Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: Donald Trump, Bully-in-Chief

The following is a transcript of an episode of DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou for Monday, July 21, 2025. Transcript was done via AI, so beware of possible errors.

Ted Rall: Hey there. Thanks for joining us here on DeProgram, where we deprogram you from corporate news propaganda. Coming to you on the left side of your screen, I’m an editorial cartoonist, Ted Rall. On the right side of the screen, but not politically, is John Kiriakou, CIA whistleblower. Thanks for joining us. We’re here now on our regular schedule, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM Eastern Time, 2 PM on the West Coast, and we love you in all other 22 time zones as well. I guess there are more than that. There are those half-time zones. Those are very strange. I don’t even understand the reason. Well, we could do it. If only there was a device that could answer that question for us.

So, let’s get into it. Lots to talk about today, as always. John suggested, and we definitely have to talk about, the role of Donald Trump as bully-in-chief. I think that’s self-explanatory, but we’ll get into the details and exactly what that’s all about. Several of my cartoonist friends called me about a story out of The Intercept saying that ICE is now setting up domestic surveillance against critics like yours truly and John, who say anything bad about ICE on social media. So we’ll talk about that chilling effect here. As ICE is prepared to become the biggest police agency in the United States now with its massive expansion, we’ll talk about the human cost of the Trump deportations, including this terrible case of an 82-year-old Chilean torture victim under Pinochet who is at death’s door in Guatemala. Sorry, not Guantanamo. He was actually reported dead. ICE thought he was dead, but he’s hanging on, thank God. We’ll talk about that. Pat Tillman—some people who are familiar with my cartooning career will remember that I did a very controversial cartoon about him. His brother appears to be having some major problems, and he’s under arrest for apparently intentionally driving into the front of a post office in San Jose, California. And on the Israel-Gaza front, I guess you could call this good news: 23 countries just signed a joint statement, including Canada, urging an immediate cessation of hostilities and criticizing Israel for its behavior there. So, John, let’s get into it with Donald Trump. There’s the Gulf of America stuff, which I have to admit, let’s start with that. A lot of stuff that Trump does comes out of the fevered rants of right-wing media over the years, as you expected. I watch Fox every single day, and I have for years. I’ve never seen anyone talk about renaming the Gulf of Mexico before Donald Trump brought it up during his second term. He never brought it up during his first term. Never. Suddenly. So where is this coming from?

John Kiriakou: I think it came from his decision to rename Mount McKinley, Mount McKinley. I think he figured, “Hey, why should I stop here? I’m going to change the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.” And, you know, the people on the MAGA right just love, love, loved it. It’s such a stupid thing, but it’s easily changed back. But then we saw the way he began bullying universities to the point where Harvard’s not allowed to accept international students. Columbia is losing its federal funding. Yale had to back down and get on its knees in front of him. That bothered me very much. But then today, he issued a new demand that the Washington Commanders, Washington’s football team, must change its name back to the Washington Redskins, or he will nix the deal that the team has negotiated with the city of Washington, D.C., for a new stadium. This is a big deal in Washington because both the Washington Redskins and the Washington Senators used to play at what became RFK Stadium. RFK Stadium is a terrible stadium. It’s been abandoned now for years. They’re in the process right now of knocking it down. The Redskins moved to Lanham, Maryland. They’ve been there for twenty-five years, whatever it is. They, under pressure, dropped the name Redskins several years ago and couldn’t pick a name. So they were known for two seasons as the Washington Football Team, which was also stupid. And then they decided to become the Washington Commanders several years ago. Well, they’re tired of playing in Lanham, Maryland. The stadium there now is old and in disrepair, and they decided that they wanted to go back to Washington because the new stadium that’s being built on the RFK Stadium site is right on the metro. It has its own metro station, so everybody can get there. It’s going to have tons of parking for thousands and thousands of cars, and Lanham’s not like that. You have to drive to Lanham, Maryland. It’s the only way to get there and the only way to get to a game. So he’s thrown this wrench into the deal now. RFK has been torn down. It can’t be renovated. They wouldn’t have renovated it anyway. But now unless they change their name back to Redskins, he’s going to kill that stadium deal, and the Commanders are stuck. Not just the Commanders are stuck. Residents of Washington, D.C., are stuck because they’re not going to see any of the revenue benefits that were expected to come from the team. So now, I mean, the only reason it seems to me that he’s doing this is just because of cruelty. He’s just mean. He’s trying to bully. And I think it just distracts from the important issues.

Ted Rall: I’m glad, John, that you reminded us of what happened with Mount McKinley, which had been renamed to Mount Denali. That’s the Native American preferred name. It’s also an SUV. So it went from McKinley to Denali. I guess, traditionally, it may have been called Denali before. It was named Mount McKinley, obviously. It’s been there a long time. And so, in the case of the Alaskan mountain, you know, let’s get rid of the Native American name because that will piss off the Native Americans. In the case of the Washington Commanders, let’s restore the Native American name because it’s a Native American name they don’t like. And I can’t help but think about that incident in the first term when he had Native American tribe representatives pose for a photo under the portrait of Andrew Jackson, a genocidal maniac who, aside from shooting the husbands of women he was having sex with, also liked to kill Native Americans.

John Kiriakou: Good point. He did.

Ted Rall: I mean, Columbia is also about to sign a $20 billion deal with the Trump administration to try to get some of their research funds back, which Trump has been wielding as well.

John Kiriakou: If they would just address the rampant antisemitism that’s taking place.

Ted Rall: I think it’ll be easier to find the Loch Ness Monster than the rampant antisemitism.

John Kiriakou: I think so too. I mean, he did. I don’t understand what he hopes to gain. He’s a lame duck. He can’t run for president again. I think this is just to be mean. And you know what? Speaking of lame ducks, I’m sorry I should have brought this up before the show, but we should probably talk about this new Trump-announced policy to convince the Texas state legislature to do an off-cycle congressional redistricting to squeeze three, four, or five more Democrats out of their congressional districts so that the Republicans can hang on to the House of Representatives in perpetuity.

Ted Rall: Is that allowed? I mean, because it normally happens after the census every ten years.

John Kiriakou: This has never been done before, Ted. It’s never been done before. And so Hakeem Jeffries then announced this morning that he is filing lawsuits to ask judicial permission to redraw the congressional districts in California, New York, New Jersey, and one other state—oh, Minnesota—to squeeze Republicans out of their districts to offset Texas if Trump wins. Incredible. They’re just like crime families, the two parties. That’s all.

Ted Rall: Well, I mean, in fairness to the Democrats—not something I do normally because I hate them—but, you know, it is true that in this particular respect, they’re between a rock and a hard place. Because if they go tit for tat, they’re playing Trump’s game, and they legitimize it. It’s kind of like having an abusive spouse. If they hit you all the time and you hit them back, well, then you’re just two people who hit each other. But on the other hand, if you don’t do anything, then you’re a wuss, and you’re getting rolled, and your partisans hate you. In this respect, I don’t know what Democrats should do.

John Kiriakou: I agree, man. I don’t know. The whole thing states. It really, this goes back to the 1990s. We can hate on James Carville all we want, and he’s deserving of our hate sometimes. But he can be charming as hell. He got into a knockdown, drag-out fight with Hillary Clinton in the mid-1990s because he wanted to pour millions of dollars into state legislative races to win seats in state houses and state senates because they’re the ones that redraw these maps every ten years. And she told him that was a waste of money, that the money the DNC had should go to U.S. House and U.S. Senate races, and anything left over should go to the presidential campaign. And the Clintons walked away from the state races. And look what happened. Republicans control, like, 70-something percent of them now. There’s no farm team. When was the last time that you ever heard of a state senator or state representative being spoken about on the national stage? It was Barack Obama in 2004, when state senator Barack Obama gave a speech at the Democratic National Convention.

Ted Rall: I was there. I remember it well. You’re right about that. And, yeah, I remember, of course, I’m so old. In the late ’80s, when I worked for a Japanese bank, I met Governor Bill Clinton, and my boss turns to me and says, “That guy’s going to be president.” And I was like, “Who? Him?” Shows my political instincts. Don’t have me pick candidates. Wow. So, I just wonder how this is going to play out legally. I mean, redistricting is kind of like, they do what they want much of the time? The states set their own rules. They change them all the time. They’re going to get away with this.

John Kiriakou: I think they’re going to get away with it. Trump has so stacked the courts.

Ted Rall: Well, let’s talk a little bit about the psychology of political bullying. There’s always been political bullying, and I could name example after example. But here, it’s really naked. It’s brazen, and it just seems to be the way Trump always worked as a developer. He just comes down like a ton of bricks: “Don’t mess with me. I do whatever I want. It’s not personal. I’ll just destroy your life to get what I want. You’re in my way. Don’t be in my way.” And nothing much really stands in his way. I mean, is it just as simple as, this works, so I do it?

John Kiriakou: I think it actually is. I think Donald Trump is like a lot of CIA officers that I’ve met over the years, senior ones, where they just push the envelope of legality as far as they can until they’re slapped down. There was a great piece in the Washington Post today saying that in 70% of the federal cases that Trump has lost so far, the administration has just ignored the judge’s decision. So they’re in contempt. But how do you hold a president in contempt? You can’t do it. What are you going to do? You’re going to lock up the White House lawyers until the president does what you tell him to do? That’s not going to happen ever.

Ted Rall: Because the guys who wrote the Constitution were a bunch of English upper-class gentlemen. The idea that someone would behave indecently, totally ignoring the rules, was just not something that would cross their minds. It never occurred to them.

John Kiriakou: I’m not optimistic. Michael Gardner says the judiciary is our best hope. I agree, but even that does not make me sleep better at night.

Ted Rall: No. I think this is a major crisis. And the part that I keep coming back to is, you know, this man was only elected six months ago. We’re one-eighth of the way out of the woods.

John Kiriakou: One thing that I find kind of fun too, and this is a minor point, but it bugs the hell out of me, is I hate having to defend Barack Obama. But when Obama named whatever it was—a drug czar, a border czar, some czar—I remember Fox News going to some Republican rally and asking people, “What do you think about this?” And they’re like, “We don’t have no czars in the U.S. That’s a communist idea, having czars.” And I was like, “Man, you morons.” Reagan is the one who started the czars with his drug czar. It was a Reagan administration policy, and the people are too stupid, shortsighted to remember that. Number one. Number two, Obama took an incredible amount of criticism for the number of executive orders that he signed. And I remember Republicans just screaming that he’s ruling by executive order. It’s just executive fiat. It’s illegal. It’s anti-democratic. Donald Trump has signed more executive orders at this point in his term than any president in American history, and the MAGA Republicans are loving it. The sum total. So now we’ve gotten ourselves into a political position where, when the Democrats win the presidency again, they’re going to have to sign hundreds of executive orders to undo the executive orders that were signed under Donald Trump. Just keep happening like this every time, cycle after cycle, and it’s going to be the Gulf of Mexico, and then it’s going to be the Gulf of America again, and then the Gulf of Mexico again. And we just make ourselves look like boobs.

Ted Rall: That’s right. And it’s a system that doesn’t work. And while we’re doing this, we’re not addressing our real problems. John, one of the things that’s really changed too is we’ve seen fairly unified government before. There have been other times when one party held the trifecta, all three branches. That’s the case now. But what I’ve never seen or read about, as far as I can tell, is where one branch of Congress, particularly the House of Representatives, completely becomes a rubber stamp, enabling party, gives up its prerogatives entirely, completely relinquishes oversight or wanting to be consulted. It used to be that in Washington, power was everything. Don’t step on my toes. Yes, we’re both from the same party. I like you, President Kiriakou. But as Speaker of the House, I’ve got to insist that you check in with me. And now it’s like, “Yes, sir, Mr. President. I’ll do, and I don’t even hear from you. You never call. You never write.” It’s really that part is truly frightening. For students of Nazism, the Enabling Act, when the Reichstag just passed one law that finally said anything that Adolf Hitler proposes is automatically passed. They still met and everything, but it was kind of like under the Roman Empire where the Senate still met, but the emperor had decided everything. It was a dictatorship. That’s where we’re at. Even Republican senators don’t seem to be pushing back real hard.

John Kiriakou: No. If you think they’re welcoming it, look at Lindsey Graham. Could Lindsey Graham be any more of a lap dog than he is? I’m not even sure it’s possible. And 2324 makes a good point. The Democrats are no better. The Democrats are in a state of utter chaos right now. They can’t even decide if they want to endorse Mamdani for mayor of New York. He’s their nominee. Well, they don’t want to. They don’t like the cut of his democratic socialist jib.

Ted Rall: That’s right. But they’re going to, and now the thing is, it’s a bad look. They will as they get closer, but by then, it’s too late. The time to show unity is in advance. Probably better not to do it at all. By the way, shout out to 2324. Thank you very much for the $9.99 donation. We really, really do appreciate it. Well, let’s answer his question. What does happen next with the Democrats? I would have expected by this point, we’d start to see some initial cohesion, but I don’t see it.

