When Did Post-Disaster News Conferences Become Long-Winded Oscar Acceptance Speeches?
This is for you older readers: when did news conferences become long-winded acceptance speeches?
I’m too young to remember for sure, but There must have been a time when, after a train derailment or a tornado or a flood or a race riot or whatever, public officials stepped up to the microphones to deliver a status update (“as soon as we learn more, we’ll let you know”), and perhaps some advice to the public (“avoid downed live wires, especially the ones that are sparking, like in that movie The Ice Storm”), answered reporters’ questions and left the stage.
Today’s news conferences are a dreary, undignified mélange of pro forma acknowledgements and sentimental pabulum.
A news conference following this week’s fatal high-speed derailment of an Amtrak passenger train in Philadelphia was a typical example:
SENATOR PAT TOOMEY (R-PA): The scene is a horrific and heartbreaking scene. My prayers go out to the people who lost their lives in this terrible tragedy, to those who were injured, to all of their families. I also want to take a moment to express my appreciation to the first responders, the men and women of this city’s police and fire forces who have responded with such professionalism. Mayor Nutter deserves a great deal of credit. He and his team have pulled together a very, very effective and well-coordinated effort that’s included the federal as well as the city officials. So we appreciate what they’re doing. And we wanted to express both our condolences and our appreciation for that effort. As Senator Casey pointed out, a big part of my being here and his being here is to make sure that Mayor Nutter and city of Philadelphia knows if there’s anything the federal government can be doing to help, we want to make sure it does that.
MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER (D-Phila.): Senators Casey and Senator Toomey, thank you both. The response at the federal level has been tremendous here. With that in mind, let me also report to you that shortly after the earlier press conference today, I had the honor and opportunity to speak directly with President Barack Obama, who called, wanting to get on-the-ground information and facts. The president is very concerned about what has happened here, expressed his condolences as well, but also pledged the full support of the federal government and all the agencies under the executive branch of the government. The president feels very saddened by what has happened, but he was tremendously supportive and encouraging of our efforts here on the ground. For that, I want to say thank you to President Barack Obama for all of his leadership and support in these difficult and tragic times. With that, let me open to some questions for anything that we can answer.
I’m only picking on Philly because it’s the most recent example. I could quote the same crap, virtually verbatim, from press briefings following 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, the Deepwater Horizon disaster, you name it. Our prayers always “go out to the victims and their families.” We always praise the sainted “first responders.” If you’re a federal politician, you thank the local hack; if you’re a local politician, you suck up to the leech who just parachuted in from the Beltway.
In pro forma post-bad-things-happening briefings, natural and manmade disasters are heartbreaking, devastating, tragic, incomprehensible, terrible and/or horrific. Crimes of mass violence, especially those committed by terrorists, are always brutal and vicious, cowardly acts. Killing children is always unthinkable.
Gov. John Hickenlooper of Colorado, shortly after the Aurora shootings, after the 2012 Newtown elementary school shootings: “The heart of every person in Colorado goes out to every person in Connecticut.”
Secy. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in 2003, after a helicopter carrying U.S. soldiers crashed in U.S.-occupied Iraq: “My heart and prayers go out to the families and the loved ones of those people.”
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014, commenting on the first death from Ebola on U.S. soil: “Our hearts go out to all the families who have been affected and our prayers are with them.”
House Speaker John Boehner after tornadoes killed people in 2014: “Our hearts and our prayers go out to those in Oklahoma who have been victimized by this storm.”
I could fill a book.
It is possible that politicians like President Obama, seen biting his lip in apparent sadness while announcing that one of his drones accidentally killed an American hostage held by Al Qaeda in Pakistan earlier this year, really meant it when he offered his “grief and condolences” to the poor dead SOB’s family…even though he was yukking it up with the Super Bowl champion New England Patriots about “deflategate” a few hours later.
It is possible. But it isn’t likely.
