Stranger Reaction

Sandy from Utah writes:

My nephew Tom in Kansas sent me your article. Thanks for putting into words what many of us are feeling. I was with Quakers that held signs of peace and pleads for not invading Iraq. The fact that everything has been mismanaged and costly in terms of money and mostly lives continues to sicken me. However, you missed an important point: This is slowly becoming a Bush war with an invitation for a “Holy War”. I live where Evangelicals are plentiful and their mantra remains joyful. Yes, these new age “Christians” are pleased that Muslim are dropping along with our Amreican hero/ soldiers…go figure? I fear that REAL trouble hasn’t even shown its ugly face. Thanks for your well written article….please keep it up.

Reading the above makes me shudder in fear that many Americans are clinically insane. Could it be true? Does anyone really want a holy war between the Christianists and Islam? What good could possible come out of it? Still, it’s obviously a phenomenon that we need to keep track of.

A Libbie Quandry

Dave writes:

On one hand, you have upholding the protection of First Amendment rights for the press and the protection of confidential sources for journalists. On the other hand, you really, really want to know who was involved in leaking the identity of Valerie Plame, with the fervent hope that it shows a direct path back to Karl Rove and the Oval Office…
What’s a liberal to do?
Personally, I think this is why douchebag of liberty, Bob Novak isn’t being bothered in all this. No liberal would really give a rats ass about protecting his rights. (Proper credit to Jon Stewart and the Daily Show for providing the greatest nickname in all of political punditry)

Ah, so true. The other quandry: standing up for the New York Times’ Judith Miller’s right to protect confidential sources while ignoring the fact that she played as important a role in getting us into Iraq as Karl Rove.

The Stranger

The Stranger, the alternative weekly newspaper in Seattle, has asked me to write a piece reacting to being proven right about the war in Iraq.

Yes.

Bill notes:

I watch and listen to the right-wing corporate media outlets just to get a feel for what kind of propaganda or distraction they are trying to present. The latest has got to be that girl from Alabama who disappeared in Jamaica. I feel bad for the girl and her family but how the fuck is this national headline news? I noticed that Fox seemed to be the first to lead with this story and the rest of the corporate media just seemed to follow suit. Nothing like a missing blonde haired girl to distract people from being outraged about a failing war that’s losing support.

You’re right about Fox. Even cynical moi was amazed to see O’Reilly spend the better part of 20 minutes on the Aruba story on the same day that Republican Congressmen were calling for the Gitmo concentration camp to be shut down. Paranthetical: Closing Gitmo would merely lead to more outsourcing of torture. Closing BUSH down is the best way to start restoring some semblance of decency to US foreign policy… State-controlled media has traveled so far down the path of total obeisance that it’s now forced to ignore the day’s top story in favor of manufactured tripe.

New Books

I’m currently working on a new book about Central Asia called “Silk Road to Ruin.” That’s due out in January. Due out around the same time will be “Attitude 3: The Subversive New Media Cartoonists,” with an emphasis on artists whose work appears online. And those of you who have been clamoring for a straightforward collection of my cartoons, the sequel to 2001’s “Search and Destroy” comes out next year. Title is: “America Gone Wild.”

Beyond that, anything is possible. I’m talking with one publisher about doing a graphic novel adaptation of a European play (gotta be coy here, sorry). I’m also due to start a project I’ve been researching for years, an all-prose novel. And there’s also a possibility of doing a foreign policy follow-up to “Wake Up, You’re Liberal!”, which focused on domestic issues. Of course, I’m always open to requests, should you have one.

Merchandise Update

Much-beloved Agitproperties.com, home to El Busho T-shirts and posters, has sadly gone under. I’m considering putting up some TR merch (T-shirts, mugs, etc.) at another site–well, first I’d have to find such a site–but before I spend a lot of time on this I’m wondering whether enough people would be interested to make such an endeavor worthwhile. So…if you’d buy a Ted Rall T-shirt or somesuch item, please email chet@rall.com…but only if you’d really, actually buy one. I do not want to hear from you if you’d consider buying one, or think seriously about buying one.

