now Knell runs NPR, which pays him about $575,000.)
Actor Carroll Spinney, who plays Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch, was paid more than $314,000 last year.
The liberal Center for American Progress countered: “While those numbers are not exactly chump change, it’s pennies compared to the salaries of another industry the U.S. taxpayers subsidize at much higher cost–Big Oil.”
But that’s red-herring sophistry.
Wasteful federal spending on overpaid executives is wrong, whether it’s for planet-murdering energy corporations, or on a network that airs free educational TV that helps ready kids for school with basics like counting, math and even Spanish.
Kill both.
“Like for-profit media companies, Sesame [and PBS] needs to pay top dollar to attract talent,” MSN’s Jonathan Berr argues, sounding like a Fortune 500 corporation defending sky-high CEO paychecks.
I disagree.
NPR and PBS do an OK job reporting the news–as long as it happens on a weekday–but that’s not the point.
If you accept public money, you’re in public service and should get paid accordingly. Which is to say, fairly–and at the lowest fair cost to taxpayers.
If you can’t find someone qualified to run NPR or PBS, or an actor up to the task of playing Big Bird, for $100,000 a year–especially in this job market–you’re not looking hard enough. Something is off-kilter when the studios of publicly-funded shows like NPR’s “All Things Considered” are centrally located and sumptuously furnished with mahogany tables and the latest high-tech gadgetry, while those of privately-owned 50,000-watt talk-radio powerhouses are situated in the slums and look like 1970s-era flophouses.
Salary figures for NPR “stars” like Robert Siegel ($341,992), Renee Montagne ($328,309), Steve Inskeep ($320,950), Scott Simon ($311,958) and Michele Norris ($279,909) are three to four times more than top-rated talk-radio hosts in the biggest markets get. How dare these 1%ers shake us down during pledge drives, much less collect federal taxdollars?
PBS only receives 15% of its funding from the feds. For NPR it’s 2%. As a former NPR exec confided, given the political heat they take over it, they’d might be better off cutting the strings. Then they’d be free to stop giving lying conservatives “equal time” to seem “fair.”
Why is the government giving broadcasters money they don’t need? There’s a much stronger argument for propping up newspapers, which remain the original source of 95% of news stories. Print media is in big trouble: the newspaper industry has shrunk 43% since 2000. Analysts say that even that chart-filled ubiquitous denizen of hotels USA Today may fold. If the feds want to do something good for journalism–and the well-informed populace required for vibrant democracy–they should start by subsidizing print newspapers.
But only if their editors and publishers don’t get paid ridiculous salaries.
(Ted Rall‘s new book is “The Book of Obama: How We Went From Hope and Change to the Age of Revolt.” His website is tedrall.com. This column originally appeared at MSNBC’s Lean Forward blog.)
COPYRIGHT 2012 TED RALL
LOS ANGELES TIMES CARTOON: Underwater on the Car
I draw cartoons for The Los Angeles Times about issues related to California and the Southland (metro Los Angeles).
This week: Gas prices in California are at a record high for the third day in a row, up slightly more than a cent overnight at $4.668 for a gallon of regular just as motorists start their work week. The cost of fueling up has soared in recent days, as refinery and pipeline problems squeezed supply. The steep and sudden run-up caused Gov. Jerry Brown to call Sunday for a quick infusion of winter-blend gasoline.
NBCNews.com Blog: Romney Was Right About Big Bird
Here’s the NBCNews.com version of this week’s column.
The Spite Vote
Mitt Romney is enjoying a bigger than expected bump in the polls following Wednesday night’s presidential debate. Why? Spite.
In a two-party system, a.k.a. the two-party trap, disgruntled voters are forced to choose between two almost equally unpalatable candidates. Most of all, they hate the incumbent who caused the problems that they are suffering: in this case, unemployment, underemployment, stagnant wages, no hope of a better future.
Until a few months ago, I would have forecast that Obama’s chances for reelection were basically doomed. In fact, I bet an acquaintance a substantial amount of money that that was in fact the case. But then Mitt Romney went on to commit a series of well reported gaffes that we don’t need to go into here. Why is Romney doing better now? People have been looking for an excuse to vote against Obama. When you are flailing between choices, you tend to lash out against the incumbent. That is what we are seeing today.
After the debate, people saw that Romney wasn’t quite as much of an a**hole as he had made himself out to be on the campaign trail. Well, of course he is exactly as much of an a**hole as that, and no doubt much more than that, but he was “nice” enough in to make them feel okay about choosing to vote against Obama – to demonstrate their anger at Obama for choosing to prolong the Depression. So there’s the bump in the polls. Will it stick? I don’t know. But it’s an interesting phenomenon to watch as a dying system gasps its final breaths.