DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “Now Trump’s Robbing Banks”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

On the “DeProgram” show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, we dissect the most urgent global and domestic issues with incisive clarity and de-program you from propaganda.

• Trump Takes DC: Rumors of a Trump-driven federal takeover of Washington, DC could end “home rule.” Congress may impose sweeping control, citing crime, governance—and “Big Balls.”

• Lone Star Chaos: Texas faces intensifying political clashes, as Democratic state leaders resist federal overreach on voting rights. Recent gerrymandering efforts by both parties threaten electoral fairness.

• Trump Robs the Banks: First the colleges. Then the law firms. In his latest shakedown, Trump accuses banks of discriminatory practices against him personally (of course) and conservatives in general.

• Japan Wants to Re-Arm: At this 80th anniversary of Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s bombings, the Japanese increasingly believe the post-World War II constitution, which guarantees a peaceful Japan, is obsolete.

• Trump Takes Over Gaza Aid: Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, says the US wants to take over control of Gaza humanitarian aid, raising fears of sidelining Palestinian autonomy, exposing Israeli genocide and putting US troops in harm’s way.

• Israel-Palestinian Statehood (some exceptions apply): Recent recognitions by France, the UK and Canada give hope to Palestine, but two of those carry some big conditions.

• Bennett’s Warning: Former PM Naftali Bennett calls Israel a “leper state” in the US, citing growing isolation.

• Israel Censors Bomb Damage: Iran’s 12-day strikes on Israel face heavy censorship, obscuring the conflict’s real toll. Reports suggest civilian casualties amid targeted attacks.

• Stanford Newspaper Lawsuit: A lawsuit targets goes after ICE and Trump, alleging free speech violations because student journalists are afraid to discuss Gaza in Stanford’s student paper lest they be deported.

• China’s AI Warfare: AI-driven information campaigns intensify, using propaganda to sway global narratives. Experts warn of sophisticated tactics. Are these vague threats real?

Get deprogrammed with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou!

 

TMI Show Ep 194: “Fires, Floods, Destruction: The New Normal?”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

“The TMI Show” with hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan is on fire. And so is much of the country and the world.

Wildfires are torching Arizona and beyond, with over 3.6 million acres burned in so far this year. Arizona’s Dragon Bravo Fire, now 112,341 acres in size, has razed the historic Grand Canyon Lodge and 70+ structures, with extreme winds and low humidity making life difficult for firefighters. Critics blame poor forest management and funding shortages, while climate change debates still rage—all the scientists blame global warming, while pro-business polluters deflect and try to pretend basic science isn’t real. We are joined by Dr. Reese Halter, a distinguished conservation biologist, award-winning broadcaster, and author, passionately advocating for bees, trees, seas, and nature’s wellness through compelling storytelling and global environmental activism.

Plus:

• The Runaway Texas Democrats: Over 50 Texas House Democrats ran away to Chicago, Boston, and Albany to stall a vote on a Trump-backed, anti-Black congressional map gerrymander that would hand Republicans five seats in next year’s midterm elections. Facing $500 daily fines and arrest threats from AG Ken Paxton, they’re defying Governor Abbott’s ultimatum to return by today or face expulsion. Meanwhile, flood victims wait for relief.

• Ghislaine Maxwell’s Gets an Upgrade: The transfer of America’s most famous pedophile to Club Fed has victims’ families furious. Is Trump preparing to cut her loose? Her meetings with Deputy AG Todd Blanche fuel pardon rumors if she cooperates on Epstein. But what does cooperation mean in this case? The Supreme Court eyes her appeal, raising stakes.

• Court Says ICE Is Racist: A Ninth Circuit ruling suspends ICE’s violent raids in L.A., noting that they’re based on racial profiling. Civil rights groups are happy, but the Trump administration may find racist friends in the Supreme Court. Will the Fourth Amendment prevail or be further gutted?

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “Steve Witkoff’s Gaza Vacation”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

On “DeProgram” with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, the world’s focus is on the ongoing crisis in Gaza:

  • Ground Offensive: Israel’s relentless military campaign escalates against Gaza, where 111 Palestinians have been killed in 24 hours, including 91 trying to get food. Civilian deaths are fueling international condemnation.
  • Famine: Famine ravages Gaza, with 147 starvation deaths and 60,000 total fatalities. Israel’s aid blockade from March to May worsened the crisis, reflecting Israel’s deliberate weaponization of starvation. Rall and Kiriakou explore the humanitarian disaster.
  • Witkoff’s Visit: US envoy Steve Witkoff’s Gaza trip to inspect sites of the GHF’s troubled food sites sparks Palestinian outrage. They call it a cheap “media stunt” and an attempt to dodge US complicity in the crisis. We look at the diplomatic implications.
  • Will Germany Step Up?: Germany resists recognizing Palestine, with Foreign Minister Wadephul advocating a two-state solution. Allies like France and Canada ratchet up the pressure as Israel and its shrinking number of allies are increasingly isolated.
  • IDF Barred at Birkenau: An IDF delegation was denied entry to the Birkenau death camp for carrying Israeli flags, per The Times of Israel. Is Israel losing the war over historical memory?
  • Microplastics: You breathe 68,000 lung-penetrating microplastics daily in your home, posing severe health risks, linked to respiratory and systemic diseases. This environmental crisis demands urgent action.
  • Democratic Senators: 27 Democratic senators voted to suspend US weapons to Israel, citing Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. What’s up with the growing schism?
  • Sanctions and Tariffs: Trump threatens sanctions and tariffs on allies like Canada for recognizing Palestineo. His shifting Gaza stance complicates diplomacy.

Join the “DeProgram” show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou for “de-programming.”

SEO-Optimized Keywords: Focus Keyphrase for WordPress:

SEO-Optimized URL for WordPress: https://rall.com/deprogram-gaza-global-crisis-2025

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “UK To Recognize Palestine”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Get insider CIA dish on a pair of stories on today’s “DeProgram show with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou,” streaming live at M-W-F 5 pm ET and available 24-7. Chime in with your questions and comments for John and Ted!

  • UK to Recognize Palestine: Prime Minister Keir Starmer says the UK will formally recognize Palestine at the UN this September—unless Israel halts its Gaza genocide and manmade famine. Which countries are next? Can Israel stop this move and should they care?
  • Iran’s GPS Switcher: Iran plans to abandon U.S.-run GPS, possibly in favor of China, after U.S.-Israeli nuclear site strikes. Tech sovereignty is spreading. What are the global tech fallout risks as distrust of the U.S. spreads?
  • Is Israel Losing the Right? U.S. evangelical and conservative support for Israel, previously reliable, is on the wane. GOP stalwarts like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are criticizing its Gaza war as genocide.  US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, visits a West Bank town attacked by settlers. Joe Rogan is boycotting Bibi. Can Israel get its right-wing groove back?
  • Tom Sylvester’s CIA Exit: CIA’s Deputy Director of Operations retires after losing a prestigious London post due to controversial book quotes. His exit sparks leadership concerns. What’s next at the CIA?
  • Sandy Grimes’ Legacy: The CIA mole hunter at 80, famous for exposing Aldrich Ames. Her counterintelligence work reshaped the agency. What’s her legacy?

TMI Show Ep 191: “Beach Day Canceled!”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

“The TMI Show” with hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan, brings you the latest about the massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake that hit Eastern Russia. This #6 biggest quake EVER, following a 7.4 foreshock, triggers tsunami warnings across the Pacific Ocean, from Japan to Chile. In Russia, tsunami waves smash boats and sweep away containers. Japan evacuates over 2 million people as waves smash into the northern coast, with warnings lingering in Hokkaido and Tohoku. French Polynesia braces for 4-meter waves in the Marquesas Islands, while Chile, Peru, and Ecuador face threats to their coasts. The Philippines and Indonesia issue alerts, though some were later canceled. Guam and Micronesia dodge\ the worst. This disaster echoes a 9.0 quake in the same spot that killed 10,000 people with a 45-foot-high wall of water in 1952,

What is a tsunami? Is climate change causing more tectonic activity? Are governments doing enough? We’ll fill you in.

Plus:

• Palestinian Statehood: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announces Britain will recognize Palestinian statehood in September unless Israel stops its genocidal policy of starving the innocent civilians it’s trying to murder in Gaza. This big move could change the Middle East forever. Is it a game-changer or political posturing?

• Brain-Eating Amoeba Tragedy: A South Carolina boy, 12, dies from Naegleria fowleri after swimming in Lake Murray. This rare, deadly amoeba thrives in warm freshwater, killing every victim except four survivors in the US since 1962. Are public waters safe?

• Iran’s GPS Changes Directions: Iran is switching China’s BeiDou system after US-Israeli attacks expose vulnerabilities from relying on US technology. This move signals a global tech realignment, challenging Western tech dominance. Could this reshape the digital space?

• Australia’s Social Media Ban: Australia’s world-first ban on social media for kids under 16 now includes YouTube. The law aims to curb harmful content, but does this censorship make sense? Other nations are watching.

 

TMI Show Ep 190: “World to Israel: Drop Dead”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

Over 60,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in Gaza since October 2023, and at least 145,870 more have been injured. Those numbers are an undercount because Israel has destroyed hospitals and other healthcare infrastructure. Entire families have been wiped out, with 1,860 children under 2 among the dead, and at least 10,000 additional bodies are rotting under rubble. Famine deaths are spiking—130 and counting—because Israel is deliberately starving the civilian population. Once a vibrant territory, Gaza’s cities are now rubble. Diseases like polio are resurfacing. 88% of the population is crammed into a tiny ghetto created by the IDF along the border with Egypt. A ceasefire collapsed because Israel resumed bombing and killing, leaving hope for peace in tatters. Now that the world is turning against the Jewish state, does it have a future?

Tune in to “The TMI Show” as Ted and Manila unpack this tragedy with their signature no-BS analysis, tackling the human cost and global fallout.

Plus:

• Manhattan Mass Shooting: Shane Tamura, 27, killed four, including an NYPD officer, at 345 Park Avenue. The gunman, armed with an AR-style rifle, died by suicide on the 33rd floor after driving his BMW from Nevada. Motive is unclear.

• UK’s Palestinian State Debate: Britain is leaning toward recognizing a Palestinian state, driven by public outrage over Gaza’s starving children. PM Starmer faces Labour Party pressure but hesitates, wary of complicating ceasefire talks. Trump’s neutral stance gives Starmer room to maneuver.

• Trump’s Russia Ultimatum: Trump slashed his 50-day Russia ceasefire deadline to 10-12 days, threatening sanctions on oil buyers like India and China. Russia’s battlefield gains continue, unfazed. Economic escalation risks U.S. alliances and global trade.

• Shaolin Abbot Scandal: Shaolin Temple’s abbot, Shi Yongxin, is accused of embezzlement and “improper relationships.” The “CEO monk” allegedly violated his celibacy vows and stole cash. Investigations are underway, shaking the iconic monastery.

