50 Years After the Fall of Saigon, Let’s Accept Defeat

My mom had an uncanny ability to size up current events and accurately predict their long-term effects. 50 years ago, I sat in my mom’s colonial dining room and watched the fall of Saigon on her black-and-white TV with two folds of aluminum foil dangling from the rabbit ears. America was not riding high. A year earlier, gas rationing went into effect and a president reelected in a record landslide resigned in disgrace.

As desperate Americans and South Vietnamese scrambled to evacuate, embassy staffers burned millions of dollars in cash to prevent it from falling into the hands of the victorious North Vietnamese. As landing decks on aircraft carriers in the South China Sea became overcrowded, UH-1 “Huey” helicopters, each worth at least $1 million in today’s dollars, were pushed into the ocean to make room for incoming aircraft. The estimated value of the military and other equipment left behind by retreating U.S. forces ranges between $1 billion and $4 billion, plus an additional $1 billion to $2 billion in corporate assets.

“The United States will never recover from this,” my mom said. “They’ll never learn anything from it, because they’ll never understand why it happened.”

Half a century later, she was clearly right. We lost but we didn’t learn.

The big lesson of the Vietnam catastrophe, one we haven’t begun to internalize, is that self-determination is a universal value. No one wants to be told what to do, much less exploited, by foreigners. There’s a corollary to that lesson: superior military and economic power cannot overcome the universal human desire to independently pursue one’s destiny.

“The enemy will win many battles, but in the end, we will win the war,” General Vo Nguyen Giap, commander-in-chief for North Vietnam, told a French interviewer in 1964. That’s what happened in 1975. And in 2011 in Iraq. And in 2021 in Afghanistan, where the $7 billion in abandoned war materiel and the falling bodies of our Afghan employees raining over Kabul created a perfect echo of the collapse of South Vietnam. Sooner rather than later, the same fate will befall Israel in Gaza.

Movies are a window into America’s political soul. American films about its invasion and occupation of South Vietnam depict a barely revised version of Kipling’s patriarchal “White Man’s Burden” with heavy dollops of confusion and self-pity. While “The Deer Hunter” (1978), “Apocalypse Now” (1979), “Platoon” (1986) and “Full Metal Jacket” (1987) all depict the brutalization of Vietnamese civilians by American troops, the primary effect of those narratives is to portray naïve young men corrupted by forces beyond their control and forced to cope with their physical wounds and psychological guilt in the aftermath. The Vietnamese play bit parts or none whatsoever, relegated to background scenery as their U.S. oppressors blow them to bits and struggle with PTSD—failing to make the ethnically correct decision to refuse to kill.

Americans weren’t victims in Vietnam. We were the bad guys. We lost 58,000 soldiers, who were sent to the other side of the earth to prop up a corrupt, unpopular regime against an enemy that posed no threat to us. Our troops killed 2 million Vietnamese. The Vietnam Veterans Memorial wall in Washington is slightly less than 500 feet long. An analogous structure dedicated to the Vietnamese would be more than three miles long.

We have never admitted that we had no business being there. “Rambo: First Blood Part II” (1985) marked the beginning of something even worse than mawkish self-pity, a string of right-wing negationist releases that attempted to retroactively justify the war as a noble patriotic cause—don’t feel guilty, be proud of your service to your country—followed by “Hamburger Hill” (1987), “We Were Soldiers” (2002) and similar imperialist whitewashing of the Iraq War in works like “Jarhead” (2005), “The Hurt Locker” (2008), and “American Sniper” (2014).

The second big lesson of Vietnam for a United States that continues to pursue international monetary, economic, political and military hegemony is that it’s cheaper to rent than to own. The United States currently has a $150 billion a year bilateral trade relationship with Vietnam and hundreds of thousands of Americans visit Vietnam every year as tourists. Business is good. There was no need to control their political system.

Finally, war is expensive. Eight million Vietnam war veterans require care for PTSD, exposure to Agent Orange and various psychological and physical injuries. Resources diverted to the Vietnam War contributed to the hollowing out of Rust Belt cities, declining schools and insufficient spending on infrastructure—problems we’re still dealing with, with no end in sight. The war cost approximately $1 trillion in 2025 dollars.

