Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Can Defeat Trumpism

           As you know if you are one of my regular readers, I’m skeptical of hysterical claims that Donald Trump and his supporters represent a uniquely existential threat to democracy and the American way of life. Right-wing populist demagogues are a recurring feature of American history; there is nothing new here. Many “mainstream” politicians have promoted and promulgated policies that stepped over the line into fascism: the Red Scares of the Palmer raids and McCarthyism, concentration camps for Japanese Americans, the John Birch society, COINTELPRO, mass surveillance by the NSA, George W. Bush’s war of aggression against Iraq and assassination drones come to mind.

Trump had four full years in office, one of which was marked by a bona fide national emergency, the COVID-19 pandemic, that he might have exploited to impose martial law, yet the republic still stands.

Trump notwithstanding, it is true that democracy, even the watered-down worn-out version of our ancient republic, is fragile. Those wary of authoritarianism can never be too vigilant. So I’m always interested in what people perceive as a threat to the current system – and what they fail to see.

            New York Times writer David Leonhardt is an intelligent mainstream subscriber to Trump Derangement Syndrome. The former president, he argues, represents a double-barreled attack on American democracy. First, Trump’s refusal to accept his loss to Joe Biden spreads the virus of delegitimization. If nothing else, elections are supposed to settle the question of which candidate is most popular. If they don’t, what’s the point of holding them?

The second threat, Leonhardt says, is that “the power to set government policy is becoming increasingly disconnected from public opinion.” The far-right Supreme Court, gerrymandering, the Senate filibuster, voter suppression and the Electoral College result in laws and rulings to the right of what most voters want.

            The sore loser concern seems overblown. Disputed elections followed by large segments of the population who refused to accept the results have occurred repeatedly. 42% of Republicans thought Obama was born in Kenya, meaning that he was unqualified to run for president. 85% of Democrats said they believed Bush cheated in the 2000 election. Conservatives thought JFK cheated Nixon out of a win in 1960 and strongly disapproved of FDR’s decision to break tradition and run for a third term in 1940. Rutherford B. Hayes became president in 1876 but there’s no doubt that his ascent to the White House was the result of the most scurrilous skullduggery imaginable. Trump’s bitching is hardly unprecedented.

            The gap between the right-wing politics of Congress and the Supreme Court and a relatively left electorate is mitigated by the decision of most liberals to live where their values are codified by legislation; New Yorkers, after all, still have abortion rights. Though blue staters may feel anger and sympathy for women who can’t get the procedure in the Deep South, those emotions are academic rather than visceral. Pitchfork-wielding liberals won’t be a thing any time soon.

            My apologies for burying the lede, but the we-are-in-unusual-peril argument that leaps out at me is that “mainstream” corporatist—read, non-populist, country-club—Republicans are in bed with Trump… and that that makes all the difference. Leonhardt quotes Harvard Professor Steven Levitsky, co-author of the book “How Democracies Die.”

 “When mainstream parties tolerate these guys, make excuses for them, protect them, that’s when democracy gets in trouble,” Levitsky says. “There have always been Marjorie Taylor Greenes. What I pay closer attention to is the behavior of the Kevin McCarthys.” Republican House Leader McCarthy, he points out, has backed up Greene despite her violent rhetoric.

Leonhardt correctly points out that something similar happened during the 1930s in Germany and other European countries. Hitler came to power with the support of traditional conservative parties whose leaders thought they could control the “Austrian corporal.” These louche establishmentarians “typically do not initiate attacks on democratic rules or institutions but who also do not attempt to stop these attacks. Through their complicity, these semi-loyal actors can cause a party, and a country, to slide toward authoritarianism.”

            For decades Democrats have moaned: why don’t “respectable” Republicans speak out against the extremist Birchers/Klansmen/neoconservatives/Proud Boys/Trumpies/QAnoners in their midst?

The answer is that right-wing extremism is not a fringe group.

It is the Republican base.

Racism, xenophobia, homophobia, supporting violent policing are all baseline beliefs of the “mainstream” GOP. Far-right groups like those who gathered for the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville provide the muscle, intellectual grounding and excitement for a Republican Party that without them would be doomed to permanent minority status. “Acceptable” Republicans like McCarthy and Mitch McConnell aren’t so much afraid of being voted out or physically assaulted if they were to criticize Trump as they are afraid of losing a vital part of their party constituency.

The few Republicans who criticize Trump and by extension the right-wing populist wing of the party commit personal political suicide and risk destroying their basic coalition. Liz Cheney aside, it’s not going to happen. Anyway, Cheney is an outlier who recognizes that her future is to get hired by MSNBC as a token fake Republican.