 

Transcript: TMI Show with Ted Rall and Robby West – Hulk Hogan RIP

Generated by AI, so errors will occur.

On a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show, hosted by Ted Rall with guest host Robby West, the duo mourns the passing of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan, dedicating the episode to his legacy and legal impact. They discuss Hogan’s rise to fame, his scripted WWE rivalry with Andre the Giant, and the rebranding from WWF to WWE, which boosted its entertainment appeal. The conversation turns to Hogan’s infamous lawsuit against Gawker for posting a private sex tape, resulting in a $115 million judgment (later settled for $31 million) with help from Peter Thiel, highlighting privacy versus press freedom debates. They also touch on personal media defamation experiences, cultural shifts, and the Epstein files controversy, exploring a potential populist left-right alliance over issues like Gaza and transparency.
Ted Rall: Hey, everyone. Thanks for tuning in. You are watching a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show, which normally airs Monday through Friday at 10 AM Eastern Time and features me, Ted Rall. I am the T in TMI. Manila Chan is the M. But today, you only have the T, not the M. You have an R. You have guest host Robby West. He is the producer of the show. Thank you very much for joining me to do this. And just as we got ready to go on the air, we received the news that legendary wrestler Hulk Hogan had passed away. So we thought we would dedicate this segment and the entire show to Hulk Hogan, his legacy, and discuss his life in detail. Additionally, I am particularly interested in the legal ramifications because he established some highly significant libel and defamation laws. Let’s dive into the discussion. Robby, do you watch wrestling?

Robby West: I did watch wrestling when I was a kid back in the eighties. Growing up, I followed Hulk Hogan, Andre the Giant, and Randy Savage; you could see all of them energetically performing, shouting, and hitting each other with chairs during their matches.

Ted Rall: So Donald Trump? Yes, he was part of that scene. Pretty much.

Robby West: Yes, because he was present at those events. I wasn’t a big wrestling fan myself, but when you grow up with cable TV in the rural South, you tend to watch whatever is broadcast. For instance, WKRG Channel 15 down in the Florida Panhandle always aired wrestling, which was as popular there as NASCAR events. So it was one of those two dominant forms of entertainment. That experience served as my introduction to Hulk Hogan. I recall that he had a notable rivalry with Andre the Giant, which stands out in memory.

Ted Rall: That rivalry was, of course, entirely scripted, as is typical with WWE. It’s interesting to note that they used to be called the WWF, but they had to change their name because they were sued by the World Wildlife Fund, which shared the same acronym. The WWF, meaning the panda conservation group, had priority since they were established first. As a result, the wrestling organization rebranded from WWF to WWE. In a strange way, this redefinition helped position them more clearly as an entertainment entity. The term World Wrestling Federation might suggest a legitimate sport organization, whereas World Wrestling Entertainment explicitly clarifies its nature as staged performance. I initially thought that this change might cause many fans to stop watching. But surprisingly, they grew even bigger than before as a result, and I believe people fully embraced this shift. Essentially, any pretense that it was anything other than scripted entertainment was eliminated. I think audiences preferred this transparency, enjoying it without the fiction of it being a genuine sport. I must admit, I don’t watch wrestling myself. However, one aspect I’ve never fully understood is the concept of awards in this context. I’m not sure if calling it fake is the right term, since the action happens, real injuries occur, and the physical effort is authentic, but I don’t grasp the awards system. For example, you win a championship belt for winning a match, yet the match was pre-scripted. There’s no scenario where the outcome wasn’t predetermined. So how can you truly be said to win anything? I understand that outcomes in other sports can be fixed too. But there’s a distinction between two athletes competing, where judges might make an erroneous call leading to the wrong person winning, which is one issue. In contrast, when the entire event is rehearsed and planned in advance, it feels different. For instance, it’s like saying Robby and I are going to wrestle, and then you are designated to receive the title. That doesn’t make sense to me.

Robby West: Well, it’s somewhat similar to elections in the EU or Ukraine. The winner is often predetermined unless an extraordinary event occurs; the voters, or the people in those states, have little real influence. Yes, that’s exactly like the situation with a candidate in Romania who kept getting elected despite being the wrong choice, prompting the European Union to essentially suspend the elections. It’s comparable to France as well. For example, Le Pen was almost certainly going to win. And then, back when I was a kid—no, more precisely, when I was in elementary school—we nearly had a riot because there was a heated argument among the kids. The debate was whether wrestling was fake or not. Of course, one group insisted it was absolutely real, while the other group argued it was obviously staged. So we went to the playground, and it turned into a chaotic brawl. It was wild, and the contention was intense. When I was growing up, wrestling, football, and church were the major activities in the Deep South.

 

Ted Rall: Oh, I’m sure that’s true. Yes, and it’s funny to reflect on this. I never watch any sports now, but I can definitely see the appeal of wrestling. I think it’s worth considering how this works as a form of entertainment, like any other medium. So, how do you think someone like Hulk Hogan achieved such fame? I’ve never seen him wrestle in my life, yet I knew everything about him. I knew who he was and why he was famous. Even though I never watched, I was aware of Andre the Giant because of the Obey stickers. Those stickers were everywhere. How does a personality transcend wrestling to become a mass pop culture figure, even for people who have never stepped inside a wrestling arena?

Alright, let’s shift our focus. I want to highlight that his real name was Terry Bollea. He apparently died of a heart attack at the age of 72. This serves as a reminder that such health events can happen to anyone. You mentioned that he died a millionaire. One reason he died with significant wealth, though I’m unsure how much he saved from his wrestling career, depends on his earnings and how well he was paid, and he had a financial manager to handle his assets. Alternatively, in some cases, managers might steal the money. In other instances, they do an excellent job. If someone has a vice, like a cocaine habit, that money can disappear quickly, or it might be lost on poor investments or taken advantage of by friends. I keep thinking of the band Blondie. They famously snorted $10 million worth of profits in a single year in 1980, and they and their entourage ended up with nothing for a while. So things can get pretty chaotic at that level of fame.

He was the plaintiff in a notorious lawsuit. What happened was that at one point, he had a friend, Bubba the Love Sponge, another Florida personality with a podcast, with whom he did radio. They were hanging out together. I’m not sure if the following incident occurred on more than one occasion; I have the impression it might have. But Bubba suggested to Hulk Hogan, or Terry, hey, would you like to have sex with my wife? I don’t know if alcohol or marijuana had been consumed, but the point is that he did. Terry was present during this event. Some people describe it as a threesome. Others say Terry just watched and derived pleasure from it. Either way, what is known is that surreptitiously, Mr. Sponge videotaped Hulk Hogan having sex with his wife, not Hulk Hogan’s wife. I’m uncertain if Hulk Hogan was married at the time; I got the impression he was single. But anyway, this is a rather sordid story.

Bubba the Love Sponge’s video, I don’t know if he had a falling out with Hulk Hogan or not, but I’m unsure if it was leaked, stolen, or sold. You might remember the website Gawker, which was a news site very prevalent around ten to twenty years ago, run by an English individual. Gawker obtained the video and posted it. Obviously, it served as clickbait for them. Hulk Hogan sued in the state of Florida for defamation. And you know, as you know, as I know personally, it is very, very difficult to sue for defamation in American courts against a media company. Media companies have created numerous legal obstacles and have influenced judges’ temperaments, making them generally predisposed against defendants and in favor of plaintiffs in defamation claims against organizations like newspapers, websites, magazines, TV stations, and radio stations.

This trial was really sensationalistic, and a lot of people thought that Hulk Hogan would not move forward because of the Streisand effect. The Streisand effect is named after the singer Barbra Streisand, who sued paparazzi for taking photos of her secret beachfront enclave. Basically, nobody really saw the photos that appeared in the magazine. But after she sued, everybody went to look at the photos and discovered where she lived. So the Streisand effect means that by complaining about a wrongdoing, you might end up drawing more attention to it. I was worried about that when I sued the LA Times. Not everybody saw the scurrilous smears they published about me. And by suing them, I risked bringing further attention to something that many readers might never have heard of otherwise. So that’s like—

Robby West: I have a quick question. If he did it, and he obviously did, then if a news organization published a video, what crime do they commit? I mean, it wasn’t a lie that something actually happened. So explain this to me. I don’t understand it.

Ted Rall: Let me see if I can find a good summary of the lawsuit. Yeah, the claims included invasion of privacy. For example, in someone else’s house, there’s an invasion of privacy when he’s there having sex with his wife. There is an expectation of privacy when you are having sex behind closed doors, even if someone else is watching, because he didn’t consent to being videotaped.

Robby West: So it was a hidden camera then. Yes, it was a hidden camera. He didn’t know he was being videotaped. Gotcha. Okay, that I don’t fully understand. So it’s an ambush.

Ted Rall: This was in February 2006. The woman’s name was Heather Clem. He said that, and anyway, he also sued for infringement of personality rights. When you are a celebrity in particular, you are deemed to have personality rights; I think at this point, both of us could probably be considered to have them, though not quite on the same level as Hulk Hogan. And Hulk Hogan wouldn’t have the same level of personality rights as, say, Obama. But basically, it is scaled based on your level of celebrity. You have the right to control your public persona and image within reason. For instance, if you go shopping, the paparazzi can take your picture because you’re in public. But a photo of you naked and having sex with someone who is not your wife is particularly damaging to your brand. He also sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress, which most lawyers will tell you is a legitimate claim, but judges and juries tend to view it as a throwaway argument. Like, “oh, too bad for you, you were sad.” But you probably would be sad if you were Hulk Hogan and woke up one morning to find your group sex tape had appeared on the internet. Not just on the internet, not even on a porn site, but on a legitimate news organization.

So anyway, Gawker’s attorneys argued that he had originally sued for copyright infringement, but that was withdrawn. During the trial, Gawker argued that Hulk Hogan had made his own sex life a public matter. However, on cross-examination, when Hulk Hogan’s lawyer asked whether a depiction of his genitalia had any news value, editor AJ Daulerio said “no.” Then Hulk Hogan stated that comments he made in interviews were done in his professional wrestling character, which is not his real personality. So this was an exposure of his real personality that diluted his brand as an entertainer. Nick Denton was the CEO of Gawker at the time, and he tried to appeal, but ultimately, a Florida jury in 2016 ordered them to pay Hulk Hogan $115 million, including $60 million for emotional distress. The jury also awarded him an additional $25 million for punitive damages. So the reactions to this case depended on what you think is more important: your right to privacy or a news organization’s right to publish material it obtains.

News organizations, as robust as the New York Times, argued this poses a threat to freedom of the press because they simply received and published it. Probably this case would not have gone Hulk’s way if he hadn’t sued in Florida. But he was very popular there, the jury liked him, and the Floridians had a dim view of what was done to him. For example, they might think, hey, someone offers to let you sleep with his wife, and then secretly tapes it to give to Gawker. So it was a really interesting case. Anyway, it’s kind of crazy that when Gawker’s editors, including publisher Nick Denton, testified, they were really snotty about the whole thing. They brought their New York attitude to it, acting like this was ridiculous, that Hulk Hogan was just a wrestler, and that he brought it on himself. They didn’t care that he was upset.