John Kiriakou: No. There’s no cohesion at all. I think what’s going to happen, though, they are such a corporatist party at their core that they’re going to go right back into that DLC, middle-of-the-road, tack to the left in the primaries, tack to the right in the general corporate party that they’ve been since Bill Clinton was nominated in 1992. When they went to, what was it? Annapolis or Y River, I think it was at Y. They went to their Democratic off-site in 1992, and they invited the Democratic Leadership Council to present on what became the centrist third way.

Ted Rall: That was the centrist third way that no longer exists. But, basically, it doesn’t need to because they run the whole DNC.

John Kiriakou: The whole party moved to the right. I don’t think it’s going to change. We’re not going to see a Bernie Sanders-like person ever again, particularly as a Democrat.

Ted Rall: No. Mamdani is the only game in town now. We’ll see what happens there. But, I mean, the mayor of New York doesn’t usually go on to anything national of any import. We’re not calling you President Giuliani. But, you know, he could have. I mean, just surprising, but for a variety of reasons, I think it just doesn’t carry over. You know, Carville has an op-ed in today’s New York Times where he talks a little about that. His prediction is that the day after the 2026 midterms, there will be a leader, a front-runner, apparent for the presidency who will effectively become the leader of the Democratic Party, and nothing will really coalesce until there’s that leader.

John Kiriakou: I think he’s living in a fantasy land.

Ted Rall: I think he may be right, but I just don’t know that there is such a leader who can do this. There are eight Democrats out of the desert.

John Kiriakou: There are eight Democrats that have already either set up exploratory committees or traveled to Iowa or New Hampshire for fundraisers.

Ted Rall: Yep. We know the list. I mean, it’s not too early to start shaking the trees for money. Gavin Newsom, Andy Beshear, governor of Kentucky, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania. Josh Shapiro will not be the nominee. The progressives will just not allow it.

John Kiriakou: You know what, though? On principle, I could or would never vote for someone who has served in a foreign army. I honestly have no idea where his loyalties lie. And if it’s to the IDF, not a chance.

Ted Rall: Yeah. The IDF is a criminal organization. Totally agree.

John Kiriakou: Travis has a very down-in-the-weeds question for me about Phil Mudd. So I knew Phil Mudd very, very well at the CIA. Believe it or not, he used to be a nice guy, a decent guy. He’s a direct descendant of Dr. Mudd, who set John Wilkes Booth’s broken leg after he murdered Abraham Lincoln. And he’s a distant cousin of Roger Mudd, the famed journalist. But Phil, in order to promote his own career, went all in with the torture program. So Phil and I were pals until 2001. And then, without even having exchanged a word, we became enemies to the point where he testified against me in the grand jury. Not that he knew anything about my case. He just wanted to say on the record that I was an asshole. That was it. So I always enjoyed watching Phil fail. He was initially appointed deputy undersecretary of Homeland Security for intelligence under Obama. And I called a couple of friends of mine at the agency who were quiet supporters of mine, and one who was on the Obama transition team, and they yanked his nomination. And he’s not done anything of import since then, except he coauthored a book that was a defense of the torture program, which just made me so happy that his name now will be associated in perpetuity with the torture program. He so deserves it.

And, Reid, I’m sorry. I never had anything to do personally with Leon Panetta, but I published an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times from prison, handwritten on a legal pad, which they gladly ran, saying that Leon Panetta should be in the bunk next to me because he committed espionage. He gave classified briefings over a classified mock-up of the bin Laden compound to Kathryn Bigelow, a Hollywood director, and Mark Boal, a Hollywood writer, for Zero Dark Thirty. And then invited them to the attaboy speech after bin Laden was killed, forgot that they had been invited, and then outed the names of all the SEAL Team Six officers who were responsible for the bin Laden killing, and then said, “Oops. Sorry.” That’s all classified. And then they redacted not just the six names. They redacted 27 lines of his comments because they found out that a whole bunch of other stuff that he said was also classified. And remember, the judge in my case said that the definition of espionage is providing national defense information to any person not entitled to receive it. What he did was the definition of espionage. Insane. Jessica Chastain played—I don’t know. Should I say her name? She played the red-headed devil. I won’t say her name. I’ll probably get in trouble again. And Billy Waugh. Billy died a couple of years ago during COVID, not of COVID. He was well into his nineties, but I did not keep in touch with him after I left the agency. Every once in a while, I would run into a mutual friend. I’d say, “Tell Billy I said hi,” and then Billy would say, “Tell John I said hi.” But that was the end of it. I liked Billy a lot, but Billy kept some dangerous company.

Ted Rall: Shall we talk about ICE? And I also, before I should interject about this case of Luis Leon that, you know, you read a case and some cases make your blood boil. This guy, 82 years old, came to the United States in 1986 under Ronald Reagan. He’d been tortured by the Pinochet regime of Chile, notorious. He got political asylum under a right-wing Republican administration, rightly so. He’s lived here peaceably all these years. He loses his wallet. In his wallet was his green card. So he goes online: “What do I do?” You go to ICE, and you file a form, and we’ll give you a new one. He makes an appointment, shows up, is cuffed immediately, dragged off, and disappeared into the system, into the network of domestic immigration gulags.

John Kiriakou: His family called every morgue, every police station, every hospital.

Ted Rall: Yep. Can’t find him. He’s got a green card. He’s basically a U.S. citizen who can’t vote. That’s what a green card holder is. And the guy’s 82 years old and suffering from all sorts of medical conditions. Well, finally, weeks pass. The family is completely losing their mind. By the way, his wife doesn’t know where he is. And then ICE calls and says, “Yeah, by the way, he died. You can pick up his body in Guatemala.” And to add to the excitement, because never a dull moment, it turns out, “Oh, not dead yet, but he might.” He’s desperately ill in a hospital in Guatemala, and he may or may not make it back. This is ludicrous.

John Kiriakou: That’s kidnapping. It’s kidnapping and torture is what it is. The guy came in.

Ted Rall: It was, yeah. They just swept him up. They don’t even allege that he committed a crime. Like, you did something that justifies us yanking your green card, which, by the way, they don’t have that authority to do anyway. They’re not even making the case. They literally have no basis. Just whoosh. He just did it. This can happen to anybody. It happened to that U.S. army vet. The Intercept has this piece that basically says that ICE is making an enemies list. They’ve hired private contractors to monitor social media feeds to keep track of their critics. Their explanation for this is that ICE officers are supposedly in a lot of danger. They really hate it. And what if something were to happen to one? They’d want to be able to know that maybe it was someone who posted on X, something that was bad that would help them investigate this possible theoretical future threat to these dudes. Of course, obviously, they are hated and reviled, not because they’re enforcing the law, but because of the way they’re behaving, the kinds of things that they’re doing.

I had two cartoonists call me today and say that they’re concerned that they’ve said negative things about ICE in their cartoons and in their social media feeds, and their cartoons appear on social media. And they’re wondering if they need to start thinking about leaving the United States. This is the intention here, clearly, to establish a chilling effect on criticism, because if that were not the case, they wouldn’t announce it. If it was something they just wanted to do for their personal safety, they’d just do it. But why announce it? The announcement is to let you know, “We see you. We’re making a list, and we’re checking it twice, and you’re going to be on that list.” And when we’re done deporting all the foreigners, well, we’re not going to just close shop and say, “Wow, we deported all the illegals. Throw us a party. You’re welcome.” They’re going to expand, and they’re going to turn—they’ve already been expelling green card holders. Just last week, there was this raid on a California cannabis farm where they arrested and tried to deport a U.S. citizen born in the U.S. who is also a U.S. Army vet, 23 years old, who was working at this legal cannabis farm. The dude almost died in custody. He was so badly physically maltreated. And, of course, he’s suing. There are all sorts of allegations of medical abuse in ICE custody. And now there’s this surveillance project, which, you know, is terrifying. It feels a lot like fascism.

John Kiriakou: I think that is fascism. I happen to be in New York. Sorry, I didn’t tell you in advance, but I’ve been swamped. I’m in Queens to finish the photography for my next book, and I went to the grave today of Roy Cohn. And, you know, what a charmer. It’s not really a grave. He’s in a family mausoleum, the Marcus family. And all it says is “Roy Cohn, birth year and death year, lawyer and patriot.” Well, he’s not a lawyer. He is one of the darkest, most hated and hateful figures in modern American history. Jesus. And he would fit in so well in government today. He represented Donald Trump.

Ted Rall: I mean, early on. Roy Cohn and they were buddies. There’s that movie, which I haven’t seen, The Apprentice, about their early relationship and the things that Trump supposedly picked up from Roy Cohn. He was, of course, the scoundrel of the Army-McCarthy hearings.

John Kiriakou: Absolutely. Let me say real quickly, we have a whole bunch of questions. Thank you, Soudan. My book, Remains of the Day, the definitive guide to Washington, D.C.’s historic cemeteries, is supposed to be out next week. It won’t be, and I don’t know why, but it’s ready to come out. The book after that is called Whispers in the Dirt, the definitive guide to New York City’s mafia graves. That’s why I’m unshaven. I’ve been out since eight this morning. I went to five different cemeteries here.

Ted Rall: Oh my god. Forever.

John Kiriakou: Ted, I’m going from one grave to the other. I put it into Waze, and it’s like, “Continue straight for two miles.” In the same cemetery. There are 350,000 people buried in this cemetery.

Ted Rall: They’re a major feature on the map of New York City.

John Kiriakou: It’s crazy. So, anyway, Cohn was also an attorney for a lot of high-level organized crime figures, and I wanted to put him in there too. That’s why I was out. But Cohn made me think, frankly, of Stephen Miller. You guys are mentioning Stephen Miller here. Just between us, I heard last week that one reason I haven’t been pardoned is that I have a Stephen Miller problem. So I’m going to try to work that out so Stephen Miller doesn’t hate who he thinks is John Kiriakou.

Ted Rall: Maybe you shouldn’t say anything bad about him here.

John Kiriakou: Yeah. Right. You get a pass from me on this. Saint John’s Cemetery in Queens has Lucky Luciano, Vito Genovese who’s next to Tommy Lucchese, who’s a hundred feet from Lucky Luciano. And then in the mausoleum is John Gotti, and he’s next to Roy DeMeo, and he’s next to a guy that he shot six times in the head. It’s just nuts.

Ted Rall: I believe it. So do we want to talk any more about ICE, or what do you think?

John Kiriakou: Before you get into it, just as an aside about ICE, I get this hyperlocal newsletter every day at four. It’s called Arlington Now, and it’s for Arlington, Virginia. And they had an article today that there’s this serious feud between the Arlington County Sheriff’s Department and ICE. And my first thought was, “Good. Good for the sheriff’s department.” I voted for this man for sheriff. I don’t even remember his name. Not the woman. She retired. I voted for this Hispanic guy because he was just a low-level sheriff, and he was going to go in and bomb-throw and tear the whole place down. So I click on the article to see what the fight is about. And it says the sheriff’s department is refusing to cooperate with ICE. And so ICE said that they’re going to try to take over the sheriff’s department. I’m like, “Okay. That’s cool.” And then it said the reason why this fight is taking place is that ICE has twice put a hold on this convicted pedophile. And rather than hold him until an ICE officer can get there to deport him to wherever it is in Latin America he’s supposed to be deported to, they just keep letting him go, and he keeps molesting other children. It’s like, “No. That’s not cool.” Stand up to ICE, but not in support of a pedophile. What the heck are you thinking?

Ted Rall: Well, also, I’m not sure, like, I want foreign kids to be molested either. Prosecute him. Hold on to him. Nail him. I mean, nail him here. This is one of those cases where it’s like, yeah, we can keep him here. I don’t know that I necessarily trust returning him, unless it’s to a country that we can believe. So what do you think? I mean, is there going to be political pushback here either in the Democratic Party, in the media, or on the street?

John Kiriakou: There has to be. I’m still kind of chuckling about that woman who voted for Trump in Indiana. She and her husband had that successful steakhouse, apparently the most successful steakhouse in Indianapolis. He came here from Mexico thirty-five years ago, never got legalized, but got married, had kids, has a profitable, successful business, a pillar of the community, and they grabbed him and sent him back to Mexico. And she was crying on the news saying that she voted for Trump because he said he was only going to throw out the bad hombres. And then there was a woman last week. I laughed so hard. I don’t mean to laugh, but she said that she voted for Trump because she wanted to own the libs. But now with the big beautiful bill, she’s going to lose her Medicaid. And what’s she going to do? She can’t afford medical insurance. What, all I wanted to do was own the libs. Like, you moron. There are consequences to our votes.

Ted Rall: This is not really saying that this is a consequence thing, but I’ve always been obsessed with always having my paperwork, particularly both of my passports, up to date. Friends who have nebulous legal status here, because a lot of people have come in and overstayed visas or gotten green cards but never become citizens, I’ve always told them, “You never know in this country how the political winds will shift. You can just ask the Japanese Americans in 1941. It’s always good. If you’re not sure, get yourself regularized. Get as much legal documentation as you can.” Right now, obviously, it’s not going to happen. But when a Democrat comes back in, get that done if you want to stay because you just never know what’s going to happen.