Ronald Reagan, Still Undead

Jim writes the following:

Dear Ted,
While channel surfing last night, I caught the Dicovery Channel’s show on “The Greatest American”. They polled Americans (on AOL.COM) and declared that Reagan was the greatest American ever. It made me sick and slightly disorientated to think that people would vote that way. Agh !
If you have not seen it, Here is the link to AOL’s site:
http://tv.channel.aol.com/greatestamerican
Best regards, and please keep it up !
PS: It is great to see your cartoons in the [name of publication deleted to stymie neofascists]

Lord knows that any praise for Reagan is praise too much but I wouldn’t assume that these results reflect the general viewpoint of the American public. These results reek of the sort of fake write-in campaigns conducted by right-wing bloggers (vote early, vote often, vote online) to make it seem like their icons and idols are much beloved by the public. Would Clinton beat Reagan in such a (legit) poll? Probably not. But George Washington probably would.

I Don’t Normally Do This, But…

People send me lots of suggestions of stuff to post to the blog, but most of them are redundant to stuff I’ve seen elsewhere or just plain suck. This reaction to Piehole’s speech last night (“Mission Accomplished II”), however, rates an exception:

I imagine you may receive a bit of mail looking for you post or link to stuff. But please consider doing either with this short essay I wrote, which you can find on leftbankblog.blogspot.com.
Thanks a lot,
Joe Farbeann

A Tale of Two Americans
June 28, 2005-
One American strode boldly into the Ft. Bragg military base in North Carolina to deliver a speech about a war on an abstract concept.
A second American was nearby in a similar setting, a navy brig in South Carolina.
The first American surrounded himself with U.S. troops, cynically using them as political props so that he could justify keeping them at risk in a dangerous occupation in a hostile land in order for the first American’s friends and campaign contributors to make a fortune off the occupation.
The second American was surrounded by the U.S. troops that have been brutally interrogating him for over 3 years, denying him his 5th Amendment rights and Geneva Convention rights. His interrogators are subverting the rule of law and trashing human rights and the American way because he is thought to be an “enemy” in the war against the abstract concept, and the government lacks the evidence to formally try him.
The first American put the second American where he is. The first American is responsible for authorizing the kidnapping of the second American, who, despite numerous court rulings ordering him to be set free, remains in confinement. The first American is the real criminal while the second American must still be considered innocent according to what at least used to be American law.
The saga of George W. Bush and Jose Padilla continues. While one still needs to be held accountable for systematic torture and illegal war, the other has already been held accountable despite not being convicted, let alone charged with a crime.
For those who still believe in constitutional and human rights, this is a most critical juncture.

Finally, You Admit We Were Right: An Iraq Victory Dance

When voters went to the polls on November 7, 1972, they possessed more than enough information to pick the right president. Republican incumbent Richard Nixon had reneged on his 1968-winning promise to withdraw from Vietnam, instead expanding the war into Cambodia and Laos and unleashing upon North Vietnam the most ferocious bombing campaign in the history of warfare. Debt from the war had triggered runaway inflation, requiring wage and price controls to stave off economic meltdown. In June Nixon’s burglars had gotten caught inside the Watergate offices of the Democratic National Committee. Everyone knew the guy was a paranoid, corrupt, lying warmonger. His supporters simply didn’t care.

Faced with this simplest of decisions, the American people screwed up—and badly so. Sixty-one percent of the electorate voted for Nixon over George McGovern, one of the most fundamentally decent candidates to have ever run for the White House and the first to propose a national healthcare plan. McGovern scored a pathetic 38 percent of the vote, the worst rout in history.

In January 1973, two months after he carried 49 states, the Gallup poll found the triumphant president’s job approval rating at 68 percent. By the time Nixon resigned in August 1974, however, only 25 percent still backed his performance. Watergate had gotten uglier; Vietnam had dragged on a little too long. Had there been a Nixon-McGovern rematch in 1974, the senator from South Dakota would have prevailed.

Reminiscing about Watergate in 1997, journalist Haynes Johnson reflected the mainstream rah-rah view to PBS’ Jim Lehrer: “The system worked. The press did its job. It didn’t solve the case or anything like that. The judges did their jobs. The grand jury did its jobs. The committee, Congress headed by people like Howard Baker and Sam Ervin did their jobs, and the public did its job…we all remember that it did work in every element.”