Robby West: It completely misread the population. Yes, that might have worked in New York, maybe. Yeah, it probably would have worked there because nobody cares, even though people like wrestling here. But I think privacy rights are not considered that important. Back in the nineteen eighties, we had community access cable, and there was pornography on it in New York City. Someone sued under obscenity law and took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Community access cable standards are based on community values, and the Supreme Court officially ruled that New York City doesn’t have community values. Therefore, the porn stayed. And so now, I would venture to say that even if you live on the Upper East Side, you probably wouldn’t be too happy about having something like what happened to Hulk Hogan occur to you. You know, it’s easy to laugh when it’s not you.

Also, part of the controversy I should mention is there was a political aspect to this. You’re going to love this. So you know who Peter Thiel is. He is a very famous right-wing billionaire tech figure, co-founder of PayPal, and former board member of Facebook. Anyway, he was hanging out with his Australian buddy, Aaron D’Souza, and they were discussing how this might be their opportunity to destroy Gawker. Gawker was liberal-leaning, and more to the point, Gawker had outed Peter Thiel as gay. Peter Thiel was really angry about that and held a grudge, saying this is nobody’s business but his own. So he was waiting for a chance to get even. He decided to finance Hulk Hogan’s case because there’s no way Hulk Hogan, even as a successful wrestler, had the money to outlast a big media organization like Gawker. So they decided to give him millions, $10 million, to fund this lawsuit.

Anyway, this dragged on. In May, Hogan sued Gawker again because they leaked sealed court documents in which he used racial slurs. The transcripts were then published by the National Enquirer. The WWE fired him for being racist. Gawker claimed they didn’t know anything about it, and the case didn’t go anywhere. Long story short, Gawker ultimately failed. They said they couldn’t afford to pay the $140.1 million judgment or the $50 million bonds needed to appeal. So they filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, put themselves up for sale. Gawker was a large group that included Deadspin, Gizmodo, Jezebel, and Lifehacker. The Spanish company Univision ended up buying them. After the sale, they negotiated, and in the end, Hulk Hogan received $31 million.

Robby West: Isn’t Peter Thiel also one of our favorite werewolf, J.D. Vance’s big financial backers? Yes, that is correct. Because one thing—and I don’t know what it is about attorneys from New York or just people from out of state in general—back in the early two thousands, when Jeb Bush first ran for governor of Florida and got soundly defeated, he was running against Lawton Chiles, if I recall correctly, back in the nineties. They were doing a debate, and Lawton Chiles, who sounded a lot like me with that Florida cracker accent, was on stage. I remember watching this debate, and Jeb looked over at Lawton Chiles and said Florida no longer has room for old southern politics. And Ted, you could have heard a pin drop; it went completely silent. My dad looked at me and said, “that stupid Yankee has lost.” And it sounds like that’s kind of what happened here with these attorneys who came down for Gawker. They just viewed the electorate as backward and unsophisticated, which, to be fair, might be true. But if that’s who you’re drawing your jury pool from, it’s probably not a good idea to insult them and pretend it’s raining.

Ted Rall: Totally. Yes, that’s exactly right. And I mean, look, honestly, I was extremely concerned. As you know, I understand what it’s like to be defamed by a media organization. And I’ve worked throughout media my entire life. I started out at a small community newspaper. I’ve worked at big city dailies and national magazines. I’ve been on radio stations, big and small. I’ve been on television and worked for ABC News. You name it, I’ve done it. I’ve been an editor, a writer, a cartoonist, an illustrator, and a copy editor. I’ve seen it all. And I gotta tell you, I could not, for the life of me, understand what Nick Denton was thinking when he posted that video. It had zero news value whatsoever.

Robby West: It might have had news value, let’s say for argument’s sake, if it involved a different person, like Jimmy Swaggart or a TV evangelist. That would make sense.

Ted Rall: Exactly. Or let’s say J.D. Vance, whom you mentioned. Right? Like, anyone who’s a public figure with a conflicting image. So I remember a friend of the show, Scott Stantis, my best friend, and I arguing about Larry Craig, the Idaho senator who was caught soliciting men in the Saint Paul Airport bathroom. He claimed he had a “wide stance” because he was reaching into the stall, playing footsie with the person next to him. That’s how he got caught. Apparently, there’s a well-known gay meeting spot in that airport bathroom. Who would have known? Anyway, the point is, he asked why Craig got in so much trouble. I said, because he was an anti-gay married senator from Idaho who constantly criticized gay people. That’s why. And like, well, how come? I said, it’s like in England, it’s always a Tory MP you find in a scandalous situation, like hanging from the ceiling with a ball gag and a spatula involved. It’s never a Labour MP.

So the point is, of course, that’s right. And like Hulk Hogan, his brand was never I only have sex with my wife.

Robby West: His brand was wild man wrestler. No, his brand was an alpha male, I’ll beat your face in jock. That completely disrupted his brand. Now who would have thought? Yes, his friend. Yes, 100%. His friend should have been completely ashamed. It’s like, no, I guess, Ted, it would be like me, coming out as the right-winger here on “The TMI Show,” if it came out that I was secretly supporting Kamala Harris for president the entire time. Just something off-brand. Or, you know, being a Christian, if I found out I was having an affair with my neighbor while my wife and kids were home.

Ted Rall: Or, let’s say for me, if you found out I’m having a torrid affair with Ann Coulter, or I’m moving to that whites-only community in Arkansas we talked about this morning, and I’ve applied to join there. That goes against brand. Right?

Robby West: So it’s like, hey, they need cartoonists. And that is newsworthy. Well, it’s news, so I don’t think it’d be off-brand. Here’s what I’m thinking about this, Ted. I could 100% say I’m already disqualified. Had you, however, you can go in because you have a couple of things going for you. One, you probably don’t have to worry about someone playing the polar bear game with you on the subway. So you know, I got some black dude just rabbit-punching you. In this whites-only community, they need someone to handle their newspaper. They’ve got to have commentary and cartoons.

Ted Rall: I can prove, by the way, I’ve been working on my genealogy. I can prove that my lineage goes back at least four hundred years in France and Germany as Christian. So they’d be okay with me.

Robby West: Yes, we’re into politics. Yes, I’d be able to trace my genealogy back to about the late nine hundreds so far reliably.

Ted Rall: Oh, that’s amazing.

Robby West: And like, true story, I don’t know if the name rings a bell, but Captain David Morgan—he is my direct ancestor. He’s like my grandfather. So badass. Oh, 100%. So whenever it says that my ancestors literally came and conquered this continent, I’m not saying that. No, I know.

Ted Rall: I believe you, and that’s true. There’s a lot more of you in the South who can say that than in the North.

Robby West: Well, because it’s just so old. It’s old. It’s big.

Ted Rall: Yes, it’s also where some of the earliest settlements were, and then people didn’t really move much once they stayed. They got to the South, like in Georgia, and tended to stay or not go too far. But people arrived in New York and tended to disperse. So, getting back to Terry Bollea, it was crazy to me at the time how many of my friends in the media rolled their eyes and thought he had no case, that he shouldn’t have complained, that he had nothing to bitch about. Literally, I’m sorry, in this case, the only person—it’s not breaking news that a guy has sex. Right? And it’s just not. And this was between the only three people involved. You know, it was between him, the wife, and Bubba the Love Sponge, who liked to watch and film it and ought not to have filmed it.

Robby West: Did the wife know it was being filmed?

Ted Rall: I don’t know. That’s a really good question. She was involved, but I thought it was really disgusting what they did to him. And I think that if I’d been on that jury, because I followed that case very closely, I would have ruled in his favor and hit Gawker hard. I’m really happy about what happened to them. They were a disgusting publication with terrible news judgment, willing to ruin people’s lives for nothing, just for fun. They thought, let’s just mock this dumb wrestler. What’s he gonna do? But it goes back to the Peter Thiel thing. Like, oh, they outed him as gay. Okay, I don’t like Peter Thiel’s politics at all. But is it really anyone’s business, my business, your business, who he sleeps with? It’s really not. And it’s like, why are you outing people? This is his personal life. Well, he’s a rich guy, and he’s famous. So what? Leave him alone. And so I don’t blame him. Also, this part really drove me crazy. A lot of my friends were mad because Peter Thiel gave all this money to Hulk Hogan, without which he never could have prevailed. It’s like, well, listen to yourselves. You’re admitting that an ordinary guy, even one as well-off as Hulk Hogan presumably was, doesn’t stand a chance against a media organization when he sues for libel. Only with the equalizing influence of a billionaire can he maybe prevail. So I don’t see that as a grave injustice to Gawker or any other future defendant. I view it like Sarah Palin needs an infusion of cash to take on the New York Times. They treated her unfairly, and it was wrong. And I don’t care if you’re on the right or the left. I want to see defamation plaintiffs prevail. If I had that cash infusion, I would have prevailed against the LA Times. As it is, I gave them a great run for their money, and they couldn’t believe how hard I was to defeat. But it took five years. The thing is, if I’d had a Peter Thiel, it would have happened, and I would have taken the money. People might say, ew, that’s disgusting. Who cares? It’s like, those guys have filthy money. Why can’t I have filthy money?

Robby West: That’s one of the things I wanted to ask Achilles about on yesterday’s show. They’re talking about the LA Times going into an IPO. Personally, I hope the LA Times dies a miserable death, especially because of what they did to you specifically.

Ted Rall: Thank you. Well, it’s true. And I’m not the only one. When an organization behaves like that, you can be sure it’s not an isolated incident; they’ve done it to many, many other people. I got to know some of the others they mistreated. For example, there was a guy, a sports writer named T.J. Simers, who was in his sixties. The LA Times paid him a lot of money, but they decided they didn’t want to pay him that much anymore. Instead of talking to him like a human being and saying the newspaper business is struggling, we need a new arrangement—he had a contract—they just fabricated excuses and fired him. So he sued for age discrimination and won. When they did discovery, and I know this for a fact, the LA Times’ internal communications came out. And perhaps the most revealing one, especially for a jury in a city that is 50% Latino, was when they were discussing internally the young Latino sportswriter they got to work for one-sixth of his salary. The editors said, okay, so before we get rid of the old guy, is your Hispanic replacement ready? That’s charming. Yes, that’s just who they were. And the LA Times workers, there was no solidarity whatsoever. I think about the first paper I ever worked for. My editor got fired because she refused to fire me over a cartoon the paper had approved. I was 16 years old at the little Vandalia Chronicle in Ohio. When this happened to me at the LA Times, internally, they were all upset. Everyone thought it was bad news, but they were terrified. Not one person who worked at the LA Times ever tweeted to say what happened was wrong, and they knew it was wrong. So there was no solidarity; their union didn’t back me up because they were scared and sucking up to management. Forget them.

Robby West: Really, what’s the point of having a union if it just collaborates with the boss to screw the workers, like talking about Hulk Hogan sleeping with someone else’s wife? What’s the point of paying union dues?

