Originally published by ANewDomain.net:
Donald Trump is under fire and losing business for racist remarks about Mexican people. But do the presidential candidate’s words and insults matter more than lives? U.S. President Barack Obama is responsible for the murders of innocent people every day, and no one seems to care about that. Strange but true. 
16 Comments.
Paradox?
Hardly. Trump is “unexpectedly” popular precisely because, as a full-time, frothing racist pig, he is the MOST credible potential mass murderer – the primary function of the US president.
What was it Trump said during an interview? Oh, yeah!
“Somebody’s doing the raping.”
A great campaign slogan according to Jon Stewart.
😀
… and somebody’s blaming the victim. (i.e. wingnuts)
I’m waiting for the Norwegians to ask for it back.
It’s all about style.
Do the evil deed but don’t make it look like fun.
What does it take to be an “immigrant” in the United States? How about “written permission from the government?” So now, let’s beg the question, just because some foreigner may set up a business, start a family, and pay taxes to the government, REGARDLESS OF HIS/HER RACIAL CLASSIFICATION, if that allegorical wetback never got permission from the U.S. Government to produce his financial dream in “America,” should his severe crime of border-invasion now severely go un(der)punished?
From what the man himself has represented, the DTrump has expressed no nasty sentiments against lawful immigrants, of any ethnicity. Religiously … he’s only talked shit about the wholly undocumented criminal element, most of whom are assisting our own, homegrown, police-state addicts to expand their own tax-revenue-depleting businesses. If we’re going to crucify the ferret-headed motherfucker, let’s do it for some real (economic) crimes that he has doubtlessly committed. From what I last understood, NOT being PC is — within itself — not a crime.
But goddamnit, he is one fantastic political distraction.
DanD
When Trump declares that the Mexican government is sending their worst to the United States, he has moved the discussion from “illegals” to those with papers. Former Mexican president Felipe Calderón offered his take on this idiocy here:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/09/former_mexican_president_felipe_calderon_wont_refute_trumps_immigration_claims_hes_only_trying_to_get_votes.html
Illegals from ANY country can have all the paperwork that a prospective ex-pat can stash away in their own water-proof travel bags … but if the documentation does not originate with the U.S. government, then that prospective resident IS NOT (because of those documents) an immigrant.
Furthermore, a FORMER immigrant who has had his/her immigration documentation cancelled because of some brand of bad faith (not complying with imposed immigration standards is bad faith) means that the handjob who lost his immigration status is — you guessed it — NOT an immigrant.
The (former) Mexican President mostly didn’t respond because he was busted.
DanD
Now explain it to me in simple terms. (Please don’t use any words larger than three syllables, because I have trouble comprehending complex issues.)
First, how does anything you wrote pertain to the Mexican government’s sending these illegals? (After all, Trump claimed that Mexico was “sending” their worst elements.)
Second, how is it that Calderón was “busted,” since he effectively proved Trump to be off-his-rocker — by showing how Mexico’s situation has improved greatly and reduced the incentive for illegals to migrate? (Am I allowed to use that word?)
The Mexican government extensively publishes and distributes “How-To” literature so that its citizens can most effectively invade the U.S. as parasitic economic weapons ~
http://www.thepowerhour.com/news/cross_border.htm
THIS WAY, Mexico’s middle and upper class are relieved of having to (not) spend billions of dollars (and Pesos) on wetback welfare in their own country ~
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/mexican-middle-class-booms-with-work-in-us/2012/07/23/gJQATo5R5W_story.html
Thus, while Mexico’s economy is relieved of the economic burden of its low and no-renting poor, America’s economy dynamically takes a much greater hit by having to fund these otherwise un(der) funded criminal-migrant costs:
http://www.workingimmigrants.com/2006/01/how_mexicans_in_us_send_money.html
By relocating its uneducated workers north of the border, these same workers are effectively diverted from producing their own, low-renter’s revolution against a1%ers government that abusively uses them as economic “cannon” fodder.
DanD
http://cis.org/ImmigrantCrime
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/05/the-fiscal-cost-of-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty-to-the-us-taxpayer
At the bottom line, the criminal trespasser from Mexico (and other places beyond the border, but mostly from — or through — Mexico) soaking up government services in the United States DO NOT — in any way — pay for themselves. It’s a perpetual negative account. Because the beneficiaries are literally undocumented, their costs, whether local, state, or federal, are unfunded, and therefore become the financial burden of the general taxpaying public.
More victims of Mexico’s criminal migrant class ~
http://www.cracktwo.com/2015/07/guess-whos-taking-all-jobs-from.html
DanD
Re: DanD
on July 19, 2015 at 10:49 PM
Well, well, well.
I just confirmed that there is indeed a TROLL amongst us. The document in that first link (http://www.thepowerhour.com/news/cross_border.htm – “The Power Hour”) stated explicitly: “This consular protection guide is not promoting the crossing [of the border] of Mexicans without legal documentation required by the government of the United States; its objective is to make known the risks implied and to inform about the rights of migrants regardless of their legal residence.” The referenced page is apparently published by a hate-monger who wants to discredit any and all Mexicans who want to migrate to the U.S., whether legally or illegally. The supposed Spanish version of that document in not obtainable with the link given on that page (http://www.sre.gob.mx/tramites/consulares/guiamigrante/default.htm ).
The second link (an article dated three years ago, July 23, 2012) contains this statement: “For the first time in 40 years, net migration is effectively zero. About the same number of Mexicans left the United States last year as arrived.” So, how does that lend credence to the conclusion that “… Mexico’s middle and upper class are relieved of having to (not) spend billions of dollars (and Pesos) on wetback welfare in their own country….”?
The third link refers to an article written by John Authers on 12/12/05 — almost TEN YEARS AGO! It describes how the Mexican peso is gaining strength against the U.S. dollar. That is hardly relevant since today’s rates are something in the neighborhood of 16 pesos to 1 dollar. It most certainly does not support the contention that “… America’s economy dynamically takes a much greater hit by having to fund these otherwise un(der) funded criminal-migrant costs….”
I guess nobody was actually supposed to look at those links and read the content, but everyone should merely accept them at face value, with the dishonest comments deceptively submitted , huh?
This TROLL will no longer enjoy the honor of my reading his submissions — I’ve confirmed the deceptions and realized that it’s a complete waste of time.
Hate much?
Sure, some Mexicans are bad people, but get this through your damned mullet: ALL BIGOTS ARE BAD PEOPLE. 100%. No exceptions.
Bigot
Noun
A person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
Checkmate CH. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Define “False Equivalency” twenty five words or less.
@ CrazyH –
Oh, no!
It’s another TROLL you’ve engaged! (Waste of time.)
😀