SYNDICATED COLUMN: Trump’s Guerilla Politics Are Here To Stay

Image result for trump debate

Donald Trump is a cat with 12 or 13 lives.

This past weekend felt like August 1974. Everyone knew Richard Nixon was toast. We didn’t know exactly how or exactly when he’d be forced out. But we knew it was coming.

After a video/audio recording of a 2005 “Access Hollywood” open mic of Donald Trump sharing his reality TV update of the medieval droit du seigneur surfaced on Friday before Sunday’s big second presidential debate, dozens of Republican lawmakers and senior officials abandoned ship. All that remained, it seemed, was a Trumpian version of the GOP bigwigs who trudged to the White House in ’74 to deliver the news that Dirty Donny could no longer count on Republican support in Congress.

Calling for the mass expulsion of 11 million people didn’t finish Trump. Demanding that Muslims be banned from entering the United States didn’t do it. Encouraging supporters to beat up protesters didn’t do it. Making fun of John McCain for being captured didn’t do it. Bragging that he likes to grab women “by the pussy” — that, of all things, was his Waterloo.

But it wasn’t.

The reason Trump is still in the race, merely wounded and behind (rather than humiliated and out), is important to note. This novice politician understands media better than anyone else.

Normally, we’d expect the election to be a referendum on Hillary Clinton and by extension President Obama. She’s the incumbent effectively running for a third term of the same policies. Instead, everyone is talking about Donald Trump — his fitness or lack thereof, his authenticity or lack thereof, his sanity or lack thereof. The reason is simple: Hillary Clinton delivers a cut-and-paste stump speech at every appearance (except for those to Wall Street, where she likes to share her “private position”). Trump, meanwhile, performs jazz. He extemporizes. No one, including him, knows what he’s going to say. So every rally gets covered live. How can she compete?

Throughout the campaign, Trump has neutralized the outrage over each of his scandalous utterances by supplanting it with a new one. The media, always lazy and now shorthanded, can’t keep up. And each one makes him the center of the conversation.

Flooding the zone was the risky but brilliant tactic that Donald Trump, who seemed to be mortally wounded on Friday afternoon, deployed a couple hours before the debate. He called a press conference announcing that he had invited four women who have spent years at war with the Clintons over allegations of sexual harassment, rape and making light of her legal defense of a rapist to attend the debate.

I don’t blame the women for allowing themselves to be used this way. They’ve been marginalized and ridiculed, their stories never taken seriously by the news media. Tacky publicity is better than obscurity.

From a political standpoint, however, I thought it would be widely perceived as a cheap and disgusting Hail Mary pass by a desperate candidate hours away from being forced out of the race. Boy, was I wrong.

Thirty minutes into the debate, the megastory of the election season had been reduced to one of numerous issues, washed away by Trump’s exercise of a nuclear option. Back to normalish: Hillary Clinton was on the defensive over her emails.

Hillary Clinton was in an impossible position. In politics, the cliché goes, when you are playing defense, you are losing. So she refused to defend herself or her husband. For viewers, however, the effect was to leave Trump’s “I may say bad things about women, but my opponent does bad things to them” argument unchallenged.

If this real estate thing doesn’t work out, Donald Trump can market himself as the brain behind the deftest crisis response in political history. I’m still reeling.

The difference between traditional elites like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is that Trump intuitively grasps the way things get perceived on the idiot box in houses and apartments across the country. Clinton and the corporate media pundit class see Trump’s constant interruptions and interjections while others are speaking as rude and ridiculous. They’re right that it’s rude. But it’s also incredibly effective.

How many times have you seen the president or some other politician say something, and you wanted to or actually did shout “liar!” or “wrong” at the TV? Trump does that for you. You can’t help but empathize with him. Trump has revolutionized political discourse as radically as “cowardly” American colonists did when they shot from behind rocks and trees at British troops lined up in formation, the way armies were “supposed” to fight.

No matter what happens in November, the guerilla politics pioneered by Trump are here to stay.

(Ted Rall is author of “Trump: A Graphic Biography,” an examination of the life of the Republican presidential nominee in comics form. Please support Ted by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)

6 thoughts on “SYNDICATED COLUMN: Trump’s Guerilla Politics Are Here To Stay

  1. So Trump has surmounted yet another scandal. How? Easy. HRC is too tainted to be able to offer a “pure” alternative. I said it a while back. She is uniquely despised by the Republican base. ANY other candidate, and the election would be over because the Republicans simply wouldn’t be motivated to turn out to oppose Bernie Sanders in anything like the way that they’d go after HRC.

    I feel like someone waiting for test results. I don’t even care if it’s bad news, I just want it over. God, let this election be over already. I just can’t stand it anymore.

  2. And that’s where it’s at. Yeah, T-rump is a bloviating dipshit, but Billary is a triangulating evil dipshit. The Republic has a chance of surviving a Trump presidency, but constitutionally? Kankles (and her warmongering ways) would blow it apart.

    Pass the hemlock, please.

    DanD

  3. It seems I was misinformed. Charles Krauthammer has graciously informed us all that Hair Furor mit dem kleinen Schwanzstucker won the debate.

    • Well, Trump did upstage her with his response to the last question regarding “something good about your opponent.”
      When she said he has nice kids it wasn’t quite up to par with “She’s a fighter and doesn’t give up.” 🙂

  4. 538 says Trump is toast. Hillary has enough Electors to win in solid Hillary states, plus 5 more states that are leaning toward Hillary, and has about an 85% chance of winning. Even if Trump could turn around the 5 states that are leaning toward Secretary Clinton by the smallest margins (and most of the margins in those 5 states are beyond statistical error levels), he’d still lose. A lot of Republican men have said, ‘Vote for your Republican Congresscritters, we do NOT endorse Trump,’ and twice as many Republican women have said that (but about half of voters vote straight ticket, so the plea to vote for Billary and Republicans, or don’t vote for president but vote Republican for all the others on the ballot is not likely to work nearly as well as the Republicans are hoping, so President Clinton should have a Democrat Senate for two years, but not 60, so they can still filibuster all her Supreme Court nominations).

    The Clintonbots all say that Bill has been investigated and investigated, and if he had sex, it was because he’s incredibly attractive to women, they demand sex with him, and he’s too polite to be rude and say, ‘No.’ For inexplicable reasons, some of those women now say it was rape, but all the investigations prove it was not. Trump, however, has admitted to raping many, many women, and several cases are still in court.

    The Deplorables say it’s just the opposite, but most of the MSM says they were there, they saw, and the Clintonbots are telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It’s hard for me to understand how the MSM can possibly know that, but, as they assure me, it’s their job to know, report and analyse, not mine.

  5. «Normally, we’d expect the election to be a referendum on Hillary Clinton and by extension President Obama. She’s the incumbent effectively running for a third term of the same policies.» May I be so bold as to correct the above, Ted ? Ms Clinton is effectively running for not a third, but a fifth term of the same policies – at least if we are talking about US foreign policy and military interventions abroad. (Indeed,, some might reasonably argue that it’s been deja vu all over again since the Truman Doctrine was announced back in 1947, but let’s abstain for the moment from opening that can of worms.) Mr Obama’s policies in this regard and amounted to a continuation and expansion of the policies of the preceding Bush-Cheney administrations. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose….

    Henri