A crisis can be an opportunity. So can a defeat.
At the end of World War II, Indonesian nationalists waged a brutal war of independence against their colonial oppressors, the Netherlands. Forced to withdraw in 1949, the Dutch turned to their domestic needs. They prioritized postwar reconstruction and expanded the welfare state, funding affordable housing, pensions, and healthcare. Losing Indonesia was great for Holland. France performed a similar pivot after losing its war in Algeria in 1962; it decolonized most of its African possessions and invested in massive public works like high-speed rail. Belgium did the same thing after losing the Congo War in 1965, as did Portugal after 1974, when it lost to the liberation movements of Angola, Mozambique and Guinea-Bissau.

Fifty years after the fall of Saigon, we should learn from our fellow former colonial powers. Stop starting wars we’re bound to lose. Invest in ourselves.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “What’s Left: Radical Solutions for Radical Problems,” which will be published May 1st. He co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis and The TMI Show with political analyst Manila Chan. Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com.

TMI Show Ep 127: “Kashmir on the Brink: Will Nuclear Rivals Clash Again?”

LIVE 10 am Eastern, Streaming After:

The TMI Show with Ted Rall and Manila Chan confronts the spiraling Kashmir crisis, where a horrific attack has pushed India and Pakistan to the brink of war. Joined by VK Samhith, a visionary Indian game developer and astute cultural commentator who founded BornMonkie Studios, the hosts deliver a blistering analysis of whether the April 22, Pahalgam attack—killing 26 tourists—could ignite a fourth war between these nuclear-armed rivals. Ted Rall, who’s traveled to the region and chronicled its fraught history, offers unparalleled insight, while Manila Chan’s razor-sharp questions cut through the chaos.

The attack, claimed by The Resistance Front but denied by Pakistan, has triggered India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, border closures, and a crackdown arresting over 500 in Kashmir. Pakistan retaliated by closing airspace to Indian flights and suspending trade, while both sides have exchanged gunfire along the Line of Control for days, raising fears of escalation. The UN and US urge restraint, but India’s vow to hunt the perpetrators “to the ends of the earth” looms large. Could this be the spark for a nuclear nightmare? TMI fearlessly dissects the stakes, blending hard-hitting facts with the raw, unfiltered edge that defines the show. This isn’t just news—it’s a pulse-pounding dive into war, power, and survival in a global flashpoint. Tune in for expert perspectives and a conversation that dares to challenge the mainstream narrative. Catch this urgent episode now on your favorite platform and join the dialogue that matters.

DeProgram: “Trump, Zelensky, and Deported Dreams: Unmasking Power Plays”

LIVE 1:30 PM Eastern Time/10:30 AM Pacific time + Streaming When You Feel It:

In this fast-moving episode of DeProgram, hosts John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer turned whistleblower who exposed the agency’s torture program, and Ted Rall, an award-winning political cartoonist and columnist renowned for his biting anti-establishment commentary, deliver a hard-hitting analysis of today’s most pressing issues.

The episode kicks off with an in-depth look at the high-stakes Rome meeting between Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unpacking its ramifications for U.S.-Ukraine relations amid the ongoing Russia conflict. The hosts then turn to U.S.-Iran negotiations, offering sharp insights into the intricate dance of diplomacy and power shaping the Middle East.

On the domestic front, Kiriakou and Rall dive into the latest polls, dissecting public sentiment toward Elon Musk’s outsized influence and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker’s political ascent, revealing how these figures are redefining America’s political landscape. The episode also confronts the deeply polarizing issue of deporting U.S.-citizen babies, exploring its legal, ethical, and humanitarian consequences with unflinching clarity.

With Kiriakou’s insider perspective on intelligence and Rall’s razor-sharp cultural critiques, the duo dismantles mainstream narratives, exposing the systems driving these global and domestic developments. This episode of DeProgram blends wit, wisdom, and anti-imperialist fervor to connect the dots between geopolitics and power struggles at home. This is a must-listen for anyone seeking to understand the world beyond the headlines. Tune in and get deprogrammed!