John Kiriakou: You never know. That’s absolutely true. And the situation domestically has become so crazy, stuff that we’ve never seen before. You know, masked ICE kidnappers roaming the streets.

Ted Rall: I’m still waiting for the violence. This is a country full of weapons. It’s like 12 guns for every man, woman, and child. Someone’s going to shoot these ICE guys. And the ICE guys, honestly, it’s not really illegal to resist being kidnapped. If you don’t know who the people are, anybody could dress like that, cruise around in an unmarked car, all masked up, and try to grab with their little fake police outfits. No badge. No ID.

John Kiriakou: You go on YouTube and type in “fake cop,” and you’ll have video after video of people getting pulled over. And it turns out the person being pulled over is a real cop, being pulled over by a fake cop, and then clarity ensues. I love those.

Ted Rall: That’s awesome. I used to tell my ex-wife, we lived in a rural area, and I would tell her, “If you’re in the rural area and you see the red and blue lights behind you, just keep driving until you get to a gas station, someplace that’s well lit. Don’t just pull over on the side of some country road. And if they get mad, they get mad. Whatever. But, you know, anyone with $20 can buy those things and put them on the roof of their car.”

John Kiriakou: Galls.com.

Ted Rall: And I don’t think cops should be driving around in unmarked cars anyway. You don’t need them. Drive around in a police cruiser like a normal person. It’s going to happen. I’m really curious when it happens, how people will respond to that. I don’t know whether they’re going to laugh and be like, “ICE had it coming,” or they’ll be like, “That’s so terrible. They were just enforcing the law.” Or will it just be completely siloed, based on what party affiliation you have?

John Kiriakou: One fun thing I saw in the LA Times the other day is that tow truck drivers are now towing ICE’s cars. So these ICE guys just park anywhere they damn well please, and they get out to raid a restaurant or whatever, and tow trucks are towing their cars away.

Ted Rall: That’s awesome. Is it intentional?

John Kiriakou: Oh, yeah.

Ted Rall: Oh, that’s so great. Keep doing it, guys. Team tow truck all the way. Jay French is asking, “How did Obama manage to deport so many people without making much noise?” Good question. I don’t know the answer to that question. My understanding is that, first of all, he trolled prisons more. So you don’t see that. He was going for undocumented people at prisons, and nobody cares when they’re really bad hombres. And, also, he went to workplaces like Tyson Chicken in Arkansas. Those are in rural areas. So he got away with a lot, man. The violent coordinated Homeland Security raids of the encampments, all on the same morning.

John Kiriakou: Oh, yeah. The Tuesday morning kill list was an Obama invention.

Ted Rall: Yeah. And my personal favorite Obama quote is his term for watching drone killings when someone’s head explodes. He coined it. He called them “squirters.” No, ma’am, we love Barack Obama. He’s the best. He was great. We love him.

John Kiriakou: Wow.

Ted Rall: I think we can probably move on to this bizarre story out of San Jose, California, where, so, Pat Tillman—I have a personal connection here. So Pat Tillman was an Arizona Cardinals player. I thought he was a quarterback, but he was a big deal at the Arizona Cardinals. And in the days after 9/11, he volunteered to serve in Iraq. And then he was ultimately transferred to Afghanistan. He died in Afghanistan. Now, a lot of this, basically, the way this was originally presented in the media at his memorial service, which was led by Senator John McCain of Arizona, and it was nationally televised, it was a big thing. It was kind of like he was our noble patriot hero who gave up a million-dollar career to go and serve his country and fight the terrorists in Afghanistan. That’s how this whole thing was marketed. He was basically marketed like he was a right-wing conservative who saw 9/11 and got pissed and went to Afghanistan. Well, that’s not really what happened. What really happened was that he went to Iraq first. Why did he go to Iraq? Because his brother had previously enlisted, and he thought, “Oh my god, I’m so pissed about this.” He was opposed to the Iraq War. He said it was completely illegal, but he got the idea, maybe from a recruiter, that he could be assigned to the same unit as his brother, with whom he was very close, and could watch his back in combat, and they could be brothers side by side in the same unit. Army recruiters are basically the best part. They told him that. He believed them. He promised their mom, “I’ll take care of Kevin. I’ll go.” And then he went to Iraq, and then they were, of course, assigned to different units. And then he went to Afghanistan, where, ironically, they were in units that served in the same area, but they were never in the same unit. And then we were told that the horrible Al Qaeda terrorists shot Tillman. Actually, that turned out not to be true. That was friendly fire that killed him. So he was killed by his comrades accidentally.

And then when his body was brought back, there was this giant patriotism-off, presenting Pat Tillman as, you know, he gave up his football career to help serve God, country, and George W. Bush. So enter Ted Rall, political cartoonist. None of this information that he’d served in Iraq, that he was a left-winger, that he had gone and met with Noam Chomsky in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that he was violently opposed to the Bush administration, to interventionism, to militarism, and that he was just there to help his brother—none of that’s reported. Nobody knows any of that. I think he’s a right-wing idiot who basically fell for Bush’s lies and bullshit about Iraq and Afghanistan and went there and got used and died like a moron. So I did a cartoon about it. And, basically, it was one of my spate of really controversial cartoons during that time period, and that was one of them. And so the cartoon came out, and all hell broke loose. Anyway, that’s some background.

I got to know—I’m at a cartooning convention in Sacramento, and I get a call from Mary Tillman, the mom. And she’s really cool, and she’s just like, “You know, I was really mad at you and furious at you. But after I calmed down, I decided I wanted to hear from you what you were thinking and what your thoughts were.” And I just told her, “Look, I did a cartoon on the story as it was reported at the time, which turned out to be all lies. If I’d had that information, I wouldn’t have done that cartoon at all. He’s not an idiot. He was a wonderful, smart, compassionate, thoughtful, progressive young man who got killed in the stupidest way you can die in a war, killed by your own men and through no fault of his own. And it’s a fucking tragedy and a nightmare.” And we talked about it, and we got to know each other. I would say we’re friends, and we’ve talked since then. So in today’s news, one of the other brothers of this family, obviously deeply touched by tragedy, drove his car intentionally into the front of a post office in the San Francisco Bay Area. It caught fire, and he’s under arrest. Apparently, he’d been suffering from mental issues for quite some time, and the family is dealing with this. And, you know, it’s just like a reminder that this happened a long time ago. Even I still feel really bad. I don’t feel guilty because you have to have done something wrong to feel guilty, and I didn’t do anything wrong as a political cartoonist, but I feel bad. If I could go back in time, I wouldn’t draw that cartoon at all. I might have drawn a cartoon criticizing Bush and John McCain for being scurrilous dogs, but I didn’t. The whole thing now, this is happening too. What a shit show. And it just shows how long the aftermath of this kind of trauma lasts. Pat Tillman, oh yeah, I know who that is, but it’s been twenty-one years since his death. And it’s still kind of killing them.

John Kiriakou: He was a safety and defensive back. I will tell you something that I have never said publicly before. My grandmother on my mom’s side had four brothers, and all four of them served in the Second World War. And when I was a little kid, my grandmother was not close to her brothers. There was one in particular, Uncle Bill, who lived in the same town. We would see him at family events, the Greek festival, or a dance, or a baptism, or whatever. And my mom always told me not to ever ask Uncle Bill about the war. When I was a little kid, that didn’t really mean anything. But by the time I was 12 or 13, I was very interested in the war because a lot of my friends’ dads had served, or if your dad didn’t, then your grandfather did. So I never approached Uncle Bill. Well, when I finally became an adult, my mom told me a story. This was the reason why she told me I really should stay away from Uncle Bill. Uncle Bill was one of the American soldiers who liberated Dachau Concentration Camp outside of Munich in the closing days of the Second World War. And he never was able to get over what he saw there—piles and piles of bodies and half-burned bodies in the crematoria and people looking like skeletons. Now we call it PTSD. They didn’t have a name for it back then. He gets back from the war and sort of bounces around from job to job. Fast forward to 1953. The war’s been over for eight years. Uncle Bill has had no therapy or mental health care whatsoever. There was nothing like that back then. He somehow gets it into his head in 1953 that Richard Nixon, who had just been elected vice president, promised him a job at the post office in Steubenville, Ohio, where he lived. So Monday morning, Uncle Bill puts on his best suit. He goes down to the post office, and they said, “What are you here for?” He said, “I’m here to start work.” They said, “We don’t know anything about that. You’re not supposed to work here.” And Uncle Bill said, “That damn Nixon, I’m going to make him pay for humiliating me.” Six months later, who happens to come to the civic center to give a speech but Vice President Richard Nixon. And Uncle Bill tried to get into the venue with a .45. And he was arrested and charged with conspiracy to shoot Richard Nixon, and he served five years in prison. What my mom used to say, “There, but for the grace of God, our name could have been Oswald.” Even after all this, he never got any mental health care. And now here we are in 2025. I’ll tell you how Uncle Bill died. He got hit by a train. Like, how can you not see that the train is coming right at you? And my mom said, “Well, I think that was the whole point.” No Walkmans back then.

Ted Rall: I almost got hit by a train. I was listening to that.

John Kiriakou: Got killed by a train. My mom’s best friend’s son got killed by a train. Uncle Bill got killed by a train. Where you and I grew up, Ted, a lot of the crossings don’t have the bars that come down. It’s just, you stop and look both ways and hope there’s not a train coming. So here we are in 2025. Seventy-two years have passed since Uncle Bill was arrested, and we still don’t have adequate mental health care for people who come back from combat.

Ted Rall: I think of that famous incident with General Patton, who slapped a shell-shocked, traumatized soldier and got into a lot of trouble for it because it was reported. He didn’t recover. His command assignments, he never recovered after slapping that soldier. And rightly so, I think. But that was the point of view. And things haven’t really changed. In this case, this is like the brother of the victim, and it’s just horrible. He’s collateral damage. We should probably leave that and check in on Israel. So, basically, 23 countries signed a declaration, mostly European countries, but also Canada. Major countries are demanding an immediate end to hostilities. And, of course, every single day, a dozen or more Palestinians report to a food distribution site in Gaza and are massacred by IDF forces. Every single day. They’re so desperate that they figure, even though it’s incredibly dangerous, “Well, we’re going to die of starvation anyway.” At this point, there’s still all the semantic arguments: Is this genocide or not? If both it is, but people who say it isn’t, my favorite counterarguments are, “Well, they haven’t killed them all.” I’m like, “Well, Hitler didn’t kill them all either.” And also, they’ve issued warnings and tell them to evacuate to other places. Nazi Germany did that too. That’s not really a defense. How much longer is this going to go on before someone who matters makes it stop?

John Kiriakou: Nobody is saying anything. I was looking at the BBC today too, and the BBC was saying that, yes, the Israeli IDF killed another 61 people who were standing in line for food. But there are also children who were reported to have starved to death today, including a four-year-old girl who hadn’t eaten in weeks. She was lucky that she was at least able to get water for a couple of weeks. So, yeah, the only European country that’s really said anything so far is Ireland. Everybody else is just pretending that this isn’t happening.

Ted Rall: I’m hoping France acts quickly because that would be a game-changer. France has tremendous power from its legacy as the dominant diplomatic power. French prestige is massive. So I’m hoping Emmanuel Macron does something to validate his far-left administration, which is wildly unpopular in France. This morning on BBC Radio, I was pleasantly surprised that they interviewed a physician-slash-reporter who’d been on the ground there in a hospital in Gaza for months. And he said in very clear language, “There’s no question that this is an attempt to exterminate the entire population of Gaza and to do complete ethnic cleansing.” He said something, John, that was extremely disturbing. He said that, for the IDF lately, for months, they play games with the injuries. And the BBC asked, “So what do you mean by that?” And he said, “Well, in one day, everyone will come in with a head wound. The next day, everyone comes in with a left leg wound. The day after that, everyone comes in with an abdominal wound.” And she said, “That’s a very serious allegation.” And he’s like, “It’s a fact. It’s documented. I have photos.” And so it’s like, “You think it’s a coincidence?” No. The idea they’re doing this for fun. They’re shooting civilians for fun. And to send a message to troll in this incredibly sinister way. I’m almost 62 years old. I’ve never heard of such a thing. I’ve studied war. I’ve just never heard of such depravity.

John Kiriakou: I don’t even have words. I’m just speechless. These are crimes against humanity, war crimes. They need to be prosecuted just as we had prosecutions at Nuremberg.

Ted Rall: Let’s get real. If Israel was not a U.S. ally and this was going on and the president of the United States got word this horrible situation is happening over in this country, there would be tremendous pressure. We have to lead an international invasion force. We would either do it ourselves or we’d go to the UN and say, “We’re going in as an international community. This is a Rwandan-style genocide. We’re putting a stop to it right here and now.” Am I wrong?

