Cartoon for January 26
There’s always been a desire to vote for the most likely winner, but the 2008 presidential race has accelerated this inane trend, thanks in no small part to media coverage that validates determining an early winner (maybe it’s cheaper to cover one candidate than six?). The New York Times, endorsing Hillary Clinton in the New York primary, openly stated in its editorial that it did not consider endorsing John Edwards because he was a “long shot.” (Never mind that he might not be a long shot if the Times endorsed him, or the paper’s conscious–and unconscionable–role in reducing his chances.)
Funny, I was under the impression that we were supposed to vote for the best candidate, and let the election returns fall where they may.
Click on the cartoon to make it bigger.