TMI Show Ep 126: “Free Speech Under Attack”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time + Streaming On Demand:

Join Ted Rall and Manila Chan on “The TMI Show” for a riveting episode featuring Jeff Dornik, CEO of Pickax, dissecting threats to free speech in tech. This urgent discussion unravels the forces reshaping digital discourse, delivering sharp insights for defenders of open dialogue.

Dornik’s expertise exposes how tech giants and regulations suffocate expression.

The episode ties to breaking news, analyzing the Pentagon’s controversial replacement of mainstream media with pro-Trump outlets in its press corps, sparking debates over media access and bias.

Further, they address X’s new content moderation policies under fire for allegedly throttling dissenting voices, as reported in tech blogs.
The episode examines a leaked memo from a leading social media platform, reportedly Meta, outlining plans to shadowban content labeled “divisive” by its algorithms. Exposed by tech whistleblowers and detailed in outlets like TechCrunch, the memo revealed intentions to suppress posts on polarizing topics like immigration and election integrity, sparking accusations of censorship and fueling distrust among users.

With the tech world reeling from a former Disney employee’s hack exposing safety system flaws, the stakes for digital freedom soar. Expect a rigorous, unfiltered exchange that challenges norms and arms viewers with insights to navigate this crisis. Rall and Chan’s incisive hosting blends intellectual rigor with pressing relevance, making this episode essential for anyone committed to safeguarding free speech. Don’t miss this compelling call to action—watch now and engage in the fight for open discourse!

TMI Show Ep 125: “Pope Francis’ Legacy: What Next?”

LIVE 10 am Eastern time! But you can watch anytime you’d like:

Tune in the TMI Show with Ted Rall and Manila Chan, where the dynamic duo dives into the transformative legacy of Pope Francis and the high-stakes papal succession process.

Joined by Catholic scholar Timothy Gordon, this episode unpacks the late pontiff’s revolutionary impact—his outreach to marginalized communities, progressive reforms, and polarizing clashes with conservative factions. From his bold stance on poverty and inclusion to navigating a divided Church, Francis’ era reshaped global Catholicism. The discussion explores the secretive conclave, where cardinals will elect the next pope, and highlights leading candidates poised to steer the Vatican’s future. Will the Church continue Francis’ progressive path or pivot to tradition?

Expect a thought-provoking, no-holds-barred analysis of faith, power, and the Catholic Church’s role in a rapidly changing world. With Ted’s incisive wit, Manila’s sharp insights, and Gordon’s deep expertise, this episode is a must-watch for anyone captivated by the Vatican’s past, present, and future. Catch it live or stream on-demand for a front-row seat to history in the making!

Detonating Democracy: The Threat of Obsolete Laws

Wars end. Bombs remain. In December 2020, the crew of an English fishing boat were pulling in a string of crab pots 22 miles northeast of Cromer when they noticed a tug on the main line. An explosion blew the Galwad-Y-Mor into the air, injuring five crew members, one of whom lost an eye. The cause was a bomb dropped by Nazi Germany three quarters of a century before.

America’s complex tapestry of federal, state and local laws, which has evolved over centuries through legislation, judicial rulings and amendments—a system that includes over 80,000 pages in the U.S. Code and millions of state regulations—contains numerous obscure laws and obsolete case decisions. Like unexploded ordnance from World War II, they lie hidden until they detonate without warning.

A case in point: the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which grants a president the authority to detain, deport or restrict non-citizens from nations deemed hostile during times of war, or when a foreign government invades the U.S. The Trump Administration revived this ancient law, deemed “outdated and dangerous” by the Brennan Center for Justice, to justify deporting hundreds of Venezuelan men whom the White House calls gang members.

The Supreme Court will soon consider whether or not they buy Trump’s dubious claim that the Tren de Aragua gang is acting on behalf of the Venezuelan nation-state, his tenuous argument that their presence in the U.S. constitutes a military-style “invasion” under the meaning of the statute signed into law by President John Adams, and his sketchy declaration that the men are all gang affiliated, no due process required.