John Kiriakou: No. It is a Rwandan-style genocide. I was outraged when I heard that Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons were not allowed to speak, but they were also not allowed to walk. They had to go from point A to point B on their hands and knees for months at a time, and they’re just destroying their legs, being forced to do so. It’s just sick the way the Israelis are treating people. Criminal.

Ted Rall: I went with an open mind the first time I went to Israel. And when I saw the checkpoints and the way that people are treated, you can’t possibly think it’s anything but apartheid.

John Kiriakou: It just is. I think I told you my mom, back in 2008, my dad had been dead a few years, and she was lonely and bored, and she wanted to take a trip. So she called me and said, “Hey, I think I’m going to take a trip to Ireland with NPR. They’ve been advertising this group.” And I was like, “Mom, it’s February. Why do you want to go to Ireland in February? It’s going to be freezing and just pouring down rain the whole time.” And I said, “My church is planning a trip to Israel. You should go to Israel. You know everybody.” So she and my sister went to Israel for the first time. My mom never paid attention to current events or the news or anything. She would always say, “Oh, I’ve been busy raising three kids. I didn’t have time for the news.” So she comes home and says to me, “Did you have any idea how they treat the Palestinians out there?” And I was like, “Of course, I did.” And she didn’t. And for months afterwards, she would talk about how their driver, who was a Palestinian Greek Orthodox guy, was humiliated at every checkpoint, not allowed in certain hotels, not allowed across certain dividing lines. They would have to get out of their little van and walk the rest of the way just because he was Palestinian. And I said, “Yeah. And multiply that times the millions of Palestinians who live in Israel. It’s criminal.”

Ted Rall: Question Everything just posted that. I guess this is probably a quote from a story. I hope. “Heads day, legs day, testicles day, heart day. The IDF sniper’s sport includes certain targets for certain days.”

John Kiriakou: I saw the spitting. They spit on a bunch of Greek Orthodox people going into a church.

Ted Rall: They just destroyed Pope Francis’s favorite church, a very historic one, hundreds of years old, bombed it. I mean, come on. They knew where it was.

John Kiriakou: But, Ted, they did say they would investigate. They would carry out an investigation.

Ted Rall: They’re so good at that. I’m still waiting to hear, you know, they have so many investigations that they owe. We’re probably going to see those Epstein files before we see the results of those Israeli investigations. Guaranteed. They’re sons of bitches. What can I say? Alright. So, let’s see. Should we put this up? Abby Martin mentioned on Rogan that most of the IDF is kids from Jersey and the Philly suburbs. Ironically, many of the kids from Philly and Jersey over there are also Palestinian. So it’s basically like Jersey-on-Jersey violence. Seriously.

John Kiriakou: Time was when they could just settle it on the football field.

Ted Rall: That would have been better.

John Kiriakou: Awful.

Ted Rall: Well, John, I think I ended up on a depressing note here, but we gotta do that. So thanks, everyone, for joining us. Please like, follow, and share the show. We really appreciate the tremendous support you guys are giving us. Just keep it coming. Love you guys. We are here Monday, Wednesday, Friday, which means we will be back Wednesday, 5 PM here on YouTube and Rumble live. Obviously, not everyone’s available then. So if you’re watching us in streaming, we appreciate you as well. We also have an audio version of this. So for you guys, we’ve seen the numbers tick up recently. For people who are just listening, thank you so much for doing that, and thanks for enjoying the show. Thank you, I’m Ted Rall,. That’s John Kiriakou. Have a great night, and see you Wednesday.

John Kiriakou: Bye-bye.

 

 

DMZ America Podcast Ep 211 for Sunday, July 20, 2025: Transcript

Generated with AI. There will be errors.

Ted Rall: Happy Sunday. I hope you are having a great weekend. You are watching the DMZ America podcast. I am editorial cartoonist Ted Rall, coming to you from the left.

Scott Stantis: I am editorial cartoonist Scott Stantis, coming to you from the right. We are here right now, right here in America. Our president has remarkably fat ankles.

Ted Rall: Do you know where your god is? I suppose that if you attended mass this morning, you do know where your god is. Perhaps you are still there. If you are one of those Protestants with your lengthy services, that is the worst thing about the Reformation. Today, we are going to discuss the Biden gate issue. Yes, it has evolved into an autopen controversy. We will address Russiagate next. Then we will talk about Stephen Colbert. Is it truly about money, or is it genuinely about politics? We are going to explore the budget cuts to NPR and PBS public broadcasting. That constitutes a full agenda. If you are watching on YouTube, or also if you are on Rumble, please feel free to contribute questions and comments, and we will attempt to respond to you. We can certainly display them on the screen on YouTube, and we can try to read them from Rumble. If you have a question that you want Scott, myself, or both of us to address, please feel free to ask. So, alright, let us begin with the autopen topic.

Scott Stantis: Oh my goodness, Ted, what a story. Ted, please go ahead.

Ted Rall: Well, basically, there is currently a partisan investigation underway, but there would not be any investigation at all if the Democrats were still in power. That is simply the nature of these matters. The party in power punishes the party that was previously in power for their past crimes. Since we do not have a divided government, that is what is occurring now. Anthony Bernal, deputy chief of staff under Biden, and Annie Tomasini, who were both part of what Jake Tapper’s book and other administration insiders called the Politburo under Biden, which is essentially a cabal of five to seven individuals—

Scott Stantis: White. They did not use the word in a positive sense.

Ted Rall: That is correct. These individuals surrounded the president, protected him, and covered for him. To some extent, they were running the United States of America on his behalf. Anyway, they all appeared before the House Oversight Committee, where they were questioned about Biden’s physical and mental health. Rather than answer any questions, the doctor, who is Biden’s physician and not considered a highly regarded doctor, first pleaded doctor-patient confidentiality. That is reasonably fair on its face, except that the former president could have chosen to allow the release of this information about himself. However, he decided not to do so. Then he also invoked the fifth amendment. Scott, the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects us from self-incrimination. If a police officer pulls you over and asks, “Hey, did you rob that bank?” you do not have to answer. The only exception is in an FBI federal investigation, where you could—

Scott Stantis: The fifth amendment. I am fairly certain you can plead the fifth there too, but you must explicitly state, “I plead the fifth.”

Ted Rall: Okay, I suppose so. Yes, you cannot just refuse to answer vaguely. With a police officer, you could refuse to answer and simply say, “Get lost.” But okay, let us proceed. There is no law against what these individuals are accused of doing. Right? I mean, these people were running interference, protecting the president, and concealing the fact that he was mentally ill, declining, demented—however you choose to describe it—and physically incapable.

Scott Stantis: All of the above.

Ted Rall: All of the above, which you and I have discussed since he was running for president in the primaries, both here on the podcast and elsewhere in our cartoons. We will not revisit the fact that we were repeatedly ridiculed, lambasted, marginalized, and otherwise treated poorly over this. We have forgiven all of you. If you hear a flamethrower, Joan, it is not mine. So yes, the point is that in your rearview mirror, flamethrowers in the mirror may be closer than they appear. So, I mean, there is no law, right? Do you think there is one? What are they afraid of? Are they merely contemptuous of the process, or do they genuinely believe they are in legal jeopardy?

Scott Stantis: You know, Ted, I must be honest. Perhaps on the next podcast, we should invite our friend Ricardo Aparicio, who is a lawyer. Although he is not technically an institutional lawyer, he is deeply interested in that field and has recently been admitted to the Supreme Court Bar. He is probably better equipped to handle the legal intricacies of this matter. Was there an existing law that they broke by committing what amounts to a coup d’etat? Did you see or hear about this? By the way, he did not say it in front of a camera, which is telling. Joe Biden, the former president of the United States—or so they tell him—did you hear his comment? He said, “I authorized all the signatures.” There are, like, what? How many of them? Thousands of—

Ted Rall: Them? There are 27,000.

Scott Stantis: Yes, that is nonsense. You have to call nonsense when it is nonsense, and that is the White House—

Ted Rall: Counsel’s office has ordered the National Archives to produce 27,000 documents signed by Biden, many of them by autopen. Previous presidents from both parties have used the autopen. Normally, correct me if I am wrong, Scott, but my understanding is that the typical use of this device is when the president is away from the White House or in a location where a document arrives and cannot be handled immediately. In many cases, a document can obviously be sent by email or fax to wherever the president is. However, in some instances, it cannot, or there is an urgent need to act quickly.

Scott Stantis: Or to a small extent. Let us say it is an orb, Ted, to be energetic. It could be a proclamation declaring, for example, National Asphalt Day. He does not need to sign it. He does not need to sign it. It is not important enough.

Ted Rall: It is not important enough. That is correct. So, basically, yes, good point. However, these documents are signed by a machine. If you do not know what an autopen is, it is essentially a device used back in the old days, before email, when you sent a letter to the White House and received a response from the president that was autopen-signed. For instance, the president and the first lady might write, “Thank you for your letter and your support. You are awesome, Joe Biden.” He obviously used this when he was in Delaware, calling to say, “Yes, go ahead and sign that for me.” However, it appears to have been used extensively—or I should say, it was used extensively. The numbers come from the House.

Scott Stantis: Well, well over 90% of all the documents were—

Ted Rall: Signed, including bills, policy statements, and executive orders.

Scott Stantis: Pardons. However, the most disturbing aspect is the pardons because there were a large number of them, and he did not sign many of them himself.

Ted Rall: Even by his own admission, he knew there was a category of people he approved for pardoning, but this is not a broad category. For example, when Jimmy Carter first became president in 1977, one of his initial acts was to pardon the Vietnam draft dodgers who had fled to Canada and other places. He issued a proclamation stating that they were all pardoned. If you avoided the Vietnam War, there was no problem. It was clearly defined, and there was no confusion about who was covered. That is not quite the case here. Basically, it reminds me of the Herb Block Foundation, a cartooning institution funded by the late cartoonist Herb Block. Herb was not very specific about defining the terms for the foundation’s end, which was funded with about $50 million. He simply said to do things that support cartooning, which he would have liked. That is subject to considerable interpretation. Similarly, Joe Biden was somewhat vague, saying to pardon people he would have wanted to see pardoned. That grants significant latitude regarding important matters that he delegated to his aides. Now, there is a question of whether these people should have been pardoned. Additionally, there is a constitutional question about whether these autopen-related, autopen-signed documents are valid. I have been researching this topic.

Scott Stantis: Oh, and what do you think? What is your conclusion?

Ted Rall: It appears that they are valid. It is not that they should not be; it does not make sense otherwise. Lawmakers do not always anticipate every scenario. If they had, we would not need to enact new laws.

Scott Stantis: You know—

Ted Rall: I think about the man in Germany who placed an advertisement on the internet saying, “Come to my house, and I will kill and eat you.” Even under German law, that action was not illegal at the time. Consequently, they had to pass a law. Oh, people do that? Okay, we will address it. Apparently, no one considered this possibility because it traces back to monarchy, where the king, the sovereign, signs a document, thereby giving it the power of law. Americans have inherited that system. Thus, when the president, governor, mayor, or other official signs a document, it becomes enforceable. The autopen was introduced and deemed enforceable by policymakers. The issue is that if it is executed with the will of the sovereign—in this case, the president—it is acceptable, I suppose. However, no one ever envisioned a situation like this, reminiscent of “Weekend at Bernie’s,” where the president is not fully competent. Then, aides like Ted and Scott might declare a national cartoonists’ day and plan to erect a giant statue of my cat, Clovis, on the Washington Mall.

Scott Stantis: That would be cool, but I understand.

Ted Rall: Just because. I mean, it seems that no one anticipated this could happen to anyone, but it appears to be what has occurred over the last four years.

Scott Stantis: Yes, clearly, that is what happened. You and I were complaining, protesting, and drawing about this very issue, asserting that it was a coup d’etat. This is the very definition of a coup d’etat, and they certainly carried it out. Now, documentation is emerging that Joe Biden did not know what he was signing, or that documents were signed on his behalf. They claim he always approved all the signings. However, the man did not even know that underwear goes under pants on some days—you could tell. So, do not tell me he was aware of every signature on every document. Granted, you and I both understand that this job involves sending letters back to schools or classes in Ohio, saying, “Hey, thank you for writing. I hope you continue to be interested in civics. Love, President Biden,” and it is signed. The children are thrilled, everyone is excited, but it is not his actual signature. I think it would be interesting. I wanted to backtrack on two points you mentioned. First and foremost, the hearings: you and I both called for them, but we also knew they would quickly devolve into the nonsense they have already become, which is highly partisan. It would have been wonderful if someone on the Republican side had said, “Can we act like adults for once and try?” Because this is too important to behave like fools. Well, no. So, the other thing—

Ted Rall: Is this administration doing that in any respect?

Scott Stantis: No, absolutely not. Not the administration, but this is Congress.

Ted Rall: It is the same thing now.