Actually, neither the press nor the public did its job when it mattered—on Election Day 1972, by voting for McGovern. During the two years it took for 43 percent of the public to turn against Tricky Dick, thousands of American and tens of thousands of Vietnamese soldiers were killed or wounded in a futile, losing war. Vietnam-related debts continued to accrue, deepening the 1974 OPEC gas crisis into a recession from which it took over a decade to fully recover.

History gives that waffling 43 percent credit for changing their minds, but these morons merit only contempt. Nothing changed between 1972 and 1974. No new information became available. They didn’t see the light until the sun had begun to set.

George W. Bush’s war against Iraq is the subject of a similar dollar-short/hour-late opinion shift. Only 39 percent of respondents to a June 20 CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll—down from 71 percent in 2003—say they still favor the war. Bush’s personal popularity has also plunged, from 91 percent just after 9/11 to 57 percent after his January 2005 inauguration to 47 percent. Were the 2004 election held tomorrow, John Kerry would handily defeat Bush.

Most Americans, in other words, have finally come around to my way of thinking. They see the war as a waste of blood and money and the war on terrorism, Bush’s signature issue, as fiction. (Only 23 percent of Americans tell CNN that they trust Bush to protect them from future attacks.) Lefties, one would suppose, ought to be crowing. After four long years of being insulted as “un-American,” “useful idiots,” “terrorist apologists” and “traitors” by racist scum too dumb to understand that you don’t bomb Osama in Afghanistan when he was in Pakistan all along and that you don’t make friends by putting bags over people’s heads, we’ve been proven absolutely right: No WMDs. No rose-petal-paved streets. No turned corners. Not even cheaper gas: Oil, now $50 a barrel, was just $22 in January 2002.

Everything turned out exactly as we predicted. A rump Iraq, minus Kurdistan, is being ripped apart by a religious civil war. Iraqi women, once citizens of the Arab world’s most secular and gender-equal nation, have been forced under the hijab. The museums were looted by local criminals; the oil fields were looted by Halliburton. Chaos has replaced autocracy as U.S. forces murder Iraqis faster than Saddam could ever have dreamed. We’re vindicated. Everyone knows we were right. Hurrah for us.

Our national change of heart prompts the question: why did you fuckers change your minds?

Surely it’s not the staggering mass murder of more than 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians. That shouldn’t have come as a surprise to anyone. Anyway, that’s what happens when the world’s best-equipped military bombs a nation incapable of fielding a single jet to defend itself.

It can’t be the incessant death toll among American forces. We’re losing two to three guys a day, not a huge increase over the one to two we were sacrificing to the search for non-existent WMDs a year ago. Besides, CIA reports leaked before the start of the war predicted the insurgency. You knew this would happen. Remember?

Or maybe you were a member of the Chris Hitchens Muslim liberation brigade. Pro-war liberals said we needed to atone for installing Saddam’s dictatorial ass—fortunately for the budget deficit they didn’t suggest pursuing the same policy everywhere the U.S. had backed a despot. Democracy might spread throughout the Middle East. And, the argument continued, Saddam was so evil that any successor regime would inevitably be an improvement. But Afghanistan, where the U.S. occupation had brought about a brand of wholesale anarchy that Afghans considered even worse than the Taliban, had already debunked this line of thinking. Entropy can always make a bad situation worse.

Afghanistan had also provided a case study of how the Bush Administration runs its wars—on the cheap, relying on unpopular and easily corruptible puppet politicians, wallowing in sleazy deals with oil companies and White House-connected contracting firms while construction projects to help ordinary people went unfunded. Bombs started raining on Baghdad a year and a half after they fell on Kabul. The United States didn’t build a single house or pave an inch of road anywhere in Afghanistan during that period. We were torturing at Bagram before Abu Ghraib. You can’t lose a war you hardly tried to fight. No one should be surprised or confused that the same idiots conducted their wars against Afghanistan and Iraq the same way.

