Canny Comment
posted by Susan Stark
Take a good look at the graph above. This represents the New York Times circulation from 1993 to 2006. The article that this graph was printed in did alot of hand-wringing about the cause of this decline, but of course they didn’t mention the obvious:
The first decline is at 1994-95. This represents when people started using the Internet for their information.
The second sharp decline begins at 2002, when the NYT started lying about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. There continues to be a steady, continuous decline from there to 2006.
Unfortunately, we don’t have stats from 2007-8, but the article states that the Times had to lay people off recently, so it’s not getting any better.
This is what happens when you become a Mouthpiece of the State, instead of a newspaper that investigates and reports the truth.