Scott Stantis: You are correct; it also involves the Justice Department. However, as you noted, have any laws been broken? Potentially, Biden invited someone over to kill and eat them. This feels somewhat similar.

Ted Rall: I mean, this should be illegal.

Scott Stantis: Oh, absolutely.

Ted Rall: Absolutely. It should be very illegal.

Scott Stantis: Well, you raised an important point. I intended to connect the dots you laid out, Ted. One aspect you mentioned at the start is that many of his aides, including his doctor—I am unsure—are involved. Is Jill part of the group pleading the fifth?

Ted Rall: She has not been implicated yet. I do not know if she has been subpoenaed or if she will be.

Scott Stantis: The fact is that they are pleading the fifth, and even liberal commentators are saying that it looks very bad when you consider that they claimed Joe Biden was fine, with good days and a few bad ones, but mostly good—which we all know is complete nonsense. If he cannot have a good day during a presidential debate, then he does not have any good days. That simply does not happen. However, pleading the fifth creates terrible optics. To your point, Ted, it also suggests that there may have been laws broken, and the attorneys for these individuals likely believe that some laws could lead to prosecution. Therefore, they plead the fifth to avoid false testimony, which is a prudent move. I just want to ride our bandwagon one last time. I am sure the listeners—both of them—of this podcast are tired of us boasting about being right, but we were correct about this. We were even more accurate than we initially thought, Ted.

Ted Rall: Yes, no, look. We smelled a rat. Little did we know how large it was, and it actually had many cousins. That was a big family. You know, rats do not travel alone. It is—

Scott Stantis: Go ahead. I apologize.

Ted Rall: It is bad. That is correct. So, basically, it seems that here—I am going to quote from the Washington Post. An anonymous Biden ally is how the person is described. They are explaining the Democratic stance. This Department of Justice is not normal. These times are not normal. Because of that, people will take different approaches. Some might speak to the committee. Others may invoke their fifth amendment rights. However, this does not change the fact that this investigation is not about oversight; it is about political retribution. So, they say the individuals pleading the fifth are concerned that they might walk into a trap, potentially leading to prosecution for something else. As we pointed out, there is nothing illegal, even if they are completely guilty of what we suspect. It ought to be, but it does not appear to be. I mean, it is not really a criminal issue. Right? It is a political issue.

Scott Stantis: It is now. Yes.

Ted Rall: But they installed a president knowing he was not fully competent, then kept him in office for four years as he deteriorated further, and even attempted to reelect him for another four years. That is what this is about. Really, you should not need a law to recognize that this is wrong. Right?

Scott Stantis: Well, concepts of right and wrong seem old-fashioned. You are such an old-fashioned person, Ted. I know. But also, I mean, okay, I am going to shift to another instance where we were correct, regarding Russiagate. You would think, as a conservative, I would be thrilled about this. In fact, full disclosure, I created several cartoons that supported the Russiagate probe and narrative. However, after conducting research and reading about it, I realized it was complete and utter nonsense. The Columbia Journalism Review, a highly respected journal chronicling journalism, published a lengthy article detailing how the New York Times knew the Russiagate story was nonsense yet continued to publish stories about it, and they still do. It is simply that we work with people—there are editorial cartoonists who still believe this story is absolutely true, and they consider us fools for thinking otherwise. Granted, we do not hate Donald Trump the way these cartoonists do, with a blind rage that I cannot fully explain. I do not like him. I dislike Donald Trump for numerous reasons. We could dedicate an entire podcast to that.

Ted Rall: Me too. Most of them do not involve policy.

Scott Stantis: Not all of them. I would say most. I think temperamentally, he is unsuitable for the job.

Ted Rall: Atrocious. Yes.

Scott Stantis: Yes. However, for me, the policies are more atrocious because he is not a conservative. That is a topic for another podcast. But regarding Russiagate now—have you read the story that has been emerging, the leaks coming out today? Are you sitting down, Ted?

Ted Rall: I am sitting down. You can see you already knew that.

Scott Stantis: I am not sure. I mean, okay, because I am looking right at you. Yes, I am not sure. Now, how do you refer to him? Is it Saint President Obama or President Saint Obama? I am trying to recall how your Democratic friends phrase it. Because the mainstream—

Ted Rall: Maybe Pope Obama. Pope—

Scott Stantis: Popeama. Pope, because the people who, you know, the mainstream—and yes, it sounds like heroin because it is—mainstream Democrats who adore Obama, well, it is turning out that the lawyerly, constitutionally expert former president helped push the Russiagate narrative. He was deeply involved and instructed his supporters to continue promoting what they all knew was nonsense. I mean, Jesus H. Christ, I cannot, for a moment, comprehend the audacity required, and it reveals their cynicism. You know, these people who love us like their own children, Ted, although they send our jobs overseas and do everything they can to harm us, they claim to love us. Ultimately, they knew the mainstream media would keep reporting a story they knew was false, and their followers would continue to believe it.

Ted Rall: I have many well-educated friends, better educated than either of us, who are quite—

Scott Stantis: A low bar for me.

Ted Rall: And for me. It is having a degree. Not anymore, I do not. Do not forget.

Scott Stantis: Oh, right. Your college is no longer accredited. I went—

Ted Rall: To Columbia University Beauty School. So that is correct. I am a high school graduate for now until they revoke that. You know that is coming next. Then I will eventually say, “Well, I am a proud graduate of Dwight L. Dwight L. Barnes Junior High School.”

Scott Stantis: Yes, until they take that away. Yes, and then it is the elementary school, which is Toller Elementary.

Ted Rall: First, they came for the bachelor’s degrees, then they—

Scott Stantis: I said nothing.

Ted Rall: So, then they came for the certificates. Anyway, yes, no. So, I think we need to recap what is happening here, right? Go ahead. Basically, Russiagate was the assertion that the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, influenced the American presidential election in 2016 in various ways, primarily by hacking into voting systems, but also by running ads on social media in favor of Trump against Hillary Clinton. That is the essence of it. Additionally, they allegedly tried to hack into the DNC servers and leaked all the DNC documents to WikiLeaks, which then posted them, creating a rift within the Democratic Party as Bernie Sanders’ supporters discovered the deceitful actions the DNC took to undermine Bernie Sanders. As it turns out, we now know that the CIA, at the time, when they assess their level of confidence—stating whether they have high confidence, no confidence, low confidence, or moderate confidence—reported no confidence in the Steele dossier. This dossier claimed, among other things, that Trump had a penchant for watching prostitutes urinate on a bed in front of him in Moscow. That was not true. That did not happen. Christopher Steele, who compiled the Steele dossier, stated that he had no confidence in the accuracy of this information. He was asked to conduct opposition research and gather every possible accusation against Donald Trump. Thus, he compiled them. This is not intelligence; it is merely a collection of potentially true or false negative claims about Donald Trump. Anyway, it turns out—what did the Russians actually do? There is no question that by the election, Putin preferred Trump to win, simply because he was terrified of Hillary Clinton. He believed, and it was the Kremlin’s assessment, that she was psychotic and intended to start World War III. There is an article in Foreign Policy magazine from 2016—not a left-wing publication—where they interviewed top Kremlin generals, and they said, “We are just scared of her. She speaks impulsively. We do not think she wants a working relationship with us. We think she wants to attack us.” So, Putin had his opinion. The question is, did he take action? There is no evidence whatsoever that he did.

Scott Stantis: Well, did they not spend $100,000 on—

Ted Rall: Yes, but okay. A company called the Internet Research Agency, a private entity that, as far as we know, had no connection whatsoever to the Russian government, right? They label it a Russian company, which is true. There are many—tens of thousands—of Russian companies not affiliated with the government. This was one of them. It is a clickbait farm. They published on Facebook a total of between $100,000 and $200,000 worth of ads in 2016, intended to generate clicks. Over 90% of them were unrelated to politics, such as cat videos or other trivial content. The tiny percentage that were political actually included more pro-Hillary ads than Trump ads. It was a minimal effort, like dipping a toe into the water. We are talking about a fraction of $100,000 in a $7 billion campaign. It had no impact. The intelligence community assessed that this minor activity had zero effect on the American presidential, state, or local elections. That is the truth and has always been the truth. However, Hillary and then Biden promoted this narrative for years, claiming Trump was a stooge of the Russian Federation. This drove the already somewhat unstable Donald Trump even more insane, as he tried to disprove a negative. He spent considerable time on this, becoming increasingly vengeful. Part of what we are witnessing now—I am not saying it is right, but it is understandable—is him seeking retribution against those who did this. It is still ongoing. Then we had a letter from 51 former intelligence officials who stated that it is their best judgment that this has all the hallmarks. Remember, this involved the Hunter Biden laptop. They said, “Hunter Biden—

Scott Stantis: Does the laptop exist? Remember that?

Ted Rall: Does not exist and has all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. It was all fabricated by the FSB, the successor to the KGB, to make Trump look good and Biden look bad. That laptop contained thousands of files. It was 100% legitimate. We all know the Hunter Biden laptop was real. Everything on it was real. All the gross photos we saw were real. This has been an ongoing issue. Now the CIA has revisited this. They are not—really, the CIA is not a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trump administration. It is the deepest part of the deep state. They concluded, “No, there was never anything here.” I do not think it will make any difference. I do not think it will change any minds whatsoever.

Scott Stantis: The one thing that will change is that if this information about Obama is true—if he was one of the people behind the scenes pushing this narrative—it diminishes his image, I think, even further. In my opinion, he is already destined to be remembered as one of the best presidents. Do you not love hearing that? That is not true. He will go down as a fairly mediocre president. Obamacare was a significant achievement, but—

Ted Rall: That is it.

Scott Stantis: That is pretty much it. And I mean—

Ted Rall: Seriously, what else is there?

Scott Stantis: He kept us involved in two utterly foolish wars. He continued to sacrifice human lives because he did not want to be perceived as weak. Yes, but if he was involved in this in any way—if there is any smoking gun—I mean, let us face it. We are looking at media outlets reporting this, whether or not it is true. You and I both know this story could collapse very quickly. However, if it turns out to be true, his historical standing will decline even further. It will not improve; he will go from mediocre to terrible.

Ted Rall: Well, Obama is quite the character, is he not? Yes, he is somewhat like Madison.

Scott Stantis: He sank the Madison Monroe.

Ted Rall: He sank—he sank the knife into Joe Biden at the end, which, by the way, is commendable, but it should have happened long ago. And he—

Scott Stantis: Also, he sank the knife in 2016, Ted, when he chose Hillary over Joe Biden. Joe Biden had served as vice president—

Ted Rall: And that drove Joe Biden crazy.

Scott Stantis: Well, and why would it not? You are the vice president of the United States, and suddenly they say, “Joe, can you sit this one out?”

Ted Rall: Yes, let the ladies have their turn.

Scott Stantis: Yes, you know, Hillary, because you know what happens to people who cross Hillary.

Ted Rall: That is a good—

Scott Stantis: It would be a damn shame if you ended up on a park bench.

Ted Rall: With your brains blown out.

Scott Stantis: Yes, so okay. We have got—that is nonsense. We have got the conclusion of pleading the fifth for the Biden investigation. Again, I sincerely wish that a sober statesman—remember the Watergate hearings?—would emerge. The Republicans never complained about the hearings being unfair, even though they dragged on for a long time. They delved deeply into the information. They allowed witnesses to speak. They did not berate them. They did not mock them. They did not call them joyless. Those of us who—

Ted Rall: It was very civilized, actually.

Scott Stantis: Ted, what is the word I am looking for to describe guys like you and me who, during that summer of not love, would rush home to watch the hearings? Yes, that is it: dorks. So, we would rush home. I did. I know you did too. We hurried home to watch these hearings almost every day. They were very dry, and they were very serious. That is the key word here: serious. There are no serious people around anymore. Speaking of unserious people, I am eager to know—because you and I have not spoken since the news broke of Colbert being canceled by CBS—

Ted Rall: Right.

Scott Stantis: Now, CBS wants to provide a quick background. Colbert’s show is number one in its time slot. However, that does not seem to matter to broadcasters. A dear friend of ours, Ted Noser—she is one of my very good friends, Patty Vasquez—had an evening program on WGN Radio, the legendary radio station in Chicago, and it aired from 11 p.m. until 2 a.m. It was by far the number one show in that time slot. Ted, it was the only number one show they had. But if you asked management there—you know where this is heading—if you asked management there, well, when they were criticizing her for various reasons, you would say, “You know what? She is the number one show in her time slot.” They would respond, “Oh, well, that is because of that time slot.” And just going—

Ted Rall: Not that time slot. No.

Scott Stantis: Well, it does not matter. What are you talking about?

Ted Rall: Who cares? She is still—

Scott Stantis: On your only number one show you have.