Ted Rall: Yes, you’re 100% right. In Japan, they have a different system with official unions that have a seat on the board of directors. It’s a much more cooperative culture, and it works a little better. But here, a union should be oppositional. That doesn’t mean they have to be mean or rude or deliberately sabotage management, but they should oppose, be militant, and push for their workers’ interests only. And it is definitely in the workers’ interest that the company stay in business and remain profitable. So there’s a balance; you don’t want to go too far. But no, I agree. The LA Times union was not really a union. They were constantly posting things like, we’re so grateful to our management for supporting us in this difficult time. I’m like, what is wrong with you people? Anyway, in terms of the LA Times, they got away with it. And in a sense, I held them to account by making it hard for them. I think they would think twice before doing something like that to someone else again.

Robby West: Well, I sure hope so. And the thing is, more to the point, I know we’re drifting a bit from Hulk Hogan here, but it’s a premium episode. Who cares? I think it just shows how our culture, for lack of a better word, has imploded. Because last night when I was at church, I was talking to another churchgoer, and he asked, Robby, why do you think Biden didn’t release the Epstein files and that Trump is involved? I said, because it’s bigger than Trump. I explained that whoever is in these Epstein files will include people from both parties, people in business, finance, and industry. This is bigger than one person; it encompasses the entire upper echelon of the American leadership establishment. That’s the problem. Forget any foreign funding that might have come through foreign influences or intelligence agencies. I said Trump is lying. He’s doing this to protect the powerful, and he’s destroying his entire coalition to do it. In a big way, it’s like what the LA Times did to you. They circled the wagons. Management knew they were wrong, but they chose to side with the establishment and screw the little guy.It didn’t matter if they were right or wrong.

Ted Rall: And to put a finer point on it, once they committed to that action, there was no going back. Like, because now, when you’re talking about a defendant like the LA Times, they committed to a series of lies they had to keep doubling and tripling down on to cover up their cover-ups. Similarly, Trump knows what’s in those files. AG Pam Bondi has told him. He may have looked at them himself, though I doubt it since he’s not a big reader. But Pam Bondi has fully informed him of the contents. He knows he’s in there. I don’t think for a minute this is about Trump personally committing sex crimes. It doesn’t fit what we know about his personality.

Robby West: No, he likes middle-aged Eastern European models, not someone like Dolph Lundgren. And corn-fed women. Yes, there’s that. Now this is so much bigger. And talking about brand, I was discussing the Hulk Hogan brand, how people always knew who he was. Dan Bongino, I don’t think he realizes—well, maybe he does—but he completely destroyed his brand. When he’s done with the FBI, there’s no going back to Rumble anymore. His show is finished because he went against brand, unlike Hulk Hogan. You know, if you’re a wrestler, a big alpha male, no one’s surprised you’re with women. If he was with a man, people would be shocked. Yes, very much so. Dan Bongino came in, before his appointment, saying the Epstein files are out there, we need the truth, and so on. And now he’s saying, oh, there’s nothing there, it was a suicide. Everyone knows he’s lying. He was putting on a show as a truth-teller who worked for the Secret Service, willing to sacrifice everything for justice, truth, and exposing corruption.

Ted Rall And then a month in, you know Bongino is the only possible source of the leak that AG Bondi told Trump he was in the files, which came out a day or two ago. We know that comes from him. The base must know that. Bongino’s fans must know that. Does that buy him any currency?

Robby West: It will with the Trumpers. So it would have bought more currency if he’d called a press conference, released it, and exposed Trump. That’s what would save Dan Bongino. Just do a press conference, drop the truth bomb, commit political suicide, and set Washington DC on fire. He’d be a hero on the left and right, lionized. Instead, he’s like Hulk Hogan’s friend who betrayed him. That’s Dan Bongino. He is the jerk.

Ted Rall: So yes, that’s what happened here. Obviously, Bongino goes to work for the administration. Yes, he’s been told he’s number two after Pam, with a lot of power, but number two isn’t number one, and even number one isn’t number one because that’s Trump. So number one is Trump, then there’s Kash Patel, then Pam, then him. So he’s really at least fourth in the pecking order. I’ve always said you can’t really affect real change from the inside, only personal change.

Robby West: Unless you’re willing to set yourself on fire on a pyre. If you’re willing to self-immolate. Like, for example, I would like to—or what you’re really doing is declaring to the people, listen, my fate is in your hands. Now if you like, I sided with you, the people, against my former bosses, the government. Now I’m on your side. If you see fit to buy my book, support my podcast, and donate to my legal defense fund, then I’ll be okay. Because I’ve never been in this position, Ted. I never will be. I would like to think I have enough spine that if I were in Dan Bongino’s place with all this going on, I would have the guts to go on national TV and tell the truth. So, here’s what’s happening. When this is done, I guarantee you I’ll be charged under the Espionage Act and go to prison. Basically, do a John Kiriakou. I would like to think I have that kind of courage. I think I do. I don’t know, I’ve never been tested. I would like to think I’m that much of a disagreeable person to burn everything down, using myself as the match. It’s rough. Yes, it is. Because that’s the only thing that can change us. Because change really happens when people are willing to say, damn the consequences, this is wrong, what’s going on is wrong, this has to change, and then you’re willing to either literally or figuratively set yourself on fire to be the change that makes it happen. I’m not advocating going out and self-immolating at Walmart. But what I am saying is that if you’re in a position of power and know the system is completely corrupt, and you promised to clean it, you have a choice. Are you going to gain more power, side with the bosses, or sacrifice everything on principle? And nobody else can do it. We had a press conference because you can’t suppress that. No, you can’t.

Ted Rall: Yes. So what do you think is going to happen here? In the end, you and I both know Trump is going to fire Dan Bongino. You know he’s going to throw him to the wolves. And I guess the other question, there are a bunch of things here. Let’s handicap what will happen with the Epstein files. Speaker Johnson seems to believe that by kicking the can down the road to Labor Day, adjourning Congress early, he can suppress this whole controversy, keep it under wraps, and that people will forget about it. Something else will come up in the headlines to overshadow this, and people will forget, as they have about so many things regarding Trump and others in the past. There’s reason to think that might be true. My instinct says not this time.

Robby West: Not this time. And do you know why? Because the Republican Party is going against its brand. We just talked about that, but take the scenario from Idaho with the anti-gay senator who turns out to be involved with young boys. I mean, I felt sick thinking about it. The Republican Party champions itself as the party of family values, traditional Americana, and protecting children and the unborn. The Democrats never promised to do any of those things. The Republican Party does. So then you have a president who ran on that promise—Trump—talking about the media all the time. Yes, QAnon, all that stuff, Pizzagate. He talked about QAnon. Yes, he owns it. So Trump ran on transparency and draining the swamp. How do you drain the swamp? By going in, cutting down trees, draining the water, and slaying the alligators. That was his brand. He promised transparency. The alligators—no, you don’t. And so this guy at church I was talking to yesterday said, could you please tell me any time when Biden, running for president, promised to release the Epstein files? He said, well, he didn’t. Okay, but Trump did. Not only did Trump promise it, Kash Patel did. Dan Bongino did so on TV all the time. The entire world knew Trump knew Epstein. We always knew they hung out together. There were all those photos. There’s nothing new about those photos. So, curious, what did MAGA World think when Trump said he’d blow all this out of the water, but they also know Trump had an association with Epstein? What did they think the truth was about that association?

Robby West: I think most people are willing to overlook that because rich people hang out with rich people. They just do. It’s a very small circle of friends. Yes, Trump was a donor before he was a politician. So what do you do? You network, you go to all the parties. He invited Bill and Hillary Clinton to his wedding. Everyone knew.

Ted Rall: And Epstein was a neighbor down there in South Beach, Florida, living just two miles away from Epstein.

Robby West: Yes, so as far as that, no one cares. The issue is that Trump promised to be transparent and to drain the swamp, not only to drain the swamp but to make America great again by dismantling the deep state. Yes, and his whole thing about the 2020 election isn’t calling out of brand. Trump always talked about how he was a winner. Well, when he lost, he suddenly became the biggest loser and claimed it was stolen. So it’s like, you can’t be both. You lost, take your lumps, but he never could accept defeat. Then he ran again, saying we’re going to expose everything, we’re going to reveal the corruption. And then he starts telling blatant lies, and you see the control coming from the top. And one day, it’s like someone flipped a switch. You have Charlie Kirk and Cat Turd on Twitter and all these other people talking about how the Epstein files must be released. And then suddenly, oh, Epstein’s a non-story anymore after Trump complained. People are smart enough to realize this. And Ted, I think here’s the opportunity your side of the aisle has now. We have on the right a small group of people in Washington, DC, who are standing up, who are fighting. They’re probably going to face primaries. I guarantee you they are. Marjorie Taylor Greene is going to face a primary. Thomas Massie is going to face a primary. Rand Paul is going to face a primary. It’s up to your people on the left now, for at least some who come in through primaries or are elected, to say, I’m going to put principle over politics. I’m not going to stand with the party. I’m going to stand with these MAGA types on the right and collaborate, because the margin is so small, you don’t need a big majority. All you have to do is obstruct a must-pass bill, like one for automobile states.

Ted Rall: Marjorie Taylor Greene is from Georgia. I don’t know if Georgia is one of those states where Democrats can vote in a Republican primary. I don’t know the answer to that. So in that situation, you’d want to see some strategic voting. Although I gotta say, you and I both believe in a left-right alliance of convenience among populists. But I don’t think the Democratic Party or even the progressive wing of the Democratic Party sees it yet. Some people do. I see it. David Sirota sees it. Cenk Uygur sees it. Others see it. But that’s kind of the intellectual vanguard of the mainstream left in America, and they usually don’t listen to us.

Robby West: I disagree. They end up taking over everything. I disagree, and I think it’s going to be one issue. And this might surprise you, Ted, about how this alliance can come about. It’s because of the genocide happening in Gaza. People are noticing that. Like, AOC actually says she’s opposed to the genocide, but she’s going to keep sending money to Israel for their defensive use to kill Gazans. People see that. So if you start getting people on the left who are sick and tired of this Israel-first mentality, where American tax dollars are used not only to commit a genocide but then you start asking questions. It’s like, Epstein. Epstein. What kind of name is that? Oh, it’s a Jewish name. Oh, it’s a Jewish state. It’s the Jewish state committing a genocide. Then people will start asking questions, which you’re not supposed to do because Ben Shapiro says that makes you a Nazi if you ask questions. Well, who else is he calling a Nazi? Tucker Carlson for asking questions. So then you start getting this conversation going back and forth. We don’t have to agree on everything, but what we can agree on is no one should agree on everything. No, I agree. So we can agree on maybe we should defund Israel. Maybe we should cut them off. Yes, and the way I look at it is if they want to kill Palestinians, they can do it without my money. I agree. And I think that’s going to be the bridge, Ted. Really, honestly, I could be wrong, but I think that’s the way people are willing to start coming together, like the way Mamdani did. I don’t agree with that man on anything. But if I lived in New York, I would have voted for him because when he said, no, I’m not going to Israel, I’m staying here, whether he realizes it or not, that is an America-first position. Of course, take care of your home first by definition. Yes, that’s what we’re asking for.

