SYNDICATED COLUMN: #MeToo: A Cultural Workaround to a Legal Failure

Image result for ny police precinct

Then there was Eric Schneiderman.

After using his office as a bully pulpit to ride the #MeToo wave, the now-former New York state attorney general is yet another boldface male name to succumb to charges of extreme misogyny. Four of his exes say he subjected them to physical abuse, including choking and slapping their faces. Schneiderman claims the violence was BDSM-related fun for all concerned, just “role-playing and other consensual sexual activity.”

Students of political crisis management will see something less than an uncategorical denial of guilt in Schneiderman’s “serious allegations, which I strongly contest.” “Strongly contest” resides far on the denial-o-meter from “it absolutely did not happen” and closer to nolo contendere — which, considering that he resigned rather than stuck around to fight, it effectively is.

Schneiderman’s implosion followed the standard script of #MeToo: accusation leads to career loss. Only career loss. This is a radical departure from how American society deals with what are, after all, crimes: going to the police, filing charges, prosecuting in court. The legal system is getting cut out of the loop.

In New York, slapping someone’s face with the intent to cause physical injury is assault in the third degree, a felony punishable by up to a year in jail. Failing a documented sustained injury, prosecutors often downgrade the charge to a misdemeanor, either attempted assault or harassment. Former AG Schneiderman is having an unpleasant week. But he probably won’t be arrested.

More than a dozen men and teenage boys accused actor Kevin Spacey of sexual harassment (a tort), statutory rape and attempted rape. Prosecutors in Los Angeles and the UK are weighing whether to file rape charges, but so far the only actual sanctions have been professional, like Netflix’s cancellation of Spacey’s hit series “House of Cards.” Even so, rehabilitation may be imminent. Legendary director Bernardo Bertolucci already says he wants to work with the disgraced actor.

The only #MeToo casualties in serious legal jeopardy are the recently convicted mickey-slipping sexual-assaulting comedian Bill Cosby and predatory producer Harvey Weinstein, though Weinstein’s problems aren’t all directly attributable to the sordid behavior that destroyed his Hollywood empire. Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance, Jr. is also investigating whether Weinstein misused company money to pay hush money to his accusers.

For the most part, #MeToo targets who stand accused in the court of public opinion for criminal acts will never face them in a court of law. Comedian Louis C.K. and PBS talker Charlie Rose are alleged to have committed indecent exposure (a misdemeanor that can get you 15 days in prison plus a $250 fine in New York, where Rose lived). Alabama senate candidate Roy Moore allegedly lured a 14-year-old girl into his car for sex, which would expose him to felony charges and 10 years in prison (but the statute of limitations has expired). If Today show star Matt Lauer used the secret Bond villain-like button under his desk to prevent a woman from leaving his office while he was hitting on her, that’s unlawful detention in the second degree, a misdemeanor that carries a one-year prison term. These men lost their jobs. But there’s no indication they’re in danger of prosecution.

#MeToo seems both too much and too little.

Too much, because the loss of hard-won career success is no small thing. On February 10, 2018, President Trump asked aloud: “Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation. Some are true and some are false. Some are old and some are new. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused – life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process?” Setting aside the hilarious incongruity of a person who kills with drones fretting over due process, Trump is correct in one respect: the #MeToo movement has claimed a lot of scalps in a very short time.

The president probably wasn’t thinking of Al Franken, but in his case the ratio of sanction — being forced out of the Senate — to seriousness of alleged offense — butt-groping — felt excessive to Democrats. As a liberal and self-professed feminist, however, the added charge of hypocrisy came into play.

If you were raped or sexually assaulted, however, #MeToo sanctions may feel like too little.

What even many thoughtful men fail to understand is that #MeToo is not, nor does it seek to be, a legal process. It is a cultural reaction to a legal system that fails women accusers. It is a workaround. It is a drive to change what constitutes acceptable behavior on a date, at the office, in the bedroom. It has nothing to do with due process — because due process hasn’t worked for women victims.

Victims of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment who want to hold attackers criminally accountable face structural challenges: embarrassment, fear that their attacker will hurt them again, a culture of slut-shaming that questions whether a woman “asked” for “it,” police personnel who discourage them from going forward and even threaten them with jail for lying, and the trauma of having to relive a terrible experience most people would rather put behind them. In part because of those obstacles about two-thirds of sexual assaults go unreported to police. 97% of rapists get away scot-free, a higher percentage than for other crimes.

Some women who don’t go to the police think the cops won’t do anything to help. They’re not necessarily wrong.

Any DA will tell you that sexual assaults are tough to prosecute. There is almost never a witness, so things come down to “he said/she said,” with two people giving differing versions of the same event. No one wants to see innocent men convicted of rape or sexual assault on the word of one person, the accuser.

The problem is, the legal system makes filing charges so daunting that the court system never gets a chance to adjudicate many cases. The accused are entitled to due process and the presumption of innocence. But accusers deserve access to the courts.

Many #MeToo cases involve sexual harassment, where the only legal redress available is filing a civil lawsuit. There too the hurdles are close to insurmountable for all but the most determined and/or deep-pocketed of plaintiffs, beginning with the simple problem that few lawyers take such cases on a contingency and ending with the inherent challenge of proving that the acts happened in the first place. On the other hand, there’s zero barrier to entry on Twitter.

