North Carolina has passed a law forbidding transgender people from using bathrooms in accordance with their gender identities. It’s time for cis people to join transgender people in a statewide piss-off: peeing and pooping outside!
Pissed Off
Ted Rall
Ted Rall is a syndicated political cartoonist for Andrews McMeel Syndication, WhoWhatWhy.org and Counterpoint. He is a frequent contributor to The Wall Street Journal, a graphic novelist and author of many books of art and prose, and an occasional war correspondent. He is, recently, the author of the graphic novel "The Stringer."
20 Comments. Leave new
I saw MA in the list of states with potential “bathroom laws”. But, the law proposed in MA actually protects transgender people from discrimination. http://wwlp.com/2015/11/12/transgender-rights-ma-lawmakers-push-for-bathroom-bill/
Been done before.
Harvard apparently once had no use for woman’s bathrooms because women were not admitted there.
“Florynce ‘Flo’ Kennedy, black civil rights attorney and feminist activist”…”Led a mass urination by women protesting a lack of women’s bathrooms at Harvard.”
From “The Quotable Atheist” , by Jack Huberman.
Why, exactly, is this a problem? You usually have complete privacy in most of those states: two-hole outhouses aren’t all that common.
This has become a problem mostly because there are tranny-types who are only “marginal” in their own self “tran”s formations. they are actually the “third sex.” Physically? they obviously ARE NOT the sex that they claim to identify as or otherwise pretend to be.
A “proper” transsexual looks enough like the opposite-sex (that they claim to be) to the point that — with the modern closed stalls of most male and female toilet facilities — it really doesn’t matter … unless they’re leaving the door open on purpose. There’s really only a conflict when the tranny (or straight/gay person) wants to put on a show, and the vast majority of the public’s toilet attendees DON’T want to witness.
So, if a Tranny in a tutu with a full face-beaver walks into a ladies room while dropping his/her(?) drawers and upsets the prevailing crowd of self-relievers, I can understand why the non-trannys get upset. If a jeans-and-wifebeater-wearing tranny female with a surplus rack walks into a male public toilet expecting to not be noticed, she/he’s a confrontationally fucking fool, and deserves what most likely could happen. SINCE ALL TRANSSEXUALS ARE THE OBTUSE EXCEPTION TO THE COMMON PARADIGM, they do need to remain careful of their own conduct just for the general purpose of self-preservation. This is because THEY ARE NOT NORMAL … by any catholic sense of the word “normal.” If they become a Darwin-award winner because of their own hubristic stupidity? At the very tail-end, it’s their own fault.
When in Rome, don’t look like an invading barbarian, you just might get your throat cut by a non-“barbarian” crowd.
DanD
> At the very tail-end, it’s their own fault.
Fail. Your intolerance is entirely your own fault.
> you just might get your throat cut by a non-“barbarian” crowd.
In this scenario – you are the barbarian. You are quite obviously incapable of dealing with others in a civilized manner.
And as usual, you have no clue what you’re talking about. The vast majority of transsexual people have no desire to ‘put on a show’ in everyday life. On those rare occasions When they do – as with the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence in a gay pride parade – they are deliberately trying to make ignorant, superstitious, bigots uncomfortable.
I see they succeeded.
Alright CH, so you would be okay with some flaming tranny swinging his/her still intact groin-rat at your granddaughters during an impromptu dress rehearsal (and enjoying it) in an otherwise conservative public toilet venue (say like, at church, or the beach, or even Dodger Stadium)?
Modesty should be practiced in certain settings. As far as men’s toilets are concerned, if a twinky wants to put on a show in there, I really don’t care just as long as they don’t kick my stall door open and insist that I watch. On the other hand, anybody advertising their sexually inconsistent body-topography is also a solicitation for criticism. Is it also discrimination to criticize visually nasty toilet habits?
Anyhow, what about down at the gym? should Catlyn Jenner be allowed unrestricted use of the women’s shower room( along with all the attending, born-to-be-doubleX matrons that may also be in there) while still sporting open visual access to his questionably atrophied tube-steak? I guarantee it, all the dongless females also scrubbing up would be extremely uncomfortable, and if he got crotch-kicked for even an inadvertent brush-by, I firmly believe that it would only be HIS fault. Until any partial tranny has his groin-nesting motherfucker at the apex-center of his legs cleanly sliced off, I will always consider that crippled-chromosome quisling just another (really strange) guy.
As it is, I’m pretty sure that the tranny-formerly-known as Bruce still keeps his/her stall door firmly secured from the inside whenever pretending to put his/her kotex on. Even so, this new paradigm of gender-ID is an open door for the verified pervert class to exploit. Do you really think that’s not going to happen? Men in drag peering over stall walls and then protesting that they were only looking for an empty slot? Don’t discriminate now … .
I am not saying that trannys should use only the toilets of their physical birthrights, but only that such use must necessarily be so modest that nobody can really confirm the questionable anomaly.