A better question is: why is this law still on the books? The last time it was used was by FDR, who invoked it after Pearl Harbor to round up, detain and deport non-citizens of Japanese, German and Italian descent. While two-thirds of the 120,000 Japanese Americans sent to U.S. concentration camps were American citizens detained under a presidential Executive Order, the Alien Enemies Act was used to imprison law-abiding non-citizens. With such an infamous history of abuse and executive overreach, it’s weird that Congress didn’t repeal the Alien Enemies Act in the 1980s, when the U.S. formally issued apologies and reparation payments to FDR’s internment-camp victims.

Trump is also exploiting the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, a relic of the McCarthy era that includes unconstitutionally vague provisions allowing the government to deport non-citizens for actions it deems to violate the foreign policy interests of the United States, however the government chooses to define it. According to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, fighting anti-Semitism is a core national security policy (that’s new to me and everyone else), protesting in favor of the people of Gaza is tantamount to supporting Hamas, which is anti-Semitic, so supporting Hamas promotes anti-Semitism, so participating in a demonstration against Israel’s war in Gaza is harmful to national security interests. That’s the pretext for ICE’s abductions and attempted deportations of college students Mohsen Mahdawi, Ranjani Srinivasan, and master’s degree graduate Mahmoud Khalil of Columbia University, and Tufts doctoral student Rumeysa Öztürk.

Courts are trying to sort out which, if any, of Trump’s claims hold legal water. Really, though, they shouldn’t have to. Also really: it shouldn’t have been available for Trump to abuse in the first place.

As with the Alien Enemies Act, the INA remains American law after repeatedly being used as a tool of oppression—to deport labor organizers during the Red Scare of the 1950s, prohibit leftist intellectuals from giving speeches under Reagan, deport thousands of Muslims after 9/11, and even to deport HIV/AIDS patients. Its repeal is long overdue.

Other legal landmines abound.

The USA Patriot Act passed after 9/11 expanded government surveillance, allowing warrantless data collection, roving wiretaps and access to personal records under the guise of counterterrorism. As we learned from Edward Snowden, the NSA abused the Patriot Act to collect millions of communications from innocent Americans, yet it remains the law of the land. The Act’s vague definitions (“relevant to an authorized investigation”) and minimal oversight allow government thugs to target political opponents and suppress dissent. The Patriot Act is un-American. It should be shredded.

Civil asset forfeiture laws allow cops to seize your property. All they have to do is claim that they suspect the cash or cars or whatever of being tied to a crime, even if you are never charged or are found not guilty. Federal and state laws place the burden on owners to prove their innocence. It’s well-documented that federal forfeitures totaling $45.7 billion between 2000 and 2019 often targeted low-income individuals unable to fight back. Supreme Court justices have repeatedly expressed skepticism about these statutes, but neither they nor Congress has acted to protect the public. Every time you drive past a policeman, one of those laws lurks like a highway robber, ready to devastate your personal finances in an instant.

Laws with potential for abuse often serve the interests of powerful political forces. The Espionage Act, a 1917 law used against whistleblowers like Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsea Manning and Snowden, remains in force. Both parties have exploited it—Trump prosecuted eight leakers, Biden continued the case against Julian Assange. Suppressing dissent is bipartisan. Civil asset forfeiture is a cash cow.

Periodic attempts at reform, like the piecemeal Law Revision Commission of the 1970s and Congressional Research Service reports, are mostly ignored.

The current system, where laws once passed are nearly impossible to repeal regardless of their flaws, is unworthy of a rational society. Congress and state legislatures should establish permanent standing committees to continuously review old laws for repeal or amendments to modernize them. Similarly, federal and state courts should regularly review case law to flag flawed decisions like the 1944 Korematsu decision in which the Supreme Court upheld FDR’s internment camps for Japanese Americans, and has since been used to justify such outrages as Bush’s extraordinary renditions and Trump’s first-term Muslim travel ban.

Insanely, Korematsu remains in force.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “What’s Left: Radical Solutions for Radical Problems,” which will be published May 1st. He co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis and The TMI Show with political analyst Manila Chan. Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com.)

DeProgram: “Trump’s Ukraine Gamble, Hegseth’s Laptop Blunder, and Noem’s Purse Fiasco”

LIVE 3 pm Eastern but you can Stream at your convenience:

Don’t miss this episode of DeProgram with hosts John Kiriakou and Ted Rall, delivering razor-sharp analysis on three explosive stories rocking the political sphere.