Ted Rall: Yes, America First is not inherently a right-wing thing. No, not at all. But we’re told it is. Yes, I know. It’s like, I gotta say I never really understood the rabid internationalism on, I think it’s fair to say, the neoliberal Democrats like the Hillary and Bill Clintons of the world, who are aligned with a lot of corporatists. You can sort of see why they like it that way. Their money goes all over the place and lives in the Caymans, Luxembourg, and Switzerland. So they’re citizens of the world. I don’t think those people really care that much what happens to one country more than another.

Robby West: No, they’re globalists. They’re not Americans. They float around. Yes, they’re globalists. By definition, if you believe the entire idea of a nation state is obsolete, then why would you identify as an American? It’s like what we talked about earlier on this morning’s show. What is an American? You know, I think we could do a whole other hour on that. Oh, easily.

Ted Rall: The idea of the nation state, which is relatively new, really only 200 years old in its modern configuration. But it’s like if you’re going to get rid of a system or want to get rid of a system, you better have some idea how you want to replace it. I’m looking at you, George W. Bush, overthrowing Saddam. The globalists don’t. I can see in some airy way how and why we should have one world government. Like, we can address the great inequalities of wealth between the North and the global South. But the point is, I don’t see logistically how you’d be able to hold a whole world government together at this stage. I don’t think our communications technology is good enough. And when you’re in a world with thousands of languages and cultures, I don’t know how you could ever have a global system, sort of like in the lexicon of Star Trek. Everybody formed one world government once we went into interstellar space so we could have one government to represent us to the rest of the galaxy. We can’t do that yet.

Robby West: No, that’s going to be a really hard sell. That’s going to be a hard sell in Pakistan. I know if you go into a short lecture on them about gay rights and feminism. I mean, let’s be honest.

Ted Rall: Or it’ll be a hard sell in Greenwich Village when the Pakistanis are trying to sell Sharia law. So either way, most cultures don’t get along with each other. People have a hard time here in the U.S., and we all speak the same language supposedly. Yes, that’s just the whole problem. And it’s weird because Hulk Hogan was kind of a throwback to Americana. Now, you’re talking about a big, strong, individual, larger-than-life figure with a brand. That was his brand. And then, about a year and a half ago, this guy—something that really impressed me—was he converted to Christianity, and he and his new wife were baptized. When he was asked about it, he said that all his life he realized it was nothing, and that the strongest he’s ever been is now by surrendering to Jesus. And as a Christian, that resonates. It’s like, hey, truly, welcome, brother. That’s huge. I just think that as the country becomes more diverse culturally and ethnically, as the culture gets more diluted, as Christianity retreats, I don’t see another Hulk Hogan. I don’t see another symbol people can look at and say, that’s the guy, without any negative judgment one way or the other. It’s like, that’s Hulk Hogan. I don’t see the next Hulk Hogan. I don’t know if you’re ever going to have another Hulk Hogan.

Ted Rall: Well, I think that’s a really good place to leave it. And I don’t know that I’m going to argue with you on that. I think that’s exactly right. You’ve been watching a Rumble Premium edition of The TMI Show with me, Ted Rall, and Manila Chan. She’ll be joining some other episodes in the future. Filling in for Manila is producer Robby West. Robby, as always, it’s a real pleasure to do this with you. If you’re watching, please like, follow, and share the show. If you’re watching one of the clips, please check out the full show and subscribe. We’re very close to that magic 1,000 subscribers threshold. We need to start earning some money. And if you’re on Rumble, come over because you’re going to see a lot of spicy content here on Rumble that you won’t see on YouTube. We’re here Monday through Friday at 10 AM Eastern Time, 7 AM on the West Coast. So check us out, and take care.

Transcript: DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou – “Why is Iran Burning?”

Transcript generated with AI. So there may be errors.

Ted Rall and John Kiriakou discuss critical issues on the Wednesday, July 24, 2025 episode of Deprogram.

Watch/listen here.

Kiriakou shares Congressman Thomas Massie’s efforts to release Jeffrey Epstein files via a discharge petition, facing resistance from House Speaker Mike Johnson, who altered rules to curb subpoenas. They speculate on Trump’s involvement in the Epstein case, doubting direct culpability but suspecting he’s protecting someone close. In Gaza, they condemn ongoing violence as genocide, citing starvation and IDF tactics. They address Kilmar Albrego Garcia’s wrongful deportation and unfair labeling by officials. In Ukraine, Zelensky’s unpopularity and potential CIA-backed coup are highlighted. They also touch on Iranian arson fires, possibly Israeli-orchestrated, and Greek protests against Israeli tourists. The show’s name changes to Deprogram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou for clarity.

Ted Rall: Hey, everyone. Thanks for joining us. You’re watching Deprogram with me, Ted Rall, and John Kiriakou. Lots to talk about. John and I are having quite a day, but, hey, so is the country. John, you were just on the phone with a guy who’s been in the news lately. Maybe you want to tell us about it.

John Kiriakou: I was asked at the last minute to appear on a show called Redacted on the Unified Television Network, not realizing that I was going to be asked to appear alongside Congressman Thomas Massie. So I got on, and as soon as I got on, Massie got on, and he was absolutely fascinating. The whole thing was about Jeffrey Epstein. I’ve been trying to talk a lot about Jeffrey Epstein because these political developments surrounding the Epstein situation are complicated. He made them more complicated with what he said. He used to be on the Rules Committee. The Rules Committee is the single most important committee on Capitol Hill because the members of the Rules Committee decide what bills go to the floor for a vote and what bills are just killed. Because he’s an independent thinker, he was removed from the Rules Committee and is no longer a member. But he says he’s a smart guy.

My time on the Rules Committee taught me how to write a discharge petition. A discharge petition is a very rarely used parliamentary trick in the House of Representatives. I remember it being used once when I was in college in 1986. What a discharge petition is, is this: Let’s say there is a bill to make Ted Rall Day. Okay? And most—well, that would be unopposed. You’d think.

Most people want a Ted Rall Day. Right? But there’s this one asshole on the Rules Committee who says, you know what? I don’t like Ted Rall. He made fun of me in a cartoon one time, and I’m not going to allow this thing to go to the floor for a vote. So Congressman Kiriakou then writes up what’s called the discharge petition. A discharge petition, if it gets a majority, that’s 218 votes, forces the bill out of the Rules Committee, whether they like it or not, to the floor for a vote. Until 1933, you needed 25% of members of Congress to vote yes on the discharge. They changed the rules in 1933, so now you need 218 votes to force a bill to the floor. Thomas Massie just now said that he has a bill to force the administration to release every scrap of paper that exists related to Jeffrey Epstein to the public, including videos, hard drives, black books, files, emails, and everything they have. And Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, said, oh, no. No. We can’t do that. That’s going to embarrass the administration. And the president has already said that there are no files. We can’t contradict the president. So Massie went to Hakeem Jeffries, and Hakeem Jeffries says, you know what? I can guarantee you every single Democrat in the House of Representatives. Meaning that Massie has to come up with five Republicans. He’s one. That’s four more. Marjorie Taylor Greene said yes. That makes three more. So he’s in talks with the Freedom Caucus. That could be as many as six more, which would give him enough to discharge the bill from the Rules Committee.

Ted Rall: So what did Mike Johnson tell him today?

John Kiriakou: Mike Johnson said, if you persist with this, I’m going to change the rules, which haven’t changed since 1933. And I’m going to make it so that you need two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives, not 50% plus one. He can do anything he wants because he’s the Speaker of the House. Another thing Massie said, which was so interesting to me, is that he wants to subpoena people in the Jeffrey Epstein orbit. When I was a senior staff member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I had subpoena power. It’s not something you want to do every day. It pisses people off to receive a subpoena. But if you have somebody that just refuses to testify, you have to issue the subpoena and force them to come and testify before your committee. So Massie issued a whole bunch of subpoenas for all these different people to come before the House and testify as to their role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes or in not helping to end Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. So what happened? Mike Johnson changed the rules. And so now the only people who can issue subpoenas in the House of Representatives are Mike Johnson’s attorneys. No member of Congress can issue a subpoena as of today. Only Mike Johnson’s attorneys. So the fix is in, man. We were saying the day before yesterday when Johnson announced that he didn’t want any votes on Epstein, so he’s just going to shut down the House of Representatives until September so that there won’t be any votes. Now you can’t even issue a subpoena, let alone have a vote. One other thing Massie said that was very interesting: despite this announcement that the House will shut down, it actually won’t shut down because Johnson doesn’t trust Trump to not make recess appointments. They’re all the same party. They’re all Republicans. It’s shocking to me. So Johnson came to an agreement this week, and folks, this is not reported in the media. This is breaking news from Thomas Massie’s mouth. Johnson came to an agreement with John Thune, the Majority Leader in the Senate, that every eight days, they will gavel the House and the Senate into session and then immediately gavel it out of session. The whole process takes five seconds. So this is like the guy in the bottom of the hatch on Lost who has to keep pushing the button. That’s exactly what it is. So that way, they’re in recess, but they’re really not in recess. That way, they can’t vote on Epstein, but Trump can’t make any federal appointments. Shocking.

Ted Rall: Well, just in case you were bored, John, this has broken in the New York Times while you were talking to Thomas. AG Pam Bondi informed Trump in the spring that his name appeared in the Epstein files, according to three people with knowledge of the exchange. The disclosure came as part of a broader briefing on the case by the FBI and prosecutors. It was made by Bondi during a meeting that also included the Deputy AG, Todd Blanch, and covered a variety of topics. She meets regularly with Trump, officials said. They informed Trump that his name, as well as those of other high-profile figures, came up during their reexamination of the Epstein files that had not previously been made public. Trump has already appeared in documents related to the investigation. Steve Chung wouldn’t answer any questions about this briefing and basically reminded everyone that this was supposedly fake news. This has all previously been reported by the Wall Street Journal. But this is a bona fide scandal, John.

John Kiriakou: It is. It is. Wow. Well, I mean, it’s like what we thought it was. The only answers here were that it had to be either the president himself who was somehow implicated to some extent. I have to admit that doesn’t really pass the smell test that the president is a pedophile. No. I don’t believe that. There’s no evidence of that. Of course, anything’s possible, but I just don’t think so. Most things are usually the way they seem. Although every now and then, you’re like, what? So this could be one of those times. But it’s got to be someone close to him. It’s got to be someone he cares about. Interference for.

It has to be. And I’ll tell you what, it has to be Dan Bongino that leaked this to the New York Times. For sure. There is no other possibility.

