The Final Countdown – 11/22/23 – Israel Reaches Agreement With Hamas; Musk Takes on Media Matters


On this episode of The Final Countdown, hosts Ted Rall and Angie Wong discussed a plethora of topics, including the prisoner exchange deal between Israel and Hamas, and Elon Musk’s bombshell lawsuit against Media Matters. 
 
Steve Loeb – Political Commentator 
Tyler Nixon – Army Infantry Veteran 
Scottie Nell Hughes– Host of 360 View on RT 
Manila Chan – Veteran News Anchor, Host of Modis Operandi on RT 
 
The show kicks off with political commentator Steve Loeb, who shares his perspective on the Hamas-Israel prisoner exchange. 
 
Then, Army Infantry veteran Tyler Nixon weighed in on presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr.’s significant boost in favorability, and how he compares to mainstream candidates. 
 
In the second hour, RT Host Scottie Nell Hughes spoke to The Final Countdown about Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the watchdog Media Matters.  
 
The show closes with veteran news anchor Manila Chan, who breaks down the stress of airline travel during the holidays amid layoffs, shortages, and bad weather. 
 
 

Democracy or Hypocrisy

At first, it seems like a good idea for President Biden to speak up in favor of democracy. But then you think about his own behavior. He is in a proxy war in favor of a country, that jails opponents and cancels elections. His party sues to keep rival political parties off the ballot. He refuses to debate challengers. He insists on running, even though most members of his own party don’t want him to. Democracy begins at home, Joe.

The Final Countdown – 7/21/23 – Trump Trial Date Set for May 2024

On this episode of The Final Countdown, host Ted Rall and Manila Chan discuss hot topics, including the Trump trial date. 
 
Mark Sleboda: International Relations & Security Analyst 
Sabrina Salvati: Boston-based activist
Helena Villar: RT Senior Correspondent 
 
The show kicks off with hosts Manila Chan and Ted Rall discussing the Trump trial date, and Biden’s $10 million bribe file. 
 
In the second half of the first hour,  International Relations & Security Analyst Mark Sleboda joins to talk about an American Army vet who escaped a murder charge to fight in Ukraine. 
 
The second hour begins with Boston-based activist and podcaster Sabrina Salvati discussing the RFK censorship trial. 
 
The show closes with Helena Villar, an RT Spanish Correspondent, to discuss the Spanish elections. 

The Final Countdown – 7/17/23 – “Israel is a Racist State,” Jayapal Walks Back Comments

On this episode of The Final Countdown, the hosts Ted Rall and Manila Chan discuss hot topics, such as U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal’s comments on Israel.  
 
Scott Stantis: Cartoonist for The Chicago Tribune 
Robert Patillo: Attorney and Executive Director of the Rainbow Push Coalition 
Mark Sleboda: International Relations, Security Analyst 
KJ Noh: Journalist, political analyst 
 
The show kicks off with Scott Stantis to have an in-depth conversation about the 2024 elections. 
 
In the second half of the first hour, the hosts speak with Robert Patillo, Attorney and Executive Director of the Rainbow Push Coalition to discuss Alabama redistricting, Jayapal walking back her comments on Israel, and backlash against the Boston mayor for having a list of her critics. 
 
The first half of the second hour kicks off with International Relations and Security Analyst Mark Sleboda discussing the cluster munitions to Ukraine, the Grain Deal, and the bridge strike in Crimea. 
 
The show closes with Kiji Noh, a journalist and political analyst discussing Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s visit to India and Vietnam. 

SYNDICATED COLUMN: Hillary Clinton’s Life of Crime

http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/styles/v2_article_large/public/2015/04/20/hillary-clinton-2.JPG?itok=mJ9guArp

Bill and Hillary Clinton “earned” — can a mortal earn such stratospheric sums? — “at least $30 million over the last 16 months, mainly from giving paid speeches to corporations, banks and other organizations,” The New York Times reports. “They have now earned more than $125 million on the [lecture] circuit since leaving the White House in 2001.”

This is an important issue. But the big story has little to with what actually matters.

Coverage of the Clintons’ spectacularly lucrative speaking career has focused on how it affects Hillary’s 2016 presidential campaign — specifically the political damage caused by the public’s growing perception that Hillary is out of touch with the common man and woman. It is a promising line of inquiry for her detractors (myself included).

