We’re Workers Too

From an economic standpoint, governments look at citizens as workers, consumers or both. Most people, of course, are both: we work and earn, and we spend.

Our dual economic roles inform the core of the affordability discussion at the center of current politics. For as long as everyone but the oldest of us can remember, both major parties have focused on and messaged to the individual as homo consumerus. Clinton promised that tariff-eliminating ‘free trade’ pacts like NAFTA and the WTO would improve our living standards by making imported goods cheaper. On that point, if the prices of imported stuff at Wal-Mart is a good indicator, he seems to have been mostly right.

But Clinton had no good answer to protectionists who worried about offshoring the good manufacturing jobs that propped up the economy of the industrial Midwest. Cheaper prices are well and good, but the unemployed can’t buy anything.

Trump promised to and claims to have reduced not only inflation but prices themselves. He has made progress on the former; the latter is hopeless.

Unlike Clinton, Trump pays occasional lip service to the importance of bringing back dignity and decent pay to working-class jobs, though his focus is sporadic and symbolic. This decades-old systemic problem—stagnant and declining wages—persists.

As the ad says, how much you earn doesn’t matter, it’s what you keep. Nor should you care much about how much you spend.

The political elites’ intense focus on the American consumer at the expense of the American worker serves two purposes. It distracts us from the decades-old problem of rising income inequality (currently being described as a K-shaped economy), which even a socialist-minded economist would find difficult to fix given capitalism’s natural tendency toward monopoly and the market’s expectation of constant GDP expansion. Keeping wages low—by suppressing unions, importing foreign workers, and maintaining at-will employment laws—maximizes the profits of the rich companies and individuals who own our politicians.

We, the consumers, are well taken care of. Producers source cheap goods around the world, forcing countless suppliers to compete for our purchases. But we workers are insecure, overworked and underpaid—and so are miserable.

What are we workers to do?

Like any other prescription that advises people to start thinking differently en masse, the solution to this situation is so unrealistic that it basically serves as an admission that everything is hopeless. If everyone stopped buying SUVs, we might make a dent in the climate crisis. If everyone stopped voting for one of the two major parties, alternative new movements could emerge. If we stopped allowing ourselves to be distracted by appeals to our consumer selves—we’d lower prices, or at least inflation, and how about a personal tariff rebate check personally signed by the president?—and focused instead on our beleaguered worker selves, we’d have a chance at achieving the living standards a demographer would expect from a nation as rich and powerful as the United States.

If we focused on income alongside or in lieu of expenses, we would demand a higher minimum wage. Not because we personally earn $7.25 an hour, but because higher minimum wages push up median wages.

We would demand something workers in other industrialized nations have, a real right to form and join a union. No more requirement that a union be certified by the NLRB in order to be considered ‘official.’ Employers who fire a worker for unionizing should be jailed. No category of worker, including public servants, should be banned from going on strike. Make America Unionized Again, watch wages grow.

Considering that self-employed freelancers account for a third of American workers, creating a system to provide them with health insurance, vacation pay, gig security and minimum fees is long overdue.

Worker solidarity should replicate the culture in Europe, where the elite class isn’t able to easily divide and conquer the workforce. If teachers go on strike, so should cops and coders and cartoonists and everyone else. Again, watch wages go up.

Of course, none of these income-expanding measures is possible as long as we keep equating the affordability crisis with high prices. At most, costs are only half of the equation. We need to start thinking and talking about raising wages too.

(Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of ‘Never Mind the Democrats. Here’s What’s Left.’ Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com. He is co-host of the podcast ‘DeProgram with Ted Rall and John Kiriakou.’)

 

 

2 Comments. Leave new

  • “We, the consumers, are well taken care of. Producers source cheap goods around the world, forcing countless suppliers to compete for our purchases”

    Ted’s main points about lack of workers’ power are well received.

    Having lived in Europe and North America, however I was struck that the consumer range in North America is actually quite narrow. Friends from Asia had similar experience.

    At first the huge box stores are overwhelming. However, each one seems to attempt to sell you everything from food to clothing to furniture, carrying the same few items of rather mediocre quality that all the others carry as well.

    I don’t think this is merely chauvinism as I was on a shoe-string budget and Americans who have traveled overseas typically concur that there is a higher range and quality to be had elsewhere.

    This may be due to a mixture of monopoly and monopsony (market power of the limited number of said big box retailers). Then there is insularity: European retailers also carry American products (alongside local versions) whereas seemingly every toilet in North America is labelled “American Standard”.

    Plus some local crazes such as fatphobia: Try “Kellog’s Original Corn Flakes” outside of the US and you will find it much better since they left the fatty acids inside the flakes. Famously the nominally same Ford models sold in the US had less efficient engines than the same models sold on the international markets.

    Online retail had begun to change this, but it too has been largely enshittified by monopoly power.

    A more equitable society would also mean more, better, and longer lasting consumer products for our fellow North American peons.

  • alex_the_tired
    December 21, 2025 9:15 PM

    Appetizer: “If everyone stopped buying SUVs, we might make a dent in the climate crisis.”

    Right now, somewhere in India, IIRC, there is a trash fire that has been going for so long, and which is so massive, that, in five months, it has negated all the benefits of every solar panel and windmill that has been built. Not buying SUVs won’t mean anything.

    Entree: Look up “rug pull.” The con artists are getting ready to blow town. If you look at this current stage of capitalism it only makes sense one way. After 40 years of wealth transfer from the 99% to the 1%, the 1% is now hoovering up what’s left. If it were a business, it’d be the boss using all the lines of credit to buy products that could be easily converted to cash while, at the same time, taking out “business improvement” loans at the bank and slipping the cash from that into his back pocket. That would be followed by liquidation of all inventory in the business and the ignoring of all vendor billing for the 60 days preceding the skipping of town.

    if possible, employee pay would be “delayed” as well.

    When you look at it that way, it all makes sense. Maybe tomorrow, maybe in 10 years, all the lights will flicker and go out. And when we look around, all the “people in charge” will be shocked, shocked at what’s come to pass. At least, that’s what they’ll say as they clean out the supply cabinet before jumping into their helicopter and heading for a bunker owned by their masters.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
keyboard_arrow_up
css.php