Ted Rall: So Elon Musk told the truth, which then makes me think, how in the world did Elon Musk know that Donald Trump was in the Epstein files when Musk should not have had access to law enforcement information? That’s a good question. Although, apparently, Doge and Musk had their noses in all sorts of holes that they weren’t supposed to be.

So, I thought we were going to be just talking about sending Congress home early and what a bad look that was. Massie was quoted in this morning’s media, probably from stuff he said yesterday to reporters, saying that MAGA World isn’t going to forget about this just because six weeks go by. This really does remind me of Watergate summer when things dragged out. It was no air conditioning in that Senate hearing. Everyone’s hot and sweaty. It was boring. And this low-level functionary named Paul Butterfield comes in and says, and then the tape recorder in the Oval Office. And people are like, what? There’s a tape recorder in the Oval Office? Reporters go scrambling out the door. I remember that. And I always thought that if Nixon hadn’t dragged his ass on this whole thing, we would have never gotten to that point. The more Trump does this, the more it’s staying in the news. I know he’s hoping there’s going to be an asteroid hit or Jesus is going to finally come back and say hi or something’s going to happen that’s going to wipe this off the headlines, but I don’t see it.

John Kiriakou: No. I don’t either. And I’ll tell you what, Massie said some other things that made me want to yelp out loud. He said that this discharge petition, he wrote it, but it’s co-sponsored by Ro Khanna. He said that he and Ro Khanna have a lot of respect for each other. They work together on a lot of legislation, and they are of one mind on this issue. Frankly, I was enjoying listening to him. I’ve been to a couple of baseball games with Thomas Massie. He is a lovely man. You don’t have to agree with everything he says. He’s very constitutionalist, but that’s cool. He is such a patriot. He said a couple of things that were fascinating. The lesser one first: he said that there is a kind of phony 501(c)(3) nonprofit that all of a sudden started broadcasting TV commercials against him in his district. It took his staff all of fifteen minutes to trace the registration of this 501(c)(3) back to the White House. Just like that. It’s like, no. You can’t do that. You’re not supposed to do that. But this organization, called something like the Make America Great Again Patriots, has already spent $1,800,000. So he’s in serious trouble. He’s being primaried in Kentucky. I went back on Friday and looked at the polls. There’s not a whole lot of polling in these individual congressional races so far. But his constituents love him, and they want him to stand up like this. The more interesting thing he said was in response to the last question of the panel. The host said, so Congressman Massie, you find yourself at odds with the administration a lot, like, all the time. And he laughed and said, yes. And remember, I was the only Republican who voted against Mike Johnson for Speaker. So everybody’s mad at Massie. He’s the Barbara Lee of the right. Or maybe Rand Paul. But Rand Paul is kind of a phony, though. Massie is a true believer. He’s really doing it. So she says, is there any chance that you might consider running for president under Elon Musk’s new America Party? Maybe you and Ro Khanna could do something together. Unity ticket. He says, never say never. That’s always the right answer. And I was like, oh my god. Any other politician would say, I’m a Republican. I’m a lifelong Republican. I stand with the Republican Party. I’m going to work to change the Republican Party from within. That’s not what he said. He said, never say never. My mouth dropped open. It’s an honest answer.

Ted Rall: Deanna Montoya is asking, so neither of us, we’ve said this already, think that it’s likely that Trump could have sexually assaulted a young girl. Let me tell you why I don’t think that’s true. Thousands of pages of biographies of Donald Trump. I wrote a biography of Donald Trump. I don’t recommend that you buy it. It’s really not one of my best books. I have better books if you want to buy one of my books. But I learned a lot about him. He’s led such a public life that it’s really hard to believe that if he had these predilections or if he was really particularly interested in unusual sex, we wouldn’t have heard about it by now. It just doesn’t seem likely. Think about Matt Gaetz; he was only a congressman, and everything came out. Larry Craig, Mr. Wide Stance at the St. Paul Airport, just a senator from Idaho, and we found out everything. So with Donald Trump, who’s the most public person in the United States and has been for decades, I think we would just know. We know he likes to sleep with porn stars now and then and other random women besides his wife, or sometimes the random woman becomes his wife. But that’s not really unusual for dudes in general and for dudes at that level. They have their wives and families and love them, and they also have sex on the side sometimes, but they do it with adults. That’s my take. I’m not saying I have a crystal ball here. If I did, I’d be buying more stocks.

John Kiriakou: I agree with you. I think if he had done something like that, it would have come out by now, even just as a rumor. We also have the statement from Stormy Daniels that he was 100% vanilla, that there was nothing special or out of the ordinary. He was the missionary man, totally ordinary. And he made that comment when he was still friendly with Epstein. He said, Jeff’s a good guy. He’s a fun guy. He loves women just like I do. He loves them young, but he loves women. I think there was a lot behind that statement.

Ted Rall: Here’s the thing too. We do live in a world where perhaps it would be nice if you knew about sexual assault and pedophilia, you might step up and try to stop it or even report it to the authorities, but I suppose that’s too much to hope for in this case.

John Kiriakou: So now we have this speculation game. I’m not going to throw out names here, but we’re all going to be wondering, who is Trump covering for? Is it one person? Are there multiple? There has to be. Because otherwise, this doesn’t make any sense. If he had nothing to hide, he would have ordered the release of the information. He campaigned on ordering the release of the information. He released most of the JFK documents. He released the MLK documents. He’s in the process of releasing the RFK documents. But then all of a sudden, like magic, there are no Epstein documents. There were no files until there were files, and then there’s no files again. I love Speaker Johnson’s comment that only the best files, the proper files, the reliable files should be released.

Ted Rall: And who’s going to get to decide that? Is it going to be you, John, or is it going to be me, Ted? I don’t think so. It’s going to be them, and the truth will out. This is going to come out. Sometimes it takes years, decades even, but the truth always comes out. Always.

John Kiriakou: I remember six weeks before my release from prison, I called my wife. I was allowed to call her every other day for fifteen minutes. So I said, how was your day? She said it was great. And I said, really? It was great? Why was it so great? And she said, because the Senate torture report came out today, and it proved that everything you said was true. So I had to wait from 2007 to December 2014, but my truth came out. This Epstein truth is going to come out, especially when you have people on the inside of the system who hate that it hasn’t come out yet. Bongino’s furious to the point where he’s talking about quitting. Kash Patel is in a real situation right now where his reputation’s on the line, and Donald Trump’s only going to be president for three and a half more years. And then what does Patel do? You have to be on the side of righteousness here. Otherwise, you’re going to ruin yourself.

Ted Rall: Shall we switch over to Gaza? Things in Gaza. It’s hard to know where to start. I could start with Bret Stephens’ rancid column in today’s New York Times, where, again, he’s turning cartwheels to redefine what’s going on there as a non-genocide. In a way, it doesn’t really matter what it’s called, but it is a genocide. He quotes the UN definition of genocide and carefully analyzes it, ignoring the whole “in whole or in part” part of that phrase. You don’t need to kill every Jew like the Nazis wanted to for it to be genocide. They were trying to get most of them to leave, actually. And they herded them into ghettos. The point is, if you go after a significant part of a population and your purpose is to kill them or just get them to leave, that’s still genocide. Even if you don’t kill anyone, you can still be committing cultural genocide by driving a population out of their homeland. But what blew me away is the starvation reports are escalating now to the point where the doctors, who are exhausted beyond belief treating the endless flow of casualties into what’s left of these hospitals in Gaza, are now themselves succumbing to starvation and are literally fainting and passing out while they’re operating on people. That’s because they don’t have enough food or water. Were you the one telling me yesterday or the day before about these games that the IDF play?

Ted Rall: Yep. Absolutely sick. The doctors report that the IDF, literally, for fun, the snipers will be like, today is shoulder day. Let’s shoot everyone in the shoulder. Today is knee day. Let’s shoot everyone in the knee. And then everybody comes in with the same identical injury—abdominal wound, buttock, head wound, all on the same day. It was on the BBC, reaffirmed in the New York Times. The Israelis are taking the piss. They’re having fun.

John Kiriakou: They are. You’ve read the genocide statutes. I’ve read the genocide statutes. I don’t care what people’s political positions are. This meets all of the legal definitions of genocide. It is a genocide. Period.

Ted Rall: There’s no question. It’s sort of like how people with borderline personality disorder will justify anything they do because you triggered them. If you hadn’t said this or done that or remembered to take out the trash, I wouldn’t have burned the house down. Israel is basically a borderline country. They’re saying, well, look at what happened on October 7. Therefore, everything that follows by definition is not our fault. That’s completely absurd and ridiculous. That’s a mental illness.

The only good news, I suppose, is that belatedly, not just two years late but decades late, the world is starting to see it, and people aren’t afraid of Israel anymore. People are willing to speak up. I don’t know that AIPAC is going to keep its power even with all the money they have.

John Kiriakou: I was disappointed in these recent votes in the House of Representatives over military aid to Israel. A friend of mine in Code Pink posted something on Facebook from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez explaining why she voted against a bill that would’ve allocated $500,000,000 for Iron Dome. It’s okay to allocate money for guns to shoot the Palestinians, but your objection is that the money was going to be spent for the Iron Dome. That’s so typical of the Democratic Party, and both parties, these pro-Israel lefties. The ideology just doesn’t make any sense to me.

Ted Rall: Part of it stems from this ridiculous idea that governments and companies have where they’ll say, the money is in a separate pot. So the Iron Dome defense money is in this pot, and the genocide money is in another pot. That’s just fiction because money is fungible by definition. If you pay my cable bill, it’s easier for me to pay my phone bill. It’s like SS guards at a death camp killing people, and we say, we don’t want to finance that because that’s bad. But we don’t want them to fall off the watchtower, so we’ll pay for a little bumper to shore things up. We don’t want them to get shot by the resistance, so we’ll buy them some body armor. If you provide defense for a belligerent, you are assisting that belligerent. Legally, you become a belligerent. Bruce Fein explained this to me. For example, the government of Belarus allowed Russian troops to invade Ukraine through Belarus. That makes Belarus a belligerent, and so it would be subject to war crimes charges after the war. It won’t be, but that’s just an example.

With the doctors falling down, it’s just going to get worse and worse. Another thing that was funny about that stupid column in the Times today was he said, if they were really committing genocide, it would be hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands. First of all, it is hundreds of thousands. They just haven’t found the bodies, but it’s arithmetic. There were 2,300,000 Palestinians there before October 6, 2023. We’re down to about two million now. 2.3 minus 2 is 300,000.

John Kiriakou: You’re right about the bodies. Most of Gaza has been leveled. It’s rubble. You can see it in the overhead photography. Nobody has any idea how many tens of thousands of bodies are underneath those buildings. Hundreds of thousands of bodies. The bodies aren’t counted by the Gaza Health Ministry unless they’re recovered and identified. So you have to know, like, that’s John Smith, his birth date is such and such, his occupation was whatever. You’ve been to wars, I’ve been to wars. It takes a long time to find out. When a body—I’m speaking to you inside a nine-story building right now. If someone dropped a bomb on this building, there’s probably fifty, sixty people here now. I think it would take weeks even for the NYPD to find everyone.