Ted Rall: The only one. Yes, it is like when they fire the editorial cartoonist who is the only person to bring a newspaper a Pulitzer Prize, and they fire him anyway. When I was fired from KFI Radio, I had the top rating in my time slot, and they let me go. They fired me because they said that talk radio is inherently conservative, and liberals could not succeed. I argued, “But my time slot included conservatives, and I outperformed them.” Then they replaced me with a conservative, Marcia Clark, the O.J. prosecutor, who was as effective a radio host as she was a prosecutor. She performed much worse than I did. I think she had about one-sixth of my ratings. It was a steep decline. To their credit, they brought me back for a short while and admitted they were wrong, which was somewhat amusing. But, yes, that could happen. I investigated this. Their excuse at CBS, which is owned by Paramount—

Scott Stantis: They want to be owned by Paramount. There is a merger, right? The merger is pending.

Ted Rall: It is pending. The Trump administration must approve it. Trump obviously does not care for Stephen Colbert. So, the speculation here is that Paramount, which recently paid $16 million to Trump to settle a defamation lawsuit over a “60 Minutes” segment they almost certainly would have won if they had persisted, decided to surrender and essentially throw the case, much like the Chicago White Sox in 1919.

Scott Stantis: Yes, 1919. Wow. Oh my goodness, Ted, you have a sports metaphor coming.

Ted Rall: Thank you. Thank you. And—

Scott Stantis: Give that man a man card.

Ted Rall: So, anyway, they rolled over and gave him $16 million, which they did not need to do, because they want that merger to be approved by the FTC. That is what this is all about. Now, they might be considering further efforts to appease the FTC, similar to how Columbia University and other institutions, including major law firms like Paul Weiss, are aligning with Trump. They might think, “Okay, we will just get rid of Colbert at Trump’s request.” That is the speculation. On the other hand, late-night television is expensive. So—

Scott Stantis: That is strange because why?

Ted Rall: Well, apparently, first of all, it is a significant operation. I looked into this. A show like Colbert’s operates out of a large theater on Broadway. It employs over 200 people full-time. They have substantial costs. They must pay many salaries. They cover guest expenses. They build elaborate sets. All of this is expensive. Of course, a person like Colbert earns a substantial income.

Scott Stantis: So, he makes between $15 million and $20 million a year.

Ted Rall: Apparently, the show costs $60 million a year to produce but only generates $40 million in revenue. However, it has the highest ratings. So, basically, you could argue it is a loss leader. It may be that late-night television is no longer a viable format. I do not know.

Scott Stantis: That is what the decision-makers at CBS are claiming. You can kind of—

Ted Rall: They are eliminating the show entirely. It will not be Colbert. It is as if “The Late Show” is disappearing.

Scott Stantis: I think “The Late Show with Rall and Stantis” would be a success, and we would accept a fraction of what Colbert was paid—100% more. He takes a plane back to Chicago every night from New York City.

Ted Rall: Colbert? Okay, every night. That might explain some things. Have you heard about this new book on Condé Nast? Like, how they were—oh, I sent it to you.

Scott Stantis: Yes, please go ahead and tell our listeners.

Ted Rall: Well, basically, during their heyday, Condé Nast owned titles like Vanity Fair and Vogue. They lived an extravagantly depraved high life. If you watch The Devil Wears Prada, which is loosely based on Anna Wintour, the editor of Vogue, you get a slight taste of it, but that is nothing. They describe instances like the editor of Vanity Fair refusing to carry his briefcase from his chauffeur-driven car to the building lobby or back at the end of the day. They all flew first class constantly. Everything was utterly extravagant. They only ate—

Scott Stantis: Legendary lunches. Lunches with a bill that could reach $10,000. I am not kidding—or sadly, it is true.

Ted Rall: Yes, in the nineties. So, shockingly, they ran into financial trouble. Who could have predicted that? Anyway, that is somewhat like what Colbert is doing. He flies home to Chicago. I did not know he lived there. He did not either; he is a New Yorker.

Scott Stantis: Well, before his troubles, Bill Cosby would return to wherever he was performing. I saw him, as I mentioned, before his troubles, performing in Las Vegas. He flew back to Massachusetts every night.

Ted Rall: Wow, that is like Trump. Trump always wanted to be at Trump Tower until he faced legal issues in New York that made him consider the possibility of spending time in a cell at Rikers. So, he decided Mar-a-Lago was where he preferred to spend more time, and occasionally he visits the Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey. But we—

Scott Stantis: I mean, Ted and I have no inside information on this. We have none, but we have observed media for decades. So, I can tell you this. I believe what happened to Stephen Colbert at CBS is likely a 50-50 combination. His show was extremely expensive, and late-night advertising, like all advertising for terrestrial television, is declining rapidly. People prefer to watch YouTube and stream—

Ted Rall: Yes, television profits for broadcast are down over 9% from last year, according to my research. And you—

Scott Stantis: You have to realize that this decline compounds year after year. So, Tim, do the math, folks. Combine that with the fact that the Trump administration must have disliked Colbert because “The Colbert Show” was essentially a liberal talking point. It drove me crazy, Ted, because I remember Johnny Carson. Again, I am an old man, but Carson’s political humor always mocked the person. You could never tell what Carson’s political stance was. He never attended fundraisers. He never declared himself a Republican or a Democrat.

Ted Rall: He was interviewed about that. You can see a clip floating around on social media now. He was asked, “What about your politics? Why do you never discuss politics on your show?” He replied, “I will never do that. I think it is bad entertainment.”

Scott Stantis: Well, my point is, why? Why would you risk that? Why would you alienate 50% of your audience? It made no sense to me. So, I—

Ted Rall: I do not think it makes sense either.

Scott Stantis: So, Colbert did do that. Every show included some content, literally a speech. And I think I—

Ted Rall: Do not really know what Letterman’s politics were.

Scott Stantis: No, well, yes, I do not know if he ever participated in political events. He did engage in some political activities, but they were mostly related to comedy and actors’ and comedians’ rights. I think the Colbert situation is a mix. CBS wants to consummate their merger; they want to unite with Paramount. Paramount desperately wants them. That is half of it, and it will need approval from the Trump Justice Department, particularly from the sharp-minded individual that is Bondi. Add to that the fact that hosting that show is extremely expensive. However, it seems to me that if Stephen Colbert truly cared about the working men and women of this world, he could take a 50% pay cut, and they could pay the staff a decent wage.

Ted Rall: Well, that would be—

Scott Stantis: And the show could continue.

Ted Rall: Well, right. You know, that is what Keanu Reeves does. Right? He does this discreetly, but in feature films, his rate is between $10 million and $20 million. However, he does not need or want that much money. So, he redistributes it somewhat evenly, giving more to the lowest-paid cast members, like key grips and others whose roles I do not understand. Basically, he lines their pockets. He only takes a small fraction, like $500,000, of what he is owed.

Scott Stantis: Wow, he just does not want it. It would unnecessarily complicate his life. He believes it is the right thing to do. And—

Scott Stantis: Yes, but he is a rarity. I mean, I think I told you this story. I was speaking with a friend’s child who interned at a large concert promoter’s company. He said they allowed him to sit in on a conference call negotiating a Bruce Springsteen concert. Bruce Springsteen was complaining that he needed an additional $200,000, even though he was already being paid a seven-figure sum to perform.

Ted Rall: Uh-huh.

Scott Stantis: He was already guaranteed seven figures. This was not his agent, Ted. This was Bruce Springsteen himself saying, “Bruce needs money.”

Ted Rall: Well, Bruce is a greedy individual. The problem here is that it contradicts his brand. If it were Kid Rock, who, granted, lacks the talent of Bruce Springsteen’s pinky finger but is a right-winger, going for the money would be fine. But the working-class man from Asbury Park, New Jersey, presents a bad image. Stephen Colbert, I think, made his reputation with The Colbert Report.

Scott Stantis: He—

Ted Rall: Did, where he mocked being a pompous, right-wing figure. I think he missed the joke. He believed the effect was to satirize the right. I think the effect was to satirize partisanship and always holding the same opinion regardless of the situation. To me, the satire applies almost equally to someone like Rachel Maddow, who consistently pushes the same talking points. So, when he moved to “The Late Show” and became the very type of hack he mocked on The Colbert Report, he lost me, and I assume he lost others too.

Scott Stantis: Yes, that is an excellent point. He lost 50%. There is—imagine me doing air quotes here, always effective on a podcast—a conservative late-night comedy show, and it is not by far the number one show in that slot.

Ted Rall: Yes, it is Gutfeld on Fox. Yes, and I must say, I find him to be a funny man. I watch the Fox show The Five at 5 p.m. Eastern time on Fox almost every day, and he is one of the highlights. However, I do not think his show is very good. No, I do not think humor works well when it is partisan.

Scott Stantis: No, it has to involve rolling your eyes and shrugging at everyone. It must target everybody, which is—

Ted Rall: By the way, if you consider the great humor from the heyday of television comedy, like Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In, Hee Haw, The Carol Burnett Show, and then in films like Kentucky Fried Movie or with George Carlin, they mocked liberals and conservatives equally—

Scott Stantis: Mercilessly. Mercilessness is the key point. Another topic, speaking of a lack of humor, public broadcasting has just been gutted. Ted and I discussed this earlier today, or yesterday, actually. I mentioned that I have been advocating for defunding public broadcasting since I began cartooning in the late seventies. However, it is not for the reason you might think. I happen to enjoy a lot of public broadcasting, though not as much as I used to because of budget cuts and because I do not think they perform the job they once did. Nevertheless, I want their budgets to be cut and removed from the federal budget entirely because they have always been a target of Republican talking points. It seemed like an easy punching bag to me. If you truly believe that NPR and PBS should survive, let them survive on their own. It is interesting, Ted, where you are in New York City; the New York NPR station, as well as public broadcasting, receives about 2% or less of its budget from the federal government. So, you can eliminate 2%. You and I could both live with 2% less. We were not liking—

Ted Rall: It. It is no big deal.

Scott Stantis: Yes, but here in Alabama, for instance, the NPR station is losing 10% of its funding. That is a significant hit. Frankly, may I go off on a tangent and discuss things I have never spoken about publicly? Well, I do not care what you say today; I am doing it anyway. You will find this interesting.

Ted Rall: When have I ever stopped you? Who could stop you?

Scott Stantis: It is true. Who could? I am a force of nature. The NPR station here has very little, if any, public programming—local programming, rather. When I moved back here, my wife and I owned a house. My son is here. My grandson is here. That is why we moved back after my decade in Chicago. I approached the radio station and said, “Listen, I have an idea for a locally generated show. I will find people to underwrite it; you do not have to spend a single cent—back when they were still making cents. You just need to provide me with a place to do it and a studio with a producer.” They said no. To think—

Ted Rall: Say—

Scott Stantis: Free programming. What is that? No, they simply said, “No, we do not think that fits into our programming.” I responded, “You do not have any programming. How can it not fit into something that does not exist?” I was also considering creating a roundtable, like a weekly political show to discuss Alabama politics, all of it being—

Ted Rall: A very good idea.

Scott Stantis: Again, I know I could find people to underwrite it and make it worthwhile for me. They said no.

Ted Rall: Do you think it is because you are conservative?

Scott Stantis: Yes, because I have a record in the community from my work drawing for the Birmingham News for thirteen years, and I have a deep history of my politics, which I thought were fairly moderate, given where I lived. I mean, I targeted Republicans as much as I did Democrats. I approached WBHM because they had an opening—remember I mentioned this once, Ted? You may not recall. They had an opening for the morning news desk. You know, it would involve following NPR news with a three-minute slot for local news, where you might say, “Today, the Gulf of America has flooded halfway up the state of Alabama.” I knew I could do that. So, I approached the news director and asked, “I saw the job posting. Can you tell me more about it?” He literally said, “It is not for you.” I am just saying, here is someone with a fairly decent track record in journalism, Ted. I think we can acknowledge that about my career. Coming to public radio in central Alabama would probably be a good story for them, but they were not interested. Okay, but that is my rant. I am done.

Ted Rall: I am sorry. I think that is disgusting, and I do not believe a liberal would have been treated the same. I must be objective about that. That is Birmingham, right? I mean, if a Republican cannot get a fair shake in Birmingham, Alabama—literally the most conservative state in the union, well, perhaps Mississippi—

Scott Stantis: Yes, we are pretty much neck and neck. We are going to have Governor Tommy Tuberville, for heaven’s sake. I mean, come on. So, WBHM, the NPR station here in Birmingham, Alabama, is losing 10% of its funding. This hurts where these cuts are potentially—I would venture to use the word dangerous. There is a rural station. The most glaring and significant example is in central Alaska. It is the only broadcast entity in the entire region. So, if there is, let us say, an attack of ice monsters from the north, no one will know. But in all seriousness, when there is a serious event—like bears—yes, the bears will—oh my goodness—they are organized.

Ted Rall: Well, actually, bears are terrifying. So, yes.

Scott Stantis: Oh, polar bears, particularly, are—

Ted Rall: Yes, it is not like they are crazy. If you endanger their cubs, no. The males, the females, the cubs—they are hungry for you as a person, and they will eat you. It is not like a shark saying, “Oh, my mistake.” No, it is like, “No, you are food. You are good.”

