20 Years After 9/11, We’re Still Morons

USA No Forgetting 9-11 Flag - 9-11 Flag - We won't Forgetting Flag -  FlagsFlagpoles, Flags, Mounts, Lights, Motorcycle Accessories

           If crisis creates opportunity, we couldn’t possibly have squandered the possibilities presented by 9/11 more spectacularly. We certainly couldn’t have failed its tests more completely. Twenty years after 9/11, it is clear that the United States is ruled by idiots and that we, the people, are complicit with their moronic behavior.

            We had to do something. That was and remains the generic explanation for what we did in response to 9/11—invading Afghanistan and Iraq, directing the CIA to covertly overthrow the governments of Haiti, Venezuela, Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and a bunch of other countries, lamely legalizing torture, kidnapping via extraordinary rendition to Guantánamo and other concentration camps, building a drone armada and sparking a drone arms race.

            Acting purely on speculation, news media was reporting as early as the afternoon of September 11 that Al Qaeda was responsible. That same day, Vice President Dick Cheney argued for invading Iraq. We began bombing Afghanistan October 7, less than a month later, without evidence that Afghanistan was guilty. A week later, the Taliban offered to turn over bin Laden; Bush refused. Before you act, you think. We didn’t.

            What should we have done—after giving it a good think?

            A smart people led by a good president would have had three priorities: bring the perpetrators to justice, punish any nation-states that were involved, and reduce the chances of future terrorist attacks.

            The 19 hijackers were suicides, but plotters like Al Qaeda’s Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who lived in Pakistan, were not. Since we have an extradition treaty with Pakistan, we could have asked Pakistani authorities to arrest him and send him to face trial in the U.S. or at the international war crimes tribunal at The Hague. Instead, we kidnapped him to CIA “dark sites” including Gitmo and subjected him to waterboarding 266 times. Because of this and other torture, as well as his illegal detention in violation of habeas corpus, KSM can’t face trial in a real, i.e. civilian, court. Not only will 9/11 families never see justice carried out, we’ve managed to turn KSM into a victim, just as he wanted.

            The Inter-Services Intelligence agency, Pakistan’s CIA, financed and provided intelligence to Al Qaeda. Pakistan harbored bin Laden. Pakistan played host to hundreds of Al Qaeda training camps. Pakistanis I talked to after 9/11 were shocked that the U.S. didn’t attack their country, instead giving its Taliban-aligned dictator General Pervez Musharraf billions in military and financial aid.

            Evidence linking top Saudi Arabian officials to 9/11 has been scarce. But 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, several are reported to have met with mid-level Saudi intelligence agents before the attacks, and, most notably, Saudi Arabia exports its radical brand of Sunni Islam, Wahhabism, all over the world. The Taliban and Al Qaeda initially recruited many of their members from Wahhabi madrassas financed by the Saudis in Pakistan and Central Asia.

            We should have treated 9/11 for what it was: a crime. Policemen, not soldiers, should have tracked down the perps. They should have been given lawyers, not torture. They should have faced fair trials. But if we had to go the military route, we should have invaded Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the two countries responsible, not Afghanistan and Iraq, two countries that had nothing to do with it. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were and remain far more dangerous to their neighbors than Afghanistan or Iraq.

            Occupying Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest exporter of Islamic extremism and global terrorism, would have done a lot to reduce the threat of another 9/11. But the most effective way to make us less of a target is to make the rest of the world look upon us with favor. Some people will always hate us. That’s inevitable. Our goal should be to reduce their number to as close to zero as humanly possible.

            We can’t eliminate anti-Americanism by killing its adherents. We’ve been trying to do that for 20 years using drones and missile strikes; all we’ve accomplished is killing a lot of innocent people and making the rest of the world look at us with disgust and contempt. You kill anti-Americanism by treating people everywhere with respect and kindness. That includes those we suspect of doing us harm.

            Unfortunately for us and the world, we learned nothing from 9/11. Not even losing Afghanistan back to the Taliban in the most humiliating U.S. defeat since Vietnam, having nothing to show for 20 years of war, has taught us a thing. We’re still a hammer that sees everything as a nail, a blunt, stupid people whose idea of a plan is to keep indiscriminately bombing innocent civilians.

(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of a new graphic novel about a journalist gone bad, “The Stringer.” Order one today. You can support Ted’s hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)

5 Comments. Leave new

  • “Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were and remain far more dangerous … than Afghanistan or Iraq.”

    Absolutely!

    Pakistan has nukes, Saudi has the plurality of the world’s available oil. So Bush, Jr picked Afghanistan, a nation only recognised by 3 other nations, not allowed a seat at the UN, a perfect scapegoat.

    And Bush, Jr had a LOT of oil, but oil was $30 a barrel, and it cost $40 worth of electricity to pump one barrel out of the ground. After the US invaded Iraq, oil went to $150 a barrel, and one assumes Bush, Jr took the opportunity and sold all his. So again, a perfect use of American unmitigated anger against one country that was easily expendable, and another that made Bush, Jr obscenely wealthy. Brilliant!

    Killing babies? The US government assured us that they were all terrorists, and a majority of US voters was in complete agreement that they all deserved it.

  • alex_the_tired
    September 6, 2021 8:55 PM

    Maybe this falls under “reduce the chances of future terrorist attacks” but a nation being led by, you know, a leader, would have pursued with absolutely fanatical dedication an answer to the question “Why did they — whoever they are — do this?”
    Not Bush’s idiotic “They hate our freedums is what President Cheney’s people told me to say” but a thorough, comprehensive analysis.

  • My suspicion is that much, though not all, of it will fall under “some people will hate you anyway”. Lots of people hate your freedums (I know I do). That answer wouldn’t be very helpful, though. On the other hand, the response ensured that those people got the best possible environment in which to win over others.

    That aside, I get the sense that Cheney probably didn’t care about 9/11. It gave him an excuse for something that he and/or many people in his circle wanted to do anyway. Why look a gift horse in the mouth? And for that matter, why try to prevent such fortuitous events from happening again?

  • Was American involvement in Belarus ever proven? (For that matter, CIA’s in Ukraine – though that’s a moot point as an American government agency certainly was involved.)

    Also, are those really connected to Al Qaeda? And here I was flattering myself thinking it was about us.

  • And in 20 years -and more-, you’ll still be morons: That’s your manifest destiny true nature.
    Mind you, brainwashing doesn’t harm…

    America is a mistake, a giant mistake. — Sigmund Freud

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Menu
css.php