            This is not to say there aren’t false accusations, or at least accusations that don’t rise to the level of reliability necessary for a conviction. The Columbia University “mattress” case and the University of Virginia/Rolling Stone fiasco come to mind here. Though some #MeToo activists urge us to “believe all women,” granting automatic credibility to any demographic or social category defies common sense.

What is necessary is for the authorities not to automatically believe every accusation, but to take accusers seriously and treat them with respect. Until that happens, those seeking justice for sex crimes will continue to make do with the clumsy, imperfect and startlingly extrajudicial process of cultural and professional shunning embodied by #MeToo.

(Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of “Francis: The People’s Pope.” You can support Ted’s hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)

19 Comments.

  • American Teacher
    May 21, 2018 2:05 PM

    Another pervert exposed. That is the point of #MeToo

    • EvilWizardGlick
      May 22, 2018 9:22 AM

      Point of me too is to level the playing field.
      Google up Anthony Andersons rape accusation and see how quickly she was paid off and everything dropped.
      Or Morgan Freeman diddling his adopted grand daughter.

  • #MeToo is one of those rare cases where the internet works as intended. Take the bastards down!

    While the false-positive rate is too high (Franken) it’s still better than the false-positive rate of our court system: ain’t nobody been executed for a crime they didn’t commit. Yet.

    • American Teacher
      May 21, 2018 5:33 PM

      @CH

      It seems that degenerate sexual behavior disgusts you, too, CH. There is hope for you yet.

      • False.

        *Harming* people disgusts me; what happens between consenting adults behind closed doors is none of my business.

      • American Teacher
        May 21, 2018 7:35 PM

        @CH

        Interesting, CH

        So you’re not upset when people consent to their own degradation?

        Did you enjoy 50 Shades of Grey and the way Christian Grey manipulated, controlled, and abused women? You turn your eyes from that and say not my business?

      • > So you’re not upset when people consent to their own degradation?

        Nope. As I said above, your marriage is none of my business.

    • EvilWizardGlick
      May 22, 2018 9:19 AM

      How is Franken “false positive”?
      We all saw the grabbing boobs pic while the model slept.
      It did look as if he didn’t actually touch her.
      But where is the pic of Al grabbing SEAL dick?
      Or faking giving one head?
      As a side note Franken wrote When a man loves a woman, a story about a man with an alcoholic wife. Rumor has it it was based on his real life.
      Maybe Al had issues he just couldn’t face.

  • American Teacher
    May 21, 2018 7:46 PM

    @CH

    And you think you’re on higher moral ground than @AT?

    • i’m not really sure what this comment is referring to, but I’ll take the opportunity anyway.

      “Oh, Hell yeah”

      I care about children’s lives more than I care about my sticks and pointy things. I don’t hate people for arbitrary reasons. I don’t seek to harm others simply because they are different than me.

      Oh, and I earn my paycheck.

      • American Teacher
        May 21, 2018 8:13 PM

        @CH

        I take back what I said.

        There is no hope for you. There could not be hope for a self-loathing white man. Didn’t I see you at the SoSorry March? You were the one with the shackles on his arms and legs, the yoke around his neck.

      • Oka-a-a-ay, I’m even less sure WTF this comment is about, so my best response is:

        “Say no to drugs.”

  • American Teacher
    May 22, 2018 2:39 AM

    Love isn’t supposed to hurt, but alas, too many women are stuck in abusive relationships.

    It is too bad that some posters here call it consensual and look away.

    • EvilWizardGlick
      May 22, 2018 9:16 AM

      My old man beat my mother, beat us and kept whores. He had money but suffered from shit he went through in occupied Poland.
      My mother had the chance to leave him when he was at his richest.
      She chose him over her kids.
      I know very few women who leave their abusers.
      Because bad attention is better than no attention.

    • Can’t have that, now can we?

      Tell ya’ what – give me your wife’s cell number and I’ll see if I can’t get her to a women’s shelter. Note that it doesn’t matter whether *you* think it’s an abusive relationship, nor does it matter whether *she* thinks it is. What matters is that a third party has preconceived notions about what constitutes abuse, and the Catholic ideal doesn’t meet the bar.

      • err, that’s a reply to the anti-american teacher.

      • EvilWizardGlick
        May 22, 2018 3:46 PM

        Tell ya’ what – give me your wife’s cell number and I’ll see if I can’t get her to a women’s shelter.
        NIXVM shelter?

  • EvilWizardGlick
    May 22, 2018 9:14 AM

    Went really deep on what a racist fuck women abuser Schneiderman is Ted. The party knew and ENABLED him.
    I find the biggest hypocrites, Schneiderman Goran Kindberg support women in public but are complete freaks in private.
    Some animals are more equal than others.

  • Leaving aside the legal (?) system in the US and other countries, Ted, I wonder if MeToo is going to have the effect on relations between men and women that its many predecessors attempted but failed to have. It’s still, perhaps, to early to tell, but it does look as if there’s a chance – or risk, depending upon one’s point of view….

    Henri

Comments are closed.

keyboard_arrow_up
css.php