Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label

Image result for bernie socialism

            Bernie Sanders is currently the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination. He and everyone else knows exactly how the Republicans will attack him if and when he becomes the nominee: old-fashioned redbaiting.

            China became communist in name only during the 1980s, the Soviet Union shut its doors in 1991, the Cold War is dead, and the 64% of Americans under age 50 have no memory of an actually-existing socialist regime. Yet Trump and the GOP have already broadcast their plans to hang the “democratic socialist” label around Bernie Sanders’ neck.

            Whether such archaic fear-mongering—against long-dead adversaries—will be effective even with elderly voters is anyone’s guess. Considering the fact that 40% of Americans consistently tell pollsters they prefer socialism or communism to capitalism, branding Bernie Sanders as a nefarious democratic socialist might have the unintended effect of bringing out people who don’t normally vote to support an ideology they’ve never had the chance to get behind before.

            On the other hand, only 76% of Democrats say they would vote for a socialist.

            One thing is for sure: the socialism thing will be Sanders’ biggest challenge. And so what? Every candidate enters the game with a handicap of some sort.

            Elizabeth Warren has acquired a reputation for deception and opportunism. Amy Klobuchar plays a mean girl on TV and behind closed doors. Pete Buttigieg is gay; only 78% of voters say they’d consider a gay candidate. He’s also inexperienced. Joe Biden appears to have been suffering from dementia for years.

            Political weaknesses are inevitable; what makes or breaks a candidacy is how his or her campaign chooses to address it. History’s answer is clear: take it on honestly, directly and credibly.

            Own your crap. Americans voters hate sneakiness and avoidance.

            Bernie has no one but himself to blame for this potential electoral albatross. As Paul Krugman of The New York Times points out, the independent senator from Vermont is not really a socialist: “He doesn’t want to nationalize our major industries and replace markets with central planning.” He is a New Deal Democrat indistinguishable from old liberal figures like Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern. The economic model Sanders wants to establish isn’t the USSR or even Yugoslavia, but the Scandinavian countries with their superior safety nets and enlightened penal systems. Capitalism as we know it would continue, albeit with reduced overall cruelty.

            Bernie is a social democrat, not a democratic socialist. For some unknown reason, however, he chose to label himself as a democratic socialist. “It’s mainly about personal branding,” Krugman speculates, “with a dash of glee at shocking the bourgeoisie. And this self-indulgence did no harm as long as he was just a senator from a very liberal state.”

            Now he’s going to have to explain himself and his beliefs to American voters who have been propagandized through education and the media to believe that socialism equals communism equals totalitarian dystopia.

            If he’s smart – and there’s no reason to believe that he and his staff are anything but—he will own the phrase and address those concerns head on.

During the 1960 campaign John F. Kennedy responded to worries about his Roman Catholicism that he might take orders from the pope in a speech that allowed anti-Catholic voters to take a chance on him. “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act,” Kennedy said.

            Aware that he was going to run for president in a few years, Barack Obama discussed his drug use as a young man, specifically the fact that he had tried cocaine, in his memoir and in an interview published ahead of the race. By the time he ran in 2008, the coke thing was old news baked into the politics of the time.

            “Democratic socialism” is a pretty meaningless term. Which is not necessarily bad. Because it doesn’t define an existing party or ideology in the real world, Bernie can imprint his own definition upon his awkward tabula rasa.

            Like every crisis, this is an opportunity. Voters want to know what Bernie stands for. Their confusion about democratic socialism (confusion caused by Sanders’ weird word choices) is his chance to explain himself and his policies.

            The one thing he should not and cannot do is to shy away from the S word. No matter how much he protests, Republicans are going to call him a Marxist, a communist, a socialist and worse. So there’s no point in protesting. “Yes,“ he could say, “I am a socialist. A democratic socialist. A democratic socialist is a person who cares more about you as an ordinary American than about greedy billionaires and corporations who pollute your water and lay you off at the drop of a hat.”

            Nothing neutralizes an attack more effectively than to cop to it.

            If nothing else, even if he loses, Bernie can rehabilitate socialism as an acceptable economic alternative. In the long run, that would be a greater accomplishment than anything Sanders could accomplish in eight years as president.