Only a sociopath could rejoice in being proven right about the pointless carnage and mayhem in Iraq. I was correct, yes, but why didn’t people listen when I played Cassandra on Sean Hannity? Hundreds of thousands of us marched through America’s cities to warn of the perils of preemptive war. Why did you ignore us? How could you have voted, well over a year after he declared “Mission Accomplished,” for a Bush without a single WMD to show for the thousands he killed? You didn’t trust me then, but please believe me now when I say: we would have loved to have been proven wrong. The sight of Iraqis rejoicing in the streets of Baghdad (as opposed to the phony Saddam statue photo op staged by 150 guys working for the army’s psychological warfare division) would have been glorious to behold. There is no joy in dancing on fresh graves dug by U.S.-funded munitions.

If the 24 percent of the public who changed their minds about Iraq and Bush had learned from their folly, there might be cause for quiet celebration. But there’s no reason to believe that. Consider, for example, a June 22 Rasmussen Reports poll about the concentration camp at Guantánamo Bay. Years after reports of torture, mass suicides and murder at Bush’s Cuban gulag first emerged, a full 70 percent of the American public continue to believe that detainees are being treated “about right” or “better than they deserve.”

As they have on Iraq, a significant portion of these torture apologists might come around to understanding the truth about the way America mistreats its Muslim POWs. But the damage—to the inmates, to our international reputation, to our souls—will already have been done. You may well have changed your minds, but you’ll still be scum.

© 2005 Ted Rall, All Rights Reserved.

A Stitch in TIME

I know, I know. I promise that the is back, then I fail to update it for weeks. Weeks! This may not make me a liar on par with, say, a certain American dictator, but it’s still a broken promise. And for that, I’m sorry.

I don’t have an excuse but I can offer an explanation. Which is, quite simply, that I’ve been busy. I’m working on my new book, due out January 2006, with the working title “Silk Road to Ruin.” Using a similar mixed cartoon/text format as “To Afghanistan and Back,” this book will be a lot longer, as will be the essays and cartoons included therein. “Silk Road” will include seven graphic novellas, each covering a trip that I took to Central Asia. There’ll be long analysis pieces about the region, why it matters to you, why it’s interesting, why it’s essentially the new Middle East as far as we’re concerned.

I’ve got 48 of the total approximate 280 page count done and, though this doesn’t sound like much, any author will tell you that getting started is the hardest part. So I’m psyched. Visitors to the NBM Publishing table at the Book Expo America in New York last week picked up the limited edition sneak 48-page preview; a few copies will undoubtedly show up on eBay if you’re interested. (Sorry, I can’t sell you one. I’ve only got one.) But we’ll post a few teaser pages at www.nbmpub.com at some point.

I’m also starting the interview process for “Attitude 3: The Subversive New Media Cartoonists.” This time the focus is primarily on cartoonists whose strips appear exclusively online. Besides interviewing each cartoonist as I did for A1 and A2, I’m compiling more than 500 cartoons into a format that master Attitude designer J.P. Trostle can work with. So that’s work too.

Coupled with all that, this is what we in the toon trade call convention season. I’m writing this from 33,000 feet over Nebraska, en route to my third favorite reason for living (my first, cheesy but true, is my family and friends. my second? I’m sticking around for Bush’s show trial), the editorial cartoonists convention. 200 cartoonists from all over the country, and a few from overseas, converge on an unsuspecting hotel to drink, debate politics and talk shit about editors. There’s another convention next week, much less interesting but no less important.

My plans sometimes change, but it looks like the remainder of 2005 will be spent finishing the books along with a final trip to Central Asia–most likely Tajikistan and, to see what things look like four years after the U.S. invasion, Afghanistan. Republicans, start your death-prayer engines!

But enough of that.

I realized while perusing the last two issues of TIME magazine that this micro look at the media is an excellent primer at what’s wrong with journalism in the United States. I’ll run through a few examples of what I mean:

I won’t even get into coverage priorities. The June 13 issue features a cover story on the housing bubble (now there’s some exciting news you can’t find anywhere else!) and a puff piece about “Iranian twentysomethings” (They drink! They use illegal drugs! They have sex!) during a week in which Amnesty International condemned the United States as not only a horrific serial torture state on par with China, but also its most influential. “Why We Suck” or “Support Our Goons” seems like a more appropriate cover to me, but hey, that’s why I don’t get the big TIME dough.