Returning to the rise of Nazism, the only real threat to Hitler and his goons in the 1930s was Germany’s left-wing parties, the communists and the socialists. Left-wing parties maintained paramilitary organizations that took on the Nazi brownshirts in the streets. With over 30% of the vote between them—1.5 million votes more than the Nazis­—German leftists were numerous and militant enough to hold the Nazis at bay at the ballot box as well as in the streets.

Tragically and stupidly, however, the less militant socialists refused to join an alliance of convenience with the communists. Writing from exile, communist Leon Trotsky asked German socialists: “The policies of our parties are irreconcilably opposed; but if the fascists come tonight to wreck your organization’s hall, we will come running, arms in hand, to help you. Will you promise us that if our organization is threatened you will rush to our aid?” As the SPD dithered, the Nazis seized power with the complicity of traditional conservative parties. When socialists and communists finally came together, it was as inmates in Nazi concentration camps.

There is no point clinging to the foolish Democratic hope that corporate Republicans will cut Trumpies loose. The lesson of the 1930s is that the only force that can defeat an energetic and well-organized far right (and its Republican Party allies) is an energetic and well-organized far left.

(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis. You can support Ted’s hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)

 

4 Comments. Leave new

  • When socialists and communists finally came together, it was as inmates in Nazi concentration camps.

    While I do realize this is a well-deserved jab at the socialists past and present, the actual history of how people intermingled in Nazi concentration camps is more nuanced in ways the perhaps are pertinent today still:

    Left prisoners, especially communists, had their own emblem sewed on their prison garb – much like the star of David for whoever the Nazis deemed to be Jewish. This apparently worked well at encouraging tribalism and preventing coordinated resistance among the political prisoners, “racial” prisoners (Jewish, Slavic…), religious prisoners (Jehova’s Witnesses), and non-hetero sexual orientation, etc.

    Rather than communists and socialists, it was the meetings between conservatives and the socialists that made a lasting impact especially in Germany and Austria. Through those contacts, the conservatives came to realize that the socialists were in equal measure terrified and disdainful of Stalin and Stalinism, and that consequently they could work with them much better than with the Nazis, if necessary.

    This history has still echos in Europe to this day. Unfortunately, especially the younger generation of conservatives, are now again beginning to look towards the far right more than to the neoliberal capitalism but with at least 30% more of a human face ™ type social democrats.

  • Although I love to criticize the New York Times for its many, many, many, many failings — I mean, really, it’s more than two — I don’t think I’m being unreasonable to question David Leonhardt’s inclusion in this article. “David Leonhardt is an intelligent mainstream subscriber to Trump Derangement Syndrome.” See? That seems like a contradiction to me. The people who have TDS have pretty much traded in intellect for gibbering hysteria.
    “The virus of delegitimization.” Leonhardt needs to wipe the brie smears from his glasses and cut back on the white wine. Many people have complained of the delegitimacy of the elections for a long time. They’re called the nonvoters. After 2000, some people simply walked away from the Supreme Court-decided election process. More recently, the discovery that the dnc decides the outcome before the first primary disenfranchised many other voters. Let’s ask some voters who live in low-income neighborhoods about hours-long waits to vote while Leonhardt sticks this on Trump.
    I will agree with the part about how the Nazis rose to power because the groups that were strong enough to stop them simply couldn’t stop squabbling. The democrats have spent 40 years fighting among themselves while the Republicans cut away at everything. Unions. Social safety. College. Everything. Now, the dems are still fighting the good in-fight. Pronouns, “equity,” “inclusiveness,” all the buzz words designed to put the fear of Goddess into anyone who dares to try to make a point that isn’t already doctrinally approved as Holy Writ. Is it any wonder at all that the Republicans are now simply just raking in the last few chips on the table? Roe v. Wade. Fetal Personhood. Marriage As One Man, One Woman.
    I wonder if the “relocation” camps will have good wi-fi.

  • ” impose martial law” that was for the second term. First term was to replace all the agency and department heads with toadies. If you recall, people kept asking TFG what his plans were. He would never say. Remember all that quality time he spent with Putin. That was Authoritarian 101.
    And of course the 2000 election was rigged, In a 100 different ways. In Florida alone some 70,000 voters names were purged. Mostly black voters. Precinct voting locations were moved without notice. Voting machines were kept in storage for precincts with high turnouts. Cops blocked traffic. The US Supreme Court overruled a unanimous decision of the Florida Supreme Court to keep voting. Thousands of votes were not counted at that point. From districts that favored Democrats. On and on.

  • The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the rubes that good always trumps evil in the long run. Despite how stupid a lot of the leadership of the far right looks, a bunch of these morons aced Harvard and Yale and eventually one will rise above the froth and then we will see the Fourth Reich- American style and it won’t be all that funny anymore.

You must be logged in to post a comment.
css.php