(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of the forthcoming “Political Suicide: The Fight for the Soul of the Democratic Party.” You can support Ted’s hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)


  • Sanders may not have to own the title (although I agree it’s wisest for him to do so).
    Right now, over at fivethirtyeight, Sanders is “predicted” to get 1540 pledged delegates. Biden is in second with 847 (yeah, it’s 538, so they’re a little show on the corrections; Biden’s campaign will end about an hour and a half into Super Tuesday).
    There are 716 superdelegates available this time around.
    So what we’re looking at is Sanders coming mighty close to the finish line and a second-place finisher who quite possibly won’t be able to steal the election away because even ALL the superdelegates won’t be enough to close the gap. The kind of math tricks that would have to occur in a contested primary to steal the victory from Sanders would simply be suicide for the democratic party.
    The Sanders people will simply walk. En masse. And some of the people of the other candidates as well. Because guess what? Donald Trump? Everyone can carry on all they want, but pound for pound, Trump is, more or less, just about as bad as all the other presidents.
    I know, I know, the Muslims are really catching hell from him. I’m talking about aggregate. Collectively, We the People, are getting rogered by Trump — just like we got rogered by all the prior presidents — at about the same rate as pre-Trump.
    And whether it’s Buttigieg or Warren or Bloomberg (none of whom can beat Trump without the Sanders voters) if one of them does manage to win the presidency, that fawning toady will have his or her tongue up the one percent’s asscrack faster than you can say “$12 an hour is good enough. Medicare for All is simply impossible. Nowhere in the world does it exist. $100 for insulin? The free market’s invisible hand has brought it to that price, we mustn’t interfere.”

  • 17Feb2020

    Anyone considering donating to Sanders should consider
    doing so in the next couple days.

    Super Tuesday is March 3 with 14 primaries.

    You can donate at actblue dot com
    Put “Sanders” in “search directory” box

  • Sanders would easily defeat Trump. But there’s no way the DNC would ever allow him the nomination.

    • As we know, Michael, it’s difficult to predict the future. But I’d love to see a race between Mr Sanders and Mr Trump, not least if the former were to choose Ms Gabbard as running mate. That would be something other than the choice between Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee with which US voters are confronted every four years !…


  • Bernie is no socialist. Bernie is a centrist democrat who employs socialist phraseology to trick voters into imagining he is something other than the F35 State-Department “socialist” that he revealed himself to be when he (a) supported the bombing and dismantling of Yugoslavia (Europe’s last actual socialist, multi-ethnic government/nation) (b) called the cops on anti-war protesters who had come to his office to demand an explanation for this betrayal and (c) voted for and vocally supported the F35 white elephant in the name of “Jobs” which, if you think about it, is about the same as claiming you “oppose death camps” but voting for them anyway becaues they bring “jobs to our community” etc.

  • It is instructive to compare and contrast Bernie the F35 State Dept “Socialist” with an actual Socialist – Gene Debs. Debs, unlike Sanders, never voted to support a war, let alone made excuses for his support of the Military Industrial Complex in the name of “Jobs.”

    Unlike Sanders, Debs actually chose prison rather than to support US imperialism.

    Ted Rall either does not know whwat socialism is or Ted Rall is attempting (like so many others today) to peddle a watered-down, star-spangled version as the real deal.

  • I’ll give you a clue how Kayfabe2020 is going to play out:

    1) Sanders wins the nomination despite “fierce opposition” within the kept “opposition” party.

    2) Sanders runs on a platform of centrist bullshit that people like Ted refer to as “Socialism”

    3) Trump is once again (S)elected by the oligarchy, from voting booths located in a “secure location” just as in 2020. (Trumpw as selected to reprise the role of “madman with a nuclear gun” played so well by Ronald Reagan in the 80s)

    4) Trump’s pre-determined (s)election will then be used by media “pundits’ to smear and discredit actual (ie, not Burn-E) Socialism for generations, as overt centrists join hands with the PNAC wing of the DNC to excoriate Sanders and his “naive” followers.

    Watch for it. It’s coming.

    I guarantee it.

    There has not been a free election in this country since the Johnson presidency. Perhaps even longer.

Comments are closed.