Fair or not cut-and-paste expressions of grief (“our hearts and prayers go out to the victims and their families”) come off as ridiculously insincere — just as fake and phony as those Academy Award-style “I’d like to thank my agent, my children, and my dog” thank-yous while we’re waiting to find out if and when the trains will begin running again.
But you know what’s worse than listening to our lame political class pretend to care? Their low regard for our intelligence, as evidenced by their obvious assumptions that they don’t have to try harder, and that we believe them.
We may be dumb. But we ain’t stupid.
(Ted Rall, syndicated writer and the cartoonist for The Los Angeles Times, is the author of the new critically-acclaimed book “After We Kill You, We Will Welcome You Back As Honored Guests: Unembedded in Afghanistan.” Subscribe to Ted Rall at Beacon.)
COPYRIGHT 2015 TED RALL, DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
9 Comments.
“My heart goes out to the victims and I just want their survivors to know it’s all about me and my campaign.”
I feel so sorry for you in all your pain, Mr. Corporate Puppet.
How could I not vote for such a nice person with such feelings for strangers he doesn’t know, or even think about when making “hard” decisions about budget cuts?
“We may be dumb, but we ain’t stupid.” ??? WTF! I would guess that you may have meant ignorant instead of dumb, but don’t include me in that crowd – the sheeple! Our representatives and legislators are banking on the majority of Americans to be ignorant and easily distracted by knee-jerk issues. Our elections and political processes have become long, drawn-out money frenzies by special interests, PACs and the super-wealthy.
The real question is how long does this have to continue, and how bad do things have to get before the sheeple wake up to the real issues – like the ‘big money’ that runs everything? When are the sheeple going to coalesce into a concerted effort to legislate big money out of our now dumbokratik processes?
Here’s the money shot. Can you provide the “heart/prayer” quote from any of the politicians who voted to not fund Amtrak properly? (That is, the ones who kept the track sensors from being upgraded.) I would like to see one of the people who prevented Amtrak from modernizing its systems try to tell us all how many prayers and hearts he’s sending.
I am surprised, however, that no one of the talking heads has discussed the thing I started to wonder about after I read details about the driver of the train: What if it wasn’t his fault? What if he wasn’t drunk, wasn’t on pills, wasn’t playing Candy Crush on his phone? What if someone hijacked the computers that provide the drivers with information to drive the train?
Eh, more news this morning certainly makes it sound like the driver did it on purpose.
But as to your larger comment: Lookit all the noise the righties are making about Benghazi. Yet not a one of them has mentioned the millions of dollars they cut from embassy security.
It’s the old GOP take on personal responsibility, to wit, “It’s always some other person’s responsibility”
The latest I’d read was that he had a lot of posts complaining about how the system was being stretched TOO thin, that something bad was going to happen because no one is taking it seriously. That sort of thing. I’ll keep an eye out for the stuff you mentioned.
The mule is never fully loaded until it stumbles.
How many hours of sleep are Amtrak drivers allowed?
“The gross exaggerations of the powers of the locomotive engine, or, to speak in plain English, the steam-carriage, may delude for a time, but must end in the mortification of those concerned. … What can be more palpably absurd and ridiculous than the prospect held out of locomotives traveling twice as fast as stage-coaches! We should as soon expect the people of Woolwich to suffer themselves to be fired off upon one of Congreve’s ricochet rockets, as to trust themselves to the mercy of such a machine going at such a rate. We will back old Father Thames against the Woolwich railway for any sum. We trust that Parliament will, in all the railways it may sanction, limit the speed to eight or nine miles an hour, which we entirely agree with Mr. Sylvester, is as great as can be ventured on with safety.” — Quarterly Review, March 1825
Good stuff. Yeah right, and how about the way they surge the security AFTER an attack or accident takes place. Great, 4 hour delays, where the fuck where you guys yesterday?
Here’s another silly one: the media reports the movies receipts, “Biggest opening weekend ever! $300 million dollars!” But their data is meaningless, because it’s not in constant dollars. Since ticket prices are always rising, every big movie that comes out is the next biggest seller of all time.