First, they dive into the Ukraine crisis, focusing on President Trump’s proposed peace deal to end the war with Russia. As Trump pushes for a swift resolution, sidelining NATO and pressuring Kyiv, what are the implications for U.S. foreign policy and global alliances? The hosts unpack the deal’s promises and pitfalls, questioning whether it’s a genuine path to peace or a geopolitical gamble.

Next, they tackle the Pete Hegseth scandal, where the Defense Secretary allegedly used his personal computer and Signal chats to handle classified Pentagon data. This reckless breach raises alarms about national security and Hegseth’s fitness for office—is this a one-off error or evidence of deeper incompetence?

Finally, Kiriakou and Rall expose Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s stunning lapse: her purse, containing $3,000 cash and sensitive documents, was stolen at a Washington, D.C., restaurant. If Noem can’t safeguard her own belongings, how can she protect the nation from terrorism and border threats?

With their trademark candor and wit, the hosts connect these stories, revealing a troubling pattern of chaos and mismanagement in America’s leadership. DeProgram cuts through the noise, challenging mainstream narratives and empowering listeners with unfiltered truth. Whether you’re skeptical of government overreach or hungry for clarity on today’s headlines, this episode is a must-listen. Stream now on YouTube, Rumble and X and join the conversation as Kiriakou and Rall dissect Trump’s Ukraine peace deal, Hegseth’s personal computer fiasco, and Noem’s security blunder!

TMI Show Ep 124: “The LGBTQ Storytime Case: A La Carte Education?”

LIVE 10 am Eastern time; Streaming Anytime:

On “The TMI Show,” hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan dive into the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor, where religious parents in Montgomery County, Maryland, seek to opt their children out of LGBTQ storybook time in public schools. The conservative majority appears poised to rule in favor of the parents, emphasizing religious freedom and parental rights. Manila argues parents should have the right to customize their children’s education, reflecting the views of many who believe public schools should accommodate personal beliefs. Ted, however, contends that allowing such choices undermines a standardized curriculum, questioning what’s next—parents picking specific history or math chapters?

On one side, parents assert their constitutional right to guide their children’s moral and religious upbringing, feeling that exposure to certain materials conflicts with their values. On the other, the school board argues that opting out disrupts educational goals of inclusivity and diversity, potentially fragmenting the system if every family cherry-picks lessons. The hosts debate the broader implications: could this lead to a slippery slope where core subjects are dissected based on individual preferences? They also discuss potential outcomes, noting the Courts likely ruling may set a precedent for future cases, reshaping how public schools balance parental rights with the need for a cohesive educational framework.

TMI Show Ep 123: “Trump Wants Peace in Ukraine & War with Harvard”

LIVE 10 AM Eastern time, Stream on demand after that:

In this episode of “The TMI Show,” hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan dive into two pressing issues shaping the national conversation: President Donald Trump’s Ukraine peace plan and his escalating feud with Harvard University. The episode, set against the backdrop of recent geopolitical and domestic tensions, offers a sharp, no-nonsense breakdown of these developments, grounded in the latest news.

First, the hosts unpack Trump’s proposed peace framework for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has sparked global debate. The plan, discussed in London, would allow Russia to retain most occupied Ukrainian territories, including Crimea, while requiring minor withdrawals. Ukraine would not join NATO. Sanctions would end. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has publicly rejected ceding land, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s decision to skip a ceasefire summit signals U.S. frustration. With Putin open to talks but Zelensky resistant, the hosts explore the diplomatic tightrope and its implications for global stability.

Switching gears, the episode welcomes guest Sabrina Salvati to dissect Trump’s war on Harvard. Sabrina Salvati is a Boston-based leftist educator, activist, and host of the Sabby Sabs podcast, known for her incisive commentary on healthcare, education, and criminal justice issues. On April 18, the Trump administration accused Harvard of failing to report foreign donations, intensifying pressure after the university rebuffed demands for sweeping changes. Trump even called for revoking Harvard’s tax-exempt status, prompting defiance from other institutions like Columbia. Salvati joins to contextualize this clash, examining its roots in Trump’s broader push against academic autonomy.

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php