The only reason liberals can bring themselves to vote for Hillary Clinton is that she’s a woman. Never mind that she voted to invade Iraq! So, what if she became a man? Would they support her then?
Mr. Hillary
Ted Rall
Ted Rall is a syndicated political cartoonist for Andrews McMeel Syndication, WhoWhatWhy.org and Counterpoint. He is a frequent contributor to The Wall Street Journal, a graphic novelist and author of many books of art and prose, and an occasional war correspondent. He is, recently, the author of the graphic novel "The Stringer."
4 Comments. Leave new
The person of the pitchman has no relevance to the political putrification they sell.
I still don’t think Hillary will run, but if she does her cheerleading for GMO’s turned me off. God, I hope Warren or Sanders runs (maybe as a team?) !!!!
> The only reason liberals can bring themselves to vote for …
It’s been a long time since I actually voted FOR someone. Usually I find myself voting against someone in particular or against Republicans in general. I did vote for O’Bummer the first time. I’d wised up by 2008, not that it did any good.
That said, one good reason to vote for Hillary would be all the heart attacks it’d cause if she was elected. Anything that gets the disloyal opposition frothing can’t be all bad.
Those «liberals» will no doubt vote for her due to the bravery she exhibited dodging (non-extant) bullets at the aeroport in Tusla. Besides, she’s promised/threatened (perception like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder) to «obliterate» Iran. What more could one ask of a US president ?…
Henri