Scott Stantis: A big piece of meat to polar bears, and it is the only thing they eat, by the way. They do not eat berries. So, that is 100%. That station I mentioned in central Alaska is 100% funded by the federal government. There are other stations in—

Ted Rall: The Plains states, right, where there are tornadoes. There are already major local news deserts in those states because, basically, when you count the radio stars, they literally have automated stations. You drive by and see an old-fashioned 1940s radio station, like “This is KAKAW, the voice of Piscataway or whatever.” It is in the middle of nowhere, with no one there. It is surrounded by a fence. It is all automated; someone checks it once a week to ensure the power is on, but no one is present.

Scott Stantis: And no rats have eaten through the power lines?

Ted Rall: Not yet. Exactly. Then a tornado comes through. There is no one there who knows about it and can report it on the air. NPR stations, in many cases, are the only game in town.

Scott Stantis: Yes, so this is why this is important and why I care. You know, and the other thing is—so are you—

Ted Rall: Are you? Let us get you on the record. Cuts, yay or nay?

Scott Stantis: I would say yay, but I would also be very interested in understanding the economics of public broadcasting because the umbrella company that owns or runs Sesame Street—the Children’s Television Workshop—brings in hundreds of millions of dollars in ancillary sales. When you see a child carrying an Elmo doll or a Big Bird lunchbox, all that money went somewhere. Where did it go, folks? Ted and I also noted—Ted, could you tell the listeners—you were on an NPR show in New York, The Midday Host. If you do not already know, if you cannot guess, they did not make a lot of money. They were not the morning show hosts, like the “Ted and Scott Morning Zoo,” who made a million each. Sometimes the afternoon drive-time host earned $900,000. But the NPR midday person—Ted Rall was on their show. Ted Rall, what was his name, and how much did he make?

Ted Rall: Brian Lehrer makes over $600,000 a year. Goodness. The thing is, I do not fault anyone for earning as much as they can, and he is a truly excellent host. However, honestly, Scott, you and I are as good as he is, and we do the same job for much less. It is like they are begging for donor money. That is the issue here. It is similar to when I was in Afghanistan and tried to check into a five-star hotel, which was booked by Doctors Without Borders. I thought, not without reservations, right? I met some of these people, and they said, “We are doing God’s work, helping people in a war zone.” I said, “God bless you, but you are using donor money. Cannot you stay at a three-star hotel? It is lovely, with air conditioning, Wi-Fi, good food, and comfort.” I am not saying they must live in squalor. I am not saying Brian should earn $20,000 a year. But come on, he makes more than the President of the United States. That is outrageous. It is funded by taxpayers and listeners. That is wrong.

Scott Stantis: To your point, Ted, this reflects my small-c conservative stance, and I am not wishy-washy. I wanted the funding to disappear, but they should have reviewed and said, “Okay, stations in places like Alaska, the Dakotas, Montana, and Wyoming—if they had said, ‘These will receive some funding until they can find another source,’ give it, say, two years. That is plenty of time to search and determine who else can support this. Can the state of Alaska fund the NPR station in central Alaska?” The same applies to the other regions I mentioned. That is what I would have done, but cutting the funding makes perfect sense. And—

Ted Rall: Although, I am just—but, Scott, all big countries have state media.

Scott Stantis: I know, and they are terrible. And I do not—oh—

Ted Rall: Really? Does the BBC suck?

Scott Stantis: Well, do you think it does? Do you think it—

Ted Rall: Do you think the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation sucks? Do you think the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation sucks? I do not.

Scott Stantis: Well, I would ask, is it biased? I mean, do you think—

Ted Rall: Yes, bias. Because human beings are running it. So, yes, it is definitely biased.

Scott Stantis: So, I think there is a definite bias in something state-run that defends the state.

Ted Rall: Right.

Scott Stantis: That is what I meant by state.

Ted Rall: Country, but I will—if you are going to be part—I mean, if we think we are involved in part of an international propaganda effort, I would rather be involved in a propaganda war than a hot war. They call this soft power, right? If Russia has RT and Sputnik, and England has the BBC, which—

Scott Stantis: Should be allowed on our channels, by the way.

Ted Rall: China has—what is it, CNCBTN? I forget the acronym, but they have their own English-language services. Shouldn’t the U.S. also have state media?

Scott Stantis: Well, this does not prevent it from existing. It just means American taxpayers do not have to pay for it, and it does not become a target.

Ted Rall: State media.

Scott Stantis: I am going to return to my original point, which is that this has been a target for Republicans for as long as I have been cartooning, so remove the target. That is all I am saying.

Ted Rall: Oh, I certainly think that, like you said, on the national level, I never understood why NPR stations allowed themselves to be a target for, you know, 1 or 2% of their budget. I would say, if someone tried to dictate what I draw, saying, “Ted, we are paying 2% of your salary,” I would—

Scott Stantis: Be—

Ted Rall: Like, “Forget it.” But I agree with that. However, I think we have a problem regarding rural access. Rural areas are very underserved. They do not have high-speed internet. They do not have—

Scott Stantis: Well, they are becoming news deserts. Their newspapers are folding.

Ted Rall: So, it is a great time to be a corrupt local politician in rural Oklahoma, you know?

Scott Stantis: Maybe we should consider moving to Oklahoma.

Ted Rall: That could be a job for us. Hey, corrupt politician, I could—we have studied corruption. We could do that.

Scott Stantis: Yes, we can do it. I do not know if there is any doubt we can do it.

Ted Rall: I mean, some of the least intelligent people who have ever lived do it.

Scott Stantis: Oh my goodness, they are idiots. One of my funniest conversations with my former boss at the Chicago Tribune occurred when I had just moved to Chicago. They had just indicted a local official—I think it was St. Clair County, but it could be another county here in Alabama. They were accused of stealing— are you sitting down, Ted?—$2,500 a month. They were convicted and went to jail. When I moved to Chicago, they caught a man—I forget his role, something like being in charge of sand or dirt in Cook County. He had embezzled $12 million, and they were not sure they would prosecute him. So, I asked my boss—

Ted Rall: You always want to steal money from private corporations. In many cases, they will not pursue you.

Scott Stantis: Is that right?

Ted Rall: Well, yes. Like, when I worked at the Japanese bank, the Industrial Bank of Japan Trust Company, from 1986 to 1990, there was a very quiet, very nice man who sat right behind my desk, about four feet away. One day, he was not at work. We wondered what happened to him. Within a few days, we learned that $10 million was missing from—

Scott Stantis: Oh my.

Ted Rall: The accounts. This was in 1988 or 1989, so it was real money, not like today when it buys an egg. So, he—

Scott Stantis: Had, like, three cups of Starbucks coffee.

Ted Rall: Maybe. Anyway, with our Zimbabwean dollars—

Scott Stantis: Without extra pumps. Yes.

Ted Rall: Yes, exactly. So, anyway, to make a long story short, the FBI came because he had written himself a check, cashed it, and disappeared. He had a wife and kids but did not involve them in the scam. So, the FBI interviewed us all about what we knew, which was truthfully nothing. I asked my boss what happened. He said, “They are going to let it go.” He added that the FBI said, “We can put this guy’s face on the front page of every paper in the world,” but the company in Tokyo said, “Let it go.” Because then the question becomes, “Can IBJ be trusted to keep your money safe if they are incompetent?” So, it is better to absorb the loss.

Scott Stantis: So, how much did you abscond with? I am just curious.

Ted Rall: I wish.

Scott Stantis: See, Ted? You disappoint me.

Ted Rall: Yes, I know. I am talented, but not in that way.

Scott Stantis: It sounds like me. So, anyway, with my story, I asked my boss, “What the hell is going on here? $10 million?” I mean, a person in Alabama was convicted for $2,500. He said, “Scott, up here, we are professionals. Welcome to the NBA.”

Ted Rall: I was like, and—

Scott Stantis: He was not wrong. He absolutely was not wrong.

Ted Rall: Yes, it is really funny. Back in the nineties, when I worked for alternative weeklies, I remember talking to some investigative reporters who would literally argue about which of their municipalities had the most corrupt politicians. It was like, “No, no, we have the best corrupt people.”

Scott Stantis: Oh, I used to have running gag arguments with my friend Marshall Ramsey, the editorial cartoonist in Jackson, Mississippi. We had a silly governor bingo game to see whose idiot—because he had one, I had one—would raise the level of idiocy. We—

Ted Rall: Let us have a—

Scott Stantis: Raise the level of idiocy. You draw an editorial moron. It was neck and neck.

Ted Rall: It is so challenging. Alright, well, I think we are complete here. Thank you, everyone, for tuning in. We have good viewership today. They are quiet, but they are out there. I see the numbers. Many people are watching and listening. That is wonderful. I guess most people are watching, according to the New York Times.

Scott Stantis: Oh my—

Ted Rall: Goodness. Podcasts today—like, three out of four people watch and do not listen.

Scott Stantis: Did you—but, Ted, in this—or they—

Ted Rall: Watch, or they watch but are really listening.

Scott Stantis: Ted, four—yes, that is like terrestrial radio used to be. You turned it on in the background. If you heard, “Mark, Ted Rall,” you would go—

Ted Rall: “Send asshole Ted Rall.”

Scott Stantis: Yes, but Ted sent an article stating that these podcasts, broadcast over YouTube and Rumble, are extremely popular. What stunned me most, Ted, is—we will end this on a note—we last about an hour.

Ted Rall: Yes.

Scott Stantis: These things are four and five hours long. Ted, I do not want to do anything I enjoy for five hours. No offense.

Ted Rall: Greed. Yes, if you and I can think of some. Yes, I do not want to make love for five hours. I do not want to drink for five hours. I do not want to watch TV for five hours. I do not want to pet my cat for five hours. Those are my favorite things. I do not want to talk to you for five hours. I do not want to do anything.

Scott Stantis: Yes, no. Like I said, no offense. I love you. I am not going to the beach—

Ted Rall: For five hours. Really?

Scott Stantis: That I could do. I suppose I could do that. Lying there, it gets—

Ted Rall: It gets hot, man.

Scott Stantis: Yes, it gets sandy. Yes, and the pelicans. Oh my goodness, the pelicans.

Ted Rall: Like, stop. And with that, alright, now it is time for our “Scott Seeing” segment of the show. Thank you, everyone, for tuning in. I am Ted Rall. That is Scott Stantis. Check us out at our respective places. You will see them scroll by. I am at rall.com. He is at gocomics.com/scottstantis, and off we go.

DMZ America Podcast Ep 210: “‘Biden’ Was President. Who Was Running America?”

LIVE 2:00 pm Eastern, and then streaming whenever you wanna hear it:

Time for another episode of the “DMZ America Podcast,” where editorial cartoonist buddies Ted Rall (Left) and Scott Stantis (Right) go where mainstream media fears to tread in the story that proves that, for four years, a pen wasn’t just a pen!

President Biden used an auto-pen to sign documents—not just when he was away from Washington, but even when be was at the White House. Why? Was he unable to do his job? Was he even aware of the important documents signed under his name? Who was really running the country?

Did his team hide cognitive decline? Former Biden deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini took the Fifth Amendment before the House Oversight Committee, joining other aides like Anthony Bernal and Biden’s doctor in refusing to talk about Biden’s mental state or auto-pen use, intensifying claims of a cover-up. Plus the White House Counsel’s Office has launched a full investigation, pulling over 27,000 documents from the National Archives to examine whether Biden’s aides used the auto-pen to sign documents without his full knowledge. Ted and Scott give you the facts, from the legal implications to the political fallout, as this scandal shakes up D.C.

Tune in for a clash of perspectives from two sharp minds who don’t pull punches!

Plus:

  • RussiaGate drags on with new twists in the ongoing investigation.
  • Colbert’s firing shocks late-night TV. Was this censorship or just about money?
  • Public Broadcasting faces massive cuts, threatening local stations and emergency alerts.

DeProgram: “Why Epstein Refuses to Stay Dead”

LIVE 1:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

It’s time for “DeProgram,” where political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou tackle today’s most urgent stories.

Ted and John bring you up-to-date on the Jeffrey Epstein case Trump wishes would just go away, where the WSJ reveals a bromance between the president and the disgraced financier in a bound birthday book, and the White House orders the release of some court documents but not all.

Next, we dissect the Senate’s vote to cut $9 billion from NPR and PBS, threatening public media and perhaps even the lives in media deserts in places like Alaska and the Great Plains.

The focus then shifts to Iran’s nuclear program, bombed by U.S. and Israeli strikes on Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, with conflicting reports on damage—Trump claims “obliteration,” while intelligence suggests a mere months-long setback, raising the stakes for diplomacy, European sanctions or renewed war with Israel.

Finally, they address the NYPD’s use of FDNY’s Clearview AI access to bypass a facial recognition ban to illegally identify a pro-Palestinian Columbia protester, Zuhdi Ahmed, in a case dismissed due to this privacy violation, sparking outrage over free speech.