If it’s blatantly in my face, then I consider it a discrimination against me.
DanD
> If it’s blatantly in my face,.
And how many times has that happened to you? Seriously? You’re crying your little eyes out over stories you’ve made up. Stories you’ve made up about people you’ve never even met. Stories that prove you have no fucking clue about the people you’re disparaging in the first place.
What are you so scared of? In the story you’ve made up it would be some bulldike waving her pussy at you. Is that such a scary thing that you need to pass laws to prevent it? Or are you scared of seeing some other person’s penis? In that case you might want to avoid the gym altogether.
> so you would be okay with some flaming tranny swinging his/her still intact groin-rat at your granddaughters
There’s a hell of a lot bigger chance of my granddaughters being harassed by some hetero who feels a need to prove something. :: dignificant glance upwards :: Maybe we should ban straights from using public restrooms?
> I consider it a discrimination against me.
I see. You’re heaping undeserved abuse on people you’ve never even met, encouraging discrimination against people who’ve done you no harm, and yet you’re the real victim here.
Once again CH, you make proclamations about things you know nothing of.
DanD
And what would those ‘things I know nothing of’ be? That you’re scared of something that is no threat to you whatsoever? You make that clear with every post.
That heteros are far more threat to little girls than gays or transsexuals? That’s borne out by statistics.
Most LGBTQABC…XYZ do no harm to others. But 100% of bigots do harm others. Moreover, they inspire those who are insecure in their own sexuality to harm others as well.
And yes, I have far more knowledge of that reality than I wish I had.
Thank you CH for making my point.
You’re right, it is the hetero-pervert crowd who will most probably be cornholing your granddaughters in the little girl’s room while dressed up like a proper matrons. It is an undeniable fact, the hetero-pervert population is many times that of the tranny and even the gay communities combined. But now if you catch them stalking fresh meat in the female’s porcelain throne room, all they have to insist is that they are merely trannies-in-transition. The plausible deniability-meter just evaporated.
DanD
And maybe killer clowns from space will eat their little eyeballs!!!! Our only hope is to outlaw alien clown pee!!!!!!!
A level of prescience.
http://www.libertynewsdaily.com/blog-519-man-strips-in-girl%E2%80%99s-locker-room,-cites-%E2%80%9Ctransgender-rights%E2%80%9D
DanD
“the man never made an effort to present himself as a woman ”
And you’ve gone full circle Dan. You started out trying to blame transgender people for the actions of people who weren’t transgender. Here you are doing it again.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to pass laws against rapists and flashers instead of passing laws against innocents? Oh, wait – we already have laws against rapists and flashers.
But if you’re so keen on the idea of passing laws against people who *might* offend – go look in the mirror. You’re a hater. It’s a fact that haters commit more hate-crime laws than normal people. If you truly believe your own bullshit – then hike on down to the police station and turn yourself in.
And here ya’ go Dan & Jack, an article for you:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/25/leading-gay-rights-activist-hacked-to-death-in-bangladesh/
You’re on the same side as Al Quaeda. Doesn’t that make you feel proud?
oooh, speaking of shaking up the straights (who richly deserve it) this is a great little vid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO-msplukrw
Don’t you know better by now than to be reasonable here, Dan?
Stating obvious problems and concerns gets you labeled as hateful and “scared.”
Anyone with any sense knows the Left is brimming with perverts. Polyamory and pedophilia are next. Eventually likely bestiality and necrophilia. Don’t be a bigot!
Of course there will be clear ideological contradictions, but that’s nothing new to the Left. Already they love Muslims, those patriarchal rapists. Hardly seems feminist.
The Left likes the idea of taking children away from religious or “xenophobic” parents, but protecting children from pedophiles? That’ll be deemed backward. Might get some pushback from PETA on the bestiality though. Or maybe they just REALLY love animals? Necrophilia? The dead don’t have rights–they’re just worm chow. A victimless crime really.
They simply won’t be satisfied until there are no standards of sexual morality left. Nothing should be taboo. But if they ever succeed, they’ll find themselves disappointed, unable to find a taboo to break to get themselves off.
So, let me see if I understand you, Jack. You’re saying that if you have to share a bathroom with someone different than you, you will start having sexual fantasies involving dead animals?
That’s pretty messed up.
Brings to mind my workplace lunchroom, being compelled to eat in the disgusting presence of Dennis Hastert while he and the company officers went about scheming ways to misrepresent stock offerings (of BRK) and get away with it using a newly crafted safe harbor law.
«Anyone with any sense knows the Left is brimming with perverts.» Indeed – i e, if one’s frame of reference is, like that of our beloved «Jack Heart», so far to the right as to regard people like Larry Edwin Craig and John Dennis Hastert as being of «the Left»….
One wonders in just what sort of public toilet – if any – «Jack Heart» would be allowed, were s/he ever to visit North Carolina….
Henri