The massacre of political cartoonists at a satirical magazine in Paris prompts American newspapers and magazines to express “solidarity” with cartoonists – even though they have been firing them for years.
Ils Ne Sont Pas Charlie
Ted Rall
Ted Rall is a syndicated political cartoonist for Andrews McMeel Syndication and WhoWhatWhy.org and Counterpoint. He is a contributor to Centerclip and co-host of "The Final Countdown" talk show on Radio Sputnik. He is a graphic novelist and author of many books of art and prose, and an occasional war correspondent. He is, recently, the author of the graphic novel "2024: Revisited."
5 Comments. Leave new
How does that make them hypocrites? If I were a media outlet of some kind, whether in print or on the Internet, why can’t I say that I think what happened was terrible? – even if I don’t employ a cartoonist in my publication? Why can’t I say that I am on the side of or support the rights and freedom of cartoonists without having to employ one? Ted – I support you and usually agree with you, but I have never sent you any money. Does that mean I can’t say that I support you – does support or solidarity have to be cash?
On the other hand, rikster, if cartooning is a vital element of freedom of expression, as all these declaration to the effect that je suis Charlie would seem to indicate, it does seem odd that these journals, which continually proclaim their support for such freedom, don’t choose to employ staff cartoonists. I fear that Ted’s conclusion that ils sont des hypocrites is spot on….
Henri
@mhenriday, Indeed. Editors have killed cartooning in the United States, not terrorists.
@rikster, To answer your two questions:
They’re hypocrites because they say they “support” free expression and political cartooning. That’s a lie. They’ve fired 99% of US political cartoonists, and those who remain are those who are the safest and blandest. If they decried murder and terrorism and left it at that, I wouldn’t accuse them of hypocrisy.
As for whether you can claim to “support” (as opposed to “agreeing” with me), that’s more subjective. In this day and age, however, with political cartooning under siege, seems that “support” ought to actually mean something other than just saying “I support.” I suppose it could mean something non-monetary, like calling your local editor to ask that she pick up my cartoons. But it has to mean something concrete.
Given how the press both in the US and Europe are ardent supporters of censorship of all kinds it’s basically hypocritical for any of them to talk about freedom of expression.