DMZ America Podcast Ep 209: “Ambiguous Grief: Steve Benson Dead at 71”

LIVE 2:30 pm Eastern, and then streaming whenever you wanna hear it:

Steve Benson, former cartoonist for the Arizona Republic, a fierce critic of the Mormon Church despite his family’s prominence within it, and a notable creator of controversial cartoons during the 1990s and 2000s, has passed away. Born in 1954, Benson began his career at the Arizona Republic in 1980, where he won the Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Cartooning in 1993. His work sparked debate, reflecting his acidic stance on political and social issues, including his public critiques of the Mormon Church, which led to personal shunning and professional tensions. On the “DMZ America Podcast,” fellow political cartoonists Scott Stantis and Ted Rall discuss Benson’s life as they knew their colleague, both professionally and personally.

For Scott, who was deeply wronged by Benson, this news carries a complexity that those left behind are rarely permitted to acknowledge, let alone discuss publicly. On DMZ, we explore that strange feeling when someone who passes leaves behind a mixed legacy.

Tune in for a thoughtful, intelligent discussion about humanity and death.

DeProgram: “RussiaGate Revisited, Epstein, ICE at War, AI Little Marco”

LIVE 6:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Never a dull moment on the “DeProgram” show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, deprogramming you about the news that matters.

RussiaGate Revisited: The Justice Department finally launches criminal probes into former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey over their roles in the Trump-Russia investigation. A “lessons learned” review of the creation of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that alleged Russia tried to influence the 2016 presidential election to help then-candidate Trump found that the process of the ICA’s creation was rushed with “procedural anomalies,” and that officials diverted from intelligence standards. It also determined that the “decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment.” Whoopsie! Will the media stop pushing RussiaGate now?

The Epstein Circular File: Controversy surrounds Attorney General Pam Bondi as she claims there’s nothing to see and no one to prosecute in the Jeffrey Epstein case. A DOJ memo that denies the existence of a “client list” fails the smell test as Team Trump seems to be indulging in a cover-up.

ICE at War: Democratic senators are about to propose a bill to ban ICE agents from wearing masks, prompted by reports of impersonators committing crimes. Examples include Carl Thomas Bennett, 37, arrested in Raleigh, North Carolina, for impersonating an ICE officer and sexually assaulting a woman at a Motel 6. Bennett allegedly displayed a business card with a badge and threatened to deport the victim if she didn’t comply. A man in Philadelphia, wearing a tactical vest labeled “Security Enforcement Agent,” robbed an auto repair shop while posing as an ICE agent. He detained a 50-year-old Dominican woman using zip-ties and stole $1,000. A man in Texas posed as an ICE agent to rob a couple, blocking their car and demanding cash. The couple fought back, with the wife and husband firing weapons, hitting the suspect, who fled and was later hospitalized. Meanwhile, 11 people allegedly used fireworks and vandalism to lure ICE agents before ambushing them with 20-30 rounds, injuring a police officer in the neck at Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas.

AI Officials: Speaking of fakery, an AI-generated imposter used a fake Signal account to mimic Secretary of State Marco Rubio, contacting three foreign ministers, a U.S. governor, and a congressmember. This scam followed a similar AI-driven impersonation of Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles. Ted’s 2020 graphic novel “The Stringer” envisioned a world in which a bad actor would start wars using AI deep fakes. Could it happen now?

Zohran Zooming: Zohran Mamdani leads the general election race in a new poll. Mamdani gets 35%, followed by Cuomo with 25%, Sliwa with 14%, Adams—the corporate establishment favorite—at 11% and attorney Jim Walden at 1%. Never has the Democratic establishment been so out of touch.

Don’t miss the unfiltered truth on these pivotal stories.

DMZ America Podcast Ep 208: “The History of Third Parties”

LIVE 12:30 pm Eastern, and then streaming whenever you wanna hear it:

Hey Elon! You’re going to need this history lesson. On the “DMZ America Podcast, s Ted Rall (Left) and Scott Stantis (Right) consider the prospects for Elon Musk’s “America Party” and the wild ride of third parties in U.S. politics! On Saturday, Musk, the billionaire disruptor, announced the launch of his “America Party” after blasting Trump’s $3.3 trillion spending bill as “criminal.” Promising fiscal restraint and liberty, his party has MAGA World furious, with critics like Steve Bannon seriously annoyed. Third parties, like Perot’s Reform Party, Greens, Prohibition Party and Eugene Debs’ Socialist Party often shake things up but tend to crash against America’s winner-takes-all electoral college system. Can Musk’s cash and clout change the game, or will it fracture the Right? Does this flaky dude have the followthrough necessary to see this project through? Ted and Scott dive into the facts, the beef, and the history without pulling punches. This ain’t your average political chat—expect straight-up analysis off why third parties have an uphill battle under our system!

Plus:

  • Texas floods devastate communities, with relief efforts lagging amid chaos. And there’s little to reason to think it won’t happen again.
  • The Trumpies’ embrace of cruelty, especially against trans soldiers and migrants, sparks debate: can America heal from this?

 

DeProgram: “A Big Beautiful Mass Extinction Event for Republicans?”

LIVE 12:00 noon Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

As we wrap up the holiday weekend, catch up on the smartest takes on the big news—tune into the “DeProgram show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou.”

John and Ted analyze the political and personal fallout of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sweeping tax-and-spending package signed July 4th, sparking numerous debates. Will the MAGA base see the massive increase in deficits as a betrayal? Can this latest attempt at Reaganite “trickle down economics” succeed in stimulating the economy? What of the millions of Medicaid recipients, mostly Republican voters, who will lose their healthcare? Is James Carville right to call this a “mass extinction event” for Republicans?

Elon Musk says he’s going to make good on his new “America Party,” as revenge for the Big Beautiful Bill. He wants to disrupt duopoly politics but can he attract new voters and overcome legal and institutional barriers?

Alligator Alcatraz, a Florida Everglades detention gulag that opened to imprisoned migrants last week, is being criticized for inhumane conditions like flooding and mosquito infestations, as well as its $450 million annual cost.

Israel rejected Hamas’ proposed changes to the latest Gaza hostage and ceasefire proposal, but will send negotiators to Qatar today. Is a breakthrough possible?

Finally, we look at the catastrophic Texas Hill Country floods, where over 10 inches of rain killed at least 50 people, including 15 children, with 27 missing from a girls’ camp. Did National Weather Service staff cuts of 600 by Trump’s DOGE lead to inadequate flood warnings, despite meteorologists’ claims that their forecasts were accurate?

 

What’s Wrong with the Democrats? They Need More Democracy

What’s wrong with the Democrats and how can the party be fixed? When an insurgent outsider candidate from the party’s progressive left defeats a moderate endorsed by the establishment, Democratic leaders reject the results and deny the will of their voters. They refuse the infusion of new ideas and tactics every organization needs to evolve. They anger their voter base. They lose elections they should have won.

It’s time for Democrats to democratize their party.

Democrats’ top-down leadership style is currently being deployed against Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist winner of New York City’s mayoral primary who defeated corporate favorite Andrew Cuomo. The primary results came in over a week ago, yet none of the party’s big guns—Obama, Schumer, Jeffries, Pelosi, Buttigieg, Newsom, Harris, DNC chair Ken Martin—has endorsed Mamdani. Ever the happy warrior, Mamdani says he’s grateful for the kind words he has received from his ideological fellow travelers Bernie, AOC and other members of The Squad. But the establishment’s silence is hypocritical—when the primary winner is a centrist like Biden, the Left is expected to fall in line—and telling.

Not so behind the scenes, the top Democrats who are not that into democracy are following the backroom skullduggery deployed against Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders. Eric Adams, the incumbent mayor elected in 2021, opted out of the Democratic primary due to his rock-bottom approval ratings amid federal corruption charges, which Trump’s DOJ dropped in exchange for opening his sanctuary city to ICE deportation operations. Yet he’s still running for reelection in the general election, as an independent under his one-man “End Anti-Semitism” line. Adams’ base is big business and Zionists. Cuomo is currently running too.

There’s a Republican, too—Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels. But he’s not a major factor in an 11% Republican city.

Billionaire Trump supporter Bill Ackman, hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb, former hedge fund executive Whitney Tilson, Kathy Wylde of the Partnership for New York City, along with the Murdoch-owned New York Post, want the disgraced Cuomo and the marginal Sliwa to step aside and consolidate the anti-Mamdani vote behind the disgraced Adams.

Even with the Post’s rabid attacks (“Socialist Mamdani Wants to Pay for Government Grocery Stores with Money That Doesn’t Exist,” Zohran Mamdani’s ‘No Billionaires’ Dream Fits His Goal — To Make Us All Live in Equal Misery,”  “With Code Words and Dog Whistles, Mamdani Puts a Pretty Face on Hate”), it’s too early to tell whether Adams’ unlikely alliance of Wall Street and Black voters can defeat Mamdani. But primary winners tend to perform better in general elections when their party is united. Support from party bosses is essential.

Obama’s opposition to the Iraq War and appeal to young and minority voters positioned him as an outsider challenging the party’s entrenched leadership in 2008, when he challenged Hillary Clinton in the primaries. His diverse coalition and fundraising prowess forced the DNC to embrace him. They won.

Similarly, party leaders got behind AOC and Squadsters Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush after they won their congressional primaries. All won.

DNC sandbagging of Bernie had mixed results. The first time, in 2016, it led to Hillary’s defeat in a contest Bernie would have been likelier to have won. Biden/Harris, the establishment choice, prevailed in 2020 but progressives who sat out contributed to the vice president’s defeat in 2024.

Though they constantly characterize Republicans as enemies of American democracy, Democrats who want to democratize their party should consider emulating their rivals. With fewer superdelegates who skew primaries toward the establishment, the GOP is structurally representative of its voters. And its party leaders tend to set their personal preferences aside when voters prefer an insurgent outsider.

The results confirm Newt Gingrich’s observation that “by definition, the person who learns enough to become the nominee is almost certainly the best person for the general election.”

Donald Trump, a businessman and reality-TV personality with no political experience, entered the 2016 primary on a lark and defeated establishment favorites Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio. Stalwarts like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan opposed Trump but, in the end, pragmatism prompted acceptance and a unified GOP defeated Hillary.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, another political novice, ran in the 2003 California gubernatorial recall election. State GOP bosses preferred conservatives like Tom McClintock and Bill Simon because Schwarzenegger’s moderate politics (pro-choice, environmentalist) made him an outsider. After Schwarzenegger won 48.6% of the vote in a crowded field, GOP leaders fell into line. He won two terms.

In another insurgent campaign Rand Paul, a libertarian ophthalmologist, won the 2010 GOP Senate primary. Mitch McConnell and other Kentucky party bosses had backed Trey Grayson. The party embraced him to co-opt his Tea Party base. Paul holds a steady seat. J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Dave Brat of Virginia all followed the path of the outsider who defeated establishment-backed candidates and were nevertheless accepted by the party hierarchy.

Like Democrats, Republicans lose when they fail to coalesce behind their insurgent primary victors. Some state Republican officials were displeased when former news anchor Kari Lake, a former news anchor, defeated establishment-backed Karrin Taylor Robson in the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial primary. The RNC supported her but it wasn’t enough. A similar fate befell Sharron Angle and Christine O’Donnell in their 2010 Senate races in Nevada and Delaware, respectively.

History is clear. The smart move for Democrats is to unify behind their winning primary candidates, whether they are establishment favorites or progressive insurgents. New York and national Democrats should endorse, fund and campaign Zohran Mamdani.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “Never Mind the Democrats. Here’s WHAT’S LEFT.” Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com.)

TMI Show Ep 173: “Bad Boy for Life”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

“The TMI Show” with host Ted Rall welcomes back Manila Chan to close out a truncated week, beginning with the verdict and looming sentence in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs! Diddy was acquitted of the major counts of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, yet the jury still nailed him on two counts of transporting prostitutes across state lines for drug-fueled sex marathons under the Mann Act. Despite his partial victory, Combs remains locked up in Brooklyn’s squalid Metropolitan Detention Center, where he faces up to 10 years per count—but as a first offender, he’ll likely get a few years after credit for time served. The judge noted that Combs’s own lawyer admitted to Diddy’s history of domestic violence and a 2024 assault on an ex-girlfriend, raising eyebrows. Sparked by Casandra “Cassie” Ventura’s $20 million lawsuit alleging abuse and forced sexual encounters, Combs now faces dozens of lawsuits accusing him of sexual assault and misconduct. This case is a wild ride of legal twists, celebrity scandal, and lingering questions about justice. Tune in as Ted and Manila unpack the details and controversies.

Plus:

Jonestown’s haunting legacy: A new $750 memorial tour stirs debate over commodifying tragedy. Is 50 years too soon?

Lone star ticks: These aggressive biters are spreading like wildfire, triggering bizarre meat allergies across the U.S. due to climate change.

AI in science: Chatbots are sneaking into research papers, raising ethical questions about authorship. Hint: certain words are giveaways.

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php