Hillary is out of touch. She hasn’t been behind the wheel of an automobile for nearly 20 years, is a multi-multi-millionaire who nevertheless considered herself “dead broke” and still believes that she and her husband are not among “the truly well off.” (Maybe Bill still drives.) Ostentatious wealth coupled with tonedeafness didn’t help Mitt “47%” Romney in 2012, or John “I can’t remember how many houses I own” McCain in 2008 — and they were Republicans, a party that gleefully despises the poor and jobless. For a Democrat under heavy fire from her party’s progressive base — with Elizabeth Warren, Bill di Blasio and Bernie Sanders leading the charge — this stuff could be politically fatal.

But the media ought to focus on the real issue. FDR was wealthy, yet he created the social safety net as we know it (what’s left of it, anyway). JFK and RFK came from money, yet no one doubted their commitment to help the downtrodden. Liberals distrust Hillary due to her and her husband’s long record of kowtowing to Wall Street bankers and transnational corporations, supporting jobs-killing “free trade” agreements, backing the NSA’s intrusions into our privacy, and as an unrepentant militarist. Her progressivism appears to have died with her law career.

Conflict of interest: that’s why we should be concerned about all those $250,000 speeches.

The big question is: why do corporations and banks shell out a quarter of a million dollars for a Hill Talk?

Corporations and banks don’t pay big bucks to Hillary Clinton because they’re dying to hear what she has to say. After having been front and center on the national political scene for a quarter century, she and Bill don’t have new insights to share. And even if I’m wrong — even if you’re a CEO and you’re dying to learn her ultimate (new) recipe for baking cookies — you don’t have to invite her to speak to your company to get the dish. You can ask one of your CEO pals who already had her speak at his firm — or pay to attend one of the zillions of other lectures she gives.

This is not about Hillary’s message.

Corporations and banks bribe the Clintons to buy political favors. The speaking racket is a (flimsy) cover.

Like, there’s the time Goldman Sachs paid $200,000 for a Bill Talk a few months before the financial conglomerate lobbied Hill when she was secretary of state. At least 13 companies paid Bill and Hill at least $2.5 million in similar sleazy deals.

Those are just the brazen quid pro quo deals.

Among the companies that have lined Hillary’s pockets over the last 16 months are “a mix of corporations (GE, Cisco, Deutsche Bank), medical and pharmaceutical groups (the California Medical Association and the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association), and women’s organizations like the Commercial Real Estate Women Network,” the Times says. “Mr. Clinton’s speeches included a number of talks for financial firms, including Bank of America and UBS, as well as technology companies like Microsoft and Oracle.”

GE, Cisco and Deutsche Bank aren’t run by idiots. Nor are lobbying groups like the female realtors. Their boards know that Hillary may well become president. Even if she loses, those bribes — er, speaking fees — are a smart investment in DC influence. The Clintons have strong ties at the highest levels of the Democratic Party establishment and on Wall Street. If you’re GE, it makes sense to make nice with people whose help you might want someday, so they’re likelier to pick up the phone when you call to, say, grease the skids for a merger in danger of getting derailed by antitrust laws.

Laws governing the sale of political access are relatively clear, but rarely enforced. The ethics, however, are simple: honest people don’t take money from people they may be charged with governing or regulating in the future.

“Behind every great fortune,” Balzac maintained, “lies a crime.” If there were any justice, the Clintons would be in prison for a generation of criminal activity that has left America a corrupted, Third Worldified nation, poorer for having been looted by the companies and banks whose criminality they aided and abetted.

(Ted Rall, syndicated writer and the cartoonist for The Los Angeles Times, is the author of the new critically-acclaimed book “After We Kill You, We Will Welcome You Back As Honored Guests: Unembedded in Afghanistan.” Subscribe to Ted Rall at Beacon.)

COPYRIGHT 2015 TED RALL, DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

 

A Look Back at the Looks Back

It began with the March on Washington, or more precisely the 50th anniversary thereof: the 50th anniversary of the 1960s. Because Baby Boomers control the media, get ready for a decade of 50th anniversaries.

If Not Now, When?

Obama wrote this one for me by channeling RFK’s “If not now, when?” The answer seems obvious: when you had 60 votes in the Senate?

css.php