They just found a body in Pacific Palisades yesterday, in the LA Times. They’re going through these houses that turned to ash. They just got around to this one block, and sure enough, there was a burned body in the ruins yesterday. This was months ago. I guess we’ll just keep an eye on this story, obviously. It’s an ongoing catastrophe.

Ted Rall: So let’s talk about Kilmar Albrego Garcia. I’m glad to see this. His lawyers are aggressive. This is, of course, the guy who, by all accounts, is a green card holder deported to El Salvador. There was a specific court order preventing that from happening, which ICE and the Trump administration either willfully or accidentally ignored, deported him anyway. Then they found out, and they made all sorts of ridiculous maneuvers to try to prevent that. When they did bring him back, they came up with some charges that may or may not be valid to say that he’d been involved in smuggling illegal immigrants and possibly working for MS-13, which, apparently, the truth is that he left El Salvador originally because he was afraid of MS-13. The Salvadoran authorities even said he doesn’t fit the profile, nothing they believe. They don’t believe he’s a member. He doesn’t have the right tattoos. Nothing fits. He’s kind of just a mild-mannered dude who may not have been the best husband. Anyway, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem went on Twitter to call him a monster. Now his lawyers are in court, and they’re asking the judge to issue an order telling the Trump administration to stifle it so that they stop prejudicing Kilmar’s ability to get a fair trial in an American court of law. This is long overdue. I don’t even understand why district attorneys go on the air and give a press conference and say, we just indicted this real son of a bitch for committing horrible crimes. At most, they should just say, we’ve arrested this person. These are the charges. We’ll keep you posted. They editorialize. They queer the jury. They queer the judges. When it’s the cabinet secretary using the power of the US government to say that you’re a monster, how the hell are you supposed to get a fair trial?

John Kiriakou: Even in the Bureau of Prisons, if you are a member of a gang, the last two digits of your prisoner ID number are going to be -47. You see these guys in the Crips, in the Bloods, and MS-13, and they all have -47. I was sitting with one guy one day, and I noticed his badge said -47. I said, how are you a -47? He’s just a typical white guy. He said, they accuse me of being in the mafia. I said, the mafia? You’re not even from a town that has the mafia. And he’s like, I know. And when I complained, they just said, so sue me. But if you have a badge that ends in -47, you can’t go to a minimum-security camp. You’re not allowed to have compassionate release. You can’t do anything. You’re stuck in prison. But they don’t have to actually show anybody any proof that you’re in a gang. Once they say you’re in a gang, that’s it. It’s done. You’re in the gang whether you like it or not. And that’s what Kristi Noem is doing in this case. You just keep repeating the lie over and over, and now all of a sudden, he’s MS-13, whether it’s true or not.

Ted Rall: He’s got great lawyers. The tricky part here is that the Trump administration, as usual, is playing it cute, trying to have everything two or three or four ways at the same time. They want to prosecute him, but they said, well, we won’t prosecute him. We might not prosecute him. In which case, we’ll send him back to El Salvador or maybe South Sudan. Then they’re like, well, but maybe we will prosecute him, but as soon as we convict him, we’ll send him to South Sudan or Libya or El Salvador. Or maybe we won’t prosecute him at all. It reminds me of the shell game guys in Times Square back in the eighties: watch the hand, watch the ball, and you can never watch the ball. When the state declares you an enemy, the amount of chicanery and bullshit they will subject you to is just incomprehensible for someone who hasn’t been through it. It’s not well reported. You find all these things out when you show up, and there you are in the jaws of the state.

There’s no let-up here. These people are relentless. The Kristi Noems of the world and these Justice Department prosecutors, oh my god. They’re just relentless. There’s no getting away. I’m very curious as to how this is going to play out. It’s a fucking embarrassment. I don’t know if they think their base likes this. Do you think their base does like it?

John Kiriakou: I think elements of the base probably do, but the thing is that they’re going to vote for you anyway. They’re going to support you anyway. So why keep pandering to them like this? Either lead or allow them to tell you on what issues they want you to lead. To me, that’s not leadership.

Ted Rall: It’s definitely leadership. It’s just leadership down the shitter. How about Ukraine? America’s favorite democratic leader, who leads the most streamlined democracy in the world that doesn’t have any opposition party and is very not corrupt in any way, shape, or form. We don’t have to have any elections because that just gets in the way of democracy. Anyway, there’s a scandal now in Ukraine, and the bloom is off the rose. I suppose it’s taken a lot longer than I would have expected it to. Zelensky was wildly unpopular before the war, and that was all suppressed, and maybe there was genuine rallying around the flag in Ukraine. You would expect that. But now, the opposition is getting brave. It’s not easy to oppose the state in Ukraine. You may end up under house arrest or worse. It’s a time of war, and they have martial law. They can literally just shoot you at a demonstration if they don’t like you. There have been large mass demonstrations opposing the regime because Zelensky basically put the kibosh on an anti-corruption campaign that was wildly popular and that people were really hoping to see happen. It reminds me a little bit of the kind of stuff that we’ve been seeing with the Epstein files here. It’s just like, yeah, we’re not going to do that.

John Kiriakou: As long as—doesn’t really seem to have a good narrative here. I was asked by a reporter this morning if I thought it was possible that we may be seeing the early stages of a coup, even maybe a CIA-backed coup. I said, if this were a year ago, I would say no. But today, I would say, sure. This could be the start of a CIA coup. It’s not 1963 where the CIA puts a bullet into the back of the head of South Vietnam’s president, but it could be the kind of coup where the US ambassador and the station chief go to see Zelensky and say, alright, it’s time for you to go. Pack your shit, get on the plane, and go to London. Could it be a kidnapping thing like we did to Jean-Bertrand Aristide from Haiti to the Central African Republic? Sure. Just like that. Something’s afoot in Ukraine, and it’s not good if you are a supporter of the Ukrainian government or of US policy. I don’t know what that means.

Ted Rall: You’re the one trained in code, John.

John Kiriakou: I never did well with code. I preferred the disappearing ink. That was much easier for me. Seriously, they do use it. You write a letter in regular ink, and then in between the lines, you write your secret letter in the disappearing ink. You send the letter, they put it into the solution—I forget what it was, maybe hydrogen peroxide. The ink disappears, and the hidden ink comes up. It’s kinda cool. Not at all complicated. It’s like stuff you can see at the Spy Museum in DC. A fun visit.

Ted Rall: Houdini is asking if there’s a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. The pressure is on Zelensky. He’s agreed to get serious, and they’re talking in the next couple of days. The US isn’t invited, but Ukraine and Russia are going to talk.

John Kiriakou: It’s my understanding that Zelensky actually owns real estate because he stole so much money as president of Ukraine. He would likely go to London. J Rock makes a good point here too: I thought the CIA already did his coup. So this is the double coup. They didn’t like the first coup, so they may try a different coup.

Ted Rall: It’s not the first time in CIA history that there was buyer’s remorse on the front of the agency. The coup and the counter-coup. If it doesn’t go well, you just do it again. No big deal.

For people who are wondering what we’re talking about, of course, we’re talking about the 2014 coup. Some people would say it’s not, but it really does fit all the requirements for a coup. Do you think that Russia and Ukraine are able to make any progress? The fighting seems to be—there’s really just not a lot of movement. What movement has been taking place has been to the benefit of Russia, but the facts on the ground haven’t really altered a hell of a lot.

John Kiriakou: This is the prime fighting season. The weather’s good. The spring rains are over, so your tanks don’t get bogged down in mud. This is where the two sides are supposed to be fighting the most so they can dig in in time for winter, and it’s just not happening.

John Kiriakou: Both sides are tired. Both sides are running short on supplies, especially fuel. Who wants this more? The Ukrainians or the Russians? I don’t know.

Ted Rall: I think you and I probably would have agreed that Russia didn’t really want this war. I’ve never seen many belligerents wait eight years to attack. That shows a certain degree of patience unless we have the big procrastinator. But now, if I were Putin, I would feel like I was in a good place to negotiate. Why not say, okay, let’s talk, let’s do this? Russia hasn’t changed their demands at all. I think they’re all achievable, perhaps, except for some random stuff like denazification, which is impossible for the Ukrainians to do and also impossible to define. Demilitarization also has to be a throwaway because that’s ridiculous. But in terms of the territorial concessions, that should not be that hard for Ukraine. I’ve always said to my friends who are pro-Ukrainian, in a way, this war fixed a problem that should never have existed in the first place. These borders were poorly drawn after 1991. If you’re Ukraine, do you want a hostile, restive population of ethnic Russians in Crimea that you basically have to suppress?

John Kiriakou: People in Crimea and in the Donbass are ethnic Russians. They speak Russian at home. Their faith is tied to the Russian Orthodox Church, not the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. They aren’t Catholics in those areas. The Catholics are in the West. So what would Ukraine really be losing? They wouldn’t really be losing anything. And if part of the deal is this fast track to membership in the European Union, what’s the downside? I don’t see the downside. Just sign the deal. Let it go.

Ted Rall: Somebody made a comment about the corruption. There are so many ways to do it. You could have a foreign company serve as a cutout. You could have the money diverted directly into your Swiss bank account. When I served overseas, we saw it nine ways from Sunday. It’s not at all hard.

John Kiriakou: Switzerland’s not as good as it used to be. The Swiss will rat you out now. Now it’s more like the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Guernsey, the Cook Islands. And old-fashioned cash. We know that skids of $100 bills left Afghanistan by plane. If you travel on a diplomatic passport, they don’t search you. You can bring vast amounts of whatever—drugs, money, anything you want in your diplomatic pouch.

I got arrested once with the diplomatic pouch. I was going to Yemen to see some friends of mine in the spring of 1991. I was kind of tired from the war and wanted to go to that vacation spot that is Yemen to decompress for a little while. Friends of mine invited me. I want one of those big pointy hats that the women wear. I collect weird hats.

Those are awesome. I actually bought little ones for my boys. They were young at the time. So I was traveling from Riyadh through Jeddah to Sana, and one of the State Department communications officers asked me if I would take a diplomatic pouch with me. It had some radios in it and some mail. Just mail. So I said, sure, I’ll take the pouch. When I arrived in Yemen, they insisted on X-raying it. I said, no, this is a diplomatic pouch. I’m a diplomat. I have my diplomatic credentials. I had the paperwork with the wax seal on it and all this stuff. And they were like, fuck that. One of them pulled out his jambiya, that curved dagger they carry. He hacked the lead seal off the pouch. I kept saying, I protest. You can’t do this. I’m 26 years old. What am I going to say? I didn’t speak Arabic yet. I had taken six weeks of Arabic familiarization. So they open up the pouch, he reaches in, pulls out this radio, an old-fashioned CB radio, and says, jasus, one of the few Arabic words I understood at the time. It means spy. And then they were on me. So they put me in this cell in the airport, and I was with a Filipino nurse and a couple of Indian guys that had hashish on them. I was in there for about four hours, and finally, the American ambassador came and said, wow, you really threw a wrench into my day. I said, I’m sorry. They should have never opened that pouch. He said, nah, forget it. Let’s just go. So we got in the car, and that was my first experience in a jail cell. It’s always funny when people just don’t follow the rules, and that happens a lot.

