Presumably argued without irony…
posted by TheDon
from Salon’s WarRoom
Libby’s lawyers argue that the assertion Plame was covert, based on an unclassified summary of her classified file, “is tantamount to asking the Court and Mr. Libby to take the government’s word on Ms. Wilson’s status, based on secret evidence, without affording Mr. Libby an opportunity to rebut it. Such a request offends traditional notions of fairness and due process.”
ummmm…… yeeeessss….. Yes it does… Remember the scene in Canadian Bacon?
“There’s a time to think, and a time to act. And this, gentlemen, is no time to think. “
no, wait… not that one… This one:
“Sir, the Helms amendment and NSC order 725 both specifically prohibit the use of Omega Force against Caucasians. “
Taking the government’s word based on secret evidence without an opportunity to rebut is not specifically proscribed for white non-muslims, but it kinda goes without saying, doesn’t it?