(Disclosure: I drew editorial cartoons for TIME between 1998 and 9/11, the Day America Stopped Laughing. Editors–seriously!–told me that “humor is dead as an art form” and promptly scrapped their entire slate of cartoonists, including Jim Siergey (“Cultural Jet Lag”), Mike Luckovich of the Atlanta Constitution and Don Asmussen of the San Francisco Chronicle. Reprints of syndicated material have recently made a reappearance in the newsweekly but the mag has a long way to go before reaching the heights of the pre-9/11 era. Also: where’s Joel Klein? But anyway…)

In the June 13 issue’s “Verbatim” section of notable quotes from the week, one entry reads: “Mishandling of a Koran here is never condoned.” It is attributed to “Brigadier General Jay Hood, commander of the Guantánamo prison and head of an inquiry that turned up five cases of mishandling of the Islamic holy book by U.S. personnel, including one in which a guard’s urine was accidentally splashed on a copy.”

A casual reader might be forgiven for taking Gen. Hood at his, um, word–especially considering the 100 percent pure bullshit that follows his assertion. First, his inquiry didn’t “turn up” five cases. FBI debriefings of released (innocent) detainees mention dozens of instances of alleged Koran abuses (abuses, not “mishandling,” which implies carelessness rather than the malice that is alleged). Hood focused on nine of these, agreeing that five had occurred. Extrapolation naturally yields one to the conclusion that 55 percent of such cases are legit.

And how exactly does a “guard’s urine…accidentally” splash a Koran? According to other published sources, the guard pissed through a vent in a Gitmo cell holding a prisoner. The Koran got splashed then, as did the prisoner–who has never been charged or allowed to see a lawyer. The soldier might have not have had pissing on the Koran in mind when he peed through that hole into the tiny cell, but calling such behavior “accidental” is astonishing–not nearly as much, however, as the fact that the media seems to be OK with pissing on the detainees themselves. Just make sure the piss stays on the POW.

Always insipid TIME columnist Joe Klein (not to be confused with the brilliant humorist Joel) actually has the nerve to argue a two-page rant calling for increased globalization with this gem: “…and a preemptory withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq might leave civil war and a safe haven for al-Qaeda operatives.”

Ahem. As opposed to now? Wake up, Joe: all those Sunnis blowing and shooting Shiites and vice versa? Kurds killing Sunnis and vice versa? Hundreds of them a day? That is a fucking civil war, Joe. As for Al Qaeda, Iraq never became their stomping grounds until after we went and removed Saddam like big stupid douches. Now that the joint is hopping with Islamists, we’re obviously having the opposite effect: Muslim fighters are going to Iraq in order to fight American members of the low-rent occupation army. There may be a good argument to be made against getting out now, yesterday, two years ago, but we haven’t heard one yet.

Here’s a personal one:

Andrew Arnold, TIME’s comics critic, calls war travelogue cartoonist Joe Sacco “virtually a one-man subgenre of reportorial comic-making. Ahem. Did Arnold forget “To Afghanistan and Back”? He reviewed it, liked it. But whatever.

Back on May 30, TIME’s “Blogwatch” discussed bloggers’ reaction to the politics, or lack thereof, of the new Star Wars flick. They quote three blogs: “Blogs for Bush,” “Centerfield” and “Instapundit”–the first and last being so far to the right that they’d be aligned with banned fascist parties were they in Europe. Two out of three–for that kind of fairness and balance we can tune to you-know-what–without wasting money on a magazine.

Again, the execrable Joe Klein farts out a diamond about Iran: “Before we talk, give up your nukes.” No one, not even a Bush shill, has asserted that Iran has nukes. If we end up going to war with Iran down the road, this sort of faux factoid will be partly responsible for planting the mistaken impression among Americas that the war is justified: Klein is every bit as much of a liar as Bush.

Same issue: In an article about the Newsweek Koran desecration story and controversy, the magazine writes: “Defense Department spokesman Lawrece Di Rita called Newsweek on May 13 to say the story was wrong. Four days later, he told reporters there were no credible allegations of Koran abuse to look into.”

This wasn’t true, obviously. The Pentagon admits it found at least five confirmed incidents of Koran desecration at Gimto. But TIME still hasn’t retracted this lie.

It’s probably unfair to single out TIME for sins committed by its rivals and daily newspapers every day. I just happened to have those two issues handy. But I hope my point is made.

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php