Ted Rall: I read the Greek papers this morning, and they were talking a lot about this new wave of refugees. Is that what you’re talking about, Nick?

John Kiriakou: I just figured since you’re Greek, you know all things Greek. Somebody asked me a question today about why Greeks hate the royal family so much. I’d love to answer that question.

Ted Rall: Israeli tourists blocked by locals from disembarking. Spicy. I like it. I’m going to check that out right now. Top story: Greece crowned champion of women’s water polo after victory over Hungary. Greek police have dismissed reports in the Israeli media alleging that a mob carried out a knife attack against a group of Israeli tourists on the island of Rhodes. That’s my ancestral island. Interesting. I’m going to text my cousin and ask him what’s going on there with Israelis.

Question from Adam Feider: When are we going to cover China? There’s a really interesting piece in the Washington Post today about deflation. China’s been in a deflationary environment for eight consecutive quarters, over two years, because of excessive competition. So the authorities are stepping in, and they’re going to start to regulate this so that there are fewer companies in the same sector. I guess the right-wingers would say they’re picking winners in the free markets. Doesn’t seem like a bad idea to me. If you have excessive competition and prices are getting so low that in the aggregate, sectors are wildly profitable, but no individual company can stay afloat, you’ve got a problem.

Ted Rall: Thanks for the suggestion, Adam. We’ll do it soon. I can’t promise it’ll be Friday, but it might be. Pretty crazy. Prince Philip was Greek. Prince Philip was the son of a very minor Greek princess. The Greek royal family, they’re not ethnically Greek. They’re half British and half Danish. That’s why we hated them so much. They were imposed on us by Queen Victoria. Philip was born on the island of Corfu, Kerkyra in Greek, and his mother suffered from severe mental illness. She ended up resigning from her royal duties and became a Greek Orthodox nun and moved to a convent where she spent the rest of her life. Prince Philip left Greece as a child and never returned to Greece ever. It was because he hated Greece and didn’t like the Greeks, and they hated him. There was no love lost between them. He was an asshole.

John Kiriakou: Charles is different. Charles goes to Greece every year or two, and he always goes to Mount Athos, which is called the Holy Mountain. He’s not Greek Orthodox, being the head of the Church of England, but he’s as close to Greek Orthodox as a British royal is going to be. They like Charles. They hated their own royal family, and we threw them out on a rail in 1967, told them never to come back. The first Greek king was King Otto the First. He was Bavarian, German. The guy was king for thirty-two years and never learned to speak Greek.

Ted Rall: That’s how those royals are. There’s a category of dudes whose job is they parachute in to run a cereal company even if they don’t eat cereal. Then they’re off to run a software company. After that, maybe they manage a ball team. These royals are the same way. Poor Marie Antoinette never could have said, let them eat cake, nor would she have because she was actually a kindhearted person. But she never could have said it in court and been quoted because she didn’t speak French. She was Austrian. She only spoke German.

John Kiriakou: We had a king of Greece who was taking a tour of some neighborhood in Thessaloniki, and he was bitten in the leg by a monkey. He pretended it didn’t hurt, and it was no big deal. It got infected, sepsis set in, and he died three weeks later. His brother became king, and his brother didn’t want to be king. He didn’t know what the hell he was doing. He’s like, we should invade Turkey and overthrow Atatürk. He led this army into Turkey, which is now called the catastrophe of 1921.

Ted Rall: Film adventures around that time, like when the Marines invaded post-revolutionary Russia. Disastrous, stupid, forgotten.

John Kiriakou: I don’t know what Houdini is talking about with Pine Gap. I’ll look it up. Pine Gap is a highly secretive jointly operated Australian-US intelligence facility located near Alice Springs. It’s a ground control station for signals intelligence satellites and a key relay station for satellite communications. The base plays a crucial role in global surveillance, particularly for missile launches and battlefield intelligence. We never called it Pine Gap. We always called it Alice Springs. But that was from Grok, and that’s even more than I knew about Pine Gap.

Ted Rall: Personal question for you here. How do you rate the Turkish intelligence?

John Kiriakou: Good in some ways and not good in others. Good in that they are on the Kurds like white on rice. And I don’t mean just their own Kurds. I mean Syria, Iran, Iraq, and all the Kurds. They’re not so good on Greece. Greek intelligence is better against the Turks than Turkish intelligence is against the Greeks. Greek intelligence officers are much more likely to speak Turkish and pass for Turks than Turkish intelligence officers are at speaking Greek. Did I work with them? Yes, I worked with them years ago.

Ted Rall: Not going back to prison. We’ll need two pardons for you.

John Kiriakou: The cruise ship incident on Sidos. I was in Sidos last summer. It’s an amazing place. Protest against Gaza war prevents Israeli visitors from touring Greek island, from the Associated Press this morning. Greek island residents stop Israeli cruise ship from docking. Travel advisory for Greece by Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs as ship is blocked in Sidos. If you’re not a scientist, you have nothing to worry about.

Ted Rall: We would be remiss not to talk about Iran. There’s this really weird situation going on in Iran now where there are arson fires all over the place. My first thought goes to a country that starts with I and ends with L and sounds like Israel. This is a problem in Greece every summer.

John Kiriakou: The Turks come and light fires, and we have these catastrophic forest fires, wildfires. They’ll send operatives into the islands and just light the forest on fire in the middle of the night. You know that the Israelis are watching the same media weather reports that everybody else is watching, that it’s 120 degrees Fahrenheit in Iran, and it’s a tinderbox because it’s so hot and dry. Of course, the Israelis are out there setting wildfires.

Ted Rall: There are no Israeli tourists in Iran, but they have lots of operatives. We know that the Iranians are infested with turncoats who are collecting money from the Israelis. A lot of Afghan refugees have taken Israeli money. Iran deserves some gratitude for the fact that they’ve taken in more refugees than any other country on the planet. They’ve always been very open that way. They allude to it in that movie Three Kings. It’s done without comment, but it’s a very sly, politically accurate thing. I’ve crossed that border from Afghanistan to Iran, and you can tell what a border feels like. Afghans like Iran. The cultural ties go back thousands of years.

So we have these arson fires. It’s psychological warfare. Why doesn’t the Mukhabarat get to the bottom of it and find out what’s going on and stop all this?

John Kiriakou: They are incompetent, underfunded, and focused on domestic political rivals, not counterintelligence. How you can have thousands of people essentially acting as sleeper agents in your country in a time of war is a mystery to me. There was an Israeli announcement yesterday saying that they were able to identify a thousand Israeli citizens passing information to Iran, and most of them were Iranian Jews living in Israel. I think it is ideological in that respect. They’re so upset about what’s going on in Gaza. They catch a lot of discriminatory bullshit on a day-to-day basis from the security forces.

Ted Rall: Are we sufficiently deprogrammed?

John Kiriakou: Do you want to tell our friends here that we’re very slightly changing our name?

Ted Rall: Right now, we had a—I don’t know if you guys have noticed this, but when you go to search for us on YouTube, there’s another thing called The Deprogram that comes up, and it’s in the UK. It’s a different show entirely, and sometimes it’s hard to find us. It’s very frustrating. So I did what we all do in this day and age when we’re trying to solve impenetrable problems. I asked AI what to do. AI said that we should do what we’re doing, which is we have officially changed the name to Deprogram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou. I graciously suggested that John’s name go first, also alphabetical order. But John pointed out that because of the spelling issue, nobody can spell my name. So that’s why my name is first.

Ted Rall: Thank you, Houdini. I would have been happy to have you go first. My pleasure. Please, please, please, please like, follow, and share the show. It really makes a difference to us. We are trying to make some money here. If we get the search terms right, I think it’s going to make a difference, but we count on you guys the most. We’re here again Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 5 PM. We’re going to probably step it up to five days very soon, maybe in a week or two. But right now, it’s Monday, Wednesday, Friday, so we’ll see you Friday at five Eastern in the afternoon. Thank you so much for your support. Really appreciate you, and take care. Bye-bye.

 

DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou: “Iran Is Burning”

LIVE 5:00 pm Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

On the “DeProgram show” with political cartoonist Ted Rall and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, we’re dissecting urgent global crises with unflinching clarity. We confront the escalating starvation crisis in Gaza, where over 100 aid groups, including Save the Children, blame Israel’s blockade for mass hunger. Gaza’s health ministry reporting 43 deaths from malnutrition in just days. We probe the horrific state of Gaza’s doctors, who are too malnourished to remain standing, much less treat patients effectively. The Guardian reports medical staff fainting from hunger, with 21 children dying in three days due to starvation, as hospitals buckle under the crisis.

In the U.S., we examine the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, where lawyers demand the Trump administration and Kristi Noem cease inflammatory rhetoric labeling him a “monster,” raising free speech concerns after a judge barred his ICE detention.

In Ukraine, we analyze President Zelensky’s response to domestic protests over entrenched corruption, as public unrest grows amid wartime struggles, with Zelensky proposing renewed talks with Russia to end the conflict.

We also tackle congressional calls for more Jeffrey Epstein files, amid Trump’s past ties to the financier, fueling debates over transparency and accountability as Congress goes home early to dodge the heat.

Finally, Iran. Why are fires breaking out all over?

TMI Show Ep 186: “Are Lower Prices Bad?”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Streaming Anytime:

China’s cutthroat business world is making prices cheaper for consumers. But deflation could cause a depression. That’s the economic paradox we’re talking about on the “TMI Show with Ted Rall and Manila Chan”!

China’s “involution” crisis: fierce competition and overcapacity are strangling industries. A hot new technology or product sparks a frenzy of copycats, with hundreds of Chinese manufacturers then flooding the market. They slash prices, ramp up production, and battle for survival, often with razor-thin margins or outright losses. Local governments fuel the chaos, backing hometown champs with cash and clout, pushing industries like steel, solar, and electric vehicles into a brutal race to the bottom.

Take BYD, China’s EV giant, which slashed prices on nearly two dozen models in May, only to get a slap on the wrist from a government-linked auto group for sparking “price wars.” Xi Jinping is on the case, vowing to curb this “disorderly competition” and outdated capacity. With Trump’s tariffs slamming exports and a slowing economy piling on unsold goods, China’s facing a deflationary spiral—its GDP deflator has tanked for eight straight quarters.

The People’s Daily warns that price wars could drive out quality players. Can China tame this self-defeating cycle, or is it too late? Could something like that happen here?

Plus: “Black Sabbath” member Ozzy Osbourne’s legacy celebrated after his passing at 76.

House Speaker Mike Johnson sends Congress home early to duck releasing the Epstein files.

Cannabis and psychedelics show promise for eating disorders.

Somerville’s cat mayor race heats up.

Keywords:

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php